Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 4/2017

13.09.2016 | Research Article

Reoperations after primary breast conserving surgery in women with invasive breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain: a retrospective study

verfasst von: J. M. Escribà, L. Esteban, J. Gálvez, M. J. Pla, A. Melià, M. Gil-Gil, R. Clèries, L. Pareja, X. Sanz, M. Bustins, J. M. Borrás, J. Ribes

Erschienen in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Although complete tumor resection is accepted as the best means to reduce recurrence, reoperations after lumpectomy are a common problem in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the reoperation rates after primary breast conserving surgery in invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed in Catalonia, Spain, between 2005 and 2011 and to identify variations based on patient and tumour characteristics.

Methods

Women with invasive incident breast cancer identified from the Patient’s Hospital Discharge Database [174.0–174.9 codes of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) as the primary diagnosis] and receiving primary breast conserving surgery were included in the study and were followed up to 3 and 12 months by collecting information about repeat breast cancer surgery.

Results

Reoperation rates after primary breast conserving surgery decreased from 13.0 % in 2005 to 11.7 % in 2011 at 3 months and from 14.2 % in 2005 to 12.9 % in 2011 at 12 months’ follow-up. While breast conservation reoperations saw a slight, non-significant increase in the same period (from 5.7 to 7.3 % at 3 months, and from 6.0 to 7.5 % at 12 months), there was a significant decrease in radical reoperation (from 7.3 to 4.4 % at 3 months and from 8.2 to 5.4 % at 12 months). Overall, additional breast surgeries decreased among younger women.

Conclusions

Despite the rise of breast conserving surgery, reoperation rates following initial lumpectomy in Catalonia decreased by 10 % at 3 and 12 months’ follow-up, remaining low and almost unchanged. Ultimately, there was also a significant decrease in mastectomies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2014. http://globocan.iarc.fr. Accessed 15 Jul 2015. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.1, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2014. http://​globocan.​iarc.​fr. Accessed 15 Jul 2015.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JWW, Comber H, et al. Cancer Incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 cancers in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JWW, Comber H, et al. Cancer Incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 cancers in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Escribà JM, Pareja L, Esteban L, Gálvez J, Melià A, Roca L, et al. Trends in the surgical procedures of women with incident breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain, over a 7-year period (2005–2011). BMC Res Notes. 2014;. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-587.PubMedPubMedCentral Escribà JM, Pareja L, Esteban L, Gálvez J, Melià A, Roca L, et al. Trends in the surgical procedures of women with incident breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain, over a 7-year period (2005–2011). BMC Res Notes. 2014;. doi:10.​1186/​1756-0500-7-587.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Kearins O, Pereira J, Sheppard C, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Trivella M, Kearins O, Pereira J, Sheppard C, et al. Reoperation rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer among women in England: retrospective study of hospital episode statistics. BMJ. 2012;345:e4505.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, et al. Variability in re-excision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.43.PubMed McCahill LE, Single RM, Aiello Bowles EJ, Feigelson HS, James TA, Barney T, et al. Variability in re-excision following breast conservation surgery. JAMA. 2012;. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2012.​43.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, Lapin B, Liederbach E, Winchester DP, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma. A report from the national cancer data base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1296–305.CrossRefPubMed Wilke LG, Czechura T, Wang C, Lapin B, Liederbach E, Winchester DP, et al. Repeat surgery after breast conservation for the treatment of stage 0 to II breast carcinoma. A report from the national cancer data base, 2004–2010. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1296–305.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Talsma AK, Reedijk AMJ, Damhuis RAM, Westenend PJ, Vles WJ. Re-resection rates after breast conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals. EJSO. 2011;37:357–63.CrossRefPubMed Talsma AK, Reedijk AMJ, Damhuis RAM, Westenend PJ, Vles WJ. Re-resection rates after breast conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals. EJSO. 2011;37:357–63.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ribes J, Gálvez J, Melià A, Clèries R, Messeguer X, Bosch FX. Automatization of a hospital based tumor registry. Gac Sanit. 2005;19:221–8.CrossRefPubMed Ribes J, Gálvez J, Melià A, Clèries R, Messeguer X, Bosch FX. Automatization of a hospital based tumor registry. Gac Sanit. 2005;19:221–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, et al. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care. 2005;43:1130–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Morrow M. Margins in breast conservation: a clinician’s perspective and what the literature tell us. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:2–7.CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Morrow M. Margins in breast conservation: a clinician’s perspective and what the literature tell us. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:2–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gentilini O, Gahir J. An urgent need to reduce re-operation rates after breast conserving surgery. Gland Surg. 2012;1:159–60.PubMedPubMedCentral Gentilini O, Gahir J. An urgent need to reduce re-operation rates after breast conserving surgery. Gland Surg. 2012;1:159–60.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Landerscaper J, Attai D, Atisha D, Beitsch P, Bosserman L, Boughey J, et al. Tool-box to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients: the American society of breast surgeons consensus conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3174–83.CrossRef Landerscaper J, Attai D, Atisha D, Beitsch P, Bosserman L, Boughey J, et al. Tool-box to reduce lumpectomy reoperations and improve cosmetic outcome in breast cancer patients: the American society of breast surgeons consensus conference. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3174–83.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, Rose A, Mou A, Buchanan M, et al. Predictors of surgical margins status in breast conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed Kurniawan ED, Wong MH, Windle I, Rose A, Mou A, Buchanan M, et al. Predictors of surgical margins status in breast conserving surgery within a breast screening program. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2542–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Porter G, Wagar B, Bryant H, Hewitt M, Wai E, Dabbs K, et al. Rates of breast cancer surgery in Canada from 2007/08 to 2009/10. CMJA Open. 2014;. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20130025. Porter G, Wagar B, Bryant H, Hewitt M, Wai E, Dabbs K, et al. Rates of breast cancer surgery in Canada from 2007/08 to 2009/10. CMJA Open. 2014;. doi:10.​9778/​cmajo.​20130025.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman K, Griggs JJ, Hawley ST, Hamilton AS, et al. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1551–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman K, Griggs JJ, Hawley ST, Hamilton AS, et al. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1551–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the american society of breast surgeons masterysm database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3185–91.CrossRefPubMed Landercasper J, Whitacre E, Degnim AC, Al-Hamadani M. Reasons for re-excision after lumpectomy for breast cancer: insight from the american society of breast surgeons masterysm database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:3185–91.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Dabbas N, Cutress RI, Wise M, Yiangou C, Agrawal A. Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer. The Surgeon. 2013;11:235–40.CrossRefPubMed Dabbas N, Cutress RI, Wise M, Yiangou C, Agrawal A. Repeat surgery following breast conservation and intra-operative sentinel lymph node analysis for breast cancer. The Surgeon. 2013;11:235–40.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, Wenkel E, Magener A, Schulz-Wendtland R, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast conserving surgery. EJSO. 2009;35:32–7.CrossRefPubMed Bani MR, Lux MP, Heusinger K, Wenkel E, Magener A, Schulz-Wendtland R, et al. Factors correlating with reexcision after breast conserving surgery. EJSO. 2009;35:32–7.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramanah R, Pivot X, Sautiere JL, Maillet R, Riethmuller D. Predictors of re-excision for positive or close margins in breast-conservation therapy for pT1 tumors. Am J Surg. 2008;195:770–4.CrossRefPubMed Ramanah R, Pivot X, Sautiere JL, Maillet R, Riethmuller D. Predictors of re-excision for positive or close margins in breast-conservation therapy for pT1 tumors. Am J Surg. 2008;195:770–4.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, et al. Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg. 2010;53:305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral Lovrics PJ, Cornacchi SD, Farrokhyar F, Garnett A, Chen V, Franic S, et al. Technical factors, surgeon case volume and positive margin rates after breast conservation surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Can J Surg. 2010;53:305–12.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Coopey S, Smith BL, Hanson S, Buckley J, Hughes KS, Gadd M, et al. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3797–801.CrossRefPubMed Coopey S, Smith BL, Hanson S, Buckley J, Hughes KS, Gadd M, et al. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3797–801.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Sabel MS, Rogers K, Griffith K, Jagsi R, Kleer CG, Diehl KA, et al. Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:99–103.CrossRefPubMed Sabel MS, Rogers K, Griffith K, Jagsi R, Kleer CG, Diehl KA, et al. Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:99–103.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dieterich M, Dieterich H, Moch H, Rosso C. Re-excision rates and local recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2012;. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1327980. Dieterich M, Dieterich H, Moch H, Rosso C. Re-excision rates and local recurrence in breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving therapy. Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2012;. doi:10.​1055/​s-0032-1327980.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung W, Kang E, Kim SM, Kim D, Hwang Y, Sun Y, et al. Factors associated with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2012;. doi:10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.412. Jung W, Kang E, Kim SM, Kim D, Hwang Y, Sun Y, et al. Factors associated with re-excision after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2012;. doi:10.​4048/​jbc.​2012.​15.​4.​412.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Jakub JW, Degnim AC, Grant CS, Farley DR, et al. Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the national surgical quality improvement program data. Surgery. 2014;156:190–7.CrossRefPubMed Boughey JC, Hieken TJ, Jakub JW, Degnim AC, Grant CS, Farley DR, et al. Impact of analysis of frozen-section margin on reoperation rates in women undergoing lumpectomy for breast cancer: evaluation of the national surgical quality improvement program data. Surgery. 2014;156:190–7.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu C, Chiang K, Kuo W, Shen S, Lo Y, Chen S. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. The Breast. 2013;22:698–702.CrossRefPubMed Yu C, Chiang K, Kuo W, Shen S, Lo Y, Chen S. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. The Breast. 2013;22:698–702.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kryh CG, Pietersen CA, Rahr HB, Christensen RD, Wamberg P, Laudrup MD. Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: a single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases. The Breast. 2014;23:784–9.CrossRefPubMed Kryh CG, Pietersen CA, Rahr HB, Christensen RD, Wamberg P, Laudrup MD. Re-resection rates and risk characteristics following breast conserving surgery for breast cancer and carcinoma in situ: a single-centre study of 1575 consecutive cases. The Breast. 2014;23:784–9.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Garvey EM, Senior DA, Pockaj BA, Wasif N, Dueck AC, McCullogh AE, et al. Rates of residual disease with close but negative margins in breast cancer surgery. The Breast. 2015;24:413–7.CrossRefPubMed Garvey EM, Senior DA, Pockaj BA, Wasif N, Dueck AC, McCullogh AE, et al. Rates of residual disease with close but negative margins in breast cancer surgery. The Breast. 2015;24:413–7.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernández AAT, Benítez VV, Giner MIG, Flores CDT, Correa PP, Hernández JRH. Predictive factors in the development of residual tumor in patients undergoing reoperation after conservative surgery for breast cancer. Rev Senol Patol Mamar. 2015;28:120–6.CrossRef Hernández AAT, Benítez VV, Giner MIG, Flores CDT, Correa PP, Hernández JRH. Predictive factors in the development of residual tumor in patients undergoing reoperation after conservative surgery for breast cancer. Rev Senol Patol Mamar. 2015;28:120–6.CrossRef
38.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. society of surgical oncology-american society for radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;. doi:10.1245/S10434-014-3481-4. Moran MS, Schnitt SJ, Giuliano AE, Harris JR, Khan SA, Horton J, et al. society of surgical oncology-american society for radiation oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;. doi:10.​1245/​S10434-014-3481-4.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Angarita FA, Nadler A, Zerhouni S, Escallon J. Perioperative measures to optimize margin clearance in breast conserving surgery. Surg Oncol. 2014;23:81–91.CrossRefPubMed Angarita FA, Nadler A, Zerhouni S, Escallon J. Perioperative measures to optimize margin clearance in breast conserving surgery. Surg Oncol. 2014;23:81–91.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Baviera GV, Singletary SE, et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1458–71.CrossRefPubMed Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Sahin AA, Kuerer HM, Baviera GV, Singletary SE, et al. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1458–71.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubio IT. Breast conservative surgery in breast cancer: simple can be harder than complex. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:1.CrossRefPubMed Rubio IT. Breast conservative surgery in breast cancer: simple can be harder than complex. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:1.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Reoperations after primary breast conserving surgery in women with invasive breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain: a retrospective study
verfasst von
J. M. Escribà
L. Esteban
J. Gálvez
M. J. Pla
A. Melià
M. Gil-Gil
R. Clèries
L. Pareja
X. Sanz
M. Bustins
J. M. Borrás
J. Ribes
Publikationsdatum
13.09.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Elektronische ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1546-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Clinical and Translational Oncology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.