Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Das Thema chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen wird im Live-Webinar am 7. Mai von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr aus internistischer, gynäkologischer und psychologisch-neurowissenschaftlicher Perspektive beleuchtet. Besprochen werden krankheitsbedingte Ursachen, Mechanismen der kognitiven Schmerzmodulation sowie mögliche Therapieoptionen. Die Fortbildung ist mit 2 CME-Punkten zertifiziert. Melden Sie sich jetzt an!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Gynecological Surgery
Erschienen in: Gynecological Surgery 3/2011

01.09.2011 | Review Article

Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology

verfasst von: Pierre Lèguevaque, S. Motton, F. Vidal, M. Soulé Tholy, J. Hoff, D. Querleu

Erschienen in: Gynecological Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to review the current data documenting the advantages of robotic surgery over open or laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the complications and perioperative outcome of robotic surgery with open and laparocopic surgery, in gynecologic oncology. The terms radical robotic or robot- assisted hysterectomy in PubMed search lead to 41 references. We excluded one review of literature, ten studies with benign and malignant cases, eight cases reports, one letter to the editor. We kept the prospective studies and comparative studies (total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) vs. total robotic hysterectomy (TRH), total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) vs. TRH or TAH vs. TRH vs. TLH). The results are separated for endometrial cancers, early cervical cancers, pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissections, radical parametrectomy and trachelectomy, and pelvic exenteration. The literature on robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy supports its safety and feasibility for the surgical management of early cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. However, the results of a phase III randomized clinical trial testing the equivalence of outcomes after laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy are expected.
Literatur
1.
Querleu D, Leblanc E, Ferron G, Narducci F, Rafii A, Martel P (2007) Laparoscopic surgery and gynaecological cancers. Bull Cancer 94(12):1063–1071PubMed
2.
Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA (2005) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS 9(1):13–15PubMed
3.
Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, Magtibay PM, Magrina JF (2007) Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(1):113–114PubMedCrossRef
4.
Advincula AP (2006) Surgical techniques: robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system. Int J Med Robot 2(4):305–311PubMed
5.
Sert BM, Abeler VM (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection—case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 27(5):531–533PubMed
6.
Reynolds RK, Advincula AP (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am J Surg 191(4):555–560PubMedCrossRef
7.
Fiorentino RP, Zepeda MA, Goldstein BH, John CR, Rettenmaier MA (2006) Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(1):60–63PubMedCrossRef
8.
Advincula AP, Reynolds RK (2005) The use of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in the patient with a scarred or obliterated anterior cul-de-sac. JSLS 9(3):287–291PubMed
9.
Fanning J, Fenton B, Purohit M (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):649–4PubMedCrossRef
10.
Kim YT, Kim SW, Hyung WJ, Lee SJ, Nam EJ, Lee WJ (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol 108(2):312–316PubMedCrossRef
11.
Oleszczuk A, Kohler C, Paulick J, Schneider A, Lanowska M (2009) Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results. Int J Med Robot 5(1):38–44PubMed
12.
Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD (2009) A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 113(2):191–194PubMedCrossRef
13.
Sert B, Abeler V (2007) Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot 3(3):224–228PubMed
14.
Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109(1):86–91PubMedCrossRef
15.
Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V et al (2009) Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case–control study. Gynecol Oncol 115(1):60–64PubMedCrossRef
16.
Nezhat FR, Datta MS, Liu C, Chuang L, Zakashansky K (2008) Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer. JSLS 12(3):227–237PubMed
17.
Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L et al (2008) A case–control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(4):357PubMed
18.
bu-Rustum NR, Gemignani ML, Moore K et al (2003) Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 91(2):402–409CrossRef
19.
Querleu D (1993) Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 51(2):248–254PubMedCrossRef
20.
Frumovitz M, dos Reis R, Sun CC et al (2007) Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 110(1):96–102PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zakashansky K, Lerner DL (2008) Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(3):387–388PubMedCrossRef
22.
Obermair A, Gebski V, Frumovitz M et al (2008) A phase III randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic or robotic radical hysterectomy with abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):584–588PubMedCrossRef
23.
Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, Everett EN, Shah C, Peters WA III (2008) Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):679PubMedCrossRef
24.
Bell MC, Torgerson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Suttle AW, Hunt S (2008) Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 111(3):407–411PubMedCrossRef
25.
Frigerio L, Gallo A, Ghezzi F, Trezzi G, Lussana M, Franchi M (2006) Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 93(3):209–213PubMedCrossRef
26.
Eltabbakh GH, Shamonki MI, Moody JM, Garafano LL (2000) Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy? Gynecol Oncol 78(3 Pt 1):329–335PubMedCrossRef
27.
Gil-Moreno A, az-Feijoo B, Morchon S, Xercavins J (2006) Analysis of survival after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with the conventional abdominal approach for early-stage endometrial carcinoma: a review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 13(1):26–35PubMedCrossRef
28.
Denardis SA, Holloway RW, Bigsby GE, Pikaart DP, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ (2008) Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111(3):412–417PubMedCrossRef
29.
Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L et al (2008) A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(4):360–369PubMed
30.
Hoekstra AV, Jairam-Thodla A, Rademaker A et al (2009) The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery. Int J Med Robot 5(4):392–397PubMed
31.
Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle SA, Kumar S, Chamberlain DH, Tillmanns TD (2009) A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 114(2 Pt 1):236–243PubMedCrossRef
32.
Kohler C, Klemm P, Schau A et al (2004) Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies. Gynecol Oncol 95(1):52–61PubMedCrossRef
33.
Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS et al (2009) Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 113(1):36–41PubMedCrossRef
34.
Scribner DR Jr, Walker JL, Johnson GA, McMeekin SD, Gold MA, Mannel RS (2001) Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible? Gynecol Oncol 83(3):563–568PubMedCrossRef
35.
Occelli B, Narducci F, Lanvin D, Leblanc E, Querleu D (2000) Learning curves for transperitoneal laparoscopic and extraperitoneal endoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 7(1):51–53PubMedCrossRef
36.
Holub Z, Jabor A, Bartos P, Hendl J, Urbanek S (2003) Laparoscopic surgery in women with endometrial cancer: the learning curve. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 107(2):195–200PubMedCrossRef
37.
Querleu D, Dargent D, Ansquer Y, Leblanc E, Narducci F (2000) Extraperitoneal endosurgical aortic and common iliac dissection in the staging of bulky or advanced cervical carcinomas. Cancer 88(8):1883–1891PubMedCrossRef
38.
Kehoe SM, bu-Rustum NR (2006) Transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers. Curr Treat Options Oncol 7(2):93–101PubMedCrossRef
39.
Marnitz S, Kohler C, Roth C, Fuller J, Hinkelbein W, Schneider A (2005) Is there a benefit of pretreatment laparoscopic transperitoneal surgical staging in patients with advanced cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol 99(3):536–544PubMedCrossRef
40.
Papadia A, Remorgida V, Salom EM, Ragni N (2004) Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(3):297–306PubMedCrossRef
41.
Magrina JF (2007) Robotic surgery in gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 28(2):77–82PubMed
42.
Holloway RW, Ahmad S, Denardis SA et al (2009) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol Oncol 115(3):447–452PubMedCrossRef
43.
Burnett AF, O’Meara AT, Bahador A, Roman LD, Morrow CP (2004) Extraperitoneal laparoscopic lymph node staging: the University of Southern California experience. Gynecol Oncol 95(1):189–192PubMedCrossRef
44.
Tillmanns T, Lowe MP (2007) Safety, feasibility, and costs of outpatient laparoscopic extraperitoneal aortic nodal dissection for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 106(2):370–374PubMedCrossRef
45.
Gil-Moreno A, Franco-Camps S, az-Feijoo B et al (2008) Usefulness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for lymph node recurrence in gynecologic malignancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(7):723–730PubMedCrossRef
46.
Vergote I, Pouseele B, Van GT et al (2008) Robotic retroperitoneal lower para-aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical carcinoma: first report on the technique used in 5 patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87(7):783–787PubMedCrossRef
47.
Michel G, Morice P, Castaigne D, Leblanc M, Rey A, Duvillard P (1998) Lymphatic spread in stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma: anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 91(3):360–363PubMedCrossRef
48.
edetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, Scambia G, Cutillo G, Greggi S, Mancuso S (1996) The pelvic retroperitoneal approach in the treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 87(4):532–538CrossRef
49.
Narducci F, Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, Collinet P, Leblanc E (2009) Early experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopy for extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the left renal vein. Gynecol Oncol 115(1):172–174PubMedCrossRef
50.
Nezhat F, Prasad HM, Peiretti M, Rahaman J (2007) Laparoscopic radical parametrectomy and partial vaginectomy for recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 104(2):494–496PubMedCrossRef
51.
Lee CL, Huang KG (2005) Total laparoscopic radical parametrectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 12(2):168–170PubMedCrossRef
52.
Ramirez PT, Schmeler KM, Wolf JK, Brown J, Soliman PT (2008) Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111(1):18–21PubMedCrossRef
53.
Shepherd JH, Spencer C, Herod J, Ind TE (2006) Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer—cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. BJOG 113(6):719–724PubMedCrossRef
54.
Diaz JP, Sonoda Y, Leitao MM et al (2008) Oncologic outcome of fertility-sparing radical trachelectomy versus radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 111(2):255–260PubMedCrossRef
55.
Einstein MH, Park KJ, Sonoda Y et al (2009) Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: a comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 112(1):73–77PubMedCrossRef
56.
Beiner ME, Hauspy J, Rosen B et al (2008) Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case–control study. Gynecol Oncol 110(2):168–171PubMedCrossRef
57.
Persson J, Kannisto P, Bossmar T (2008) Robot-assisted abdominal laparoscopic radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 111(3):564–567PubMedCrossRef
58.
Burnett AF, Stone PJ, Duckworth LA, Roman JJ (2009) Robotic radical trachelectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical cancer: case series and description of technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 16(5):569–572PubMedCrossRef
59.
Geisler JP, Orr CJ, Manahan KJ (2008) Robotically assisted total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for fertility sparing in stage IB1 adenosarcoma of the cervix. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18(5):727–729PubMedCrossRef
60.
Ferron G, Querleu D, Martel P, Letourneur B, Soulie M (2006) Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 100(3):551–555PubMedCrossRef
61.
Pruthi RS, Stefaniak H, Hubbard JS, Wallen EM (2008) Robot-assisted laparoscopic anterior pelvic exenteration for bladder cancer in the female patient. J Endourol 22(10):2397–2402PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology
verfasst von
Pierre Lèguevaque
S. Motton
F. Vidal
M. Soulé Tholy
J. Hoff
D. Querleu
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Gynecological Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-010-0656-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

Gynecological Surgery 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Communication

Pseudomyxoma extraperitonei of ovarian origin mimicking a psoas abscess

Short Communication

Fallopian tube incarceration complicating surgical termination of pregnancy

Short Communication

Tuberculosis of the cervix: a rare cause of postcoital bleeding and inadequate cervical smear

Erratum

Erratum to: Transcervical, intrauterine ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of uterine fibroids with the VizAblate System: safety, tolerability, and ablation results in a closed abdomen setting

Techniques and Instrumentation

Uterine manipulation in operative laparoscopy by suction disposable uterine device

Short Communication

Progression of bowel endometriosis during treatment with the oral contraceptive pill

Neu im Fachgebiet Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Rezidivierender Peritonsillarabszess nach Oralsex

02.05.2024 Peritonsillarabszess Kasuistik

Die erotischen Dimensionen von Peritonsillarabszessen scheinen eng begrenzt zu sein. Das heißt aber nicht, solche Abszesse und Erotik hätten nichts miteinander gemein, wie ein Fallbericht verdeutlicht.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Hybrid-DRG-Verordnung soll dazu führen, dass mehr chirurgische Eingriffe ambulant durchgeführt werden, wie es in anderen Ländern schon länger üblich ist. Die gleiche Vergütung im ambulanten und stationären Sektor hatten Niedergelassene schon lange gefordert. Aber die Umsetzung bereitet ihnen doch Kopfzerbrechen.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise