Erschienen in:
01.11.2015 | Thoracic Oncology
Recurrence Risk-Scoring Model for Stage I Adenocarcinoma of the Lung
verfasst von:
Hee Chul Yang, MD, Hyeong Ryul Kim, MD, Sanghoon Jheon, MD, PhD, Kwhanmien Kim, MD, PhD, Sukki Cho, MD, PhD, Soyeon Ahn, PhD, Ho-Young Lee, MD, PhD, Jin-Haeng Chung, MD, PhD, Kyung Young Chung, MD, PhD, Mi Kyung Bae, MD, Seong Yong Park, MD, Dong Kwan Kim, MD, PhD, Se Hoon Choi, MD, Jae Ill Zo, MD, PhD, Moon Soo Kim, MD, Jong Mog Lee, MD, Jhingook Kim, MD, PhD, Young Mog Shim, MD, PhD, Kook Joo Na, MD, PhD, Ju Sik Yun, MD, Jae Yong Park, MD, PhD
Erschienen in:
Annals of Surgical Oncology
|
Ausgabe 12/2015
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this retrospective, multicenter study was to develop a recurrence risk-scoring model in patients with curatively resected stage I lung adenocarcinoma (ADC).
Methods
Clinicopathologic and outcome data for a development cohort of 1,700 patients with pathologic stage I ADC from four institutions resected between January 2000 and December 2009 were evaluated.
A phantom study was performed for correction of inter-institutional differences in positron emission tomography-standardized uptake value (PET-SUV). A nomogram for recurrence prediction was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression. This model was validated in a cohort of 460 patients in two other hospitals. The recurrence rate was 21.0 % for the development cohort and 22.1 % for the validation cohort.
Results
In multivariable analysis, three independent predictors for recurrence were identified: pathologic tumor size (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95 % CI 1.017–1.048; p < 0.001), corrected PET-SUV (HR 1.08, 95 % CI 1.051–1.105; p < 0.001), and lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.17–2.33; p = 0.004). The nomogram was made based on these factors and a calculated risk score was accorded to each patient. Kaplan–Meier analysis of the development cohort showed a 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 83 % (95 % CI 0.80–0.86) in low-risk patients and 59 % (95 % CI 0.54–0.66) in high-risk patients with the highest 30 percentile scores. The concordance index was 0.632 by external validation.
Conclusions
This recurrence risk-scoring model can be used to predict the RFS for pathologic stage I ADC patients using the above three easily measurable factors. High-risk patients need close follow-up and can be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.