Key Points
Use of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) in elderly patients was safe, well tolerated and effective in reducing seizure frequency. |
The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, convulsion and hyponatraemia. |
No relationship was observed between the incidence or severity of hyponatraemia and ESL dose. |
1 Introduction
Epilepsy affects more than 50 million adults and children worldwide. The two highest peaks of incidence are in children and in the elderly population aged > 65 years. Prevalence estimates in the total population vary from 4 to 8 per 1000 subjects [1]. Focal-onset seizures (FOS), which are related to a focal brain dysfunction, are the most frequent type (~ 60% of cases). Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the major therapeutic intervention and approximately 60% of newly diagnosed patients become seizure-free on a single AED; but in about 30% of patients, seizures are not satisfactorily controlled and many patients have significant adverse events [1]. This lack of seizure control means that combination therapy is often recommended, but a sizeable proportion of patients continue to have seizures regularly despite therapy with more than one AED. Therefore, there is still a need for new, effective AEDs, particularly those that can be used safely as adjuncts to standard therapy, in order to further reduce seizure frequency.
Anzeige
Epidemiological studies of several populations have found that the incidence of seizures, epilepsy, or both, is high within the first few years of life, stabilizes over the second through fifth decades, and then rises again. The elderly is the most rapidly growing segment of the population, and incidence of epilepsy is higher in this age group than in any other. Treatment of older patients with AEDs, as with many other medications, is complicated by increased sensitivity to drug effects, altered pharmacokinetics, and an increased risk for drug interactions due to multiple drug therapy [1‐3]. Additionally, there are relatively limited data to guide the use of anti-epileptic medications and other treatments in this patient population [3].
Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a voltage-gated sodium channel blocker currently approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada, as adjunctive and monotherapy in adults for the treatment of FOS with or without secondary generalization. Paediatric indication was granted by the EMA and Health Canada as adjunctive therapy in adolescents and children aged > 6 years with FOS with or without secondary generalization. ESL was also approved by the FDA as adjunctive and monotherapy in children 4 years of age and older.
ESL is chemically related to carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, but contains molecular variations that result in differences in metabolism [4]. These metabolic differences may result in a lower potential for drug interactions, good tolerability, once-daily dosing and a simple titration regimen. In humans, eslicarbazepine (S-licarbazepine, BIA 2-194), is the major active metabolite of ESL and the entity responsible for the pharmacological effect [5]. Steady-state of eslicarbazepine plasma concentration occurs after 4 or 5 days of once-daily dosing [6, 7]. Pharmacokinetics is dependent on renal function [8], but is not significantly affected by the presence of food [9], moderate hepatic impairment [10], age [7] or gender [6].
This clinical study was a post-approval commitment with the EMA and aimed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ESL as adjunctive therapy for focal-onset seizures in elderly patients (aged 65 years or older).
Anzeige
2 Methods
2.1 Study Design
This open-label study (trial registration EudraCT No. 2009-012587-14) was conducted in 44 centres across 13 countries in Europe and Asia (2 in Austria, 5 in Bulgaria, 2 in Croatia, 7 in the Czech Republic, 4 in Germany, 3 in Malaysia, 3 in Poland, 2 in Portugal, 3 in Romania, 3 in South Korea, 4 in Spain, 2 in Taiwan and 4 in Thailand), to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of ESL as adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 65 years with FOS.
The study design consisted of an 8-week baseline period, followed by a 26-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up period. Patients were treated in the range of 400–1200 mg ESL and the recommended starting dose was 400 mg once daily for 2 weeks. Thereafter, the investigator was allowed to up- or down-titrate the ESL dose in 400-mg steps based on individual response, including safety issues. During the 4-week follow-up period, if needed, ESL could be tapered off, also in 400 mg steps, and a standard AED could be introduced. The investigator was also allowed to introduce, remove, up- or down-titrate any other AED.
ESL was administered orally, once daily (QD), at approximately the same time each day, preferably in the evening or before going to bed. The ESL 400 mg and 800 mg divisible tablets used in the study were manufactured by BIAL-Portela & Ca S.A., Coronado (S. Romão e S. Mamede), Portugal. The sample size was discussed and agreed with the EMA. A study population of 100 evaluable patients aged ≥ 65 years was considered adequate. However, due to recruitment difficulties, the sponsor agreed with the EMA to stop recruitment when 72 patients had been enrolled.
The schedule of assessments in this study included the following timing points: (1) screening visit (V1), 8 weeks ± 3 days before V2; (2) baseline visit (V2); (3) treatment period visit (V3), 2 weeks ± 3 days after V2; (4) telephone contact, 2 weeks ± 3 days after V3; (5) treatment period visit (V4), 4 weeks ± 3 days after V3; (6) treatment period visit (V5), 8 weeks ± 3 days after V4; (7) end-of-study visit (V6) or early discontinuation visit (EDV), 12 weeks ± 3 days after V5; and (8) follow-up visit (V7), 4 weeks ± 3 days after V6/EDV.
Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic data, type of epilepsy, seizure types and frequency of side effects. Changes in seizure frequency were conducted using Chi square tests or Fisher exact tests (p value < 0.05 was considered as significant).
The study was approved by the national Independent Ethics Committee and Competent Authorities. The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration, ICH Good Clinical Practice recommendations and applicable local regulations. Written informed consent was obtained for each study participant.
2.2 Population
Adult men or women (aged 65 years or older) were eligible if they had a documented diagnosis of epilepsy for at least 12 months and at least two focal seizures (including subtypes of focal aware seizures—focal impaired awareness seizures evolving to secondarily generalized) in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment, and were currently being treated with one or two AEDs (any except oxcarbazepine)—vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was considered an AED—in a stable regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to enrolment. Patients with only focal aware seizures with no motor symptomatology, primarily generalized seizures, known progressive neurological disorders and progressive dementia, history of status epilepticus or cluster seizures within the 3 months prior to enrolment were excluded. Patients with seizures of non-epileptic origin, major psychiatric disorders, history of suicide attempt, any uncontrolled disorder, clinical laboratory abnormalities as defined by the investigator and calculated creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min were also excluded. A guidance was given to the investigator regarding exclusion values for laboratory abnormalities such as plasma sodium < 130 mmol/L, alanine or aspartate aminotransferases > 2.0 times the upper limit of the normal range, or white blood cell count < 3000 cells/mm3.
2.3 Safety Assessments
Safety and tolerability were assessed through incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory evaluations, vital signs, 12-lead ECG and physical/neurological examinations. Mental sedation and intellectual impairment were assessed at baseline (V2), V5 and V6/EDV using Norris’ adapted method, four 10-point numeric rating scales. This is a numeric version of a series of 16 analogue scales described by Norris [11]. The 16 items are divided into four categories of effects (‘mental sedation and intellectual impairment’, ‘physical sedation and bodily impairments’, ‘tranquilization and calming effects’, and ‘other types of feelings and attitudes’). The four items used in this study were the ones associated with the category ‘mental sedation or intellectual impairment’.
Anzeige
Intellectual ability was also assessed at last visit (V6/EDV) using the Patient’s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Intellectual Ability, a 7-point rating scale. The cognitive mental state of patients was examined only at screening (V1) by means of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire. Suicidal ideation and behaviour was assessed at baseline, V3, V4, V5, V6/EDV and V7 using the Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
2.4 Efficacy Assessments
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients who received at least one dose of treatment and had at least one day of efficacy evaluation reported after baseline. The Safety Set (SS) consisted of all subjects who had received at least one dose of ESL. The Per-Protocol (PP) set consisted of all patients in the FAS who completed the treatment period and did not have any protocol deviation in a sufficiently serious manner to warrant data (but not patient) exclusion. Decisions regarding data exclusion from the PP set were taken prior the start of the statistical analyses in a data review meeting.
The efficacy assessments were based on occurrence (date and time) and type of seizures recorded in the patient diaries. Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 inventory (QOLIE-31) performed at baseline, V4 and V6/EDV, and PGIC of intellectual ability performed at last visit (V6/EDV), were also applied.
3 Results
3.1 Population
A total of 72 patients were allocated to study treatment and included in the SS. Of these, 50 (69.4%) completed the treatment period, while 22 (30.6%) prematurely terminated the trial. The most frequent reason for premature trial termination was the occurrence of an adverse event (16 patients, 22.2%).
Anzeige
Patients’ age ranged from 65 to 84 years, with a mean (SD) age of 71.6 (5.40) years. The patients aged 65–69 years comprised 41.7% of the SS, those aged 70–74 years and 75–79 years were 26.4% (each group), whereas the 80- to 84-year-old patients comprised 5.6% of the population. Male patients accounted for 52.8%. The majority of patients (83.3%) were Caucasian.
The mean epilepsy duration was 246.8 months, ranging from 12.2 to 850 months. The most frequently reported epilepsy aetiologies were ‘other or unknown’ (38.9% of patients), cerebrovascular disease (23.6%) and cranial trauma or injuries (11.1%), and 93.1% of the patients had at least one concomitant disease at screening. The most common concomitant diseases (in ≥ 5%) at baseline were hypertension (54.2%), dyslipidaemia (13.9%), obesity (13.9%), hypercholesterolaemia (11.1%), myocardial ischaemia (11.1%), benign prostatic hyperplasia (9.7%), depression (9.7%), insomnia (8.3%), hypothyroidism (8.3%), back pain (6.9%), and hypoacusis, decreased creatinine clearance, osteoarthritis, meningioma, cerebrovascular disorder, hemiparesis, and arteriosclerosis (5.6%, each).
The most frequently used concomitant AEDs were valproic acid (36.1% of patients), carbamazepine (31.9%), lamotrigine (25.0%) and levetiracetam (13.9%). Concomitant non-AED medication was taken by 83.3% of patients. Regarding the use of concomitant drugs (in more than one subject) that have been associated with hyponatraemia, indapamide was used by six patients (8.3%), hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide and spironolactone by three subjects (4.2%) and amiloride, hydrochlorothiazide and paroxetine were used by two patients (2.8%).
The MMSE was performed at V1 and the vast majority of patients had either normal cognitive function (68.1%) or mild cognitive impairment (26.4%). Severe cognitive impairment was reported for one subject (1.4%).
Anzeige
3.2 Safety Results
Mean treatment duration was 151.8 days and the mean ESL dose during the overall treatment period was 591.9 mg/day. The majority of patients were exposed to doses not higher than 800 mg QD. An ESL dose of 1200 mg QD was used by 10 patients (13.9% of the SS).
TEAEs, reported by ≥ 5% of patients, were dizziness (12.5%), somnolence (9.7%), fatigue, convulsion and hyponatraemia (8.3% each), nasopharyngitis (6.9%) and upper respiratory tract infection (5.6%) (Table 1). The majority of TEAEs were assessed by the investigators as mild (36.1%) to moderate (34.7%) (Table 1). In total, 16 treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported for 10 patients (13.9%). No TESAE occurred in more than one subject (Table 2). Three patients died (4.2%), one due to cardiac failure, one due to glioblastoma multiforme and one due to ischaemic stroke. None of the fatal cases were considered related to study medication, either by the investigator or by the sponsor. Sixteen (22.2%) patients prematurely discontinued the study because of TEAEs. The TEAEs leading to the discontinuation of more than one subject were hyponatraemia (3 patients), dizziness and fatigue (2 patients each). The lowest value of sodium blood measured was 120 mmol/L and all patients that experienced hyponatraemia (6/72) recovered.
Table 1
Summary of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported for the safety population (N = 72)
TEAEs | No. of patients (% of safety population) | Number of TEAEs |
|---|---|---|
All | 47 (65.3) | 152 |
Frequency of patients with TEAEs ≥ 5%, categorized by preferred term | ||
Dizziness | 9 (12.5) | 11 |
Somnolence | 7 (9.7) | 7 |
Fatigue | 6 (8.3) | 7 |
Convulsion | 6 (8.3) | 6 |
Hyponatraemia | 6 (8.3) | 6 |
Nasopharyngitis | 5 (6.9) | 5 |
Upper respiratory tract infection | 4 (5.6) | 5 |
Frequency of patients with at least one TEAE, categorized by severity | ||
Mild | 26 (36.1) | 67 |
Moderate | 25 (34.7) | 44 |
Severe | 12 (16.7) | 18 |
Not applicablea | 14 (19.4) | 23 |
Frequency of patients with at least one TEAE, categorized by System Organ Class—Investigations | ||
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | 3 (4.2) | 3 |
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | 3 (4.2) | 3 |
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Blood potassium decreased | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Blood urea increased | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
White blood cell count decreased | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Frequency of patients with at least one TEAE, categorized by System Organ Class—Metabolism and nutrition disorders | ||
Hyponatraemia | 6 (8.3) | 6 |
Hyperglycaemia | 1 (1.4) | 2 |
Hyperkalaemia | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Hyperlipidaemia | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Hypertriglyceridaemia | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Hypokalaemia | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Table 2
Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported for safety population (N = 72)
Primary System Organ Class preferred term | No. of patients (% of safety population) | Number of TEAEs |
|---|---|---|
Patients with any serious TEAE | 10 (13.9) | 16 |
Nervous system disorders | 5 (6.9) | 5 |
Altered state of consciousnessa | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Grand mal convulsiona | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Ischaemic stroke | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Lacunar infarction | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Presyncope | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Infections and infestations | 3 (4.2) | 3 |
Bronchitis | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Gastroenteritis | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Pneumonia | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Cardiac disorders | 2 (2.8) | 2 |
Cardiac failure | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Coronary artery disease | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified | 2 (2.8) | 2 |
Glioblastoma multiforme | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Prostate cancer | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Toxicity to various agentsa | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Metabolism and nutrition disorders | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Hyponatraemiaa | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Psychiatric disorders | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Postictal psychosis | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 2 (2.8) | 2 |
Upper airway obstruction | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Gastrointestinal disorders | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Gastritis | 1 (1.4) | 1 |
Of the total number of patients exposed to ESL 400 mg (n = 68), 31 (45.6%) experienced at least one TEAE while on this dose. The most commonly reported TEAEs (occurring in ≥ 3 patients) were fatigue (6 patients), dizziness, somnolence, nasopharyngitis (5 patients each), convulsion and hyponatraemia (4 patients each). For the ESL 800-mg dose, 21 (50%) of the 42 exposed patients experienced at least one TEAE while on this dose, with the most common being dizziness and blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increase (3 patients each). For the ESL 1200-mg dose, only four TEAEs were reported among three (30%) of the ten exposed patients (abdominal pain upper, prostate cancer, anxiety and urinary retention). The pattern and incidence of TEAEs was overall similar between gender and age groups, although the small number of analysed patients does not allow meaningful comparisons (see Table 1 and Table 2, respectively, in the electronic supplementary material).
Laboratory TEAEs affecting more than one subject were hyponatraemia (6 patients, 8.3%), blood CPK increased (3 patients, 4.2%) and gamma-GT increased (3 patients, 4.2%) (Table 1). Overall, 19.4% of patients experienced a sodium decrease from baseline ≥ 10 mmol/L. Post-baseline incidences of sodium levels < 130 and < 125 mmol/L were 9.7% and 1.4%, respectively. Of the 10 subjects with sodium levels < 130 mmol/L, five were receiving ESL 400 mg and five ESL 800 mg. The single subject with sodium < 125 mmol/L was receiving ESL 400 mg.
For thyroid function tests, although there were no TEAEs concerning hypothyroidism reported during the study, 24 patients (33.3%) presented post-baseline shifts from normal to low free T4 levels at any post-baseline assessment. There were no patients presenting a shift from normal to a clinically significant value for any thyroid parameter per investigators assessment. One subject had a shift from normal to clinically important free T3 low value per sponsor’s criteria. No relevant changes were observed for liver function tests.
The incidences of relevant findings for vital signs, ECG, and physical and neurological examinations were low, with no trends observed. The only significant new onset post-baseline finding from the 12-lead ECG was one case of atrial fibrillation, assessed as not related to study treatment. Rash was reported in two patients (2.8%), but neither were assessed as severe or serious.
Norris’ adapted mental sedation scales showed minor changes from baseline to last study visit in subject responses towards a slight worsening of mean values (see Table 3 in the electronic supplementary material). These results did not correlate with the subjects’ intellectual ability ratings by means of the PGIC score: approximately half of the patients reported improvements, compared with 16.9% of patients who considered values to have worsened (see Table 4 in the electronic supplementary material).
No reports of suicidality (suicidal ideation or behaviour) were observed post-baseline, as assessed by TEAEs and the C-SSRS.
3.3 Efficacy Results
The mean (SD) standardized seizure frequency decreased from 4.8 (5.53) during the 8-week baseline period to 3.6 (5.84) during the 26-week treatment period (FAS) (p = 0.1824). Although not statistically significant (p ≥ 0.05), improvements were observed for all types of seizures throughout the 26-week treatment period. By type of seizure, the mean (SD) standardized frequency decreased from 3.6 (5.43) to 3.1 (5.00) for focal aware seizures with motor component (p = 0.6883), from 3.5 (3.77) to 2.6 (4.11) for focal impaired awareness seizures with motor component (p = 0.2105), and from 1.6 (2.03) to 0.6 (1.11) for focal evolving to secondarily generalized seizures (p = 0.0594).
During the treatment period, 11 (15.5%) patients were seizure free and a total of 39 (54.9%) patients were responders; that is, reported a ≥ 50% reduction of seizure frequency relative to baseline (Table 3). Similar results were obtained when the PP set was considered.
Table 3
Summary of efficacy data during treatment period
Full analysis set (N = 71) | Per-protocol set (N = 55) | |
|---|---|---|
Proportion of seizure-free patients [n (%)] | ||
Seizure-free | 11 (15.5) | 7 (12.7) |
Not seizure-free | 60 (84.5) | 48 (87.3) |
Proportion of responders [n (%)] | ||
Responder | 39 (54.9) | 31 (56.4) |
Non-responder | 32 (45.1) | 24 (43.6) |
The mean (SD) number of days with seizures statistically significantly decreased from 4.1 (3.72) during the baseline period to 2.8 (3.97) during the treatment period (p = 0.0408).
Minimal changes were observed for all QOLIE-31 scores throughout the treatment period. Although not statistically significant (p = 0.2852), the mean (SD) overall score improved from 58.5 (14.93) at baseline to 61.3 (17.93) at the last visit. Importantly, the cognitive functioning score did not worsen over the course of treatment (mean change of + 1.3, not significant).
Thirty-three patients (46.5%) considered that their intellectual ability was ‘very much improved’, ‘much improved’ or ‘minimally improved’ in relation to baseline. Intellectual ability was considered to have worsened in the PGIC of 12 patients (16.9%) (see Table 4 in the electronic supplementary material).
4 Discussion
This open-label, single-arm, non-controlled trial investigated the safety and efficacy of ESL as adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 65 years with focal epilepsy over a 26-week treatment period. A total of 72 patients were enrolled to ESL treatment and were analysed for safety and efficacy.
The mean treatment duration was 151.8 days and the mean ESL dose during the overall treatment period was 591.9 mg/day. The overall frequency of TEAEs was 65.3%, which is comparable to that reported for the phase III studies in adults with ESL as adjunctive therapy [12‐15]. This incidence was lower when compared with oxcarbazepine [16], which reported at least one TEAE for 42 of 52 elderly patients (81%), as well as for 78/95 elderly patients (82%) exposed to zonisamide [17]. A similar trend was attained for TEAEs at least possibly related in this study (31/72 patients, 43.1%) when compared with that reported for zonisamide (53/95 patients, 55.8%) [17].
The most common TEAEs in the current trial were dizziness (12.5%), somnolence (9.7%), fatigue (8.3%), convulsion (8.3%) and hyponatraemia (8.3%). These are known common side effects of ESL, but the incidence of hyponatraemia was higher than that observed in the phase III adjunctive studies (1.5%) [14]. In fact, a small mean reduction of serum sodium level was found at week 8 in both the ESL 800-mg and ESL 1200-mg groups (− 1.6 and − 2.2 mEq/L, respectively) compared with placebo (0.1 mEq/L) [14]. In the present study, of those six subjects with a TEAE of hyponatraemia, one had reduced levels of sodium at baseline, but considered non-clinically significant, and five had normal values of sodium at baseline. Among the five patients with normal sodium levels at baseline, one had an acute episode of chronic gastritis one day after starting ESL treatment, with discontinuation of ESL on day 5. Low sodium level was measured on day 8. Two patients had hyponatraemia around week 14 of ESL treatment, one at week 6, and the fourth subject on week 23 of ESL treatment (data not presented in the results section). Despite the elderly population having the highest incidence of hyponatraemia, with higher co-morbidities, and are often medicated with drugs that may themselves lead to hyponatraemia (diuretics), no special concern is given to elderly patients when compared with other aged groups, and no dose adjustment of ESL is needed if the renal function is not disturbed [18].
The majority of TEAEs were of mild or moderate intensity, similar to those reported with other AEDs [16, 17]. Rash was uncommon, seen in two (2.8%) patients, neither of which were assessed as severe or serious. Three deaths were reported during the study (cardiac failure, glioblastoma multiforme and ischaemic stroke), but none were considered related to ESL treatment, either by the investigator or the sponsor.
The incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) (13.9%) and TEAEs leading to study discontinuation (22.2%) were higher than that observed for the phase III studies [12‐15]. This was expected given the higher incidence of comorbidities in the elderly (as observed in the study). Similar results were reported for zonisamide, with incidence of SAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuation of 12.6% and 17.9%, respectively [17], whilst 26.9% (14/52 patients) discontinued oxcarbazepine due to TEAEs [16]. Moreover, there were no different trends in the types of these events when compared with phase III studies [12‐15]: no SAE occurred in more than one subject, and the TEAEs leading to the discontinuation of more than one subject were hyponatraemia (3 patients), dizziness and fatigue (2 patients each).
Norris’ adapted mental sedation scales showed minor changes in subject responses towards a minor worsening of mean values. Slight improvements were observed for all QOLIE-31 scores throughout the treatment period. Importantly, the cognitive functioning score did not worsen over the course of treatment, and rather, was slightly improved at last study assessment. No reports of suicidality (suicidal ideation or behaviour) were observed post-baseline, as assessed by TEAEs and the C-SSRS.
The assessment of efficacy was not a primary objective of the study; nevertheless, it can be observed that the mean standardized seizure frequency decreased from 4.8 during the 8-week baseline period to 3.6 (− 35%) during the 26-week treatment period. For other seizure efficacy variables, the proportion of responders and seizure-free patients were 54.9% and 15.5%, respectively. In a 1-year observational study of add-on levetiracetam in elderly patients with focal epilepsy, the mean monthly seizure frequency decreased from 7.0 at baseline to 1.4 at 12 months, whilst seizure freedom of 58% at 12 months’ follow-up was reported [19]. As described by the authors, a potential confounder of this study was that efficacy analysis was based on the PP population (n = 364; safety population, n = 491), which might exclude patients with a negative initial treatment effect and poor tolerance. The mean duration of epilepsy was 13 years (range 0–75), whilst in the present ESL study it was about 21 years (range 1–71). In fact, the elderly patients eligible for this study represent a relatively refractory population since patients with mean epilepsy duration of 246.8 months were under treatment with one or two AEDs and had at least two focal seizures in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment. In clinical practice, most elderly patients respond favourably to monotherapy and rarely need an add-on treatment to control their seizures [3].
The efficacy results were consistent with known previous data on ESL obtained from the phase III pivotal population [14]. With regards to other adjunctive ESL studies, an analysis of patients aged > 65 years included within the ESLIBASE study showed that, at 6 months, 24.1% of elderly patients were seizure free, similarly to our findings [20]. It is also similar to a retrospective open-label study of zonisamide as monotherapy/add-on treatment in focal and primary generalized epilepsy stratified by age, where seizure freedom was achieved in 27% of elderly patients, although 36% of the elderly epileptic patients received monotherapy, and were less refractory patients [21].
The main difficulty of this study was with patient recruitment, which limited the sample size. Another limitation was the open-label, non-controlled and single-arm study design including a refractory population with variable epilepsy duration. Nevertheless, the data presented in this study could be useful for clinicians treating elderly patients with epilepsy as it offers a more realistic picture of everyday practice compared with the rigorous inclusion criteria and too-short follow-up period of controlled trials.
5 Conclusions
ESL taken once daily (400–1200 mg) as adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 65 years was found to be safe, well tolerated and efficacious. The known safety and tolerability profile of ESL was confirmed without any new findings of concern, although higher incidences of hyponatraemia were observed without relationship between its incidence or severity and ESL dose.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Funding
This study was sponsored by BIAL-Portela & Cª, S.A.
Conflict of interest
All authors were involved in the design or conduct of the study, the collection, management or analysis of the data, and the preparation or review of the manuscript. Drs Costa, Gama, Ikedo, Rocha and Soares-da-Silva are or were employees of BIAL at the time of the study. Dr Steinhoff has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by national Independent Ethics Committee and Competent Authorities. The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration, ICH Good Clinical Practice recommendations and applicable local regulations.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was received from all subjects prior to the conduct of any trial-related procedures.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.