Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2006

01.06.2006 | Original Paper

Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: Prospective study with clinical implications

verfasst von: Bodil Heijbel, Malin Josephson, Irene Jensen, Stefan Stark, Eva Vingård

Erschienen in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Ausgabe 2/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective cohort study with 18-month follow-up. Objective: To investigate if long-term sick listed persons’ own predictions of their future return to work (RTW) have an impact on their RTW when controlling for other established factors. Method: Postal questionnaires at baseline were sent to persons who had been on sick leave for more than 90 days, and were employed in five municipalities and four county councils in Sweden. A follow-up regarding their RTW was performed 18 months later. Results: After 18 months 135 out of 508 persons (27%) had returned to work, full or part-time. In a multivariate logistic regression, the sick listed persons’ own prediction of their RTW proved to be highly significant (OR=8.28, 95% CI: 3.31–20.69). Only six out of 132 persons with a negative view of their RTW did return to wok. Other predictive factors that were found for RTW were: being on sick leave for a period of less than 1 year (OR=2.09, 95% CI: 1.19–3.67), having less pain than persons in the quartile with most pain (OR=2.65, 95% CI: 1.21–5.81), perceiving that one was welcome back to work (OR=1.98, 95% CI: 1.10–3.58), and being under 55 years of age (OR=2.37, 95% CI: 1.07–5.23 for age between 45 and 54 years and the same trend for age below 45 years OR=1.85, 95% CI: 0.82–4.20). Conclusion: Persons with a positive prediction should get help to realise their potential for RTW. Offering traditional rehabilitation measures to a person with a negative prediction of his/her RTW, could be a waste of resources if done ahead of improving self-confidence and view of what is possible. The problems in this group might decrease or be easier to handle if decisions about the future are taken within a year.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L, Sullivan T, Sinclair S. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:464–84.PubMedCrossRef Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L, Sullivan T, Sinclair S. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:464–84.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McIntosh G, Frank J, Hogg-Johnson S, Hall H, Bombardier C. Low back pain prognosis: Structured review of the Literature. J Occup Rehabil 2000;10(2):101–15.CrossRef McIntosh G, Frank J, Hogg-Johnson S, Hall H, Bombardier C. Low back pain prognosis: Structured review of the Literature. J Occup Rehabil 2000;10(2):101–15.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Franche R-L, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):233–56.PubMedCrossRef Franche R-L, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(4):233–56.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause N, Dasinger L, Deegan L, Rudolph L, Brand R. Psychosocial job factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:374–92.PubMedCrossRef Krause N, Dasinger L, Deegan L, Rudolph L, Brand R. Psychosocial job factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:374–92.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Dasinger L, Deegan L, Brand R, Rudolph L. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42(3):323–33.PubMedCrossRef Dasinger L, Deegan L, Brand R, Rudolph L. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42(3):323–33.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Friesen M, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMed Friesen M, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D, Group tW-R. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–14.PubMedCrossRef Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D, Group tW-R. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–14.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mondloch M, Cole D, Frank J. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients´ recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ 2001;165(2):174–9.PubMed Mondloch M, Cole D, Frank J. Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients´ recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ 2001;165(2):174–9.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cole D, Mondloch M, Group EPM. Listening to injured workers: How recovery expectations predict outcomes? Can Med Soc J 2002;166:749–54. Cole D, Mondloch M, Group EPM. Listening to injured workers: How recovery expectations predict outcomes? Can Med Soc J 2002;166:749–54.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Marhold C, Linton S, Melin L. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: Evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(2):65–75.PubMedCrossRef Marhold C, Linton S, Melin L. Identification of obstacles for chronic pain patients to return to work: Evaluation of a questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(2):65–75.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandström J, Esbjörnsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation: The significance of the patient's own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18(1):29–33.PubMed Sandström J, Esbjörnsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation: The significance of the patient's own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med 1986;18(1):29–33.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Beecher H. The powerful placebo. JAMA 1955;159:1602–6. Beecher H. The powerful placebo. JAMA 1955;159:1602–6.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Benight C, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther 2004;42(10):1129–48.PubMedCrossRef Benight C, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: the role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther 2004;42(10):1129–48.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Heijbel B, Josephson M, Jensen I, Vingård E. Employer, insurance, and health system response to long-term sick leave in the public sector: Policy implications. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(2):149–58.CrossRef Heijbel B, Josephson M, Jensen I, Vingård E. Employer, insurance, and health system response to long-term sick leave in the public sector: Policy implications. J Occup Rehabil 2005;15(2):149–58.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, Dworkiin S. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–49.PubMedCrossRef Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe F, Dworkiin S. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–49.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloch F, Prins R. Who returns to work and why? A six country study on work incapacity and reintegration. New Brunswick New Jersey: Transaction Publisher; 2000. Bloch F, Prins R. Who returns to work and why? A six country study on work incapacity and reintegration. New Brunswick New Jersey: Transaction Publisher; 2000.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Berglind H, Gerner U. Motivation and return to work among the long-term sicklisted: An action theory perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(14):719–26.PubMedCrossRef Berglind H, Gerner U. Motivation and return to work among the long-term sicklisted: An action theory perspective. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24(14):719–26.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Weide W, Verbeek J, van Dijk F. Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain. Occup Environ Med 1999;56(7):488–93.PubMedCrossRef van der Weide W, Verbeek J, van Dijk F. Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain. Occup Environ Med 1999;56(7):488–93.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Anema J, Van Der Giezen A, Buijs P, CVan Mechelen W. Ineffective disability management by docotrs is an obstacle for return to work: A cohort study on low back pain paitients sicklisted for 3–4 months. Occup Environ Med 2002;59(11):729–33.PubMedCrossRef Anema J, Van Der Giezen A, Buijs P, CVan Mechelen W. Ineffective disability management by docotrs is an obstacle for return to work: A cohort study on low back pain paitients sicklisted for 3–4 months. Occup Environ Med 2002;59(11):729–33.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13(1):11–20.PubMedCrossRef Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil 2003;13(1):11–20.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dellve L, Lagerström M, Hagberg M. Rehabilitation of home care workers: supportive factors and obstacles prior to disability pension due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(2):55–64.PubMedCrossRef Dellve L, Lagerström M, Hagberg M. Rehabilitation of home care workers: supportive factors and obstacles prior to disability pension due to musculoskeletal disorders. J Occup Rehabil 2002;12(2):55–64.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Krause N, Dasinger L, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998;8(2):113–39.CrossRef Krause N, Dasinger L, Neuhauser F. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 1998;8(2):113–39.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat van Duijn M, Miedema H, Elders L, Burdorf A. Barriers for early return-to-work of workers with musculoskeletal disorders according to occupational health physicians and human resource managers. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14(1):31–41.PubMedCrossRef van Duijn M, Miedema H, Elders L, Burdorf A. Barriers for early return-to-work of workers with musculoskeletal disorders according to occupational health physicians and human resource managers. J Occup Rehabil 2004;14(1):31–41.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kenny D. Employers’ perspectives on the provision of suitable duties in occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 1999;9(4):267–76.CrossRef Kenny D. Employers’ perspectives on the provision of suitable duties in occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 1999;9(4):267–76.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Return to work expectation predicts work in chronic musculoskeletal and behavioral health disorders: Prospective study with clinical implications
verfasst von
Bodil Heijbel
Malin Josephson
Irene Jensen
Stefan Stark
Eva Vingård
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2006
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Ausgabe 2/2006
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9016-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2006

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2/2006 Zur Ausgabe