Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 1/2019

14.11.2018 | Original Article

Robotic distal pancreatectomy with selective closure of pancreatic duct: surgical outcomes

verfasst von: Luca Moraldi, Benedetta Pesi, Lapo Bencini, Marco Farsi, Mario Annecchiarico, Andrea Coratti

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Pancreatic fistula is the main post-operative complication of distal pancreatectomy associated with other further complications, such as intra-abdominal abscesses, wound infection, sepsis, electrolyte imbalance, malabsorption and hemorrhage. Surgeons have tried various techniques to close the stump of the remaining pancreas, but the controversy regarding the impact of stapler closure and suture closure of the pancreatic stump is far from resolved. In this study, we reported our technique and results of robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy with ultrasound identification and consequent selective closure of pancreatic duct. Twenty-one patients underwent consecutive robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy were included in our study. We describe our technique and analyzed the operative and peri-operative data including mean operative time, intra-operative bleeding, blood transfusions necessity, conversion rate, mortality and morbidity rate, pancreatic fistula rate and grade, time of refeeding and canalization, length of hospital stay and readmission. Median operative time was 260 min. No conversion occurred. Estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range 50–200). No blood transfusions were performed. Mortality rate was 0%. One (5%) patient had a major complication, while 9 (43%) patients had minor complications (grade I). Three (14%) patients developed pancreatic fistula (grade B), while two (10%) patients had a biochemical leak. No late pancreatic fistula and re-operation occurred. The refeeding was started at second day (range 1^–6^) and the median canalization time was 4 days (range 2–7). The median hospital stay was 6 days (range 3–25) with a readmission rate of 0%. Robotic distal pancreatectomy can be considered safe and feasible. Our technique is easily reproducible, with good surgical results.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244(6):931–937 (discussion 937–9) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M et al (2006) Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 244(6):931–937 (discussion 937–9) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo TP, Hruban RH, Leach SD et al (2002) Pancreatic cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 26(4):176–275CrossRefPubMed Yeo TP, Hruban RH, Leach SD et al (2002) Pancreatic cancer. Curr Probl Cancer 26(4):176–275CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN et al (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92(5):539–546CrossRefPubMed Knaebel HP, Diener MK, Wente MN et al (2005) Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 92(5):539–546CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T et al (2003) Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 73(11):922–925CrossRefPubMed Takeuchi K, Tsuzuki Y, Ando T et al (2003) Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 73(11):922–925CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’Graggen K et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 245(4):573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kleeff J, Diener MK, Z’Graggen K et al (2007) Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 245(4):573–582CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Butturini G, Falconi M et al (1999) Prospective randomised pilot study of management of the pancreatic stump following distal resection. HPB 1(4):203–207CrossRef Bassi C, Butturini G, Falconi M et al (1999) Prospective randomised pilot study of management of the pancreatic stump following distal resection. HPB 1(4):203–207CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 30:1514–1522CrossRef Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 30:1514–1522CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pachter HL, Pennington R, Chassin J et al (1979) Simplified distal pancreatectomy with the Auto Suture stapler: preliminary clinical observations. Surgery 85:166–170PubMed Pachter HL, Pennington R, Chassin J et al (1979) Simplified distal pancreatectomy with the Auto Suture stapler: preliminary clinical observations. Surgery 85:166–170PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y et al (1998) Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 22:494–498CrossRefPubMed Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y et al (1998) Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 22:494–498CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Morris JA Jr et al (1991) Distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a multicenter experience. J Trauma 31(12):1600–1606CrossRefPubMed Cogbill TH, Moore EE, Morris JA Jr et al (1991) Distal pancreatectomy for trauma: a multicenter experience. J Trauma 31(12):1600–1606CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang E et al (2015) The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg 209(3):557–563CrossRefPubMed Sharpe SM, Talamonti MS, Wang E et al (2015) The laparoscopic approach to distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma results in shorter lengths of stay without compromising oncologic outcomes. Am J Surg 209(3):557–563CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Finan KR, Cannon EE, Kim EJ et al (2009) Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: a comparison of outcomes. Am Surg 75(8):671–679PubMed Finan KR, Cannon EE, Kim EJ et al (2009) Laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy: a comparison of outcomes. Am Surg 75(8):671–679PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Guerra F, Pesi B, Amore Bonapasta S et al (2015) Challenges in robotic distal pancreatectomy: systematic review of current practice. Minerva Chir 70(4):241–247PubMed Guerra F, Pesi B, Amore Bonapasta S et al (2015) Challenges in robotic distal pancreatectomy: systematic review of current practice. Minerva Chir 70(4):241–247PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Karabicak I, Satoi S, Yanagimoto H et al (2017) Comparison of surgical outcomes of three different stump closure techniques during distal pancreatectomy. Pancreatology 17(3):497–503CrossRefPubMed Karabicak I, Satoi S, Yanagimoto H et al (2017) Comparison of surgical outcomes of three different stump closure techniques during distal pancreatectomy. Pancreatology 17(3):497–503CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yui R, Satoi S, Toyokawa H et al (2014) Less morbidity after introduction of a new departmental policy for patients who undergo open distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):72–77CrossRefPubMed Yui R, Satoi S, Toyokawa H et al (2014) Less morbidity after introduction of a new departmental policy for patients who undergo open distal pancreatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21(1):72–77CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic distal pancreatectomy with selective closure of pancreatic duct: surgical outcomes
verfasst von
Luca Moraldi
Benedetta Pesi
Lapo Bencini
Marco Farsi
Mario Annecchiarico
Andrea Coratti
Publikationsdatum
14.11.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0605-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Updates in Surgery 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Editorial and Commentary

Is taTME delivering?

Acknowledgement to Referees

REFEREES 2018

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.