Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2017

13.10.2016 | Original Scientific Report

Role of Drain Placement in Major Hepatectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Cases

verfasst von: Chaya Shwaartz, Adam C. Fields, Jeffrey J. Aalberg, Celia M. Divino

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The value of drain placement in hepatic surgery has not been conclusive. The aim of this study was to determine whether drain placement during major hepatectomy was associated with negative postoperative outcomes and whether its placement reduced the need for secondary procedures.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Database was used to identify patients who underwent major hepatectomy. Patients were divided into two groups based on the placement of a drain during the procedure. Propensity score-matched cohorts of patients who underwent major hepatic resection with or without drain placement were created accounting for patient characteristics. The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative complications including bile leak, post-hepatectomy liver failure, and invasive intervention as well as mortality and readmission.

Results

A total of 1005 patients underwent major hepatectomy; 500 patients (49.8 %) had prophylactic drains placed at the conclusion of the procedure. Drain placement was associated with any complication (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p < 0.001), renal insufficiency (p = 0.02), bile leak (p < 0.001), invasive intervention (p = 0.02), length of stay (p = 0.001), and readmission (p < 0.001). In the matched cohort, drain placement was associated with any complication (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p < 0.001), superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.028), bile leak (p < 0.001), and longer length of stay (0.03). In addition, placement of a prophylactic drain did not decrease the rate of postoperative bile leaks requiring therapeutic intervention (p = 0.21) (Table 2). In multivariate analysis, drain placement was independently associated with any complication (p < 0.001), blood transfusion (p = 0.02), bile leak (p < 0.001), invasive intervention (p = 0.011), superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (p = 0.039), and hospital readmission (p = 0.005) (Table 3). Placement of a prophylactic drain did not decrease the rate of postoperative bile leaks requiring therapeutic intervention (p = 0.15).

Conclusion

Drain placement after major hepatectomy may lead to increased postoperative complications including bile leak, superficial surgical site infection, and hospital length of stay and does not decrease the need for secondary procedures in patients with bile leaks.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V et al (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084 (discussion 1084–1075) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V et al (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–1084 (discussion 1084–1075) CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Macfie J et al (1995) Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 38:254–258CrossRefPubMed Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Macfie J et al (1995) Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 38:254–258CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Messager M, Sabbagh C, Denost Q et al (2015) Is there still a need for prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage in elective major gastro-intestinal surgery? J Vasc Surg 152:305–313 Messager M, Sabbagh C, Denost Q et al (2015) Is there still a need for prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage in elective major gastro-intestinal surgery? J Vasc Surg 152:305–313
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Wainess RM, Cowan JA et al (2004) National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 199:31–38CrossRefPubMed Dimick JB, Wainess RM, Cowan JA et al (2004) National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg 199:31–38CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Knol JA et al (2003) Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch Surg 138:185–191CrossRefPubMed Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Knol JA et al (2003) Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch Surg 138:185–191CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Hyder O et al (2014) Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery. Br J Surg 101:836–846CrossRefPubMed Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Hyder O et al (2014) Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery. Br J Surg 101:836–846CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavros MN, de Jong M, Dogeas E et al (2013) Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 100:711–718CrossRefPubMed Mavros MN, de Jong M, Dogeas E et al (2013) Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 100:711–718CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyoden Y, Imamura H, Sano K et al (2010) Value of prophylactic abdominal drainage in 1269 consecutive cases of elective liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:186–192CrossRefPubMed Kyoden Y, Imamura H, Sano K et al (2010) Value of prophylactic abdominal drainage in 1269 consecutive cases of elective liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 17:186–192CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanaka K, Kumamoto T, Nojiri K et al (2013) The effectiveness and appropriate management of abdominal drains in patients undergoing elective liver resection: a retrospective analysis and prospective case series. Surg Today 43:372–380CrossRefPubMed Tanaka K, Kumamoto T, Nojiri K et al (2013) The effectiveness and appropriate management of abdominal drains in patients undergoing elective liver resection: a retrospective analysis and prospective case series. Surg Today 43:372–380CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Squires MH 3rd, Lad NL, Fisher SB et al (2015) Value of primary operative drain placement after major hepatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1,041 patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:396–402CrossRefPubMed Squires MH 3rd, Lad NL, Fisher SB et al (2015) Value of primary operative drain placement after major hepatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of 1,041 patients. J Am Coll Surg 220:396–402CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu CL, Fan ST, Lo CM et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after hepatic resection is contraindicated in patients with chronic liver diseases. Ann Surg 239:194–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y et al (2015) Patterns of care among patients undergoing hepatic resection: a query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted hepatectomy database. J Surg Res 196:221–228CrossRefPubMed Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y et al (2015) Patterns of care among patients undergoing hepatic resection: a query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-targeted hepatectomy database. J Surg Res 196:221–228CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688CrossRefPubMed Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R et al (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281CrossRefPubMed D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17:2265–2281CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRef Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46:399–424CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bona S, Gavelli A, Huguet C (1994) The role of abdominal drainage after major hepatic resection. Am J Surg 167:593–595CrossRefPubMed Bona S, Gavelli A, Huguet C (1994) The role of abdominal drainage after major hepatic resection. Am J Surg 167:593–595CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K et al (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162CrossRefPubMed Fong Y, Brennan MF, Brown K et al (1996) Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection. Am J Surg 171:158–162CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Burt BM, Brown K, Jarnagin W et al (2002) An audit of results of a no-drainage practice policy after hepatectomy. Am J Surg 184:441–445CrossRefPubMed Burt BM, Brown K, Jarnagin W et al (2002) An audit of results of a no-drainage practice policy after hepatectomy. Am J Surg 184:441–445CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg 93:422–426CrossRefPubMed Sun HC, Qin LX, Lu L et al (2006) Randomized clinical trial of the effects of abdominal drainage after elective hepatectomy using the crushing clamp method. Br J Surg 93:422–426CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuster J, Llovet JM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a randomized controlled study. Hepatogastroenterology 51:536–540PubMed Fuster J, Llovet JM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC et al (2004) Abdominal drainage after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: a randomized controlled study. Hepatogastroenterology 51:536–540PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Butte JM, Grendar J, Bathe O et al (2014) The role of peri-hepatic drain placement in liver surgery: a prospective analysis. HPB (Oxf) 16:936–942CrossRef Butte JM, Grendar J, Bathe O et al (2014) The role of peri-hepatic drain placement in liver surgery: a prospective analysis. HPB (Oxf) 16:936–942CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishizawa T, Zuker NB, Conrad C et al (2014) Using a ‘no drain’ policy in 342 laparoscopic hepatectomies: which factors predict failure? HPB (Oxf) 16:494–499CrossRef Ishizawa T, Zuker NB, Conrad C et al (2014) Using a ‘no drain’ policy in 342 laparoscopic hepatectomies: which factors predict failure? HPB (Oxf) 16:494–499CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for Liver Surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB (Oxf) 17:46–51CrossRef Brooke-Smith M, Figueras J, Ullah S et al (2015) Prospective evaluation of the International Study Group for Liver Surgery definition of bile leak after a liver resection and the role of routine operative drainage: an international multicentre study. HPB (Oxf) 17:46–51CrossRef
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrero A, Russolillo N, Vigano L et al (2008) Safety of conservative management of bile leakage after hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2204–2211CrossRefPubMed Ferrero A, Russolillo N, Vigano L et al (2008) Safety of conservative management of bile leakage after hepatectomy with biliary reconstruction. J Gastrointest Surg 12:2204–2211CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagino M, Nishio H, Ebata T et al (2007) Intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy following hepatobiliary resection. Br J Surg 94:70–77CrossRefPubMed Nagino M, Nishio H, Ebata T et al (2007) Intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy following hepatobiliary resection. Br J Surg 94:70–77CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Role of Drain Placement in Major Hepatectomy: A NSQIP Analysis of Procedure-Targeted Hepatectomy Cases
verfasst von
Chaya Shwaartz
Adam C. Fields
Jeffrey J. Aalberg
Celia M. Divino
Publikationsdatum
13.10.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3750-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

World Journal of Surgery 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.