nach oben

Journal of Religion and Health

Erschienen in:

01.09.2013 | Original Paper

Spirituality and Support: A Descriptive Analysis of Online Social Support for Depression

verfasst von: David M. Keating

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study examined supportive messages in spiritual and non-spiritual online support groups for depression. Both social support and religiosity have been associated with reduced depressive symptomology. Proportions of three types of support (i.e., informational, emotional, and network) were considered; messages were further delineated as being either religious or non-religious in nature. Messages (N = 2,674) from two Christian and two unaffiliated online groups were analyzed. Results indicated that Christian groups communicated more informational support and General groups communicated more network support. Christian groups communicated more religious messages. This and future research is valuable to practitioners and clergy aiding depressed individuals and to the literature on social support and religion.

The coding system includes two additional categories: Tangible aid (i.e., providing goods or services) and esteem support (i.e., communicating respect for and confidence in another). However, these are not relevant to online groups (Bambina 2007). In particular, tangible aid is extremely difficult to enact; because online groups are characterized by anonymity and geographical space, members are severely limited in their ability to “provide goods or services needed in the stressful situation” (Cutrona and Suhr 1992, p. 159). Also, esteem support, as it is conceptualized above, may be considered as a subcategory of emotional support, rather than its own supra-category (Bambina 2007); validation of others’ abilities is intrinsically an appeal to their self-efficacy and control, which implies encouragement, care, or concern.

All random assignment procedures were conducted using a random number generator.

The names of these groups have been changed to protect confidentiality. For any excerpts included, specific members are not identified; instead, fictional names are used. Additionally, it appears that since the data were collected, one group has restricted its use to members only and one group has been disassembled.

Although the esteem support subcategories of “compliment” and “relief of blame” were removed per Bambina (2007), “validation” was considered a sub-category of emotional support.

Two-tailed tests were used in all analyses in order to detect any differences that were opposite of those predicted.

Albrecht, T. L., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2003). Social support, social networks, and health. In A. Dorsey, K. I. Miller, R. Parrott, & T. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 263–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Argyle, M. (2000). Psychology and religion: An introduction. New York: Routledge.

Bambina, A. (2007). Online social support: The interplay of social networks and computer mediated communication. New York: Cambria Press.

Beck, A. T., & Alford, B. A. (2009). Depression: Causes and treatment. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Bower, B. (2003). US survey probes depression care. Science News, 164, 29.

Braithwaite, D. O., Waldron, V. R., & Finn, J. (1999). Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Communication, 11, 123–151.PubMedCrossRef

Burleson, B. R., Albrecht, T. L., & Sarason, I. G. (Eds.). (1994). Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cutrona, C. E., & Suhr, J. A. (1992). Controllability of stressful events and satisfaction with spouse support behaviors. Communication Research, 19, 154–174.CrossRef

Fiala, W. E., Bjorck, J. P., & Gorsuch, R. (2002). The religious support scale: Construction, validation, and cross-validation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 761–786.PubMedCrossRef

Fox, S., & Jones, S. (2009). The social life of health information. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org.

Haber, J. R., Jacob, T., & Spangler, D. J. C. (2007). Dimensions of religion/spirituality and relevance to health research. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 265–288.CrossRef

Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43–56.CrossRef

Kehoe, N. C. (1998). Religion and mental health from the Catholic perspective. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 211–223). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef

Kleman, E. E., Everett, M. K., & Egbert, N. (2009). Social support strategies among women of faith. Journal of Communication and Religion, 32, 157–193.

Koenig, H. G. (Ed.). (1998). Handbook of religion and mental health. San Diego: Academic Press.

Koenig, H. G., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Religion and mental health: Evidence for an association. International Review of Psychiatry, 13, 67–68.CrossRef

Koenig, H. G., & Pritchett, J. (1998). Religion and psychotherapy. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 323–336). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef

Kral, G. (2006). Online communities for mutual help: Fears, fiction, and facts. In M. Murero & R. E. Rice (Eds.), The Internet and health care: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 215–232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Krause, N., Ellison, C. G., Shaw, B. A., Marcum, J. P., & Boardman, J. D. (2001). Church-based social support and religious coping. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 647–656.CrossRef

Laurencelle, R. M., Abell, S. C., & Schwartz, D. J. (2002). The relation between intrinsic religious faith and psychological well-being. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 12, 109–123.CrossRef

Levin, J. S., & Chatters, L. M. (1998). Research on religion and mental health: An overview of empirical findings and theoretical issues. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 33–50). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef

Lieberman, M. A., & Winzelberg, A. (2009). The relationship between religious expression and outcomes in online support groups: A partial replication. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 690–694.CrossRef

Macias, W., Lewis, L. S., & Smith, T. L. (2005). Health-related message boards/chat rooms on the web: Discussion content and implications for pharmaceutical sponsorships. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 209–223.PubMedCrossRef

Malony, H. N. (1998). Religion and mental health from the Protestant perspective. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 203–210). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef

National Cancer Institute. (2007). HINTS: Health information national trends survey. Retrieved from http://hints.cancer.gov/hints/.

Nooney, J. G. (2005). Religion, stress, and mental health adolescence: Findings from Add Health. Review of Religious Research, 46, 341–354.CrossRef

Pargament, K. I., & Brant, C. R. (1998). Religion and coping. In H. G. Koenig (Ed.), Handbook of religion and mental health (pp. 111–128). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRef

Rains, S. A., & Young, V. (2009). A meta-analysis of research on formal computer-mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35, 309–336.CrossRef

Shaw, B., Han, J. Y., Kim, E., Gustafson, D., Hawkins, R., Cleary, J., et al. (2007). Effects of prayer and religious expression within computer support groups on women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 676–687.PubMedCrossRef

Tanis, M. (2007). Online social support groups. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology (pp. 139–153). New York: Oxford University Press.

Tichon, J. G., & Shapiro, M. (2003). With a little health from my friends: Children, the internet, and social support. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 21, 73–92.CrossRef

Wright, K. B., & Bell, S. B. (2003). Health-related support groups on the internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology, 8, 39–54.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Spirituality and Support: A Descriptive Analysis of Online Social Support for Depression
verfasst von: David M. Keating
Publikationsdatum: 01.09.2013
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9577-x

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Is the Connection Between Religiosity and Psychological Functioning Due to Religion’s Social Value? A Failure to Replicate

Negotiating Health-Related Uncertainties: Biomedical and Religious Sources of Information and Support

Beliefs About Tobacco, Health, and Addiction Among Adults in Cambodia: Findings from a National Survey

A Journey Toward Wholeness, a Journey to God: Physical Fitness as Embodied Spirituality

Linking Religion and Spirituality with Psychological Well-being: Examining Self-actualisation, Meaning in Life, and Personal Growth Initiative

Role of Religious Attendance and Identity Conflict in Psychological Well-being