Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2015

Open Access 01.12.2015 | Poster presentation

Skin side effects of chlorine solutions used for hand hygiene: a systematic review

verfasst von: Z Kubilay, J Hopman, T Allen, H Edrees, B Allegranzi

Erschienen in: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control | Sonderheft 1/2015

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Introduction

Chlorine solutions (CS), mostly containing sodium hypochlorite (SH), have been widely used for hand hygiene (HH) in the West African countries affected by the Ebola outbreak due to unavailability of alcohol-based handrub solutions and soap, easiness of use and “fear” factors leading to (false) sense of safety given by using an easily available disinfectant. However, no HH guidelines recommend the use of CS and concerns have been raised about skin tolerability among users.

Objectives

We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether the use of CS causes skin side effects when used for HH.

Methods

PubMed and EMBASE were searched on 26/09/14 with no time, age, human, language or geographical restrictions. Contact Dermatitis journal and the reference lists of relevant articles were also screened separately.

Results

Out of 3241 hits, 14 articles about skin side effects were included; 10 case reports, 3 surveys and one comparative study. Only one case report was related to the use of SH 4-6% for HH by a veterinary surgeon who developed allergic contact dermatitis (CD) with a positive patch test to SH at dilutions 100 times lower than 4-6 %. In 5 case reports, CD with a variable severity was reported following use of SH for disinfection (2 papers) and for domestic cleaning (3papers); these cases had positive patch tests for SH; conversely, their experimental control groups showed either no reaction or very low-intensity skin reactions. Two papers reported severe dermatitis related to environmental cleaning with SH, and 2 others reported unusual systemic allergic reactions with accidental exposure and bathing the foot. One comparative study showed that SH was the most irritating product even at low concentrations when compared to alcohol, chlorhexidine and iodine. Finally, one survey among 706 nurses showed that 33.5% of cases of allergic or irritant CD had a history of chlorine exposure; 2 other surveys among cleaners showed higher prevalence of hand dermatitis with SH exposure.

Conclusion

Overall, only one report described allergic CD related to use of high-concentration CS for HH. Very low-quality evidence shows that SH used for other purposes might cause skin irritations even at low concentrations following bare skin exposure.

Disclosure of interest

None declared.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Metadaten
Titel
Skin side effects of chlorine solutions used for hand hygiene: a systematic review
verfasst von
Z Kubilay
J Hopman
T Allen
H Edrees
B Allegranzi
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
BioMed Central
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-4-S1-P9

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2015

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Mehr Lebenszeit mit Abemaciclib bei fortgeschrittenem Brustkrebs?

24.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

In der MONARCHE-3-Studie lebten Frauen mit fortgeschrittenem Hormonrezeptor-positivem, HER2-negativem Brustkrebs länger, wenn sie zusätzlich zu einem nicht steroidalen Aromatasehemmer mit Abemaciclib behandelt wurden; allerdings verfehlte der numerische Zugewinn die statistische Signifikanz.

ADT zur Radiatio nach Prostatektomie: Wenn, dann wohl länger

24.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Welchen Nutzen es trägt, wenn die Strahlentherapie nach radikaler Prostatektomie um eine Androgendeprivation ergänzt wird, hat die RADICALS-HD-Studie untersucht. Nun liegen die Ergebnisse vor. Sie sprechen für länger dauernden Hormonentzug.

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

So sicher sind Tattoos: Neue Daten zur Risikobewertung

22.05.2024 Melanom Nachrichten

Das größte medizinische Problem bei Tattoos bleiben allergische Reaktionen. Melanome werden dadurch offensichtlich nicht gefördert, die Farbpigmente könnten aber andere Tumoren begünstigen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.