Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 1/2009

01.01.2009 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

A prospective study was designed to test the hypothesis that short-term results after hip revisions are in association with the surgical approach with lower clinical scores for the transfemoral approach.

Materials and methods

A total of 120 hip revision operations with the modular cementless revision stem “Revitan Curved” (Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland), of which 42 replacements involved an endofemoral (posterolateral) approach and 78 implantations a transfemoral approach, were followed up over a period of at least 24 months.

Results

In the early post-operative stage, stems implanted transfemoral were associated with significantly lower Harris Hip Scores and a significantly more frequent appearance of Trendelenburg signs. The differences lessened at the end of the follow-up period. Within the group of transfemoral implantation, all six stems with a circular fixation zone measuring less than 3 cm had subsided and two of these had become loose; none of the stems with greater fixation zones exhibited these properties. In the case of the endofemoral implants, three stems exhibited sinking but there did not appear to be any relationship between this event and length of fixation zone.

Conclusion

The surgical approach has an association with the short-time outcomes of hip revsions using cementless modular stems. Transfemoral implantation of the “Revitan curved” stem requires a fixation zone of at least 3 cm and a longer period of rehabilitation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bircher HP, Riede U, Lüem M, Ochsner PE (2001) Der Wert der SL-Revisionsprothese nach Wagner zur Überbrückung großer Femurdefekte. Technik und Resultate. Orthopäde 30:294–303PubMedCrossRef Bircher HP, Riede U, Lüem M, Ochsner PE (2001) Der Wert der SL-Revisionsprothese nach Wagner zur Überbrückung großer Femurdefekte. Technik und Resultate. Orthopäde 30:294–303PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Böhm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem. J Bone Joint Surg 83-A:1023–1031PubMed Böhm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem. J Bone Joint Surg 83-A:1023–1031PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Böhm P, Bischel O (2001) The uncemented diaphysal fixation of femoral revision stems in case of large bone defects—analysis of twelve years experience with the Wagner SL revision stem. Z Orthop 139:229–239PubMedCrossRef Böhm P, Bischel O (2001) The uncemented diaphysal fixation of femoral revision stems in case of large bone defects—analysis of twelve years experience with the Wagner SL revision stem. Z Orthop 139:229–239PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Böhm P, Bischel O (2004) The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Rel Res 420:148–159CrossRef Böhm P, Bischel O (2004) The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Rel Res 420:148–159CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Challgahan JJ, Slavati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 67-A:1074–1085 Challgahan JJ, Slavati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD, Ranawat CS (1985) Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 67-A:1074–1085
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA (2000) Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 82-A:1215–1219 Chen WM, McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA (2000) Extended slide trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 82-A:1215–1219
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Paprosky WG (2003) Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:2385–2390PubMed Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Paprosky WG (2003) Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:2385–2390PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dohmae Y, Bechthold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB (1988) Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 36:214–220 Dohmae Y, Bechthold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB (1988) Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 36:214–220
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan DP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMed Duncan DP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink B, Hahn M, Fuerst M, Thybaut L, Delling G (2005) Principle of fixation of the cementless modular revision stem Revitan. Unfallchirurg 108:1029–1037PubMedCrossRef Fink B, Hahn M, Fuerst M, Thybaut L, Delling G (2005) Principle of fixation of the cementless modular revision stem Revitan. Unfallchirurg 108:1029–1037PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink B, Grossmann A (2007) Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:32–55PubMedCrossRef Fink B, Grossmann A (2007) Modified transfemoral approach to revision arthroplasty with uncemented modular revision stems. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:32–55PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M (2007) A modified transfemoral approach using modular cementless revision stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:105–114PubMedCrossRef Fink B, Grossmann A, Schubring S, Schulz MS, Fuerst M (2007) A modified transfemoral approach using modular cementless revision stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:105–114PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Glassman AH (2004) Exposure for revision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:39–47PubMedCrossRef Glassman AH (2004) Exposure for revision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:39–47PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE (1997) Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:187–197PubMedCrossRef Grünig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE (1997) Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:187–197PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS (1988) Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:111–119PubMed Gustilo RB, Pasternak HS (1988) Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:111–119PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hartwig C-H, Böhm P, Czecg U, Reize P, Küsswetter W (1996) The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:5–9PubMedCrossRef Hartwig C-H, Böhm P, Czecg U, Reize P, Küsswetter W (1996) The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115:5–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hedley AD, Gruen TA, Ruoff OP (1988) Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porous-coated anatomic components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:75–90PubMed Hedley AD, Gruen TA, Ruoff OP (1988) Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porous-coated anatomic components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:75–90PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Huffman GR, Ries MD (2003) Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:273–277PubMed Huffman GR, Ries MD (2003) Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:273–277PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R (2000) The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 24:139–142PubMedCrossRef Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R (2000) The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 24:139–142PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlsted B (1996) The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5–5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 67:541–544PubMedCrossRef Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlsted B (1996) The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. 31 hips followed for 1.5–5 years. Acta Orthop Scand 67:541–544PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG (1997) 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revisions surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:839–847PubMedCrossRef Krishnamurthy AB, MacDonald SJ, Paprosky WG (1997) 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revisions surgery. J Arthroplasty 12:839–847PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Béguec P (2000) Système PFM-revision pour reprise d’une prothèse fémorale descellée. Maîtrise orthopédique 91 Le Béguec P (2000) Système PFM-revision pour reprise d’une prothèse fémorale descellée. Maîtrise orthopédique 91
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mardones R, Gonzalez C, Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2005) Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications. J Arthroplasty 20:79–83PubMedCrossRef Mardones R, Gonzalez C, Cabanela ME, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ (2005) Extended femoral osteotomy for revision of hip arthroplasty: results and complications. J Arthroplasty 20:79–83PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Miner TM, Momberger NG, Chong D, Paprosky WL (2001) The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty 16:188–194PubMedCrossRef Miner TM, Momberger NG, Chong D, Paprosky WL (2001) The extended trochanteric osteotomy in revision hip arthroplasty: a critical review of 166 cases at mean 3-year, 9-month follow-up. J Arthroplasty 16:188–194PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Moreland JR, Bernstein ML (1995) Femoral revison hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Rel Res 319:141–150 Moreland JR, Bernstein ML (1995) Femoral revison hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Rel Res 319:141–150
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Paprosky WG, Lawrence J, Cameron H (1990) Femoral defect classification. Clinical application. Orthop Rev 19(Suppl):9–15 Paprosky WG, Lawrence J, Cameron H (1990) Femoral defect classification. Clinical application. Orthop Rev 19(Suppl):9–15
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:230–242PubMedCrossRef Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J (1999) Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 369:230–242PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW Jr (2001) Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:181–193PubMedCrossRef Paprosky WG, Weeden SH, Bowling JW Jr (2001) Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:181–193PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters PC Jr, Head WC, Emerson RH Jr (1993) An extended trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 75-Br:158–159 Peters PC Jr, Head WC, Emerson RH Jr (1993) An extended trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 75-Br:158–159
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Sieber HP, Le Bèguec P (2001) Einsatz des PFM-R-Schaftes bei Revisionseingriffen. In: Perka C, Zippel H (eds) Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenkes. Schaftrekonstruktion und perioperatives Management. Einhorn-Presse Verlag, pp 174–184 Sieber HP, Le Bèguec P (2001) Einsatz des PFM-R-Schaftes bei Revisionseingriffen. In: Perka C, Zippel H (eds) Revisionsendoprothetik des Hüftgelenkes. Schaftrekonstruktion und perioperatives Management. Einhorn-Presse Verlag, pp 174–184
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner H (1987) Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk bei schwerem Knochenverlust. Orthopäde 16:295–300PubMed Wagner H (1987) Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk bei schwerem Knochenverlust. Orthopäde 16:295–300PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner H (1989) Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk. Orthopäde 18:438–453PubMed Wagner H (1989) Revisionsprothese für das Hüftgelenk. Orthopäde 18:438–453PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Wagner H, Wagner M (1997) Hüftprothesenwechsel mit der Femur-Revisionsprothese. Erfahrungen von 10 Jahren. Med Orthop Tech 117:138–148 Wagner H, Wagner M (1997) Hüftprothesenwechsel mit der Femur-Revisionsprothese. Erfahrungen von 10 Jahren. Med Orthop Tech 117:138–148
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Warren PJ, Thompson P, Flechter MDA (2002) Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:557–560PubMed Warren PJ, Thompson P, Flechter MDA (2002) Transfemoral implantation of the Wagner SL stem. The abolition of subsidence and enhancement of osteotomy union rate using Dall-Miles cables. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:557–560PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R (2002) Femoral revision using the Wagener stem: results at 2–9 years. Int Orthop 26:36–39PubMedCrossRef Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R (2002) Femoral revision using the Wagener stem: results at 2–9 years. Int Orthop 26:36–39PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Weeden SH, Paprosky WG (2002) Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):134–137PubMedCrossRef Weeden SH, Paprosky WG (2002) Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17(4 Suppl 1):134–137PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkes RA, Birch J, Pearse MF, Lee M, Atkins RM (1994) The Wagner technique for revision arthroplasty of the hip: a review of 24 cases. J Orthop Rheum 7:196–198 Wilkes RA, Birch J, Pearse MF, Lee M, Atkins RM (1994) The Wagner technique for revision arthroplasty of the hip: a review of 24 cases. J Orthop Rheum 7:196–198
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Wirtz DC, Niethard FU (1997) Ursachen, Diagnostik und Therapie der aseptischen Hüftendoprothesenlockerung—eine Standortbestimmung. Z Orthop 135:270–280PubMed Wirtz DC, Niethard FU (1997) Ursachen, Diagnostik und Therapie der aseptischen Hüftendoprothesenlockerung—eine Standortbestimmung. Z Orthop 135:270–280PubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG (1995) Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:329–338PubMedCrossRef Younger TI, Bradford MS, Magnus RE, Paprosky WG (1995) Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:329–338PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2009
Erschienen in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2009
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0617-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2009

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 1/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.