Background
Results
Induction of dendritic simplification requires the action of human tau on an APPSDL transgenic background
Dendritic simplification occurs at sites of Schaffer collateral input in CA1 neurons
γ-Secretase inhibition and treatment with NMDA receptor inhibitors counteract dendritic simplification
A. Total path length | |||||||||
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) in mm | Student’s test | ||
p values (B6 vs. APP) | |||||||||
EGFP | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 9 | 3.113±0.465 |
p = 0.775 | ||
EGFP | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 5 | 5 | 3.364±0.707 | |||
EGFP | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 7 | 8 | 4.490±0.292 |
p = 0.401 | ||
EGFP | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 5 | 7 | 4.187±0.202 | |||
EGFP | untreated | DG | B6 | 6 | 6 | 1.223±0.232 |
p = 0.275 | ||
EGFP | untreated | DG | APPSDL
| 5 | 7 | 0.911±0.161 | |||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 4 | 7 | 3.996±0.237 |
p
= 0.0003
| ||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 6 | 8 | 2.491±0.163 | |||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 4.344±0.423 |
p = 0.428 | ||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 5 | 6 | 3.920±0.283 | |||
EGFP-htau | untreated | DG | B6 | 5 | 10 | 0.813±0.071 |
p = 0.888 | ||
EGFP-htau | untreated | DG | APPSDL
| 7 | 17 | 0.826±0.051 | |||
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) in mm | One way ANOVA (together with EGFP-htau untreated, both genotypes, same region) |
p values (B6 vs. APP) |
p values ( vs. untreated EGFP-htau same region and same genotype) |
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA1 | B6 | 4 | 6 | 3.691±0.154 |
F (3,24) = 14.05 ;
p
< 0.0001
|
p
= 0.0440
|
p = 0.2657 |
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 7 | 3.122±0.154 |
p
= 0.0182
| ||
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 3.122±0.258 |
F (3,22) = 3.634 ;
p
= 0.0287
|
p = 0.8981 |
p
= 0.0133
|
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA3 | APPSDL
| 4 | 8 | 3.177±0.249 |
p = 0.0940 | ||
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 7 | 3.671±0.289 |
F (3,25) = 7.781 ;
p
= 0.0008
|
p = 0.2469 |
p = 0.3517 |
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA1 | APPSDL
| 6 | 7 | 3.265±0.263 |
p
= 0.0279
| ||
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA3 | B6 | 6 | 6 | 3.714±0.293 | F (3,23) = 0.5765 ; p = 0.6363 |
p = 0.8658 |
p = 0.2483 |
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA3 | APPSDL
| 7 | 9 | 3.797±0.357 |
p = 0.8023 | ||
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA1 | B6 | 7 | 8 | 3.038±0.288 |
F (3,27) = 7.040 ;
p
= 0.0012
|
p = 0.5142 |
p
= 0.0092
|
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA1 | APPSDL
| 8 | 8 | 2.820±0.241 |
p = 0.3273 | ||
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA3 | B6 | 7 | 8 | 3.603±0.186 |
F (3,23) = 5.757 ;
p
= 0.0043
|
p
= 0.0416
|
p = 0.0527 |
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA3 | APPSDL
| 7 | 7 | 2.853±0.126 |
p
= 0.0089
| ||
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 7 | 2.797±0.268 |
F (3,24) = 8.839 ;
p
= 0.0004
|
p = 0.1005 |
p
= 0.0011
|
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 3.370±0.249 |
p
= 0.0125
| ||
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 2.912±0.224 |
F (3,20) = 4.276 ;
p
= 0.0174
|
p = 0.8829 |
p
= 0.0076
|
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 2.984±0.396 |
p = 0.0667 | ||
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 4 | 7 | 3.342±0.298 |
F (3,24) = 5.250 ;
p
= 0.0063
|
p = 0.6532 |
p = 0.1107 |
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 3.155±0.429 |
p = 0.1091 | ||
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 3.578±0.450 | F (3,20) = 2.724 ; p = 0.0714 |
p = 0.1941 |
p = 0.1722 |
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 2.851±0.352 |
p = 0.0621 | ||
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) in mm | One way ANOVA (together with EGFP untreated, both genotypes, same region) |
p values (B6 vs. APP) |
p values ( vs. untreated EGFP same region and genotype) |
EGFP | CPP | CA1 | B6 | 6 | 7 | 3.597±0.207 | F (3,23) = 0.4707 ; p = 0.7056 |
p = 0.7702 |
p = 0.4144 |
EGFP | CPP | CA1 | APPSDL
| 6 | 6 | 3.787±0.334 |
p = 0.5514 | ||
EGFP | CPP | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 5 | 3.603±0.244 | F (3,22) = 2.806 ; p = 0.0634 |
p = 0.7762 |
p = 0.0473 |
EGFP | CPP | CA3 | APPSDL
| 5 | 6 | 3.474±0.382 |
p = 0.0974 | ||
EGFP | EpoD | CA1 | B6 | 6 | 6 | 3.110±0.307 | F (3,23) = 0.2951 ; p = 0.8285 |
p = 0.4532 |
p = 0.9960 |
EGFP | EpoD | CA1 | APPSDL
| 7 | 7 | 3.591±0.168 |
p = 0.7353 | ||
EGFP | EpoD | CA3 | B6 | 6 | 6 | 2.995±0.268 |
F (3,23) = 5.693 ;
p
= 0.0046
|
p
= 0.0438
|
p
= 0.0006
|
EGFP | EpoD | CA3 | APPSDL
| 6 | 6 | 3.851±0.287 |
p = 0.3939 | ||
B. Number of branching points | |||||||||
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) | Student’s t test | ||
p values (B6 vs. APP) | |||||||||
EGFP | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 9 | 31±4.11 |
p = 0.571 | ||
EGFP | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 5 | 5 | 36±7.22 | |||
EGFP | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 7 | 8 | 39±3.83 |
p = 0.203 | ||
EGFP | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 5 | 7 | 33±1.90 | |||
EGFP | untreated | DG | B6 | 6 | 6 | 11±2.68 |
p = 0.261 | ||
EGFP | untreated | DG | APPSDL
| 5 | 7 | 7±0.57 | |||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 4 | 7 | 36±3.58 |
p
= 0.016
| ||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 6 | 8 | 23±3.05 | |||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 40±3.24 |
p = 0.185 | ||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 5 | 6 | 34±2.24 | |||
EGFP-htau | untreated | DG | B6 | 5 | 10 | 8±4.49 |
p = 0.933 | ||
EGFP-htau | untreated | DG | APPSDL
| 7 | 17 | 8±2.73 | |||
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) | One way ANOVA (together with EGFP-htau untreated, both genotypes, same region) |
p values (B6 vs. APP) |
p values ( vs. untreated EGFP-htau same region and genotype) |
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA1 | B6 | 4 | 6 | 36±2.11 |
F (3,24) = 4.920 ;
p
= 0.0084
|
p = 0.2443 |
P > 0.9999 |
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 7 | 31±2.00 |
p = 0.0511 | ||
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 30±1.95 |
F (3,22) = 8.519 ;
p
= 0.0006
|
p = 0.1167 |
p
= 0.0058
|
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA3 | APPSDL
| 4 | 8 | 25±1.51 |
p
= 0.0076
| ||
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 7 | 32±4.34 | F (3,25) = 2.434 ; p = 0.0885 |
p = 0.4497 |
p = 0.4497 |
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA1 | APPSDL
| 6 | 7 | 28±3.53 |
p = 0.3310 | ||
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA3 | B6 | 6 | 6 | 32±2.77 |
F (3,23) = 5.381 ;
p
= 0.0059
|
p = 0.1041 |
p = 0.0509 |
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA3 | APPSDL
| 7 | 9 | 26±2.19 |
p
= 0.0339
| ||
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA1 | B6 | 7 | 8 | 27±1.83 |
F (3,27) = 4.824 ;
p
= 0.0081
|
p = 0.5753 |
p
= 0.0203
|
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA1 | APPSDL
| 8 | 8 | 25±1.31 |
p = 0.5753 | ||
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA3 | B6 | 7 | 8 | 29±2.86 |
F (3,23) = 4.362 ;
p
= 0.0143
|
p = 0.4458 |
p
= 0.0120
|
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA3 | APPSDL
| 7 | 7 | 26±2.93 |
p = 0.0668 | ||
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 7 | 26±3.41 |
F (3,24) = 3.655 ;
p
= 0.0266
|
p = 0.1135 |
p
= 0.0430
|
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 34±3.12 |
p
= 0.0288
| ||
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 25±3.06 |
F (3,20) = 4.572 ;
p
= 0.0135
|
p = 0.5032 |
p
= 0.0028
|
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 28±3.72 |
p = 0.1878 | ||
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 4 | 7 | 32±3.28 |
F (3,24) = 3.736 ;
p
= 0.0246
|
p = 0.1469 |
p = 0.3815 |
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 25±2.45 |
p = 0.6630 | ||
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 6 | 38±6.57 | F (3,20) = 0.6744 ; p = 0.5778 |
p = 0.3253 |
p = 0.7762 |
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA3 | APPSDL
| 4 | 6 | 31±6.14 |
p = 0.6702 | ||
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) | One way ANOVA (together with EGFP untreated, both genotypes, same region) |
p values (B6 vs. APP) |
p values ( vs. untreated EGFP same region and genotype) |
EGFP | CPP | CA1 | B6 | 6 | 7 | 34±3.15 | F (3,23) = 0.3279 ; p = 0.8052 |
p = 0.7518 |
p = 0.6011 |
EGFP | CPP | CA1 | APPSDL
| 6 | 6 | 36±2.74 |
p > 0.9999 | ||
EGFP | CPP | CA3 | B6 | 5 | 5 | 33±3.24 | F (3,22) = 2.872 ; p = 0.0594 |
p = 0.1730 |
p = 0.2132 |
EGFP | CPP | CA3 | APPSDL
| 5 | 6 | 26±3.16 |
p = 0.1396 | ||
EGFP | EpoD | CA1 | B6 | 6 | 6 | 25±2.16 | F (3,23) = 1.069 ; p = 0.3814 |
p = 0.3033 |
p = 0.2778 |
EGFP | EpoD | CA1 | APPSDL
| 7 | 7 | 31±0.57 |
p = 0.4130 | ||
EGFP | EpoD | CA3 | B6 | 6 | 6 | 23±3.24 |
F (3,23) = 4.970 ;
p
= 0.0084
|
p
= 0.0141
|
p
= 0.0010
|
EGFP | EpoD | CA3 | APPSDL
| 6 | 6 | 35±1.99 |
p = 0.6501 |
The microtubule-stabilizing drug EpoD induces dendritic simplification in control cultures
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) of normalized intensity values | Student’s t test | ||
p values (B6 vs. APP) | |||||||||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 3 | 5 | 1.061±0.099 |
p = 0.6210 | ||
EGFP-htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 5 | 5 | 1.111±0.120 | |||
Construct | Condition | Region | Genotype | Mice (n) | Cells (n) | Mean ± s.e.m (based on cell number) of normalized intensity values | One way ANOVA (together with EGFP-htau untreated, both genotypes) |
p values (B6 vs. APP) |
p values (vs. untreated same genotype) |
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA1 | B6 | 3 | 6 | 0.827±0.066 | F (3,17) = 2.183 ; p = 0.1275 |
p = 0.0273 |
p = 0.2007 |
EGFP-htau | DAPT | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 5 | 1.197±0.154 |
p = 0.5981 | ||
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA1 | B6 | 4 | 5 | 1.119±0.138 | F (3,16) = 0.2108 ; p = 0.8874 |
p = 0.8533 |
p = 0.5763 |
EGFP-htau | EpoD | CA1 | APPSDL
| 5 | 5 | 1.148±0.066 |
p = 0.8135 | ||
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 5 | 0.945±0.176 | F (3,16) = 1.334 ; p = 0.2984 |
p = 0.3752 |
p = 0.6129 |
EGFP-htau | CPP | CA1 | APPSDL
| 4 | 5 | 0.793±0.019 |
p = 0.0745 | ||
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 5 | 5 | 1.083±0.135 | F (3,16) = 0.6240 ; p = 0.6098 |
p = 0.2952 |
p = 0.7390 |
EGFP-Ala htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 5 | 5 | 0.917±0.068 |
p = 0.2240 | ||
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA1 | B6 | 3 | 5 | 1.174±0.064 | F (3,16) = 0.5229 ; p = 0.6727 |
p = 0.9881 |
p = 0.2937 |
EGFP-PHP htau | untreated | CA1 | APPSDL
| 3 | 5 | 1.172±0.080 |
p = 0.6495 |