Introduction
The prenatal window is a sensitive developmental period, during which the exposure to sex hormones organizes the brain with lasting neurobiological and behavioral effects. Animal experiments have established causal evidence that prenatal exposure to sex hormones influences sex-typical behavior, brain structures, and gene expression with effects that persist into adulthood [
1‐
3]. In humans, androgenization during the prenatal development is thought to sex-specifically shape adult behaviors such as risk-taking, aggression [
4‐
6], sociability [
7], reduced impulse control [
8], and emotional instability [
9]. It was also suggested to influence regional brain morphology [
10], enhanced reactivity to positive relative to negatively valenced facial cues [
11] in young males, and P2a response to motivational stimuli in a predominantly female cohort [
12]. Moreover, prenatal exposure to androgens further interacts sex-specifically with the risk for and symptoms of mental illnesses in adolescence and adulthood [
13], including addictive disorders [
14‐
16], suicidal behaviors [
17], depression [
18,
19], and eating disorders [
20‐
22]. On the brain level, this could be particularly related to the structure and function of the prefrontal cortex, which plays a central role in cognitive control, modulates these behaviors, and associates with mental illness symptoms [
23‐
28]. These relationships are also subject to sex differences [
29].
However, there is only little knowledge on how prenatal androgen load shapes human frontal brain structure during developmental sensitive periods like adolescence [
30]. Here, frontal brain regions are important for top-down cognitive control, and the temporal dissociation of the development of frontal and subcortical brain regions [
31] promotes higher risk-taking behavior and stronger sensation seeking. These behaviors increase the risk for substance abuse [
32], attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [
33], suicidal behaviors [
17], and depressive disorders [
34]. Moreover, the incidence rates of these disorders typically peak during adolescence [
35].
To investigate the effects of prenatal androgen exposure on behavioral phenotypes and brain structure, research has widely used the second-to-fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) as an easily accessible proxy for prenatal androgen exposure [
36]. Lower 2D:4D indicates higher prenatal androgenization. Males have lower 2D:4D than females [
37], the fetal amniotic testosterone / estradiol ratio correlates negatively with the children’s 2D:4D at the age of two years [
38], and higher maternal plasma testosterone collected at amniocentesis associates with lower 2D:4D in the newborn infants [
39]. Moreover, it is assumed that 2D:4D is established during the first trimester and changes only little afterwards [
40,
41] (but see also [
42‐
45]). 2D:4D does not significantly correlate with peripheral sex hormone levels in adulthood and should thus be independent from direct androgen effects [
46]. Some evidence suggests that right-hand 2D:4D (R2D:4D) might be a better marker for prenatal androgenization than left-hand 2D:4D (L2D:4D) [
37] and that R2D:4D and L2D:4D are oppositely associated with handedness [
47]. The validity of 2D:4D as a marker of prenatal androgen effects is further underlined by experimental rodent studies [
48,
49] (but see also [
50]) and human data based on conditions with altered prenatal androgen exposure such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia [
51], Klinefelter’s syndrome [
52,
53], androgen insensitivity syndrome [
54], and the twin testosterone transfer [
55]. The 2D:4D therefore is thought to give specific insight into the prenatal sex steroid milieu.
It is also important to note that research has established sex-specific associations of 2D:4D with risk for, symptoms of, and severity of mental disorders [
13]. For example, a recent meta-analysis supports lower 2D:4D in substance-related and non-substance-related addictions with stronger effects in males than in females [
14]. Supporting translational evidence established that in male mice the prenatal androgen receptor antagonism with flutamide decreases alcohol intake of the adult animals, whereas in female mice prenatal androgen treatment increases later alcohol intake. These prenatal androgen receptor modulations also cause differences in expression of genes relevant to addictive behaviors in the adult rodent brain [
3]. Moreover, externalizing symptoms [
56], aggression [
6], and suicide [
57] have been related to lower 2D:4D in males, but not in females, and higher 2D:4D has been associated with risk for and symptom severity of depression in females (but not in males) [
18,
19] and bulimia nervosa in females [
20,
21].
In summary, there is growing evidence for a sex-specific impact of prenatal androgenization (assessed via 2D:4D) on human behavior and mental health. Thus, 2D:4D should also sex-specifically associate with brain function and structure. Previously, Kallai et al. [
58] found that lower (i.e., prenatally androgenized) 2D:4D is related to smaller posterior and larger middle hippocampus volumes of the left side. However, the sample consisted of healthy adult females and frontal regions were not the targeted brain areas. We lack knowledge on how prenatal androgenization associates with frontal brain volumes, which are related to behavioral control in male and female adolescents.
Discussion
The prenatal exposure to sex hormones influences the development of the brain with effects that last into adulthood. However, there is a lack of knowledge on how prenatal androgenization shapes brain volumes in developmental sensitive periods. Especially during adolescence, frontal brain regions are important within the context of risky behavior and mental illness. The field is also subject to important sex differences. Hence, we aimed to provide novel evidence for a sex-specific role of prenatal androgenization in frontal brain control regions in an adolescent sample.
In sex-separated analyses, we found that higher prenatal androgen load (indicated by lower 2D:4D) is related to smaller r-ACC in male adolescents and larger l-IFGorb in female adolescents. In post hoc analysis, the ACC associations remained significant for R2D:4D, but not for L2D:4D. This finding is consistent with previous results suggesting that 2D:4D on the right hand might be superior than 2D:4D on the left hand to indicate prenatal androgen exposure [
37].
The functioning of the ACC is associated with impulse control, and behavioral inhibition has been associated with right-lateralized prefrontal networks [
64]. Thus, the observed association between lower 2D:4D and smaller r-ACC in male adolescents per se and
vs. female adolescents might indicate that prenatal hyperandrogenization reduces the capacity of behavioral control in males, but not in females. However, it is important to note that the investigated sample consisted of healthy adolescents without known deficits in behavioral control. We also did not directly assess behavioral control in this study, which should be a focus of future research. The ACC and related behavioral control are relevant for addictive behaviors, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and suicide. Adolescents with less top-down regulation capacity may be more vulnerable to develop substance use disorders [
31]. In young alcohol-naive adolescents, those with a high risk for alcohol use disorder due to a positive family history show less inhibitory frontal activation than those with a negative family history [
66]. Mashhoon et al. [
67] found lower cortical thickness in the right middle ACC of alcohol binge drinkers
vs. light drinkers. Moreover, the ACC is involved in processing of negative emotions [
68], and coping with depressive symptoms is a frequent goal for alcohol use in individuals with alcohol use disorder [
69]. Reduced volumes of the ACC are also involved in deficits of impulse control and cognition of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [
70]. Furthermore, lower 2D:4D (with the here identified link to frontal brain volumes) has been related to addictions [
14,
45,
71,
72], attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [
13], overactive [
8] and externalizing symptoms [
56], aggression [
4‐
6], and suicide [
17,
57,
73] in males, but not in females. Altogether, these different pieces of evidence might indicate that in males prenatal androgenization organizes frontal brain control regions with lasting reduced behavioral control capacity. Consequently, this might increase the risk to develop mental illnesses, which are more prevalent in males than females particularly regarding addictive disorders (for a review highlighting the complexity of sex differences in substance use disorder see [
74]) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. However, this model certainly needs validation in future studies. In particular, evidence on underlying causality from for example animal models and experimental modulations is needed. It will also be important to investigate whether the here observed associations between 2D:4D and frontal brain volumes are relevant to mental health in later life. Moreover, 2D:4D is related to sociability [
7]. Hence, future studies should consider interactions with social and sociocultural aspects. It will be interesting to determine how prenatal androgenization interacts with other biopsychosocial factors (e.g., peer group pressure or self-efficacy expectancy) to associate with behavioral outcomes. In addition, future research should investigate mechanisms that transfer the prenatal influences into adolescence. Epigenetics might be of special interest, as its patterns have been associated with sex hormone activities [
75,
76].
Previous research identified alcohol use and misuse as one of the main risk behaviors in relation to 2D:4D [
14,
16] and even light-to-moderate alcohol consumption associates negatively with brain volume [
77]. Thus, we analyzed whether AUDIT scores affect the here observed associations between 2D:4D and frontal brain structure. The findings remained significant after adjusting the statistical models for the AUDIT scores. Thus, it is unlikely that the observed smaller r-ACC volumes in male adolescents with higher prenatal androgenization is a consequence of alcohol use, but rather might represent a risk factor. The low AUDIT scores in our cohort of underage participants show that most participants did not use alcohol in a hazardous or harmful manner [
78], which further supports this assumption.
This study also established in female adolescents an association between higher 2D:4D (indicative of lower prenatal androgenization) and smaller l-IFGorb volumes, a frontal brain region involved in emotion processing [
79]. Smaller IFGorb volumes have been found in predominantly female samples of depression [
80,
81] and bulimia nervosa [
82], and higher 2D:4D has been associated with a higher risk and more severe symptoms of depression [
18,
19] (but see also [
83]) and bulimia [
20,
21] in females. Together with the results observed here, this might indicate that lower prenatal androgen load entails lower l-IFGorb volumes in females with an increased risk for later depressive and eating disorders. However, this assumption needs again further validation in future studies.
The results may have important preventive implications. In combination with additional markers, 2D:4D might evolve as an illness predictor (e.g., the difference between alcohol-dependent patients and controls is of moderate effect size [
14]) and thus help to identify individuals who are in particular need for targeted prevention programs. Moreover, human and animal research demonstrated that maternal smoking behavior, alcohol use, and higher stress during pregnancy are related to lower 2D:4D in the offspring [
84‐
86]. Also, early life stress appears to affect neurochemistry within frontal brain areas in a sex-dependent manner [
87]. A prospective, controlled, and investigator-blinded study is currently being conducted to test whether the reductions of cigarette smoking, consumption of alcohol, and stress in pregnant women influence 2D:4D in the offspring [
88]. Based on the results of our work here, it will be interesting to test whether the aforementioned behavioral intervention during pregnancy is also able to modulate volumes of frontal brain control regions in adolescents with preventive effects. Again, it will be important to study how prenatal androgenization interacts with environmental factors to influence brain structure and function as well as behavior and mental illnesses.
The focus on adolescence as an important developmental period of the frontal brain control areas, the sex-balanced cohort, and the sex-separated analytical approach are important strengths of our study. Moreover, all included participants were right-handed, which is important as some data indicate associations between 2D:4D and hand preference [
47,
60]. The limitations of this study include criticism regarding the validity and reliability of 2D:4D [
89‐
91]. Most studies assume that 2D:4D is a marker for the prenatal androgen milieu [
90]. However, there is evidence suggesting that estrogens are also involved in the development of 2D:4D. 2D:4D increased after prenatal estradiol treatment in male mice, and it decreased after prenatal estrogen receptor antagonism (fulvestrant) in female mice [
49]. Here, we were able to replicate the expected sex differences [
37] with lower 2D:4D in male than in female adolescents. Future research should also consider ethnicity/population [
41,
92], sexual orientation [
93], gender identity [
94], and hand preference [
47,
60] as potential confounders in 2D:4D research. As expected from the literature [
37], we further observed stronger effects on the right hand than on the left hand. In line with previous work using the same method [
94‐
97], the inter-rater agreement for 2D:4D can be interpreted as excellent with inter-rater correlation coefficients greater than 0.950. The here analyzed 2D:4D values are based on hand scans, a method which is more time consuming, but also more precise than using a caliper [
98]. We found lower 2D:4D in participants aged 16 years than in those aged 14 years, which was rather unexpected. Previous work established increases in 2D:4D between 20 and 40 months of age (based on hand scans) [
44] and from age 1 to age 17 (radiographically determined) [
42]. However, serial 2D:4D analysis in the latter study found high reliability for 2D:4D as a trait marker [
42]. In rodent experiments, the increase of prenatal testosterone entailed a delayed onset of puberty [
99]. Thus, future studies should investigate whether pubertal status influences the observed lower 2D:4D in adolescents aged 16 years than in those aged 14 years. Moreover, we dichotomized the sample into females and males according to the biological sex. Future studies are requested to consider here neglected aspects of the gender concept such as self-defined gender identity and gender expression concerning for example appearance and behavior associated with social norms [
100]. The most important limitation is that this study used a cross-sectional design, which does not allow for drawing causal conclusions. Our results suggest that AUDIT scores do not significantly influence the sex-specific associations between 2D:4D and frontal brain volumes. However, future studies should also investigate the effects of other drugs such as cannabis. It is very tempting to infer behavioral consequences from the observed associations between 2D:4D and brain structure. However, brain structure cannot simply be transferred into brain function. To better understand the direct effects of prenatal androgenization on ongoing brain development and behavioral consequences, a longitudinal design and animal experiments will be needed.