Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Urology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports 1/2013

01.02.2013 | New Imaging Techniques (A Atala, Section Editor)

Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty:Recent Developments in Efficacy, Outcomes, and New Techniques

verfasst von: Casey A. Seideman, Aditya Bagrodia, Jeffrey Gahan, Jeffrey A. Cadeddu

Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports | Ausgabe 1/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Within the last decade, the adaptation of robotic urologic surgery has had a profound impact on surgical practice, with robotic upper tract reconstruction for ureteropelvic junction obstruction gaining rapid acceptance. Recent advances in robotic reconstruction demonstrate efficacious outcomes of robotic pyeloplasty, as compared with conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty, even in the case of secondary surgery. Furthermore, efforts to continue to reduce the morbidity of laparoscopic surgery have led to the development and implementation of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) surgery. The recent applications of the da Vinci robotic surgical platform to LESS pyeloplasty (R-LESS) has demonstrated the potential to further decrease morbidity, improve surgeon ergonomics, and improve cosmesis.
Literatur
1.
Gettman MT, et al. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002;60(3):509–13.PubMedCrossRef
2.
•• Braga LH, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol. 2009;56(5):848–57. The Braga et al. metanalysis represents the most comprehensive paper that looks at robotic pyeloplasty compared to conventional laparoscopy. It demonstrates equivalence of the two techniques, and serves as a strong foundation for the adaptation of the robotic technique.PubMedCrossRef
3.
El-Shazly MA, Moon DA, Eden CG. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: status and review of literature. J Endourol. 2007;21(7):673–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Singh I, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome. Can J Urol. 2010;17(2):5099–108.PubMed
5.
Schuessler WW, et al. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993;150(6):1795–9.PubMed
6.
Passerotti CC, et al. Comparing the quality of the suture anastomosis and the learning curves associated with performing open, freehand, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a swine animal model. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(4):576–86.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Mei H, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2011;25(5):727–36.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Vemulakonda VM, et al. Surgical management of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a Pediatric Health Information System database study. J Urol. 2008;180(4 Suppl):1689–92. discussion 1692.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Nelson CP, et al. Contemporary trends in surgical correction of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: data from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol. 2005;173(1):232–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Nelson CP, et al. Contemporary trends in surgical correction of pediatric ureteropelvic junction obstruction: data from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol. 2005;173(1):232–6.PubMedCrossRef
11.
• Sukumar S, et al. National trends and disparities in the use of minimally invasive adult pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2012;188(3)):913–8. Sukumar et al. demonstrates the national practice patterns, and highlights that robotic pyeloplasties are now performed more commonly than conventional laparoscopy, despite being underutilized compared to open surgery.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Sivaraman A, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional experience. Urology. 2012;79((2):351–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Niver BE, et al. Analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyleloplasty for primary versus secondary repair in 119 consecutive cases. Urology. 2012;79(3)):689–94.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Thom MR, et al. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: outcomes for primary and secondary repairs, a single institution experience. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38(1):77–83.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Desai MM, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: initial hundred patients. Urology. 2009;74(4):805–12.PubMedCrossRef
16.
White WM, et al. Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology. 2009;74(4):801–4.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Tracy CR, et al. Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology. 2009;74((5):1029–34.CrossRef
18.
Olweny, E.O., et al., Importance of cosmesis to patients undergoing renal surgery: a comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS), laparoscopic and open surgery. BJU Int, 2011
19.
Best SL, et al. Complications during the initial experience with aparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2011;108(8):1326–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Desai MM, et al. Scarless single port transumbilical nephrectomy and pyeloplasty: first clinical report. BJU Int. 2008;101(1):83–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Best, S.L., et al., Complications during the initial experience with laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. BJU Int, 2011
22.
Joseph RA, et al. "Chopstick" surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(6):1331–5.PubMedCrossRef
23.
• Seideman CA, et al. Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty: technique using the da vinci si robotic platform. J Endourol. 2012;26(8):971–4. Seideman et al. outlines the technique for robotic laparoendoscopic pyeloplasty, to aid in the adoption of this subspecialized procedure.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Cestari A, et al. Feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of robotic laparoendoscopic single-site (R-LESS) pyeloplasty using a new single-port platform. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):175–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
26.
Seideman CA, Sleeper JP, Lotan Y. Cost comparison of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2012;26(8):1044–8.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Descazeaud A, Peyromaure M, Zerbib M. Will robotic surgery become the gold standard for radical prostatectomy? Eur Urol. 2007;51(1):9–11.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Morino M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg. 2006;93(5):553–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Smith A, et al. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2010;183(2):505–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty:Recent Developments in Efficacy, Outcomes, and New Techniques
verfasst von
Casey A. Seideman
Aditya Bagrodia
Jeffrey Gahan
Jeffrey A. Cadeddu
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2013
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Urology Reports / Ausgabe 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-012-0291-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Current Urology Reports 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

New Imaging Techniques (A Atala, Section Editor)

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Bladder Diverticulectomy

Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio, Section Editor)

Small Renal Mass: To Treat or Not To Treat

New Imaging Techniques (A Atala, Section Editor)

Lymphadenectomy with Robotic Cystectomy

Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio, Section Editor)

Partial Nephrectomy: Is There Still a Need for Open Surgery?

Kidney Diseases (G Ciancio, Section Editor)

The Role of Metastasectomy in Renal Cell Carcinoma in the Era of Targeted Therapy

New Imaging Techniques (A Atala, Section Editor)

Preserving Continence During Robotic Prostatectomy

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

22.04.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Erst PSA-Test, dann Kallikrein-Score, schließlich MRT und Biopsie – ein vierstufiges Screening-Schema kann die Zahl der unnötigen Prostatabiopsien erheblich reduzieren: Die Hälfte der Männer, die in einer finnischen Studie eine Biopsie benötigten, hatte einen hochgradigen Tumor.

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

20.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Beim chronischen Harnwegsinfekt bei Frauen wird bisher meist eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe eingesetzt. Angesichts der zunehmenden Antibiotikaresistenz erweist sich das Antiseptikum Methenamin-Hippurat als vielversprechende Alternative, so die Auswertung einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise