Skip to main content
Erschienen in: HSS Journal ® 3/2017

01.03.2017 | Original Article

Reliability and Reproducibility of Subject Positioning with EOS Low-Dose Biplanar X-ray

verfasst von: Christine Goodbody, MD, Paz Kedem, MD, Michaela Thompson, BA, Huong T. Do, MA, Douglas N. Mintz, MD, FACR, Roger F. Widmann, MD, Emily R. Dodwell, MD, MPH, FRCSC

Erschienen in: HSS Journal ® | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

EOS low-dose biplanar X-ray used with tantalum bead implantation is an appealing imaging modality to evaluate limb length and physeal growth due its relatively low radiation exposure, excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability, and minimal magnification/shrinkage error.

Questions/Purposes

The purpose of this study was to establish the error in total length and inter-bead distances using EOS and tantalum beads due to variable positioning in the EOS gantry, by assessing variation in measurements made on the same subject repeatedly positioning by one positioner (intra-positioner measurement error) and variation in measurements made on the same subject with positioning by multiple positioners (inter-positioner measurement error).

Methods

Tantalum bead markers were placed about the distal femoral physis of a cadaveric lamb femur. Three investigators positioned the femur in the EOS gantry 10 times, totaling 30 EOS scans. Total limb length and inter-bead distances were measured on AP and lateral views; mean and standard error were calculated. A random effects analysis of variance for nested data was used to determine the proportion of variation due to differences between positioners and differences between positioning by the same positioner.

Results

Intra-positioner measurement error ranged from 0.01 to 0.06 mm. Inter-positioner measurement error ranged from 0.00 to 0.09 mm.

Conclusions

EOS has relatively low radiation and allows standing assessment of limb length and alignment. In this study, length measurements and inter-bead distances demonstrated minimal error due to positioning in the EOS gantry, documenting that there is minimal error from positioning, minimal magnification/shrinkage error, and exceptional inter and intra-rater reliability. EOS is the preferred method for length and angular measurements, and with tantalum beads, is ideal for measuring growth about the physis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittersohl B, Freitas J, Zaps D, et al. EOS imaging of the human pelvis: reliability, validity, and controlled comparison with radiography. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery American. 2013; 95, e58. doi:10.2106/JBJS.K.01591. 1–9.CrossRef Bittersohl B, Freitas J, Zaps D, et al. EOS imaging of the human pelvis: reliability, validity, and controlled comparison with radiography. The Journal of Bone Joint Surgery American. 2013; 95, e58. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​K.​01591. 1–9.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietrich TJ, Pfirrmann CWA, Schwab A, Pankalla K, Buck FM. Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography. Skeletal Radiology. 2013; 42: 959-67. doi:10.1007/s00256-013-1600-0.CrossRefPubMed Dietrich TJ, Pfirrmann CWA, Schwab A, Pankalla K, Buck FM. Comparison of radiation dose, workflow, patient comfort and financial break-even of standard digital radiography and a novel biplanar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length lower limb and whole spine radiography. Skeletal Radiology. 2013; 42: 959-67. doi:10.​1007/​s00256-013-1600-0.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, et al. A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine. 2005; 189: 287. 97-300.PubMed Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, et al. A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine. 2005; 189: 287. 97-300.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Escott BG, Ravi B, Weathermon AC, et al. EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2013; 95: e1831-7. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00989.CrossRefPubMed Escott BG, Ravi B, Weathermon AC, et al. EOS low-dose radiography: a reliable and accurate upright assessment of lower-limb lengths. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume. 2013; 95: e1831-7. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​L.​00989.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Garner MR, Dow M, Bixby E, Mintz DN, Widmann RF, Dodwell ER. Evaluating length: the use of Low-dose biplanar radiography (EOS) and tantalum bead implantation. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics. 2016; 36: e6-9. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000000425. Garner MR, Dow M, Bixby E, Mintz DN, Widmann RF, Dodwell ER. Evaluating length: the use of Low-dose biplanar radiography (EOS) and tantalum bead implantation. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics. 2016; 36: e6-9. doi:10.​1097/​BPO.​0000000000000425​.
7.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilharreborde B, Dubousset J, Le Huec J-C. Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk. European Spine Journal. 2014; 23(Suppl 4): S397-405. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3334-7.PubMed Ilharreborde B, Dubousset J, Le Huec J-C. Use of EOS imaging for the assessment of scoliosis deformities: application to postoperative 3D quantitative analysis of the trunk. European Spine Journal. 2014; 23(Suppl 4): S397-405. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-014-3334-7.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ilharreborde B, Steffen JS, Nectoux E, et al. Angle measurement reproducibility using EOS three-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36: E1306-13. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182293548.CrossRef Ilharreborde B, Steffen JS, Nectoux E, et al. Angle measurement reproducibility using EOS three-dimensional reconstructions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior instrumentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011; 36: E1306-13. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3182293548​.CrossRef
12.
Metadaten
Titel
Reliability and Reproducibility of Subject Positioning with EOS Low-Dose Biplanar X-ray
verfasst von
Christine Goodbody, MD
Paz Kedem, MD
Michaela Thompson, BA
Huong T. Do, MA
Douglas N. Mintz, MD, FACR
Roger F. Widmann, MD
Emily R. Dodwell, MD, MPH, FRCSC
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
HSS Journal ® / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1556-3316
Elektronische ISSN: 1556-3324
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9548-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

HSS Journal ® 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Clinical Pathology Conference

Immunoglobulin G4-related Aortitis

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.