Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 9/2016

02.05.2016 | Original Scientific Report

Prospective Validation of Optimal Drain Management “The 3 × 3 Rule” after Liver Resection

verfasst von: Yusuke Mitsuka, Shintaro Yamazaki, Nao Yoshida, Moriguchi Masamichi, Tokio Higaki, Tadatoshi Takayama

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We previously established an optimal postoperative drain management rule after liver resection (i.e., drain removal on postoperative day 3 if the drain fluid bilirubin concentration is <3 mg/dl) from the results of 514 drains of 316 consecutive patients. This test set predicts that 274 of 316 patients (87.0 %) will be safely managed without adverse events when drain management is performed without deviation from the rule.

Objective

To validate the feasibility of our rule in recent time period.

Methods

The data from 493 drains of 274 consecutive patients were prospectively collected. Drain fluid volumes, bilirubin levels, and bacteriological cultures were measured on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7. The drains were removed according to the management rule. The achievement rate of the rule, postoperative adverse events, hospital stay, medical costs, and predictive value for reoperation according to the rule were validated.

Results

The rule was achieved in 255 of 274 (93.1 %) patients. The drain removal time was significantly shorter [3 days (1–30) vs. 7 (2–105), p < 0.01], drain fluid infection was less frequent [4 patients (1.5 %) vs. 58 (18.4 %), p < 0.01], postoperative hospital stay was shorter [11 days (6–73) vs. 16 (9–59), p = 0.04], and medical costs were decreased [1453 USD (968–6859) vs. 1847 (4667–9498), p < 0.01] in the validation set compared with the test set. Five patients who required reoperation were predicted by the drain-based information and treated within 2 days after operation.

Conclusions

Our 3 × 3 rule is clinically feasible and allows for the early removal of the drain tube with minimum infection risk after liver resection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong Y, Ng IO, Lam CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM, Wong Y, Ng IO, Lam CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S, Rees M, Vauthey JN, Hugh TJ et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for liver surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB. 17:46–51CrossRefPubMed Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S, Rees M, Vauthey JN, Hugh TJ et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for liver surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB. 17:46–51CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Franco D, Karaa A, Meakins JL, Borgonovo G, Smadja C, Grange D (1989) Hepatectomy without abdominal drainage: results of a prospective study in 61 patients. Ann Surg 210:748–750CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Franco D, Karaa A, Meakins JL, Borgonovo G, Smadja C, Grange D (1989) Hepatectomy without abdominal drainage: results of a prospective study in 61 patients. Ann Surg 210:748–750CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A, Vilgrain V, Panis Y, Fekete F (1993) Drainage after elective hepatic resection: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 218:748–753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Belghiti J, Kabbej M, Sauvanet A, Vilgrain V, Panis Y, Fekete F (1993) Drainage after elective hepatic resection: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 218:748–753CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, Heffernan N, Blumgart LH (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162CrossRefPubMed Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K, Heffernan N, Blumgart LH (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu L, Sun HC, Qin LX, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N et al (2006) Abdominal drainage was unnecessary after hepatectomy using the conventional clamp crushing technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 10:302–308CrossRefPubMed Lu L, Sun HC, Qin LX, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N et al (2006) Abdominal drainage was unnecessary after hepatectomy using the conventional clamp crushing technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 10:302–308CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg 93:422–426CrossRefPubMed Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L, Wang L, Ye QH, Ren N et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg 93:422–426CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 149:680–688CrossRefPubMed Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery. 149:680–688CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ et al (2011) Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 13:528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ et al (2011) Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 13:528–535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Moriguchi M, Mitsuka Y, Okada S, Midorikawa Y et al (2012) Criteria for drain removal following liver resection. Br J Surg 99:1584–1590CrossRefPubMed Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Moriguchi M, Mitsuka Y, Okada S, Midorikawa Y et al (2012) Criteria for drain removal following liver resection. Br J Surg 99:1584–1590CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, Harihara Y, Hui AM, Sano K et al (2001) Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg 136:922–928CrossRefPubMed Takayama T, Makuuchi M, Kubota K, Harihara Y, Hui AM, Sano K et al (2001) Randomized comparison of ultrasonic vs clamp transection of the liver. Arch Surg 136:922–928CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura H, Takayama T, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Aoki T, Kaneko J et al (2002) Pringle`s maneuver in living donors. Lancet 360:2049–2050CrossRefPubMed Imamura H, Takayama T, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, Aoki T, Kaneko J et al (2002) Pringle`s maneuver in living donors. Lancet 360:2049–2050CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Kimura Y, Moriguchi M, Higaki T, Nakayama H et al (2011) Transfusion criteria for fresh frozen plasma in liver resection: a 3 + 3 cohort expansion study. Arch Surg 146:1293–1299CrossRefPubMed Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Kimura Y, Moriguchi M, Higaki T, Nakayama H et al (2011) Transfusion criteria for fresh frozen plasma in liver resection: a 3 + 3 cohort expansion study. Arch Surg 146:1293–1299CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayashi Y, Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Moriguchi M, Ohkubo T, Nakayama H et al (2011) Validation of perioperative steroids administration in liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 253:50–55CrossRefPubMed Hayashi Y, Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Moriguchi M, Ohkubo T, Nakayama H et al (2011) Validation of perioperative steroids administration in liver resection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 253:50–55CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Nakamura M, Higaki T, Matsuoka S, Mizuno S et al (2014) Prophylactic impact of endoscopic treatment for esophageal varices in liver resection: a prospective study. J Gastroenterol 49:917–922CrossRefPubMed Yamazaki S, Takayama T, Nakamura M, Higaki T, Matsuoka S, Mizuno S et al (2014) Prophylactic impact of endoscopic treatment for esophageal varices in liver resection: a prospective study. J Gastroenterol 49:917–922CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M, Kirchberg J, Dutlu M, Mehrabi A et al (2012) Bilirubin level in the drainage fluid is an early and independent predictor of clinically relevant bile leakage after hepatic resection. Surgery 152:821–831CrossRefPubMed Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M, Kirchberg J, Dutlu M, Mehrabi A et al (2012) Bilirubin level in the drainage fluid is an early and independent predictor of clinically relevant bile leakage after hepatic resection. Surgery 152:821–831CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Torzilli G, Olivari N, Del Fabbro D, Gambetti A, Leoni P, Gendarini A et al (2005) Bilirubin level fluctuation in drain discharge after hepatectomies justifies long-term drain maintenance. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1206–1210PubMed Torzilli G, Olivari N, Del Fabbro D, Gambetti A, Leoni P, Gendarini A et al (2005) Bilirubin level fluctuation in drain discharge after hepatectomies justifies long-term drain maintenance. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1206–1210PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, Masui H, Endo I, Sekido H et al (2003) Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg 27:695–698CrossRefPubMed Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, Masui H, Endo I, Sekido H et al (2003) Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg 27:695–698CrossRefPubMed
20.
Metadaten
Titel
Prospective Validation of Optimal Drain Management “The 3 × 3 Rule” after Liver Resection
verfasst von
Yusuke Mitsuka
Shintaro Yamazaki
Nao Yoshida
Moriguchi Masamichi
Tokio Higaki
Tadatoshi Takayama
Publikationsdatum
02.05.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3523-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

World Journal of Surgery 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.