Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Orthopaedics and Traumatology 3/2013

01.09.2013 | Original Article

Revision total knee arthroplasty: experience with tantalum cones in severe bone loss

verfasst von: Matteo Fosco, Luca Amendola, Rossana Fantasia, Gennaro Pipino, Domenico Tigani

Erschienen in: European Orthopaedics and Traumatology | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Tantalum-made cones have been developed to compensate for large bone defect involving metaphyseal segment or major portion of the condyle or plateau during knee revision prosthetic surgery.

Materials and methods

We present our experience with femoral and tibial tantalum cones in 11 knees (12 cones overall were used, 6 on femur and 6 on tibia) with 2B or 3 Engh defect type during knee revision arthroplasty. Both cemented and cementless cones were used. Patients were submitted to a specific study protocol in order to exclude a new or persistent infection. Only one intra-operative complication not related to the implantation of the trabecular metal cone was observed.

Results

Neither early nor late post-operative re-infection was reported in our series at a mean follow-up of 39.8 months. Radiological analysis showed no cases of aseptic loosening or migration of the components. The only post-operative complication was delayed union of the tibial tuberosity in a patient who required osteotomy for surgical exposure. All patients improved both clinically and functionally.

Conclusions

The results of this study support the use of femoral and tibial porous tantalum metaphyseal cones as a viable option for revision knee arthroplasty with large amount of bone defects in both tibia and femur. We think that the main advantages of tantalum cones compared to structural bone graft lie in faster full weight-bearing recovery and in the cones' potential long-term maintenance of mechanical support. By our results, we can eventually exclude any concern regarding a possible direct correlation of the trabecular metal cones with re-infection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Loon CJ, De Waal Malefijt MC, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Veth RP (1999) Femoral bone loss in total knee arthroplasty: a review. Acta Orthop Belg 65(2):154–163PubMed Van Loon CJ, De Waal Malefijt MC, Buma P, Verdonschot N, Veth RP (1999) Femoral bone loss in total knee arthroplasty: a review. Acta Orthop Belg 65(2):154–163PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175PubMed Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (1999) Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 48:167–175PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Benjamin J, Engh G, Parsley B, Donaldson T, Coon T (2001) Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:62–67PubMedCrossRef Benjamin J, Engh G, Parsley B, Donaldson T, Coon T (2001) Morselized bone grafting of defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:62–67PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ries MD (1996) Impacted cancellous autograft for contained bone defects in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 9:51–54PubMed Ries MD (1996) Impacted cancellous autograft for contained bone defects in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 9:51–54PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA (2004) Structural femoral head allografting with revision TKA. Orthopedics 27:999–1000PubMed Engh GA (2004) Structural femoral head allografting with revision TKA. Orthopedics 27:999–1000PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2007) Uses of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2640–2647PubMedCrossRef Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2007) Uses of structural allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty in knees with severe tibial bone loss. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2640–2647PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Haidukewych GJ, Hanssen A, Jones RD (2011) Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(6):311–318PubMed Haidukewych GJ, Hanssen A, Jones RD (2011) Metaphyseal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty: indications and techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(6):311–318PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ (1999) Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(5):907–914PubMedCrossRef Bobyn JD, Stackpool GJ, Hacking SA, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ (1999) Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(5):907–914PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine B, Sporer S, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Paprosky W (2007) Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg 20(3):185–194PubMed Levine B, Sporer S, Della Valle CJ, Jacobs JJ, Paprosky W (2007) Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg 20(3):185–194PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA, Soileau ES, Vail TP (2011) Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):199–204CrossRef Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA, Soileau ES, Vail TP (2011) Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):199–204CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Long WJ, Scuderi GR (2009) Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2 year follow up. J Arthroplasty 24(7):1086–1092PubMedCrossRef Long WJ, Scuderi GR (2009) Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2 year follow up. J Arthroplasty 24(7):1086–1092PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2008) Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):78–84PubMedCrossRef Meneghini RM, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2008) Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):78–84PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Raimondi A (2009) Early aseptic loosening of a porous tantalum knee prosthesis. Chir Organi Mov 93(3):187–191PubMed Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Raimondi A (2009) Early aseptic loosening of a porous tantalum knee prosthesis. Chir Organi Mov 93(3):187–191PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Savarino L, Tigani D, Baldini N, Bochicchio V, Giunti A (2009) Pre-operative diagnosis of infection in total knee arthroplasty: an algorithm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:667–675PubMedCrossRef Savarino L, Tigani D, Baldini N, Bochicchio V, Giunti A (2009) Pre-operative diagnosis of infection in total knee arthroplasty: an algorithm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:667–675PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Fosco M, Rimondi E, Amendola L, Rossi G, Tigani D (2010) Revision of knee prostheses with components malrotation: treatment algorithm using a computed tomographic analysis. Eur Orthop Traumatol 1:61–68CrossRef Fosco M, Rimondi E, Amendola L, Rossi G, Tigani D (2010) Revision of knee prostheses with components malrotation: treatment algorithm using a computed tomographic analysis. Eur Orthop Traumatol 1:61–68CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Baleani M, Persson C, Zolezzi C, Andollina A, Borrelli AM, Tigani D (2008) Biological and Biomechanical effects of the use of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement. J Arthroplasty 23(8):1232–1238PubMedCrossRef Baleani M, Persson C, Zolezzi C, Andollina A, Borrelli AM, Tigani D (2008) Biological and Biomechanical effects of the use of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement. J Arthroplasty 23(8):1232–1238PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O'Connell JX, Duncan CP (1999) Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigation for diagnosis of infection at the site of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:672–683PubMed Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O'Connell JX, Duncan CP (1999) Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigation for diagnosis of infection at the site of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:672–683PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM (1996) Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):226–228PubMed Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM (1996) Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(2):226–228PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (1994) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116–123PubMed Murray PB, Rand JA, Hanssen AD (1994) Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:116–123PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–114PubMed Insall J, Salvati E (1971) Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology 101:101–114PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Scuderi GR (2001) Revision total knee arthroplasty: how much constraint is enough? Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:300–305PubMedCrossRef Scuderi GR (2001) Revision total knee arthroplasty: how much constraint is enough? Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:300–305PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schildhauer TA, Peter E, Muhr G, Koller M (2009) Activation of human leukocytes on tantalum trabecular metal in comparison to commonly used orthopedic metal implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res A 88:332–341PubMed Schildhauer TA, Peter E, Muhr G, Koller M (2009) Activation of human leukocytes on tantalum trabecular metal in comparison to commonly used orthopedic metal implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res A 88:332–341PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Schildhauer TA, Robie B, Muhr G, Koller M (2006) Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials. J Orthop Trauma 20:476–484PubMedCrossRef Schildhauer TA, Robie B, Muhr G, Koller M (2006) Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials. J Orthop Trauma 20:476–484PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Hiebert R, Stuchin SA (2001) The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16(6):759–767PubMedCrossRef Jazrawi LM, Bai B, Kummer FJ, Hiebert R, Stuchin SA (2001) The effect of stem modularity and mode of fixation on tibial component stability in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16(6):759–767PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Albrektsson BE, Ryd L, Carlsson LV et al (1990) The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman–Samuelson knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(2):252–258PubMed Albrektsson BE, Ryd L, Carlsson LV et al (1990) The effect of a stem on the tibial component of knee arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric study of uncemented tibial components in the Freeman–Samuelson knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(2):252–258PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Whiteside LA (1999) Cementless fixation issues in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 48:177–182PubMed Whiteside LA (1999) Cementless fixation issues in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 48:177–182PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Revision total knee arthroplasty: experience with tantalum cones in severe bone loss
verfasst von
Matteo Fosco
Luca Amendola
Rossana Fantasia
Gennaro Pipino
Domenico Tigani
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2013
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Orthopaedics and Traumatology / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1867-4569
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-4577
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-013-0160-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

European Orthopaedics and Traumatology 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.