Introduction
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a malignancy that mainly infringes the lymphoid system, with extranodal sites often affected as well. It has arisen to the top 10 most common cancers in 2020 [
1]. Among all the subtypes of NHLs, diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype and accounts for 25-30% of diagnoses [
2]. Albeit aggressive, most DLBCL is chemo-sensitive, and R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) is the standard regimen. However, due to resistance to R-CHOP, there are still ~ 30% of patients suffering from refractory or relapse (r/r) disease, and their prognosis is rather poor [
3,
4]. Such treatment plight has prompted the emergence of novel treatment options, such as therapeutics targeting immune checkpoints, tumor microenvironment (TME), signaling pathways, and cellular immunotherapy [
5]. As a cellular immunotherapy, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown a promising future in the management of B cell lymphomas. Two CAR T-cell products are now approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma [
6]. However, its acute and late toxicities, as well as on-target off-tumor effect should be addressed [
7]. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, as an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), aims to protect cytotoxic T cells and restore their function from PD-1/PD-L1 mediated immune evasion. However, its efficacy in DLBCL remains unsatisfactory compared to classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) [
8,
9]. Research accumulated that the pre-existing immune landscape within the TME may influence the response to immunotherapies [
10‐
12] and R-CHOP [
13,
14]. Therefore, it is pivotal to explore agents that can modulate TME. TME is an extremely intricate environment that harbors diverse cells, structures, and matters, with one component interacting with many others, forming complex regulatory networks. Drugs that have multiple targets might be a promising combination therapy to modulate TME, especially those that could elicit both innate and adaptive immune responses against cancers.
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has a long history in treating various diseases and ailments. Formula, a prescription that contains multiple drugs with different but related modes of action, is a representative of combination therapy in the system of TCM [
15]. With the guidance of this philosophy, the Qin Huang formula (QHF), was grouped and used as adjuvant therapy for treating lymphoma in our hospital (Patent No.:2015103646392). Containing Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi. (Lamiaceae) (SR), Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch) Bunge (AM),
Prunella vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae) (PV), and
Curcuma Longa L. (Zingiberaceae) (CL), the 4-herb formula conforms to the theology of TCM in treating malignancies. Huang et al. [
16] found that baicalin, an ingredient of SR, could down-regulate PI3K/Akt signaling pathway and induce apoptosis in the Burkitt lymphoma cell line. Kumagai et al. [
17] demonstrated that SR and its major components, baicalein, and wogonin, could exert anti-proliferation and induce apoptosis mediated by mitochondrial damage in lymphocytic leukemia, Burkitt lymphoma, and myeloma cell lines. Studies [
18‐
20] also showed that PV and CL have a strong antiproliferation effect upon Raji, a Burkitt lymphoma cell line, and other solid tumors. Meanwhile, it is reported that AM and its extract could protect human epithelial and endothelial cells from LPS-induced apoptosis [
21] and exert a cardioprotective effect against Adriamycin-induced cardiotoxicity [
22]. Thus, as a mixture of the four herbs, QHF was expected to exert an antitumor effect in B cell lymphoma as well. And our previous work [
23] found that QHF (also referred to as Qin Huang mixture) has a modulating effect on the systemic immune function of lymphoma patients who have completed R-CHOP chemotherapy. Besides, we also found that when combined with R-CHOP, QHF can significantly lower the overall side effect frequencies and improve the short-term effects of R-CHOP in treating initial onset DLBCL patients [
24]. In addition, we explored the effects of several major flavonoids of QHF in vitro and found that wogonin, luteolin, kaempferol, quercetin, and silymarin can inhibit the proliferation and induce apoptosis of the Raji, SU-DHL-4, and A20 cell lines (data not published), which is consistent with other studies [
25‐
28]. Therefore, we hypothesized that QHF can enhance the antitumor effects of chemotherapy by modulating immune functions, especially the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), of B cell NHL. In this study, a systemic pharmacological analysis was carried out to predict the targets and mechanisms of QHF in treating B cell lymphoma. Then, the antitumor effect of QHF in combination with Adriamycin (ADM) was evaluated on a murine model induced by the mouse B cell lymphoma cell line A20. Moreover, the TME of the mouse B cell lymphoma was further evaluated via IHC staining, ELISA, as well as western blot to confirm our hypothesis. Our extensive study provides experimental evidence regarding the antitumor effect of QHF + ADM combination therapy and revealed its underlying mechanisms.
Methods
Screening the chemical constituents of QHF and their targets
B cell lymphoma-associated targets were collected from the following databases: Genecards [
33] (
https://www.genecards.org/), GEO [
34] (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/), DisGeNET [
35] (
https://www.disgenet.org/), and OMIM [
36] (
https://www.omim.org/). As of GEO analysis, the GSE12453 dataset was utilized to draw the differentially expressed genes of DLBCL compared with naive B cells. The results with P-adjusted value < 0.05 and | log2(fold change) | > 1 were kept for further analysis. Then R platform ggplot2 [
37] package was used to draw a volcano plot. Finally, with the help of the R platform VennDiagram [
38] package, the common targets of QHF and B cell lymphoma were analyzed.
The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and drug-disease-target network building
The common targets were imported to the STRING [
39] database (version 11.0,
https://string-db.org) to construct the PPI network. The gene expression was correlated with others by minimum required interaction score thresholds of 0.9. Disconnected nodes in the network were hidden. The nodes in the PPI network represent the protein targets, while the edges stand for the interaction between two targets. Then, topological parameters of nodes betweenness, closeness, degree, network centrality, as well as local clustering coefficient were analyzed via R in the network. Targets with node degrees over twice the average were kept and ranked by node degree. Then the top 30 targets were counted to be the core targets. Circlize [
40] package (version 0.4.13) of the R platform [
41] was used to construct an herb-target chord plot to display the relationship between the herbs and the core targets. And a drug-disease-target network was constructed with the utilization of Cytoscape 3.6.0 software [
42] to show the interactions of the compounds and the core targets.
Gene ontology (GO) functional and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment
GO and KEGG enrichment analysis was employed to further clarify the biological interpretations and signaling pathways of the 30 core targets we obtained in Part 2.2. ClusterProfiler [
43], an R (version 4.1.0) package for GO and KEGG enrichment analysis tool, was utilized to access the databases of GO and KEGG. Pathview [
44] package of R platform was applied to visualize KEGG pathways. The genes with adjusted
P-value < 0.05 were retained.
The molecular docking processing
Although the relationship between the targets and compounds was verified, the intensity of the interaction remained unclear. The computer-assistant molecular docking technology was used in this study to further investigate the ligation intensity. First, the SDF files of the compound structures were downloaded from the PubChem database (
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Second, the protein data bank (PDB) (
http://www.rcsb.org/) database was searched to obtain the molecular structures of the target proteins. The ligand-receptor compound structures were priorly chosen and modified by removing the original ligands. The pocket of the combination was constructed in the slot. Third, after adding polar hydrogen atoms, the AutoDock Vina software [
45] (ver. 1.1.2, the Scripps Research Institute, U.S.) was used to achieve the binding free energy of ligands and receptors. Finally, the bonds within the ligand-receptor complexes were visualized by Ligplot software [
46] (ver. 4.5.3, EBI, UK).
Materials and reagents
The herbal formula QHF is constituted of four medicinal herbs: SR (20 g), AM (20 g), PV (15 g), and CL (10 g) at a rate of 4:4:3:2 (w/w/w/w). The herbs were obtained from Shanghai Wanshicheng Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Lot Number: SR 20210406-1; AM 20210515-1; PV 20210604-1; CL 20210526-1), and the frozen powder of QHF was prepared by Shanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine Technology Co. Ltd. To obtain the extract of QHF, the herbs were first soaked in water at tenfold volume (v/w) overnight, then extract the decoction twice for 1 h each time with a tenfold volume of water to herbs (v/w). After filtration, the solution was evaporated under reduced pressure at 60 °C to a relative density of 1.15, then the extract was frozen desiccated to powder, and stored at − 20 °C for further use.
According to the pre-study of the effective dosage of QHF we conducted on mice, we found QHF (6000 mg/kg) is more effective compared with QHF (300 mg/kg) and QHF (3300 mg/kg), but tolerable as well (see Additional file
1). Therefore, the regimen of the combination group (QHF (6000 mg/kg) + ADM (5 mg/kg)) was used in this study.
Animals and treatments
Nineteen male Balb/c mice aged 6-8 weeks were purchased from the Animals Care Centre at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The animals were given free access to food and water and acclimatized for 1 week under standard conditions and 12 h light/dark cycle. All experimental procedures were conducted under the requirements of the research ethics Committee at Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Ethical reference no. 10687).
The mouse B cell lymphoma A20 cell line was kindly provided by the Institute of Hematology, Shanghai Ruijin Hospital, and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/ mL streptomycin. The cells were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO
2. Then the cells (~ 1.0 × 10
7 cells/mouse) were transplanted subcutaneously into the right axillary region of the mice. After 1 week or so, when the tumors reached a size of 50 mm
3, the mice were randomly allocated into three groups as follows:
-
Control group (Control): intravenously injected with 0.1 mL PBS three times on day 1, day 4, and day 8, respectively.
-
Adriamycin group (ADM): received ADM (5 mg/kg) intravenously (i.v.) three times on day 1, day 4, and day 8, respectively [
47].
-
Combination therapy group (QHF + ADM): received 6000 mg/kg QHF dissolved in ddH2O intragastrically, 0.1 mL per day; ADM was administered same as ADM group.
The tumor diameters were measured routinely with a caliper. Tumor volume was estimated as follows: length × width
2× 0.5. Besides, the tumor growth inhibition rate (TGI, %) was calculated to evaluate the anticancer effect of the two regimens.
$$\mathrm{TGI}\left(\%\right)=\left(1-\frac{tumor\ volume\ of\ treated\ group}{tumor\ volume\ of\ control\ group}\right)\ast 100\%$$
QHF was administered intragastrically (i.g.) every day throughout the experiment. On day 12, the mice were sacrificed under euthanasia with pentobarbital sodium. After dissection, the tumor of each mouse was divided into two parts, one part was kept in 4% paraformaldehyde and the other was freshly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at − 80 °C.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples
Tumors were embedded in paraffin blocks and cut into tissue sections 4 μm thick. Then hematoxylin & eosin staining was processed to confirm the presence of the tumors. Besides, paraffin sections were dewaxed with xylene and rehydrated with alcohol at graded concentrations for immunohistochemical staining. Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated with 3% H2O2 for 15 minutes. Then, the slides were blocked with 5% goat serum for 20 min at 37 °C, followed by incubated with anti-CD4 (1:3000, Servicebio, China), anti-CD8 (1:1000, Servicebio, China), anti-CD206 (1:500, Servicebio, China) and anti-iNOS (SP126, 1:100, Abcam, UK) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The next day, samples were incubated with a secondary antibody (Servicebio, China) for 1 hour at room temperature. After that, staining the samples with the ready-to-use reagent DAB kit. Finally, the sections were observed with a microscope.
The images of the tissue sections were obtained by the tissue slice digital scanner. The Servicebio image analysis system was used to automatically analyze and calculate the number of weak, medium, and strong positive cells in the measurement area (negative for no coloring, score 0 points; weak positive for light yellow, score 1 point; medium positive for brownish yellow, score 2 points; strong positive for tan, score 3 points). The positive cell rate indicator was used to assess the percentage of positive cells [
48].
\(\mathrm{positive}\ \mathrm{cell}\ \mathrm{rate}\ \left(\%\right)=\frac{number\ of\ positive\ cells}{\ number\ of\ total\ cells}\ast 100\%.\)
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on FFPE samples
The total protein was extracted from the freshly frozen tumor tissues previously stored. First, 1 ml of RIPA buffer was prepared for every 0.1 g of tissue and protease and phosphatase inhibitors were added to a final 1x concentration. The tissues were ground under 60 Hz for 4 cycles. Then, the homogenate was centrifuged at 12500 rpm at 4 °C for 15 minutes. After this, the supernatant was transferred to a clean tube for ELISA. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, commercially available ELISA kits (MultiSciences (LIANKE) Biotech Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) were applied for mouse protein expression detection of CXCL10, IL-2, IL-17, IL-6, TGF-β, and IFN-γ levels.
Western blotting
Three freshly frozen samples of each group were also homogenized in RIPA buffer supplemented with proteinase/phosphatase inhibitors. After centrifuging, the protein concentration was determined with a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Twenty μg protein from each sample was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to 0.22uM PVDF membranes. Then, the membranes were subjected to blocking buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China), followed by incubation overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies (1:1000, Abcam, U.S.) against p38 MAPK, p- ERK, TLR2, and β-actin. After that, the probed membranes were washed with TBST three times, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (1:5000, Abcam, U.S) for 1 h at room temperature. The protein signals were detected using a chemiluminescence ECL assay kit and imaged using a Tanon 5200 imaging system. β-actin was served as the internal reference. The expression levels of proteins were calculated by Image J platform.
18F-FDG PET-CT scan
One mouse of each group was picked out to receive the 18F-FDG PET-CT scanning on the first day (d1) and the last day (d8) of therapy, respectively. The combination group underwent another 18F-FDG PET-CT scan on the 7th day after discontinuing therapy. PET/CT imaging was performed on the Inveon MM Platform (Siemens Preclinical Solutions, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA), which was equipped with a computer-controlled bed and 8.5 cm transaxial and 5.7 cm axial fields of view (FOV). After fasting overnight for 8 h and being anesthetized under pentobarbital sodium, three mice received an intravenous infusion of 100-200 uCi 18F-FDG. The scanning process was performed with Inveon Acquisition Workplace (IAW) 1.5.0.28. Before the PET scan, the CT X-ray for attenuation correction was scanned for 10 minutes with a power of 80 Kv and 500 uA and an exposure time of 1100 ms. Then, 10-minute static PET scans were acquired, followed by images reconstruction with an OSEM3D (Three-Dimensional Ordered Subsets Expectation Maximum) algorithm. The 3D regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn over the right axillary region guided by CT, with the tracer uptake measured by the Inveon Research Workplace (IRW) 3.0. Individual quantification of the 18F-FDG uptake, as well as the max uptake values (SUVmax) of the mice, were determined.
Statistical analysis
The obtained data were expressed as mean ± standard errors. Statistical analysis was performed on the platform of GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Comparisons among multiple groups were performed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Comparisons between two groups were assessed using Student’s unpaired t-tests. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Discussion
B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma is a highly heterogeneous neoplasm, and its most common subtype is diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Although it is curable to most patients, there are still 30-40% recurrence or refractory cases [
53]. And cancer immunotherapies are initially used in these settings. The TME, especially the immune landscape within it, is found to be crucial in the responses to the immunotherapies [
54]. The TME of B-cell lymphoma mainly consists of T cells, macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, stromal cells, blood vessels, and extracellular matrix [
55,
56]. A combination therapy targeting TME has proven efficacy and displayed great potential for novel immunotherapies. As a traditional formula, QHF consists of four different herbs with various functions. In this study, we verified the tumoricidal effect of QHF in combination with ADM using a murine model and explored its underlying mechanisms with the guidance of systemic pharmacology.
Systemic pharmacology is a comprehensive approach to clarify the active compounds and drug targets, as well as to predict the mechanisms of traditional Chinese medicinal formulas. Our work displayed that QHF has 541 significant targets in B cell lymphoma, among which MAPK1/ERK2 and AKT1 are mostly enriched. Based on KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, we discovered that the TLR signaling pathway, which plays a critical role in activating both innate and adaptive immune responses, was one of the major pathways that QHF might trigger. In addition, we filtered out five active components of QHF, i.e., quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, wogonin, and stigmasterol, that might be the most promising ingredients to represent QHF. The molecular docking technique also authenticated the ligation of the five components and targets.
Our murine model built with an A20 cell line showed that compared with ADM monotherapy, the QHF + ADM group could significantly inhibit the tumor growth. Meanwhile, the tumor-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T cells of the QHF + ADM group were remarkably increased. Research demonstrated that anti-CD20 mAb, such as rituximab, could achieve a long-lasting “vaccinal effect” with the presence of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [
57,
58], indicating the potential value of QHF as an add-on therapy to the R-based therapy for lymphoma patients. In this study, one mouse from each group was picked out to receive the
18F-FDG PET-CT scan before and after the treatment, respectively. Notably, although the posttreatment tumor volume of the combination group is smaller than the ADM group, the SUV
max of the combination group is higher. What’s more, after the treatment was discontinued for 1 week, the SUV
max of the combination group decreased to a level lower than that of pretreatment. Evidence showed that SUV
max is positively related to the TILs and TAMs [
59,
60]. And a provoking study published in
Nature this year has proven that it is the myeloid cells, followed by T cells, that uptake most FDG rather than tumor cells [
61]. Therefore, the dynamic changes of SUV
max of the combination group might indicate the level changes of infiltrating T cells. The
18F-FDG PET-CT scan provided an additional description of the increased infiltrating T cells in the QHF + ADM group.
According to the immunophenotype of TME, tumors can be divided into “hot” tumors and “cold” tumors. Hot tumors present with rich TILs, whose initial immune response is obstructed by upregulation of immune checkpoints or immunosuppressive cells. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies block tumor immune evasion by protecting CD8+ T cells from PD-1 mediated cell death [
62,
63]. However, such ICI has limited efficacy in ‘cold’ tumors, where immune cells are less abundant or completely absent in TME [
64]. Mullins et al. [
65] found that TLR agonists tuned TME to inflamed immunophenotype by activating CD8+ T cells, thus enhancing the antitumor effect of ICIs. This has highlighted the promising value of TLR agonists. TLR is a big family consisting of TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, TLR8, and other receptors. TLR signaling pathway starts with TLR receptor and ligand recognition, followed by TLR dimerization and a signaling cascade to produce inflammatory molecules. In this study, we first predicted that the active components of QHF bind to TLR2 with hydrogen bonds via molecular docking methods. In theory, when the components of QHF bind to TLR2 and activate the TLR2 signaling pathway, the constitutive MAPK or NF-κB signaling pathway will be triggered to express various cytokines like IL-6, TNF-α, and IFNs. It is also reported that activation of TLR2 can reverse mouse Treg suppression, promote and generate efficient memory T cells by increasing IFN-γ level, and enhance the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells [
66]. Besides, ADM can activate p38 to regulate the expression of topoisomerase II, inducing apoptosis of lymphoma cells. Therefore, QHF + ADM could enhance the antitumor effect via different mechanisms theoretically. In the present study, the IL-6 level was up-regulated in the QHF + ADM group, but the levels of TNF-α and IFN-γ were not remarkably changed. As the IL-6 production regulation is controlled through both transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms [
67], it remains elusive whether the increased IL-6 is the result of TLR signaling pathway activation or not. But the increase in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in TME, as well as up-regulated CXCL10 and TLR2 in the combination group, indicated QHF + ADM could modulate TME by targeting TLR2.
As aforementioned, the immune cells within TME can interact with the tumor cells directly or through chemokines and cytokines to impact the behavior of the tumor and response rate [
68]. A variety of chemokines are expressed by immune cells, including CCR7, CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL2, and IFN-γ. Secreted by effector T cells, IFN-γ can induce the expression of CXCL10, which in return attracts even more T cells into the TME, thus forming a positive feedback loop [
69‐
73]. Despite IFN-γ, TLR agonists also elicit cytokines and chemokines expression in multiple cells [
65]. In a melanoma model, TLR2/6 agonists + IFN-γ can induce CXCL10 production, leading to more T cells migrating into TME [
74]. In our study, the combination group displayed upregulated levels of TLR2 and CXCL10, indicating that QHF might target TLR signaling pathway to promote CXCL10 expression with the presence of IFN-γ, and consequently increased T cell infiltration and IFN-γ expression in return. Transforming growth receptor beta (TGF-β), expressed by both tumor cells and tumor-associated cells, directly inhibits T cell proliferation and activation while promoting the survival of immunosuppressive Tregs. Therefore, in the context of TME, upregulated TGF-β may lead to T cell dysfunction and limited efficacy of cancer immunotherapies [
75]. Moreover, with the presence of IL-6, TGF-β may also promote CD4+ T cell differentiation along a Th17 pathway, which was predicted in the KEGG enrichment analysis as mentioned before. Although IL-6 is associated with lymphoma proliferation and poor prognosis, it is reported that IL-6 can prevent apoptosis of T cells by upregulation of Bcl-2 and promote T cell proliferation via the TCR pathway [
76]. Also, evidence shows that increased IL-6 is associated with highly functional CAR T cells and their expansion [
77]. Consistent with these findings, we observed a downregulated level of TGF-β, as well as an upregulated level of IL-6 in the combination group, suggesting that QHF may aid to restore T cell function and survival in the TME. Taken together, we speculated that QHF took effect through modulating the TIME via targeting the TLR signaling pathway.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.