Background
Methods
The REMARK profile
Part a: Patients, treatments, and variables | ||||
Study and marker | Remarks | |||
Marker handled | = NPI Continuous and categorical. Cutpoints as predefined in the literature. For details see Blamey et al. [27] in [16] | |||
Further variables | v1 = Tumor size, v2 = no. of pos. Lymph nodes, v3 = tumor grade, v4 = age, v5 = histology, v6 = hormone receptor status, v7 = menopausal status, v8 = vessel invasion, v9 = lymphatic vessel invasion | |||
Patients | n | Remarks | ||
Assessed for eligibility | 2062 | Disease: primary breast cancer Patient source: Database Surgical clinic Charité, Berlin. All patients with surgery from 1st Jan. 1984 to 31st Dec. 1998. | ||
Excluded | 502 | 63 metastasis, 73 previous carcinomas other than breast cancer, 86 primary breast cancer prior to the study, 134 breast cancer in situ, 8 pt0, 123 older than 80 years, 20 neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, 71 death within the first months of surgery, three or more standard prognostic factors missing. For some patients, more than one exclusion criterion applied | ||
Included | 1560 | Previously untreated. Treatment: local therapy: BCT or mastectomy with or without radiotherapy, adjuvant therapy: chemo (y/n), hormone (y/n). For details see, Add file 1 and table 2 in Winzer et al. [28] in [16] | ||
Outcome events | 221 | Overall survival: death from any cause | ||
Part b: Statistical analysesh | ||||
Analysis | Patients | Events | Variables considered | Results/remarks |
IDA 1a: imputation for missing values | 1560 | NRb | v1(94), v2 (68), v3(217), v6(490), v7(54) | Variables (number of patients) with imputed values |
A1c: NPI (3) | 1560 | 221 | NPI | Prognostic value of NPI in 3 categories (Tables 2 and 3, Fig. 1) |
A2: NPI (6) | 1560 | 221 | NPI | 6 categories (Fig. 1, Table 3) |
C1d: check of PHe in NPI (3) and in NPI (6) | 1560 | 221 | NPI | Fig. 2, S4 and non-significant result of FPTf (see last paragraph 4.2) |
A3: NPIcont | 1560 | 221 | NPI | More information from continuous data? (Table 3) |
C2: NPIcont. has a linear effect | 1560 | 221 | NPI | FP2 function not significantly better, see 4.3.1 |
C3: check of PHe in NPIcont | 1560 | 221 | NPI | Non-significant result of FPTf (see last paragraph 4.3.1) |
A4: MFP7 of the three NPI variables (univ. and multivariable) | 1560 | 221 | v1, v2, v3 | Table 4 |
A5: functional form for nodes | 1560 | 221 | v2 | Fig. 3 |
A6: prognostic value and additional value of further variables (univ. and multiv.) | 1560 | 221 | NPI, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9 | Table 5, Fig. 4 |
A7: MFP using all available information | 1560 | 221 | v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9 | Final MFP model in Table 6, see 4.5 |
A8: measures of separation | 1560 | 221 | NPI, v1, v2, v3, v4, v5, v6, v7, v8, v9 | Table 7, see 4.6 |
C4: check of PHe in MFP model | 1560 | 221 | v1, v2, v3, v6 | Non-significant result of FPTf (see end of 4.5) |
Part a: Patients, treatments, and variables | ||||
Study and marker | Remarks | |||
Marker | M = main predictor | |||
Further variables | v1, v2, v3, etc. | |||
Patients | n | Remarks | ||
Assessed for eligibility | Disease | |||
Patient source | ||||
Excluded | Numbers and reasons for exclusions | |||
Included | Inclusion criteria | |||
Outcome(s) and number of events | Overall, perhaps also in subgroups | |||
Part b: Statistical analyses | ||||
Analysis | Patients | Events | Variables considered | Results/remarks |
IDA: initial data analysis | n | m | V1, V2, ... | For example, description of patient characteristics, data screening, handling of missing data |
A1: univariable analysis of M | M | Page in manuscript, table, or figure | ||
A2: model 1 or subgroup or sensitivity analysis | ||||
C1: model evaluation or diagnostics, check of assumptions | ||||
A3: model 2 | ||||
P1: presentation of function |
Selected papers
Results
Selected profiles to illustrate weaknesses of current reporting and advantages of the REMARK profile
Examples of better-reported studies
Part a: Patients, treatment, and variables | |||||
Patients: consecutively selected patients treated for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) at 16 medical centers in 8 countries (USA, Italy, Poland, Japan, Australia, Spain, Czech Rep, South Korea), over differing time periods spanning 1978-2011. | |||||
? | Patients assessed | ||||
? | Patients excluded | ||||
2099 | Patients included for analysis, subgroups by v8 (v8-S1: CPTC, n = 1448; v8-S2: FVPTC, n = 431), v9 (v9-S1: stage I, n = 1273; v9-S2: stage II, n = 234), and v4 (v4-S1: tumor size ≤ 1.0 cm, n = 534) Missing data not mentioned—appears to have been none | ||||
Treatment and follow-up: total thyroidectomy and neck dissection in all patients, postoperative hormone suppression, and radioiodine ablation (in all centers except the Japanese center). Median follow-up 36 months (IQR 14 to 75 months) | |||||
Marker: | M = BRAF V600E mutation (positive/negative) | ||||
Outcome (events) | Recurrence free survival (RFS, events overall: n = 338; in subgroups: v8-S1: n = 247, v8-S2: n = 43, v9-S1: n = 119, v9-S2: n = 32, v4-S1: n = 57). Expressed as both a proportion of recurrences, and as rate of recurrence per 1000 person-years of follow-up | ||||
Further variables | v1 = age, v2 = sex, v3 = medical center, v4 = tumor size, v5 = extrathyroidal invasion, v6 = lymph node metastasis, v7 = multifocality, v8 = PTC subtype, v9 = tumor stage Adjustment model 2: v1–v3; model 3: v1–v8 | ||||
Part b: Statistical analysis of survival outcomes | |||||
Aim | n | Outcome (events) | Variables considered | Results/remarks | |
Ch1: check of proportional hazards assumption after initially fitting models A2 and A3 | Led to stratification by medical center (v3) and revision of these analyses | ||||
IDA1: computation of rates of recurrence per 1000 person-years | Total and all subgroups | Displayed in Tables 2 and 4 and A3 | |||
A1: univariable unadjusted model 1 | All | 2099 | RFS (338) | M | Poisson regression p-values and CI; Cox regression HR, CI: Table 2; Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence-free survival, p-values: Fig. 1 |
v8-S1 | 1448 | RFS (247) | |||
v8-S2 | 431 | RFS (43) | |||
A2: multivariable model 2 | All | 2099 | RFS (338) | M, v1–v3 | p-values, HR, CI, Table 2 |
v8-S1 | 1448 | RFS (247) | |||
v8-S2 | 431 | RFS (43) | |||
A3: multivariable model 3 | All | 2099 | RFS (338) | M, v1–v8 | p-values, HR, CI, Table 2 |
v8-S1 | 1448 | RFS (247) | |||
v8-S2 | 431 | RFS (43) | |||
A4: sensitivity analysis, excluding patients with < 3 year follow-up, no recurrence | ? | RFS ? | M | Results p.44 text. Data not shown | |
A5: interaction of M with conventional risk factors, univariable | 2099 | RFS (338) | M, v1 (dichotomized), v5, v6 | Kaplan-Meier estimates, p-values, Fig. 2, Synergy Index, CI, Table 3 | |
A6: low-risk patients, unadjusted model 1 | v9-S1 | 1273 | RFS (119) | M | Poisson regression p-values and CI; Cox regression HR, CI: Table 4 |
v9-S2 | 234 | RFS (32) | |||
v4-S1 | 534 | RFS (57) | |||
A7: low-risk patients, multivariable model 2 | v9-S1 | 1273 | RFS (119) | M, v1–v3 | p-values, HR, CI, Table 4 |
v9-S2 | 234 | RFS (32) | |||
v4-S1 | 534 | RFS (57) | |||
A8: low-risk patients, multivariable model 3 | v9-S1 | 1273 | RFS (119) | M, v1–v8 | p-values, HR, CI, Table 4 |
v9-S2 | 234 | RFS (32) | |||
v4-S1 | 534 | RFS (57) | |||
A9: univariable model in v4 subgroups | Varies by subgroup | RFS (varies) | M | p-values, HR, CI, Tab. A2 | |
A10: univariable model for 35 subgroups by v1, v2, and v8 | Varies by subgroup | RFS (Varies) | M | HR, CI, Tab. A4 |
Part a: Patients, treatment, and variables | |||||
Patients: diagnosis of primary breast cancer 2002–2011 at Skåne University Hospital Lund, Sweden | |||||
1045 51 994 | Patients assessed Patients excluded (treatment prior to surgery) Patients included for descriptive analysis | ||||
46 | Patients additionally excluded (in situ carcinoma, 38; metastatic spread within 3 months, 8) | ||||
948 | Patients included for predictive analysis of the risk of an early breast cancer (BC) event | ||||
Treatment and follow-up: standard care. Follow-up up to 9 years (until December 2012); median 3.03 years (IQR 1.93–5.23) | |||||
Markers | Oral contraceptive (OC) use: M1 = ever OC use (yes/no) M2 = se before age 20 (yes/no) M3 = OC use before first child (yes/no) M4 = OC start 1974 or later (proxy for dose) (yes/no) M5 = duration of OC use (continuous) | ||||
Outcomes (events) | Breast cancer events (BCE) (100): distant metastasis (DM) (65) | ||||
Variables | v1 = age, v1_c50 = age ≥ 50 (proxy for menopause), v2 = tumor sizea, v3 = gradeb, v4 = nodal involvement, v5 = hormone receptor status, v6 = BMI9, v7 = endocrine treatment | ||||
Missing data | |||||
Part b: Statistical analysis of survival outcomes | |||||
Aim | n | Events | Outcome | Variables considered | Results/remarks |
IDA1: data screening and definitions of categories | 994 | NA | M1, M2, M3 | Stat. methods. Definition of markers (categorization of OC use) | |
IDA2: descriptive | 994 | NA | OC use categories (M1, M2, M3) | v1–6, plus 12 descriptive-only variables | Table 1 (patient characteristics), Table 2 (tumor characteristics) |
A1: multivariable | 948 | 100 | BCE | M1, M2, M3, v1-v6 | Reported only in the text (no data provided), p.508 first column |
A2: univariable/multivariable subgroup v1_c50 ≥ 50 | 760 | 70 | BCE | M1, M2, M3, v1–v6 | For M2: Fig. 2a, Table 3. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and HR. M1 and M3 non-significant and reported only in the text, p.508 first column |
A3: univariable/multivariable subgroup v1_c50 < 50 | 188 | 30 | BCE | M1, M2, M3, v1–v6 | For M2: Fig. 2b, Table 3. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and HR. M1 and M3 non-significant and reported only in the text, p.508 first column |
A4: multivariable subgroup v1_c50 ≥ 50 | ? | ? | DM | M2; v1–v6 | Reported in the text, no data provided: p.508 second column |
A5: multivariable subgroup v1_c50 < 50 | ? | ? | DM | M2; v1–v6 | Log-rank and HR in text, p.508 second column |
A6: multivariable | 948 | 100 | BCE | M4; v1–v6 | HR in text, p.508 second column |
A7: multivariable subgroup v1_c50 ≥ 50 | 760 | 70 | BCE | M4, M5; v1–v6 | HR in text, p.508 second column |
A8: multivariable subgroup v1_c50 < 50 | 188 | 30 | BCE | M4, M5; v1–v6 | HR in text, p.508 second column |
A9: multivariable subgroup v7 (TAM treatment), v1_c50 (age ≥ 50), v5 (ER+) | 372 | 29 | BCE | M1; v1–v7 | Fig. 3a. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and HR—adjusted for tumor and patient characteristics and aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment |
A10: multivariable subgroup v7 (AI treatment), v1_c50 (age ≥ 50), v5 (ER+) | 277 | 26 | BCE | M1; v1–v7 | Fig. 3b. Kaplan-Meier, log-rank, and HR—adjusted for tumor and patient characteristics and tamoxifen (TAM) treatment |
Examples of inadequately reported studies
Part a: Patients, treatment, and variables | ||||
Patients: treated for primary prostate cancer at the Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Austria, 2003–2007 | ||||
> 700 | Patients assessed | |||
> 439 | Patients excluded (did not meet below criteria, as well as those with a follow-up of < 4 months)a | |||
261 | Patients included for analysis (histologically confirmed primary prostate cancer + pre-treatment CRP levels taken) | |||
Treatment and follow-up: 3D radiation therapy in curative intent; median follow-up 80 months | ||||
Markers | M = pre-treatment CRP (continuous variable; analyses for dichotomized or categorical data, based on optimal cutpoints) | |||
Outcomes (events) | CSS—primary outcome (24), OS (59), DFS (56) | |||
Further variables | v1 = age at diagnosis, v2 = PSA at diagnosis, v3 = tumor stage, v4 = Gleason score, v5 = risk groupb, v6 = total duration of ADT | |||
Part b: Statistical analysis of survival outcomes | ||||
Aim | n | Outcome (events) | Variables considered | Results/remarks |
IDA1: correlations | Variesc | M, v1–v5 | Results p.613 first column | |
IDA2: determination of optimal cutpoint for M | 261 | CSS (24) | M | CRP dichotomised into high (≥ 8.6 mg 1−1) and low (< 8.6 mg -−1) |
A1: univariable survival analysis | 261 | A1.1 CSS (24) A1.2 OS (59) A1.3 DFS (56) | M | Kaplan-Meier estimates, Figs. 1, 2, and 3 |
A2: univariable associations | Varies | A2.1 CSS (24) A2.2 OS (59) A2.3 DFS (56) | M, v1, v2, v3, v4, v6 | HR, CI, p-values, Tables 2, 3, and 4 |
A3: multivariable (including v. from A2.1, A2.2, and A2.3 with p<.05) | ? | CSS (?) OS (?) DFS (?) | M, v2, v3, v4, v6 | HR, CI, p-values, Table 2 (CSS), Table 3 (OS), Table 4 (DFS) |
A4: univariable, high risk (v5) | 144 | A4.1 CSS (?) A4.2 OS (?) A4.3 DFS (?) | M | HR, CI, p-value, Table 5 |
A5: multivariable, high risk (v5) | 144 | A5.1 CSS (?) A5.2 DFS (?) | M, v6 | HR, CI, p-value, Table 5d |
A6: univariable, intermediate risk (v5) | 66 | A6.1 CSS (?) A6.2 OS (?) A6.3 DFS (?) | M | p-values in text, p.615 first column (all n.s.) |
A7: univariable, low risk (v5) | 51 | A7.1 CSS (?) A7.2 OS (?) A7.3 DFS (?) | M | p -values in text, p.615 first column (all n.s.) |
IDA3: cutpoint determination for M in subgroups of v5 | 261 | CSS (24) | M | CRP categorized with cutoff values of 8.9, 8.4, and 13.4 for the v5 risk groups |
A8: univariable by v5 subgroups | 144/66/51 | A8.1 high-risk, CSS (?) A8.2 intermediate-risk, CSS (?) A8.3 low-risk, CSS (?) | M | No data shown, p.615 first column (findings same as A4.1, A6.1, and A7.1) |
IDA4: cutpoint determination for M in subgroups of v6e | 261 | CSS (24) | M | CRP dichotomized with cutoff values of 6.7 and 8.9 for patients with and without ADT |
A9: univariable by v6 subgroups | ?/? | A9.1 CSS (?) A9.2 OS (?) A9.3 DFS (?) | M | HR, CI, p-value, p.615 first and second columns |
Part a: Patients, treatment, and variables | ||||
Patients: tissue samples from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) from 2009 to 2012 were analyzed at the Pathology Department of the University Hospital of Pisa | ||||
? | Patients with available KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutational status included | |||
? | Patients excluded | |||
786 | Patients included for analysis | |||
Treatment and follow-up: follow-up not mentioned | ||||
Markers | M1 = NRAS mutation (y/n), M2 = KRAS mutation (y/n), M3 = BRAF mutation (y/n), M4 = all wt (no NRAS, KRAS or BRAF mutation) (y/n)a | |||
Outcomes (events) | OS (?), PFS (?) | |||
Further variables | v1 = sex, v2 = age at diagnosis, v3 = ECOG PS (0/1–2), v4 = primary tumor site (nominal), v5 = mucinous histology (y/n), v6 = tumoral penetration (pT) (1–2/3–4), v7 = nodal involvement (pN) (0/1–2), v8 = time to metastasis (mts) (binary), v9 = number of mts (1/> 1), v10 = resected primary (y/n), v11 = liver only mts (y/n), v12 = liver mts (y/n), v13 = lung mts (y/n), v14 = nodes mts (y/n), v15 = peritoneal mts (y/n), v16 = bone mts (y/n), v17 = metastasis site (v11–v16) classified into 6 categories; see Table 2 | |||
Part b: Statistical analysis of survival outcomes | ||||
Aim | n | Outcome (events) | Variables considered | Results/remarks |
IDA: homogeneity | 786 various n due to missing | – | M1–M4, v1–v9, v11–v17 | p-values, Tables 1 and 2 |
A1: univariable | 786 | OS (?) | M1- M4 | Kaplan-Meier-estimate, Log-rank-test (p-value) Fig. 1 |
A2: univariable | 321 (47 (M1) + 274 (M4), see Table 1) | OS (?) | M1, M4 | Kaplan-Meier estimate, HR, CI, p-value, Fig. 2 |
A3: univariable | Varies | OS (?) | M1–M4, v3–v5, v8, v10, v11 | HR, CI, p-value, Table 3b |
A4: multivariable M1 vs M4, M2 vs M4, and M3 vs M4 | Varies but unknown | OS (?) | Adjusted for v3–v5, v8, v10, v11 | HR, CI, p-value, Table 4 |
Additional: NRAS patients treated with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies | 8 | Median OS and PFS | See page 87 |
Summary of the quality of reporting
ID | Study | Journal | Country/year | Data source | Number of patients | Follow-up | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessed | Excluded | Included | ||||||
b1 | Hayashi (Hayashi et al. 2015) [28] | BCRT | Japan/2001–2012 | Multiple institutional databases | 1466 | 1034 | 432 | Median 50.6 months |
b2 | Huzell (Huzell et al. 2015) [24] | BCRT | Sweden/2002–2011 | Cohort | 1045 | 97 | 948 | Median 3 years |
b3 | Jerzak (Jerzak et al. 2015) [29] | BCRT | Canada/2007 | Institutional database | Unknown | Unknown | 129 | Min 5 years |
c1 | Billingsley (Billingsley et al. 2015) [30] | Cancer | USA/years unknown | Cohort | 544 | 9 | 535 | Median 68 months |
c2 | Huang (Huang et al. 2015) [31] | Cancer | Canada/2000–2010 | Cohort | 1108 | 406 | 702 | Median 5.1 years |
c3 | Price (Price et al. 2015) [32] | Cancer | Australia/2006–? | Registry | Unknown | Unknown | 2972 | Not reported |
e1 | Gonzalez-Vallinasa (González-Vallinas et al. 2015) [33] | EJC | Spain/2000–2004 | Institutional database | Unknown | Unknown | 77 | Median 72 months |
e2 | Hokuto (Hokuto et al. 2015) [34] | EJC | Japan/2000–2012 | Institutional database | Unknown | Unknown | 150 | Median 51.8 months |
e3 | Thurner (Thurner et al. 2015) [25] | EJC | Austria/2003–2007 | Institutional database | > 700 | > 439 | 261 | Median 80 months |
i1 | Keck (Keck et al. 2015) [35] | IJC | Germany/1982–2007 | Institutional database | 473 (?) | 226 (?) | 247 | Up to 15 years |
i2 | Roedel (Rödel et al. 2015) [36] | IJC | Germany/years unknown | Multiple institutional databases | Unknown | Unknown | 95 | Median 40 months, range 1–264 |
i3 | Schirripa (Schirripa et al. 2015) [26] | IJC | Italy/2009-2012 | Institutional database | Unknown | Unknown | 786 | Not reported |
j1 | Martina (Martin et al. 2015) [22] | JCO | Multiple countries/years unknown | Cohorts | 8737 | 577 | 8160 | Median 41.3 months |
j2 | Ostronoffa (Ostronoff et al. 2015) [37] | JCO | UK/1992–2009 | Clinical trial data sets | Unknown | Unknown | 156 | Not reported |
j3 | Xing (Xing et al. 2015) [23] | JCO | Multiple countries/1978–2011 | Cohorts | Unknown | Unknown | 2099 | Median 36 months, quartiles (14,75) |
ID | Study | Journal | Markers | Outcomes | Variables | Events for primary outcome | Events for all outcomes reported | Information on exclusionsa | Subgroup analysisb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b1 | Hayashi | BCRT | 1 | 1 | 3 | Unknown | No | 3c | |
b2 | Huzell | BCRT | 1 | 2 | 7 | 100 | Yes | 3 | 2 |
b3 | Jerzak | BCRT | 2 | 2 | 14 | 36 | Yes | 2 | |
c1 | Billingsley | Cancer | 1 | 2 | 8 | Unknown | No | 3 | |
c2 | Huang | Cancer | 3 | 2 | 8 | 257 | Yes | 3 | 2 |
c3 | Price | Cancer | 1 | 1 | 9 | Unknown | No | 1 | 0 |
e1 | Gonzalez-Vallinas | EJC | 1 | 1 | 9 | 22 | Yes | 2 | |
e2 | Hokuto | EJC | 1 | 5 | 13 | 86 | No | 1 | |
e3 | Thurner | EJC | 1 | 3 | 6 | 24 | Yes | 2 | 0 |
i1 | Keck | IJC | 2 | 2 | 10 | Unknown | No | 1 | 0 |
i2 | Roedel | IJC | 2 | 4 | 7 | 27 | Yes | 1 | 1 |
i3 | Schirripa | IJC | 3 | 1 | 11 | Unknown | No | 1 | 0 |
j1 | Martin | JCO | 2 | 1 | 8 | 6294 | Yes | 3 | 2 |
j2 | Ostronoff | JCO | 2 | 6 | 10 | Unknown | No | 2 | 2 |
j3 | Xing | JCO | 1 | 1 | 9 | 338 | Yes | 1 | 2 |