Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2/2013

01.06.2013

Secular Versus Religious Norms Against Smoking: Which Is More Important as a Driver of Quitting Behaviour Among Muslim Malaysian and Buddhist Thai Smokers?

verfasst von: Hua-Hie Yong, Steven Savvas, Ron Borland, James Thrasher, Buppha Sirirassamee, Maizurah Omar

Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This paper prospectively examined two kinds of social normative beliefs about smoking, secular versus religious norms.

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to determine the relative importance of these beliefs in influencing quitting behaviour among Muslim Malaysian and Buddhist Thai smokers.

Methods

Data come from 2,166 Muslim Malaysian and 2,463 Buddhist Thai adult smokers who participated in the first three waves of the International Tobacco Control Southeast Asia project. Respondents were followed up about 18 months later with replenishment. Respondents were asked at baseline about whether their society disapproved of smoking and whether their religion discouraged smoking, and those recontacted at follow-up were asked about their quitting activity.

Results

Majority of both religious groups perceived that their religion discouraged smoking (78% Muslim Malaysians and 86% Buddhist Thais) but considerably more Buddhist Thais than Muslim Malaysians perceived that their society disapproved of smoking (80% versus 25%). Among Muslim Malaysians, religious, but not societal, norms had an independent effect on quit attempts. By contrast, among the Buddhist Thais, while both normative beliefs had an independent positive effect on quit attempts, the effect was greater for societal norms. The two kinds of normative beliefs, however, were unrelated to quit success among those who tried.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that religious norms about smoking may play a greater role than secular norms in driving behaviour change in an environment, like Malaysia where tobacco control has been relatively weak until more recently, but, in the context of a strong tobacco control environment like Thailand, secular norms about smoking become the dominant force.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action-control: from cognition to behaviour. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. p. 11–39. Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action-control: from cognition to behaviour. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. p. 11–39.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fekadu Z, Kraft P. Expanding the theory of planned behaviour: the role of social norms and group identification. J Health Psychol. 2002;7:33–43.PubMedCrossRef Fekadu Z, Kraft P. Expanding the theory of planned behaviour: the role of social norms and group identification. J Health Psychol. 2002;7:33–43.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishbein M, Yzer M. Using theory to design effective health behaviour interventions. Commun Theor. 2003;13:164–83. Fishbein M, Yzer M. Using theory to design effective health behaviour interventions. Commun Theor. 2003;13:164–83.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Armitage C, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:471–99.PubMedCrossRef Armitage C, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:471–99.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Conner M, Armitage C. Extending the theory of planned behaviour: a review and avenues for future research. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28:1429–64.CrossRef Conner M, Armitage C. Extending the theory of planned behaviour: a review and avenues for future research. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1998;28:1429–64.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cialdini R, Kallgren C, Reno R. A focus theory of normative conduct. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1991;24:201–34.CrossRef Cialdini R, Kallgren C, Reno R. A focus theory of normative conduct. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 1991;24:201–34.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiium N, Torsheim T, Wold B. Normative processes and adolescents’ smoking behaviour in Norway: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:1810–8.PubMedCrossRef Wiium N, Torsheim T, Wold B. Normative processes and adolescents’ smoking behaviour in Norway: a multilevel analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:1810–8.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Putte B, Yzer M, Brunsting S. Social influences on smoking cessation: a comparison of the effect of six social influence variables. Prev Med. 2005;41:186–93.PubMedCrossRef Van den Putte B, Yzer M, Brunsting S. Social influences on smoking cessation: a comparison of the effect of six social influence variables. Prev Med. 2005;41:186–93.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Albers A, Siegel M, Cheng D, Biener L, Rigotti N. Effect of smoking regulations in local restaurants on smokers’ anti-smoking attitudes and quitting behaviours. Tob Control. 2007;16:101–6.PubMedCrossRef Albers A, Siegel M, Cheng D, Biener L, Rigotti N. Effect of smoking regulations in local restaurants on smokers’ anti-smoking attitudes and quitting behaviours. Tob Control. 2007;16:101–6.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. Health Policy Ethics. 2006;96:1359–63. Alamar B, Glantz SA. Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. Health Policy Ethics. 2006;96:1359–63.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilpin E, Lee L, Pierce J. Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA. Tob Control. 2004;13:38–44.PubMedCrossRef Gilpin E, Lee L, Pierce J. Changes in population attitudes about where smoking should not be allowed: California versus the rest of the USA. Tob Control. 2004;13:38–44.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosking W, Borland R, Yong H, Fong G, Zanna M, Laux F, et al. The effects of smoking norms and attitudes on quitting intentions in Malaysia, Thailand, and four Western nations: a cross-cultural comparison. Psychol Health. 2009;24(1):95–107.PubMedCrossRef Hosking W, Borland R, Yong H, Fong G, Zanna M, Laux F, et al. The effects of smoking norms and attitudes on quitting intentions in Malaysia, Thailand, and four Western nations: a cross-cultural comparison. Psychol Health. 2009;24(1):95–107.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Swaddiwudhipong W, Chaovakiratipong C, Nguntra P, Khumklam P, Silarug N. A Thai monk: an agent for smoking reduction in a rural population. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:660–5.PubMedCrossRef Swaddiwudhipong W, Chaovakiratipong C, Nguntra P, Khumklam P, Silarug N. A Thai monk: an agent for smoking reduction in a rural population. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22:660–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yong H, Hamann S, Borland R, Fong G, Awang R, Omar M, et al. Adult smokers’ perception of the role of religion and religious leadership on smoking and association with quitting: a comparison between Thai Buddhists and Malaysian Muslims. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1025–31.PubMedCrossRef Yong H, Hamann S, Borland R, Fong G, Awang R, Omar M, et al. Adult smokers’ perception of the role of religion and religious leadership on smoking and association with quitting: a comparison between Thai Buddhists and Malaysian Muslims. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1025–31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bock E, Beeghley L, Mixon A. Religion, socioeconomic status, and sexual morality: an application of reference group theory. Sociol Quart. 1983;24:545–59.CrossRef Bock E, Beeghley L, Mixon A. Religion, socioeconomic status, and sexual morality: an application of reference group theory. Sociol Quart. 1983;24:545–59.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Merton R, Rossi A. In: Merton R, editor. Contributions to the theory of reference group behaviour. New York: Free Press; 1968. Merton R, Rossi A. In: Merton R, editor. Contributions to the theory of reference group behaviour. New York: Free Press; 1968.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Terry D, Hogg M. Group norms and the attitude-behaviour relationship: a role for group identification. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996;8:776–93.CrossRef Terry D, Hogg M. Group norms and the attitude-behaviour relationship: a role for group identification. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996;8:776–93.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson M, Fong G, Hammond D, Boudreau C, Driezen P, Hyland A. Methods of the international tobacco control four-country survey. Tob Control. 2006;15 Suppl 3:iii12–8.PubMedCrossRef Thompson M, Fong G, Hammond D, Boudreau C, Driezen P, Hyland A. Methods of the international tobacco control four-country survey. Tob Control. 2006;15 Suppl 3:iii12–8.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranney L, Melvin C, Lux L, McClain E, Lohr K. Systematic review: smoking cessation intervention strategies for adults and adults in special populations. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:845–56.PubMedCrossRef Ranney L, Melvin C, Lux L, McClain E, Lohr K. Systematic review: smoking cessation intervention strategies for adults and adults in special populations. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:845–56.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Secular Versus Religious Norms Against Smoking: Which Is More Important as a Driver of Quitting Behaviour Among Muslim Malaysian and Buddhist Thai Smokers?
verfasst von
Hua-Hie Yong
Steven Savvas
Ron Borland
James Thrasher
Buppha Sirirassamee
Maizurah Omar
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-012-9225-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 2/2013 Zur Ausgabe