nach oben

Diabetologia

Erschienen in:

07.01.2021 | Article

Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with prior hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Grace Zhao, Dominika Bhatia, Flora Jung, Lorraine Lipscombe

Erschienen in: Diabetologia | Ausgabe 3/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

The association between a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and subsequent type 2 diabetes (referred to throughout as diabetes) remains inconclusive. We reviewed the most recent evidence to quantify the association of previous HDP with incident diabetes.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL was performed up to 17 February 2020 to identify observational studies of the association between HDP (pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension) and incident diabetes. Studies of women with pre-pregnancy diabetes were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened citations and abstracted results. Study quality was assessed in duplicate using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects models were used to pool effect estimates. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results

After screening 4617 citations, 16 cohort studies with a total of 3,095,457 participants were included (unspecified HDP n = 5, pre-eclampsia only n = 4, gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia n = 7). Risks of subsequent diabetes were significantly higher in women with a history of any HDP (HDP: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.24, 95% CI 1.95, 2.58; gestational hypertension: aHR 2.19 [95% CI 1.69, 2.84]; pre-eclampsia: aHR 2.56 [95% CI 2.02, 3.24]; preterm pre-eclampsia: aHR 3.05 [95% CI 2.05, 4.56]). The association between HDP and diabetes persisted in studies that adjusted for gestational diabetes mellitus (aHR 2.01 [95% CI 1.77, 2.28]).

Conclusions/interpretation

HDP are independently associated with a higher risk of diabetes. Further study is needed to determine how HDP contribute to diabetes risk prediction to develop evidence-based screening and prevention strategies.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Fraser A, Nelson SM, Macdonald-Wallis C et al (2012) Associations of pregnancy complications with calculated cardiovascular disease risk and cardiovascular risk factors in middle age: the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children . Circulation 125(11):1367–1380. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.044784

Umesawa M, Kobashi G (2017) Epidemiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, predictors and prognosis. Hypertens Res 40(3):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2016.126CrossRefPubMed

ACOG (2020) Practice bulletin no. 222: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 135(6):e237–e260. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003891CrossRef

Bethesda M (2000) Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183(1):s1–s22. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.107928CrossRef

Pouta A, Hartikainen A-L, Sovio U et al (2004) Manifestations of metabolic syndrome after hypertensive pregnancy. Hypertension 43(4):825–831. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000120122.39231.88CrossRefPubMed

Parretti E, Lapolla A, Dalfra M et al (2006) Preeclampsia in lean normotensive normotolerant pregnant women can be predicted by simple insulin sensitivity indexes. Hypertension 47(3):449–453. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000205122.47333.7f

Sierra-Laguado J, Garcia RG, Celedon J et al (2007) Determination of insulin resistance using the homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) and its relation with the risk of developing pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens 20(4):437–442

Carpenter MW (2007) Gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, and late vascular disease. Diabetes Care 30(Supplement 2):S246. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-s224CrossRefPubMed

Viana Pinto P, Rei M, Machado AP, Montenegro N (2014) Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular risk: are women and general practitioners aware of this relationship? The experience from a Portuguese centre. Obstet Gynecol Int 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/531539

10.

Callaway LK, Lawlor DA, O’Callaghan M, Williams GM, Najman JM, McIntyre HD (2007) Diabetes mellitus in the 21 years after a pregnancy that was complicated by hypertension: findings from a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(5):492.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.03.033

11.

Mannisto T, Mendola P, Vaarasmaki M et al (2013) Elevated blood pressure in pregnancy and subsequent chronic disease risk. Circulation 127(6):681–690. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.128751

12.

Feig DS, Shah BR, Lipscombe LL et al (2013) Preeclampsia as a risk factor for diabetes: a population-based cohort study. PLOS Med 10(4):e1001425. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001425

13.

Bilandzic A, Rosella L (2017) The cost of diabetes in Canada over 10 years: applying attributable health care costs to a diabetes incidence prediction model. Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 37(2):49–53. https://doi.org/10.24095/hpcdp.37.2.03

14.

Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P et al (2019) Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843

15.

Feig DS, Zinman B, Wang X, Hux JE (2008) Risk of development of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes. CMAJ 179(3):229–234. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080012

16.

Canada D (2018) Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 42(Suppl 1):S1–S325

17.

Noctor E, Dunne FP (2015) Type 2 diabetes after gestational diabetes: the influence of changing diagnostic criteria. World J Diabetes 6(2):234–244. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v6.i2.234

18.

Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, Williams D (2009) Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 373(9677):1773–1779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5CrossRefPubMed

19.

Association AD (2003) Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26(suppl 1):s21–s24. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2007.S21CrossRef

20.

NICE (2012) Type 2 diabetes: prevention in people at high risk (Public health guideline PH38). Available from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph38/evidence. Accessed Apr 2020

21.

Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang L et al (2017) Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and risk of type 2 diabetes in later life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine 55(3):809–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-016-1075-6

22.

Wu P, Kwok CS, Haththotuwa R et al (2016) Pre-eclampsia is associated with a twofold increase in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 59(12):2518–2526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-016-4098-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Stuart JJ, Tanz LJ, Missmer SA et al (2018) Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and maternal cardiovascular disease risk factor development: an observational cohort study. Ann Intern Med 169(4):224–232. https://doi.org/10.7326/m17-2740CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Kuo Y-L, Chan T-F, Wu C-Y, Ker C-R, Tu H-P (2018) Preeclampsia-eclampsia and future cardiovascular risk among women in Taiwan. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 57(3):364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2018.04.035CrossRefPubMed

25.

Timpka S, Markovitz A, Schyman T et al (2018) Midlife development of type 2 diabetes and hypertension in women by history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Cardiovasc Diabetol 17(1):124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-018-0764-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Timpka S, Stuart JJ, Tanz LJ, Hu FB, Franks PW, Rich-Edwards JW (2019) Postpregnancy BMI in the progression from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 42(1):44–49. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1532CrossRefPubMed

27.

Groenhof TKJ, Zoet GA, Franx A et al (2019) Trajectory of cardiovascular risk factors after hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertension 73(1):171–178. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11726CrossRefPubMed

28.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 283(15):2008–2012. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008CrossRefPubMed

31.

BMJ Best Practice (2019) Study design search filters. Available from https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/study-design-search-filters/. Accessed Feb 2020

32.

Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (2019) Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (updated July 2019). Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 5 Feb 2020

33.

Reeves BCDJ, Higgins JPT, Wells GA (2008) Chapter 13: Including non-randomized studies. In: Higgins JPTGS (ed) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Chichester

34.

Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D et al (2000) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis. Available from http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 1 Apr 2020

35.

DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2CrossRefPubMed

36.

Zhang J, Yu KF (1998) What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. Jama 280(19):1690–1691. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.19.1690CrossRefPubMed

37.

Wilmot EG, Edwardson CL, Achana FA et al (2012) Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 55(11):2895–2905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2677-zCrossRefPubMed

38.

Biswas A, Oh PI, Faulkner GE et al (2015) Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 162(2):123–132. https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-1651CrossRefPubMed

39.

Sutradhar R, Austin PC (2018) Relative rates not relative risks: addressing a widespread misinterpretation of hazard ratios. Ann Epidemiol 28(1):54–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.10.014CrossRefPubMed

40.

Heida KY, Franx A, Rijn BBV et al (2015) Earlier age of onset of chronic hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy or gestational diabetes mellitus. Hypertension 66(6):1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06005CrossRefPubMed

41.

Engeland A, Bjørge T, Daltveit AK et al (2011) Risk of diabetes after gestational diabetes and preeclampsia. A registry-based study of 230,000 women in Norway. Eur J Epidemiol 26(2):157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9527-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Carr DB, Newton KM, Utzschneider KM et al (2009) Preeclampsia and risk of developing subsequent diabetes. Hypertens Pregnancy 28(4):435–447. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641950802629675CrossRefPubMed

43.

Libby G, Murphy DJ, McEwan NF et al (2007) Pre-eclampsia and the later development of type 2 diabetes in mothers and their children: an intergenerational study from the Walker cohort. Diabetologia 50(3):523–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0558-zCrossRefPubMed

44.

Lykke JA, Langhoff-Roos J, Sibai BM, Funai EF, Triche EW, Paidas MJ (2009) Hypertensive pregnancy disorders and subsequent cardiovascular morbidity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the mother. Hypertension 53(6):944–951. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.130765CrossRefPubMed

45.

Savitz DA, Danilack VA, Elston B, Lipkind HS (2014) Pregnancy-induced hypertension and diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and diabetes hospitalization in the year following delivery. Am J Epidemiol 180(1):41–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwu118CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Hwu L-J, Sung F-C, Mou C-H et al (2016) Risk of subsequent hypertension and diabetes in women with hypertension during pregnancy and gestational diabetes. Mayo Clin Proc 91(9):1158–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.05.017CrossRefPubMed

47.

Wang IK, Tsai IJ, Chen P-C et al (2012) Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and subsequent diabetes mellitus: a retrospective cohort study. Am J Med 125(3):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.07.040CrossRefPubMed

48.

Bellamy L, Casas J-P, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ (2007) Pre-eclampsia and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 335(7627):974–974. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.385301.BECrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Hannaford P, Ferry S, Hirsch S (1997) Cardiovascular sequelae of toxaemia of pregnancy. Heart 77(2):154–158. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.77.2.154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Kestenbaum B, Seliger SL, Easterling TR et al (2003) Cardiovascular and thromboembolic events following hypertensive pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis 42(5):982–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajkd.2003.07.001CrossRefPubMed

51.

Srivaratharajah K, Abramson BL (2019) Identifying and managing younger women at high risk of cardiovascular disease. CMAJ 191(6):E159–E163. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180053CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Schull MJ, Redelmeier DA (2005) Cardiovascular health after maternal placental syndromes (CHAMPS): population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet 366(9499):1797–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67726-4CrossRefPubMed

53.

Vatten LJ, Skjærven R (2004) Is pre-eclampsia more than one disease? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 111(4):298–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00071.xCrossRef

54.

Raymond DPE (2011) Critical review of early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Surv 66(8):497–506. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182331028CrossRefPubMed

55.

Scott RA, Langenberg C, Sharp SJ et al (2013) The link between family history and risk of type 2 diabetes is not explained by anthropometric, lifestyle or genetic risk factors: the EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetologia 56(1):60–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2715-xCrossRefPubMed

56.

Spanakis EK, Golden SH (2013) Race/ethnic difference in diabetes and diabetic complications. Curr Diab Rep 13(6):814–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9CrossRefPubMed

57.

Ghaderpanahi M, Fakhrzadeh H, Sharifi F et al (2011) Association of physical activity with risk of type 2 diabetes. Iran J Public Health 40(1):86–93PubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Brouwers L, van der Meiden-van Roest A, Savelkoul C et al (2018) Recurrence of pre-eclampsia and the risk of future hypertension and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 125(13):1642–1654. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15394CrossRef

59.

Kong APS, Luk AOY, Chan JCN (2016) Detecting people at high risk of type 2 diabetes - how do we find them and who should be treated? Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 30(3):345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2016.06.003

60.

Cornell J, Mulrow C, Localio R et al (2014) Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change. Ann Intern Med 160(4):267–270. https://doi.org/10.7326/m13-2886%m24727843CrossRefPubMed

61.

IntHout J, Ioannidis JPA, Borm GF (2014) The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:25–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Bender R, Friede T, Koch A et al (2018) Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies. Res Synth Methods 9(3):382–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Seely EW, Solomon CG (2003) Insulin resistance and its potential role in pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(6):2393–2398. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030241CrossRefPubMed

64.

Hashemi S, Ramezani Tehrani F, Mehrabi Y, Azizi F (2013) Hypertensive pregnancy disorders as a risk factor for future cardiovascular and metabolic disorders (Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study). J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39(5):891–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.02069.xCrossRefPubMed

65.

Bryson CL, Ioannou GN, Rulyak SJ, Critchlow C (2003) Association between gestational diabetes and pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Epidemiol 158(12):1148–1153. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwg273CrossRefPubMed

66.

Granger JP, Alexander BT, Bennett WA, Khalil RA (2001) Pathophysiology of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens 14(S3):178S–185S. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-7061(01)02086-6CrossRefPubMed

67.

Maynard SE, Min J-Y, Merchan J et al (2003) Excess placental soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction, hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest 111(5):649–658. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI17189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

68.

Staff AC, Redman CWG, Williams D et al (2016) Pregnancy and long-term maternal cardiovascular health. Hypertension 67(2):251–260. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06357CrossRefPubMed

69.

Romundstad PR, Magnussen EB, Smith GD, Vatten LJ (2010) Hypertension in pregnancy and later cardiovascular risk. Circulation 122(6):579–584. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.943407CrossRefPubMed

70.

Barrett PM, McCarthy FP, Kublickiene K et al (2020) Adverse pregnancy outcomes and long-term maternal kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 3(2):e1920964–e1920964. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20964CrossRefPubMed

71.

Zoet GA, Benschop L, Boersma E et al (2018) Prevalence of subclinical coronary artery disease assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography in 45- to 55-year-old women with a history of preeclampsia. Circulation 137(8):877–879. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032695CrossRefPubMed

72.

Visintin C, Mugglestone MA, Almerie MQ, Nherera LM, James D, Walkinshaw S (2010) Management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 341:c2207. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2207CrossRefPubMed

73.

Mosca L, Benjamin EJ, Berra K et al (2011) Effectiveness-based guidelines for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in women–2011 update. Circulation 123(11):1243–1262. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820faaf8

74.

Regitz-Zagrosek V, Roos-Hesselink JW, Bauersachs J et al (2018) 2018 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the task force for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 39(34):3165–3241. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy340CrossRefPubMed

75.

Association AD (2002) Screening for diabetes. Diabetes Care 25(suppl 1):s21–s24. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.2007.S21CrossRef

76.

Karly Pippitt ML, Gurgle HE (2016) Diabetes mellitus: screening and diagnosis. Am Fam Physician 93(2):103–109PubMed

77.

Benschop L, Duvekot JJ, Roeters van Lennep JE (2019) Future risk of cardiovascular disease risk factors and events in women after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. Heart 105(16):1273–1278. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313453CrossRefPubMed

78.

Barrett PM, Khashan AS, McCarthy FP, Kublickiene K (2020) Adverse pregnancy outcomes and maternal health: action needed for long-term benefit. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13945

Titel: Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with prior hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: Grace Zhao
Dominika Bhatia
Flora Jung
Lorraine Lipscombe
Publikationsdatum: 07.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Diabetologia / Ausgabe 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-020-05343-w

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with prior hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions/interpretation

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Update Innere Medizin

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions/interpretation

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2021

C-C motif chemokine receptor 9 regulates obesity-induced insulin resistance via inflammation of the small intestine in mice

HDL particle size is increased and HDL-cholesterol efflux is enhanced in type 1 diabetes: a cross-sectional study

Structural and functional polarisation of human pancreatic beta cells in islets from organ donors with and without type 2 diabetes

Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome Follow-Up Study: newborn anthropometrics and childhood glucose metabolism

The liver–alpha cell axis associates with liver fat and insulin resistance: a validation study in women with non-steatotic liver fat levels

Altered hormonal and autonomic nerve responses to hypo- and hyperglycaemia are found in overweight and insulin-resistant individuals and may contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

Update Innere Medizin