Plain English summary
Introduction
Methods
Study setting and design
Study participants
Measures
Construct | Source of measure | Description | Item examples | Response format |
---|---|---|---|---|
eIMB constructs | ||||
SCM knowledge | Woldesadik et al. [32] | 18-items measure knowledge of availability of SCM in general, specific SCM (e.g., TCI, MSI), and risk reduction strategies not specific to conception (e.g., circumcision, PrEP); number of correct items is summed. | Only having condomless sex during the few days each month when the woman is most fertile helps to limit the risk of HIV transmission to an uninfected partner | True, False, Don’t know |
SCM motivation | Gerkovich [33] | 2 items measure level of commitment and readiness to use SCM; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater motivation. | It is important to me that my partner and I use methods that can limit HIV transmission risks during attempts to conceive a child | Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree |
SCM self-efficacy | Johnson et al. [34] | 6 items measure level of confidence to negotiate and utilize SCM; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater self-efficacy or confidence. | I can follow advice about limiting condomless sex to only 2–3 specific days per month | Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree |
SCM cultural acceptability | WHO [35] | 6 items measure perception of the cultural acceptability of specific SCM. Respondents indicate their level of agreement with statements about the willingness of HIV-affected couples to engage in specific safer conception strategies. Mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater perceived cultural acceptability. | Examples of safer conception strategies enquired about: delaying attempts to conceive until CD4 count is high; use of TCI, MSI, and PrEP | Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree |
Attitudes towards contraception use | 13 items that assess beliefs regarding both positive and negative effects of contraception use. Scoring of negatively worded items is reversed; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect more positive attitude towards contraception. | Hormonal contraception can cause permanent sterility in women My religion supports the use of contraception | Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree | |
Other potential correlates | ||||
Demographic characteristics | Created in house | Measures of client background characteristics | Age, gender, education level | – |
Health management characteristics | Created in house | Information on patient management of HIV disease and immune status that is either self-reported or chart abstracted | Date of HIV diagnosis; most recent CD4 count and HIV viral load; use of HIV antiretroviral therapy | – |
Reproductive health history | Created in house | Background on reproductive health history of patient and partner | Number of biological children for patient and partner (including with each other), pregnancy history including miscarriages and abortions | – |
Relationship and partner characteristics | ||||
Self-agency in decision making within the relationship | Pulerwitz et al. [36] | 15-item relationship control measure adapted from Sexual Relationship Power scale to assess self-agency in decision making within the relationship; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater self-agency. | My partner has more say than I do about important decisions that affect us | Strongly agree, agree, disagree, strongly disagree |
Reproductive coercion | Anderson et al. [37] | 5-item scale to measure presence of actions from partner to pressure respondent to have a child in the past year; total score is the sum of all items and reflects greater coercion. | Your partner said he/she would leave you if you did not try to have a child | Yes, No |
Provider support for family planning and safer consumption | ||||
Receipt of family planning counseling | Created in house | A measure to assess whether the client/couple received any consults from their providers in the past 6 months regarding reproductive health decisions and behaviors | Were consults received related to (1) decision to have a child; (2) use of methods to conceive safely; (3) use of contraception to prevent pregnancy | Number of consults received in each category |
Childbearing stigma and pressure | ||||
Internalized childbearing stigma | Created in house | A single item to measure internalized stigma or shame for wanting to have a child as someone living with HIV | I feel ashamed for wanting a (nother) child | Disagree strongly disagree slightly, neutral, agree slightly, agree strongly |
Perceived community stigma towards childbearing | Created in house | 3-item measure of perceptions of how family, friends and others in community viewed HIV-affected couples who want to have a child or are pregnant; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater stigma. | People in the community look down on HIV+ individuals who want to have a child | Disagree strongly disagree slightly, neutral, agree slightly, agree strongly |
Provider stigma toward childbearing | Created in house | 2-item measure of perceived provider stigma toward childbearing among PLHIV; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater stigma. | Most HIV providers think that HIV+ clients should not have children | Disagree strongly disagree slightly, neutral, agree slightly, agree strongly |
Cultural pressure to have a child | 5-item measure of beliefs about how the identify of a man, woman and couple are influenced by whether or not they have children, and perceived expectations from family to have children; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater perceived cultural pressure. | It is very important that a married couple has children together in order to legitimize the relationship | Strongly disagree, somewhat disagree, somewhat agree, strongly agree | |
Psychosocial functioning | ||||
Internalized HIV stigma | Kalichman et al. [38] | 8-item scale measuring stigma about HIV; mean item score is calculated and higher scores reflect greater internalized stigma. | I am ashamed that I am HIV positive | Strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree |
Depression | Cox et al. [39] | 10-item Edinburgh Post-partum Depression Scale to measure depression in past week. The total score is the sum of all items and reflects severity of depressive symptomatology; scores > = 10 reflect possible clinical depression, and scores > 13 reflect likely clinical depression. | In the past 7 days: I have been able to laugh and see the funny side of thing | Response options vary by item but all range from 0 to 3 |
Sexual and reproductive health behavior measures
Childbearing intentions and recent conception behavior
Use of safer conception methods (SCM)
Use of contraception
Data analysis
Results
Sample description
Mean (SD)/N (%) | |
---|---|
Sociodemographic characteristics | |
Age (years) | 35.9 (8.2) |
Female gender | 194 (49.9%) |
Some secondary education | 132 (33.9%) |
HIV disease characteristics | |
Time since HIV diagnosis (years) | 10.7 (8.7) |
CD4 count (cells/mm3) | 511 (293) |
Undetectable HIV viral load (N = 315) | 264 (83.8%) |
Currently on ART | 385 (99.0%) |
Time on ART (among those on ART, in years) | 7.8 (7.1) |
Partner and relationship characteristics | |
Married to partner | 326 (83.8%) |
Length of relationship (years) | 9.9 (10.7) |
Currently living with partner | 344 (88.4%) |
Participant has biological children | 349 (89.7%) |
Partner has biological children | 194 (49.9%) |
Has had a child with partner | 195 (50.1%) |
Self-agency in decision making (PR = 1–4) | 3.07 (0.44) |
Reproductive coercion (PR = 0–5) | 0.13 (0.60) |
Discussed childbearing with provider in past 6 months | 33 (8.5%) |
Psychosocial functioning | |
Depression (PR = 0–30) | 4.21 (4.55) |
Possibly clinically depressed | 54 (13.9%) |
Likely clinically depressed | 15 (3.9%) |
Internalized HIV stigma (PR = 1–5) | 2.19 (0.90) |
eIMB information | |
SCM knowledge (0–18) | 11.92 (2.95) |
eIMB motivation | |
SCM motivation | 3.73 (0.45) |
Positive attitudes towards contraception (PR = 1–4) | 2.59 (0.41) |
eIMB behavioral skills | |
SCM self-efficacy | 3.47 (0.40) |
eIMB social/ecological | |
Community childbearing stigma (PR = 1–5) | 3.27 (1.50) |
Provider childbearing stigma (PR = 1–5) | 1.92 (0.89) |
Internalized childbearing stigma (PR = 1–5) | 1.17 (0.60) |
SCM cultural acceptability (PR = 1–4) | 2.96 (0.59) |
Family planning/SCC services | |
Had any consults with provider about decision to have another child | 37 (9.5%) |
Had any consults with provider about safer conception methods | 22 (5.7%) |
Had any consults with provider about contraception | 33 (8.5%) |
Childbearing intentions and behaviors
Full sample (N = 389) | Both members of couple want child now (N = 313) | Tried to conceive in the past 6 months (N = 118) | Did not try to conceive in the past 6 months (N = 268) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Both members of couple want child now | Tried to conceive in the past 6 months | Used SCM during attempts to conceive | Current use of modern contraceptives | Use of contraception or behaviors consistent with pregnancy prevention | |||||
UOR (CI) | AOR (CI)a | UOR (CI) | AOR (CI)b | UOR (CI) | AOR (CI) | UOR (CI) | AOR (CI) | UOR (CI) | |
Sociodemographic characteristics | |||||||||
Age | 1.02 (.99, 1.05) | – | 0.95*** (.92, .98) | 1.03 (.98, 1.07) | 0.98 (.91, 1.06) | – | 0.97 (.94, 1.001) | – | 1.02 (.99, 1.05) |
Female gender | 1.13 (.69, 1.87) | – | 4.16*** (2.54, 6.83) | 2.54** (1.28, 5.06) | 0.47 (.15, 1.47) | – | 1.64 (.94, 2.85) | – | 0.96 (.59, 1.57) |
Some secondary education | 0.43** (.26, .72) | 0.61 (.31, 1.23) | 0.66 (.39, 1.10) | – | 1.76 (.54, 5.73) | – | 0.94 (.53, 1.66) | – | 1.12 (.68, 1.85) |
HIV disease characteristics | |||||||||
vTime since HIV diagnosis | 1.01*** (1.00, 1.01) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.01) | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | – | 1.00 (1.00, 1.01) | – | 1.00 (1.00, 1.01) | – | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) |
Currently on ART | 2.07 (.18, 23.09) | – | 1.00c | – | 0.13 (.01, 2.14) | – | 1.00c | – | 1.00c |
CD4 countd | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | – | 1.002** (1.001,1.003) | −h | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | 1.002* (1.000, 1.003) | −f | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | |
Undetectable HIV viral loade | 3.52 (1.81, 6.83) | −g | 1.08 (.50, 2.36) | 0.56 (.10, 2.98) | 1.04 (.47, 2.29) | 1.57 (.79, 3.12) | |||
Time on ART | 1.01*** (1.01, 1.01) | – | 1.00 (.99, 1.00) | – | 1.00 (.99, 1.01) | – | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) | – | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) |
Partner and relationship characteristics | |||||||||
Married to partner | 3.55*** (1.97, 6.38) | 4.96*** (1.75, 14.04) | 1.35 (.65, 2.78) | – | 1.00c | – | 0.63 (.33, 1.22) | – | 1.02 (.55, 1.88) |
Length of relationship | 1.06** (1.02, 1.09) | 1.08* (1.02, 1.15) | 0.94*** (.91, .96) | 0.99 (.96, 1.03) | 1.03 (.97, 1.08) | – | 0.96* (.93, .99) | 0.96* (.93, .99) | 1.00 (.98, 1.02) |
Currently living with partner | 2.93** (1.51, 5.70) | 1.02 (.36, 2.93) | 1.30 (.57, 2.97) | – | 1.00c | – | 1.05 (.47, 2.35) | – | 0.99 (.49, 2.00) |
Participant has biological children | 0.31 (.09, 1.02) | – | 0.33*** (.16, .68) | 0.46 (.19, 1.11) | 0.52 (.15, 1.86) | – | 2.54 (.56, 11.45) | – | 4.00* (1.26, 12.74) |
Partner has biological children | 1.06 (.64, 1.75) | – | 2.77*** (1.72, 4.46) | 1.61 (.90, 2.89) | 0.65 (.21, 2.01) | – | 1.45 (.83, 2.51) | – | 1.14 (.70, 1.84) |
Has had a child with partner | 0.33*** (.19, .58) | 0.09*** (.04, .21) | 0.19*** (.11, .31) | 0.33** (.16, .67) | 0.96 (.25, 3.73) | – | 1.38 (.77, 2.46) | – | 1.49 (.91, 2.46) |
Self-agency in decision making | 2.02* (1.13, 3.64) | 1.58 (.74, 3.38) | 0.19*** (.10, .35) | 0.39* (.19, .81) | 6.34*** (1.64, 24.50) | 5.80* (1.27, 26.50) | 0.37** (.18, .73) | 0.34** (.16, .74) | 0.69 (.38, 1.24) |
Reproductive coercion | 0.95 (.63, 1.41) | – | 1.32 (.87, 1.99) | – | 1.00c | – | 1.41 (.91, 2.19) | – | 1.31 (.79, 2.16) |
Discussed childbearing with provider | 1.10 (.44, 2.77) | – | 2.07 (.92, 4.65) | – | 5.86*** (1.62, 21.29) | 5.29 (.95, 29.42) | 0.65 (.18, 2.35) | – | 1.85 (.62, 5.47) |
Psychosocial functioning | |||||||||
Depression | 0.97 (.92, 1.02) | – | 1.11*** (1.05, 1.17) | 1.04 (.97, 1.11) | 1.02 (.91, 1.15) | – | 0.95 (.88, 1.01) | – | 0.98 (.93, 1.03) |
Possibly clinically depressed | 0.73 (.37, 1.44) | – | 2.15* (1.11, 4.16) | – | 1.91 (.54, 6.78) | – | 0.27* (.08, .91) | 0.20* (.06, .72) | 0.79 (.38, 1.65) |
Likely clinically depressed | 0.35 (.12, 1.00) | – | 3.46 (.85, 14.11) | – | 1.00c | – | 1.00c | – | 0.39 (.10, 1.61) |
Internalized HIV stigma | 0.57*** (.43, .75) | 0.83 (.54, 1.29) | 1.21 (.94, 1.56) | – | 1.04 (.56, 1.90) | – | 1.13 (.83, 1.53) | – | 0.98 (.75, 1.28) |
eIMB information | |||||||||
SCM knowledge | 1.21*** (1.11, 1.32) | 1.18* (1.04, 1.33) | 0.91* (.84, .99) | 0.96 (.87, 1.06) | 1.03 (.84, 1.27) | – | 1.04 (.95, 1.15) | – | 1.01 (.93, 1.09) |
eIMB motivation | |||||||||
SCM motivation | – | – | – | – | 2.62 (.49, 14.19) | – | – | – | – |
Positive attitudes towards contraception | 1.20 (.65, 2.22) | – | 0.53* (.31, .92) | 0.63 (.32, 1.25) | – | – | 2.13* (1.09, 4.19) | 3.17** (1.47, 6.83) | 1.08 (.61, 1.91) |
eIMB behavioral skills | |||||||||
SCM self-efficacy | – | – | – | – | 7.42* (1.30, 42.24) | 5.16 (.91, 29.27) | – | – | – |
eIMB social/ecological | |||||||||
Community childbearing stigma | 1.37*** (1.15, 1.63) | 1.40* (1.05, 1.76) | 0.98 (.84, 1.13) | – | 0.72 (.49, 1.06) | – | 0.96 (.80, 1.16) | – | 0.97 (.83, 1.14) |
Provider childbearing stigma | 0.96 (.72, 1.28) | – | 1.18 (.92, 1.52) | – | 1.30 (.70, 2.42) | – | 0.76 (.54, 1.07) | – | 0.96 (.73, 1.26) |
Internalized childbearing stigma | 0.61** (.43, .87) | 0.44** (.28, .71) | 0.72 (.42, 1.22) | – | 1.00c | – | 0.93 (.61, 1.41) | – | 1.41 (.93, 2.12) |
SCM cultural acceptability | 0.51** (.32, .80) | 0.65 (.34, 1.25) | 1.74** (1.17, 2.59) | 1.92* (1.19, 3.08) | 1.72 (.60, 4.93) | – | 1.29 (.81, 2.06) | – | 1.41 (.93, 2.13) |
FP/SCC services | |||||||||
Had any consults with provider about decision to have another child | 1.04 (.44, 2.48) | – | 1.90 (.88, 4.10) | – | – | – | 0.70 (.23, 2.18) | – | 2.59 (.92, 7.35) |
Had any consults with provider about safer conception methods | 1.57 (.45, 5.46) | – | 1.93 (.76, 4.90) | – | 6.53*** (1.58, 27.10) | 1.05 (.23, 4.85) | – | – | – |
Had any consults with provider about contraception | 1.10 (.44, 2.77) | – | 1.05 (.46, 2.39) | – | – | – | 0.28 (.06, 1.25) | – | 1.69 (.66, 4.32) |