Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically-significant adult arrhythmia [1, 2]. In 2010, 5.2 million people in the United States were estimated to have AF and a projected 12.1 million people were expected to have AF by the year 2030 [3]. For individuals with AF, the most frequent cardiovascular complications include ischemic stroke, heart failure and sudden cardiac death [4]. To prevent such complications, medications, including anticoagulants, are prescribed to lower the risk of ischemic stroke and other arterial thromboembolisms [5]. Medications for heart rate control and/or medications for rhythm control are also routinely prescribed [6‐8]. Nevertheless, adherence to such prescribed medications is suboptimal and can translate into an increased risk of treatment failure, hospitalizations and early mortality [9‐15].

In addition to the potential occurrence of AF-specific complications, many patients with AF present with non-cardiovascular specific comorbidities [16‐19]. One study reported that 98% of patients with AF had at least one comorbidity [16]. The most commonly reported non-cardiovascular comorbidity was urologic disorders (62%) followed by chronic pain (61%), respiratory (42%), gastrointestinal (41%), sleep (29%), psychiatric (28%), cancer (26%) and dermatologic (26%) conditions. However, little is known about medication adherence to the treatment of these comorbidities and limited data exist regarding predictors of AF-specific medication non-adherence [15, 20]. It may be that patients with AF present as a unique sub-population among those with cardiovascular disease. According to the American Heart Association, many people with AF don’t recognize the seriousness of their illness (> 65%) [21] and may be less adherent to their medication compared to those in the general cardiovascular disease population. Additionally, patients with AF may not experience symptoms [21], leading to potentially lower adherence to medication. Although these instances are specific to treatments for AF, these behaviors may carry over into adherence to their other medication regimens.

It has been suggested, in studies assessing AF-specific medication adherence, that younger age may be one possible risk factor for non-adherence [22], but the findings for gender [23, 24], socioeconomic status [22, 25] and comorbidities [26, 27] are mixed. Additionally, dementia, mental function and the complexity of the dosing regimen have been found to decrease medication adherence in patients with AF [20, 22, 28]. Identifying those AF patients at greatest risk for general medication non-adherence remains a difficult task. To address this knowledge gap, we evaluated the associations between select patient characteristics and self-reported medication adherence within a large, ethnically diverse population of adults with incident diagnosed AF to elucidate those patients who may be at greatest risk for medication non-adherence.

Of the 12,159 patients with incident diagnosed AF who responded to the questionnaire items regarding medication adherence, 771 (6.3%) were categorized as not adherent to their prescribed medications (Table 1). Patients who self-reported non-adherence to prescribed medications were younger (< 65 years of age) and more likely to be a racial/ethnic minority, not married or living with a partner and have a household income of $25,000 or less compared to those who were adherent (Table 2). Non-adherent patients were also more likely to report less physical activity, be a current smoker and consume alcohol. In addition, non-adherent patients were more likely to self-report more than 1 day of poor physical and/or mental health in the last month, have fair or poor current overall health, indicate that sleep affected their daily function more than 1 day a week, have memory decline in the past 2–3 years and have inadequate health literacy compared to those patients who were adherent. Lastly, non-adherent patients were less likely to have hypertension, but more likely to report low-dose aspirin use in the last year, have a BMI ≥30, CHADS₂ score of 0, depression and diabetes mellitus compared to adherent patients. Most univariate associations were retained in the multivariable model, with a few exceptions (Table 3). In particular, household income, cigarette use, self-rated current health, BMI and depression status were not statistically significant independent correlates of medication non-adherence. However, having a CCI score ≥ 3 was associated with a decreased adjusted odds of medication non-adherence, after accounting for other patient characteristics.

Among a large, ethnically-diverse sample of adults with incident AF receiving medical care within an integrated healthcare delivery system, we classified 6.3% as being not optimally adherent to prescribed medications per self-report. Patients were more likely to be non-adherent to their prescribed medications if they were a racial/ethnic minority versus non-Hispanic white, not married/with partner, physical inactive, used alcohol, had any days of self-reported poor physical health, mental health and/or sleep quality in the past 30 days versus 0 days, had memory decline, inadequate health literacy, low-dose aspirin use and/or diabetes mellitus. Whereas, patients who were of older age (65–84 years versus < 65 years of age), had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 3 versus 0 and had hypertension were less likely to be non-adherent.

Several studies have estimated one-year non-adherence rates to oral anticoagulants among AF patients to be 3–28% based on the type of oral anticoagulant prescribed [11‐13, 43]. Although our study assessed general medication adherence, which included assessment of both medication adherence to AF-specific treatment and any medication used to treat comorbidities, our medication non-adherence rate within our full AF cohort (6.3%) was on the lower end of what has been previously estimated in an AF population. More broadly, it has been shown that self-reported medication adherence to cardiovascular disease medications is less than 40% [44] and in an elderly population with a range of chronic illnesses only 45% had good medication adherence [45]. Our finding of only 6.3% medication non-adherence may be due, in part, to our cohort receiving care within an integrated healthcare delivery system that emphasizes coordination of care across different providers and clinical setting through a single EHR, as opposed to the more fragmented care seen in other types of healthcare delivery systems [46, 47]. Additionally, our assessment of medication adherence was based on self-report. This may have introduced some recall, social desirability and/or interviewer bias, leading to an over-estimate of the patient’s actual medication adherence [48]. Nonetheless, using this brief self-reported measure of medication adherence increased our ability to capture adherence information from a larger population (in our case 12,159 atrial fibrillation patients) due to the ease and cost-effectiveness of implementation in a clinical setting [49]. Additionally, self-reported medication adherence measures may also have the benefit of demonstrating high specificity in capturing people who are truly non-adherent [48, 49]. This was particularly valuable in our analyses, where we aimed to better understand population-level patient factors that may be associated with medication non-adherence in patients with atrial fibrillation. Self-reported adherence measures have also been shown to correlate well with adherence captured by pill counts and other monitoring devices [50], as well as with pharmacy dispensing records [51].

Results from the univariate analyses showed that patients who self-reported non-adherence to prescribed medications generally reported worse health indicators, as well as, factors related to low socio-economic status (racial/ethnic minority, being unmarried, lower household income, physical inactivity, BMI ≥30, alcohol and cigarette use, poor physical, mental and current health, decreased sleep quality, memory decline, inadequate health literacy and both depression and diabetes mellitus) which are similar to those factors that have been reported with non-adherence in other chronic conditions [52]. Many of these risk factors for medication non-adherence may also be preventable and/or modifiable. Physical inactivity and alcohol use, although most likely not directly related to medication adherence, can lead to poor physical health, mental health and sleep quality. These later three factors have all been associated with medication non-adherence across populations [53, 54]. Poor health literacy, on the other hand, may be both modifiable and preventable. It is also one of the most common problems associated with medication non-adherence [55]. Additionally, our study found that non-adherent patients were less likely to have hypertension, but more likely to report low-dose aspirin use in the last year and have CHADS₂ score of 0 when compared to patients who were adherent. The finding that patients who had hypertension were more likely to be adherent to their medication(s) is most likely due to the success of the Kaiser Permanente Hypertension Control Program [56]. From 2001 to 2013, hypertension control within KPNC increased from 44 to 90% [57]. One aspect of this program encouraged single pill combination therapy — combining multiple drugs into one pill. This strategy improved adherence, lowered patient costs and improved blood pressure control. Due to the program’s success, Kaiser Permanente Southern California also implemented these strategies into their region. Thus, many, if not all, patients included in our study were recipients of this program.

In our multivariable regression analysis, results paralleled those from the univariate associations. Of note, however, was the finding that higher CCI score (≥3) was linked to lower adjusted odds of being non-adherent compared to a CCI score of 0. These results may reflect the impact of increased contact with healthcare providers, which can improve medication adherence accountability [46, 47].

Considering these findings, we also acknowledge that the cross-sectional and observational nature of these data precluded us from assessing longitudinal trends in medication adherence among our patients with incident AF. Additionally, we were unable to assess polypharmacy for inclusion in our adjusted models. Thus, it may be that our low non-adherence rate was influenced by the relatively few prescriptions prescribed per patient. We were also unable to measure time since diagnosis to questionnaire completion. As adherence rates to AF-specific medications have been shown to decline with time, it may be that many of our patients completed the questionnaire soon after being diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Thus, adherence for those patients could have been misleadingly high. However, a strength of our study was that we had access to a large, socio-demographically diverse population of validated incident diagnosed AF patients. This allowed for the detailed investigation into the relationships between a wide range patient factors and medication adherence status within a highly representative population of AF patients.

In an ethnically-diverse cohort of AF patients, we identified multiple possible risk factors for medication non-adherence. These include selected socio-demographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, self-reported poor physical health, mental health and/or sleep quality, having memory decline, inadequate health literacy, using low-dose aspirin, having diabetes mellitus and a higher comorbidity burden. This has broad implications for both patients and providers when managing care for patients with AF, where maximizing the benefit from AF medication and treatment for any existing comorbidities involves understanding the patient factors associated with medication non-adherence. Additionally, by finding ways to intervene on those risk factors that may be preventable and/or modifiable may improve overall medication adherence and bring awareness to those patients at highest risk for non-adherence.