nach oben

Erschienen in:

13.10.2018 | Original Article

Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems

verfasst von: Philippe Francois, Elsa Vennat, Stéphane Le Goff, Nathalie Ruscassier, Jean-Pierre Attal, Elisabeth Dursun

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the shear bond strength (SBS) and interface between a resin composite and a new high-viscous glass ionomer cement (HV-GIC), a HV-GIC, a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RM-GIC), a bulk-fill flowable composite, and a regular flowable composite bonded with various adhesive systems.

Methods and materials

A resin composite (Filtek Z350) was bonded to a new HV-GIC (EQUIA Forte Fil) using various adhesive systems, including a universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse mode (Scotchbond Universal), a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive (Scotchbond 1-XT), a one-step self-etch adhesive (Optibond All-in-one) tested also after silane application (Monobond Plus), and a coating material (EQUIA Forte Coat). The resin composite was also bonded to a HV-GIC (Fuji IX GP), a RM-GIC (Fuji II LC), a bulk-fill flowable composite (SDR), and a regular flowable composite (Tetric Evo Flow) with the universal adhesive in self-etch mode (Scotchbond Universal). Two-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test was used to investigate the difference in SBS. Failures were analyzed by chi-square test. Bonding interfaces were examined by environmental scanning electron microscopy (E-SEM).

Results

SBS to EQUIA Forte Fil was significantly lower with Scotchbond 1-XT than with all other adhesive systems. By using Scotchbond Universal with the self-etch technique, the SBS to EQUIA Forte Fil was significantly higher than the SBS to Fuji IX GP and significantly lower than the SBS to Fuji II LC, SDR, and Tetric Evo Flow. E-SEM images showed an intimate contact at all interfaces examined.

Conclusion

EQUIA Forte Fil showed satisfactory SBS and interfaces with all adhesives tested.

Clinical relevance

Bonding between the resin composite and HV-GIC can be achieved using a universal adhesive in self-etch mode, an easy-to-use adhesive system.

Dietschi D, Spreafico R (2015) Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part I. Historical perspectives and clinical rationale for a biosubstitutive approach. Int J Esthet Dent 10:210–227PubMed

Rocca GT, Krejci I (2007) Bonded indirect restorations for posterior teeth: from cavity preparation to provisionalization. Quintessence Int 38:371–379PubMed

Zaruba M, Göhring TN, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T (2013) Influence of a proximal margin elevation technique on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 71:317–324. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.680905 CrossRefPubMed

Fragkou S, Nikolaidis A, Tsiantou D, Achilias D, Kotsanos N (2013) Tensile bond characteristics between composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer restoratives used in the open-sandwich technique. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 14:239–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0055-2 CrossRefPubMed

Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C (2004) Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dent 17:43–50

Dietschi D, Spreafico R (1998) Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthetic Dent 10:47–54 quiz 56

Kielbassa AM, Philipp F (2015) Restoring proximal cavities of molars using the proximal box elevation technique: systematic review and report of a case. Quintessence Int 46:751–764. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a34459 CrossRefPubMed

Ilgenstein I, Zitzmann NU, Bühler J, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, Weiger R, Krastl G (2015) Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays. Clin Oral Investig 19:1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-014-1325-z CrossRefPubMed

Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C (2003) In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci 111:73–80CrossRefPubMed

10.

Marchesi G, Spreafico R, Frassetto A, Turco G, Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, Breschi L (2014) Cervical margin-relocation of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crown using resin-composite. Dent Mater 30:e14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.029

11.

Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH (2001) Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113780 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Boruziniat A, Gharaee S, Sarraf Shirazi A, Majidinia S, Vatanpour M (2016) Evaluation of the efficacy of flowable composite as lining material on microleakage of composite resin restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quintessence Int 47:93–101. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a35260 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Hernandes NMAP, Catelan A, Soares GP, Ambrosano GM, Lima DA, Marchi GM, Martins LR, Aguiar FH (2014) Influence of flowable composite and restorative technique on microleakage of class II restorations. J Investig Clin Dent 5:283–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12058 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC (2015) Flowable resin composites: a systematic review and clinical considerations. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR 9:ZE18–ZE24. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12294.6129 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Baroudi K, Silikas N, Watts DC (2009) In vitro pulp chamber temperature rise from irradiation and exotherm of flowable composites. Int J Paediatr Dent 19:48–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00899.x CrossRefPubMed

16.

Koubi S, Raskin A, Dejou J, About I, Tassery H, Camps J, Proust JP (2009) Effect of dual cure composite as dentin substitute on marginal integrity of class II open-sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 34:150–156. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-29 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Roggendorf MJ, Krämer N, Dippold C, Vosen VE, Naumann M, Jablonski-Momeni A, Frankenberger R (2012) Effect of proximal box elevation with resin composite on marginal quality of resin composite inlays in vitro. J Dent 40:1068–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.019 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Heintze SD, Rousson V (2012) Clinical effectiveness of direct class II restorations - a meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent 14:407–431. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a28390 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Khoroushi M, Keshani F (2013) A review of glass-ionomers: from conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 10:411–420

20.

Lazaridou D, Belli R, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U (2015) Dental materials for primary dentition: are they suitable for occlusal restorations? A two-body wear study. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 16:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-014-0151-y CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY (2015) Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system. Oper Dent 40:134–143. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-239-C CrossRefPubMed

22.

Fukegawa D, Hayakawa S, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Osaka A, Van Meerbeek B (2006) Chemical interaction of phosphoric acid ester with hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 85:941–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608501014 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kadoma Y (2002) Surface treatment agent for dental metals using a thiirane monomer and a phosphoric acid monomer. Dent Mater J 21:156–169. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.156 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Chen L, Suh BI, Brown D, Chen X (2012) Bonding of primed zirconia ceramics: evidence of chemical bonding and improved bond strengths. Am J Dent 25:103–108PubMed

25.

Kim RJ, Woo JS, Lee IB, Yi YA, Hwang JY, Seo DG (2015) Performance of universal adhesives on bonding to leucite-reinforced ceramic. Biomater Res 19:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-015-0035-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Lee Y, Kim JH, Woo JS, Yi YA, Hwang JY, Seo DG (2015) Analysis of self-adhesive resin cement microshear bond strength on leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic with/without pure silane primer or universal adhesive surface treatment. Biomed Res Int 2015:361893. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/361893 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B (2004) Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res 83:454–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300604 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Çolak H, Tokay U, Uzgur R, Uzgur Z, Ercan E, Hamidi MM (2016) The effect of different adhesives and setting times on bond strength between Biodentine and composite. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater 14:e217–e222. https://doi.org/10.5301/jabfm.5000266 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Odabaş ME, Bani M, Tirali RE (2013) Shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to biodentine. Sci World J 2013:626103–626105. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/626103 CrossRef

30.

Zhang Y, Burrow MF, Palamara JEA, Thomas CDL (2011) Bonding to glass ionomer cements using resin-based adhesives. Oper Dent 36:618–625. https://doi.org/10.2341/10-140-L CrossRefPubMed

31.

Wexler G, Beech DR (1988) Bonding of a composite restorative material to etched glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J 33:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1988.tb04185.x CrossRefPubMed

32.

Hinoura K, Moore BK, Phillips RW (1988) Tensile bond strength between glass ionomer cements and composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 114:167–172. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0021 CrossRef

33.

Kandaswamy D, Rajan KJ, Venkateshbabu N, Porkodi I (2012) Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to glass-ionomer cement using self-etching bonding agents with different pH: in vitro study. J Conserv Dent JCD 15:27–31. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.92602 CrossRefPubMed

34.

Nurrohman H, Nakashima S, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Nikaido T, Asakawa Y, Uo M, Marshall SJ, Tagami J (2015) Immobilization of phosphate monomers on collagen induces biomimetic mineralization. Biomed Mater Eng 25:89–99. https://doi.org/10.3233/BME-141243 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Shimazu K, Karibe H, Ogata K (2014) Effect of artificial saliva contamination on adhesion of dental restorative materials. Dent Mater J 33:545–550. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-007 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Park J, Chang J, Ferracane J, Lee IB (2008) How should composite be layered to reduce shrinkage stress: incremental or bulk filling? Dent Mater 24:1501–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.013 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Cebe MA, Cebe F, Cengiz MF, Cetin AR, Arpag OF, Ozturk B (2015) Elution of monomer from different bulk fill dental composite resins. Dent Mater 31:e141–e149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.04.008 CrossRefPubMed

38.

Dursun E, Fron-Chabouis H, Attal JP, Raskin A (2016) Bisphenol a release: survey of the composition of dental composite resins. Open Dent J 10:446–453. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010446 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Sideridou ID, Achilias DS (2005) Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 74:617–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30252 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Calesini G, Micarelli C, Fabianelli A, Papacchini F (2014) The evaluation of marginal gap with and without optical aids: clinicians versus technicians. Int J Prosthodont 27:161–164. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3649 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Mamoun J (2015) Preparing and restoring composite resin restorations. The advantage of high magnification loupes or the dental surgical operating microscope. N Y State Dent J 81:18–23PubMed

42.

Magne P (2014) IDS: Immediate Dentin Sealing (IDS) for tooth preparations. J Adhes Dent 16:594. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a33324 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Panahandeh N, Torabzadeh H, Ghassemi A, Mahdian M, Akbarzadeh Bagheban A, Moayyedi S (2015) Effect of bonding application time on bond strength of composite resin to glass ionomer cement. J Dent (Tehran) 12:859–867

44.

Beriat NC, Nalbant D (2009) Water absorption and HEMA release of resin-modified glass-ionomers. Eur J Dent 3:267–272PubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V, Payan J, Moya F, Meyer JM (1999) Effect of water on the physical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 15:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00016-0

46.

Karaoğlanoğlu S, Akgül N, Ozdabak HN, Akgül HM (2009) Effectiveness of surface protection for glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and polyacid-modified composite resins. Dent Mater J 28:96–101. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.96 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Gopikrishna V, Abarajithan M, Krithikadatta J, Kandaswamy D (2009) Shear bond strength evaluation of resin composite bonded to GIC using three different adhesives. Oper Dent 34:467–471. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-009-L CrossRefPubMed

48.

Tanumiharja M, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ (2000) Microtensile bond strengths of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) cements to dentine using four conditioners. J Dent 28:361–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00009-9 CrossRefPubMed

49.

Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Mulyani (2006) Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure technique. Aust Dent J 51:175–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00423.x CrossRefPubMed

50.

Coutinho E, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Fukuda R, Snauwaert J, Nakayama Y, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Gel phase formation at resin-modified glass-ionomer/tooth interfaces. J Dent Res 86:656–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600714 CrossRefPubMed

51.

Tay KCY, Loushine BA, Oxford C, Kapur R, Primus CM, Gutmann JL, Loushine RJ, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2007) In vitro evaluation of a Ceramicrete-based root-end filling material. J Endod 33:1438–1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.07.038 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems
verfasst von: Philippe Francois
Elsa Vennat
Stéphane Le Goff
Nathalie Ruscassier
Jean-Pierre Attal
Elisabeth Dursun
Publikationsdatum: 13.10.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2678-5

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Shear bond strength and interface analysis between a resin composite and a recent high-viscous glass ionomer cement bonded with various adhesive systems