Introduction
Materials and methods
Search strategy
Selection criteria
Assessment of study quality
Study | Study population (years follow-up) | Number of cases (% women) | Postmenopausal women | CV disease excluded | Mean age | Outcome CV disease | Outcome bone mass | Results # | Quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sennerby, 2009 [13] | Population-based (20) | 31,936 (NA) | NA | Yes | 67.9 to 74.4 | CV disease by National patient registry, ICD 9 codes | Incident hip fracture by National patient registry, ICD 9 codes | Women: HR: 4.42 (95% CI 3.49 to 5.61) Men: HR: 6.65 (95% CI 4.82 to 9.19) | 3 |
Szulc, 2008 [14] | Population-based (10) | 781 (0%) | No | No | 65 | AC by X-spine | Incident fracture by hospital records or X-ray | OR: 2.54 to 3.04 (P < 0.005 to 0.001) | 3 |
Naves, 2008 [4] | Population-based (4) | 624 (51%) | NA | No | 65 | AC by X-spine | BMD lumbar spine and femur by DXA Incident fracture by hospital record or X-ray | Change BMD spine in progression AC vs no progression AC: -1.48% vs 1.43% (P <.0001) Change BMD hip in progression AC and no progression AC: -0.48% vs 0.23% (P = 0.315) Incident fracture: OR: 2.13 (95% CI 0.85 to 5.31) | 3 |
Von Muhlen, 2009 [15] | Population-based (4) | 1,332 (60%) | NA | No | 73.8 | PAD by ABI | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA and incident fracture by X-ray | Women: Change BMD in PAD vs no PAD: 59.2% vs 43.5% (P < 0.05) Incident non-vert fracture: OR: 0.84 (95% CI 0.31 to 2.26) Men : Change BMD in PAD vs no PAD : 43.5% vs 35.5% (P = 0.20) Incident non-vert fracture: OR: 1.52 (95% CI 0.30 to 7.45) | 3 |
Collins, 2009 [2] | Population-based (5.4) | 4,302 (0%) | NA | No | 73.5 | PAD by ABI | BMD hip by DXA Incident fractures by x-ray and hospital records | Change BMD in PAD vs no PAD: -0.60% vs -0.32% (P < 0.001 PAD and non-vert fracture risk: HR = 1.47 (95% CI 1.07 to 2.04) | 3 |
Hak, 2000 [3] | Population-based (9) | 236 (100%) | No (100%) | No | 49 | AC by X-spine | MCA by radiogrammetry | MCA in patients with AC progression vs no AC progression -3.5 mm vs -2.0 mm (P < 0.01) | 3 |
Samelson, 2007 [12] | Population-based (21) | 2,499 (58%) | No | 61 | AC by X-spine | Incident hip fracture by hospital records and death certificates | Women: HR: 1.4 (0.8 to 2.3) Men: HR: 1.2 (0.2 to 5.7) | 4 | |
Bagger, 2006 [1] | Population-based (7.5) | 2,262 (100%) | Yes (100%) | No | 65 | AC by X-spine | BMD lumbar spine and hip and incident fractures by hospital records or X-ray | Change hip BMD AC score ≥3 vs <3: -0.38% vs -0.25% (P < 0.001) AC and hip fracture: OR: 2.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.8) AC and vert fracture: OR: 1.2 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.5) | 4 |
Schulz, 2004 [17] | Clinic-based (8) | 228 (100%) | Yes | No | 65.2 | AC by CT-scan of spine | BMD spine by CT-scan | Change BMD AC vs no AC: -5.3% vs -1.3% (P < 0.001) | 6 |
Study | Study population (years follow-up) | Number of cases (% women) | Postmenopausal women | CV disease excluded | Mean age (years) | Race | Outcome osteoporosis | Outcome CV disease | Results # | Quality (x nee) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mussolino, 2007 [69] | Population-based (9) | 5,272 (NA) | NA | Yes | 60.9 to 69.4 | Caucasian (NA%), black and Mexican-American | BMD proximal femur by DXA | CV and stroke mortality by death certificates | Women: BMD and CV mortality RR: 1.26 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.80) BMD and stroke mortality: RR: 1.34 (95% CI 0.86 to 2.07) Men: BMD and CV mortality: RR: 1.05 (95% CI 0.79 to 1.39) BMD and stroke mortality: RR; 0.73 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.23) | 3 |
Farhat, 2007 [6] | Population-based (5.4) | 2,310 (55%) | Yes | Yes | 73.5 | Caucasian (58%) and black | BMD total hip, femoral neck and trochanter by DXA BMD spine by CT-scans | Incident CV disease by hospital records and death certificates | Women: BMD fem neck and incident CV disease: HR: 1.24 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.52) Men: BMD fem neck and incident CV disease: HR: 1.04 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.21) | 3 |
Tamaki, 2009 [75] | Population-based (10) | 609 (100%) | Yes (60%) | No | 55.9 | Japanese | BMD lumbar spine and total hip by DXA | IMT values | <10 YSM: IMT OP vs normal bone mass: 1.55 vs 1.19 (P < 0.05) ≥YSM: IMT OP vs normal bone mass: 1.53 vs 1.28 (P < 0.05) | 3 |
Browner, 1991 [5] | Population-based (2.8) | 9,704 (100%) | Yes | No | NA | Caucasian (99%) and Asian | BMD distal radius, prox radius and calcaneus by single photon absorptiometry | Overall mortality and CV mortality by death certificates | BMD and risk overall mortality: RR: 1.22 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.47) BMD and stroke mortality: RR: 1.75 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.65) BMD and CV mortality: RR: 1.17 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.51) | 3 |
Trone, 2007 [68] | Population-based (7.6) | 1,580 (60%) | Yes (NA %) | No | 71.9 | Caucasian | Prevalence vertebral fracture by lateral spine radiographs | Overall mortality by death certificates | Women: prevalent vertebral fracture and overall mortality: HR: 1.15 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.59) Men: prevalent vertebral fracture and overall mortality: HR: 0.98 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.46) | 3 |
Kado, 2000 [64] | Population-based (3.5) | 6,018 (100%) | Yes | No | 76.5 | Caucasian | BMD total hip by DXA | Overall and CV mortality by death certificates | BMD and overall mortality: RH: 1.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 1.4) BMD and CV mortality: RH: 1.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 1.9) | 4 |
Trivedi, 2001 [67] | Population-based (6.7) | 1,002 (0%) | No women included | No | 69.7 | NA | BMD total hip by DXA | Overall and CV mortality by death certificates | BMD and overall mortality: RR: 0.79 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.97) BMD and CV mortality: RR: 0.72 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.93) | 4 |
Tanko, 2005 [76] | Clinic-based (4) | 2,576 (100%) | Yes | No | 66.5 | NA | BMD lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA | Incidence CV events self-reported and confirmed by primary documents | HR: 3.9 (95% CI 2.0 to 7.7) | 4 |
Pinheiro, 2006 [66] | Population-based (5) | 208 (100%) | Yes | No | 75.1 | Caucasian | BMD lumbar spine, femoral neck and trochanter by DXA | Overall and CV mortality by death certificates | BMD and overall mortality: HR: 1.44 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.21) BMD and CV mortality: HR: 1.28 (95% CI 1.08 to 2.26) | 4 |
Johansson, 1998 [7] | Population-based (7) | 1,468 (56%) | Yes | No | 74.0 | Caucasian | BMD calcaneus by DPA | Overall mortality by death certificates | Women: RR: 1.19 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.39) Men: RR: 1.23 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.41) | 4 |
Mussolino, 2003 [65] | Population-based (18.5) | 3,402 (NA) | NA | Yes | NA | Caucasian (87%) and black | BMD phalangeal by single photon absorption | Stroke mortality by death certificates | Women: RR: 1.01 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.19) Men: RR: 1.13 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.38) Blacks: RR : 0.93 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.21) | 4 |
Samelson, 2004 [70] | Population-based (30) | 2,059 (60%) | Yes (85,3-94%) | Yes | 60.2 | NA | Second MCA by radiogrammatry | Incidence coronary heart disease by hospital records and death certificates | Women: HR: 0.73 (95% CI 0.53 to 1.00) Men: HR: 1.14 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.56) | 4 |
Kiel, 2001 [77] | Population-based (25) | 554 (66%) | NA | No | 54.4 | NA | Second MCA by radiogrammetry | AC by radiograph of the lumbar spine | Women: Sign association % change in MCA and change AC index (P = 0.01) Men: No association % change MCA and change AC index (P = 0.50) | 4 |
Browner, 1993 [62] | Population-based (1.98) | 4,024 (100%) | Yes | Yes | NA | Caucasian | BMD distal radius and calcaneus by single photon absorptiometry | Incident strokes by hospital records and death certificates | HR: 1.31 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.67) | 5 |
Von der Recke, 1999 [8] | Clinic-based (17) | 1,063 (100%) | Yes | Yes | 50 and 70 | NA | BMD distal forearm by single photon absorptiometry with 125I source | CV mortality by death certificates, hospital records and autopsy reports | Early menopause: RR: 2.3 (95% CI 1.0 to 5.3) Late menopause: RR: 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.8) | 5 |
Silverman, 2004 [71] | Clinic-based (3) | 2,565 (100%) | Yes | No | 67 | Caucasian (95.8%) | Prevalence vertebral fracture by lateral spine radiographs | Incident CV event self-reported and confirmed by primary documents | CV event rate women with prevalent vertebral fracture vs no vertebral fracture: 15.1 vs 8.3 (P = 0.55) | 5 |
Varosy, 2003 [73] | Clinic-based (4.1) | 2,763 (100%) | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | Prevalent and incident skeletal fracture self-reported. Incident fractures were confirmed by radiological reports | Incident coronay event by hospital records | HR: 0.75 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.98) | 5 |
Gonzales-Macias, 2009 [63] | Clinic-based (3) | 5,201 (100%) | Yes | No | 72.3 | Caucasian | eBMD calcaneus by QUS | Overall and CV mortality by medical records | eBMD and overall mortality: HR: 1.19 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.45) eBMD and CV mortality: HR: 1.39 (95% CI 1.15 to 1.66) | 6 |
Statistical analysis
Study | Study population | Number of cases | % women | Outcome bone mass | Outcome CV disease | Main results # |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frye, 1992 [35] | Population-based | 200 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by single photon absorptiometry | AC by x-ray | Association AC and BMD lumbar spine: β-2.213 (P < 0.05) Association AC and BMD hip: β-0.661 (NS) |
Barengolts, 1998 [32] | Clinic-based | 45 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | Coronary calcium score by EBT | Correlation BDM hip and calcium score: r-0.34 (P = 0.022) Correlation BMD spine and calcium score: r-0.28 (P = 0.056) |
Jorgensen, 2001 [27] | Clinic-based | 63 | 52% | BMD femoral neck by DXA | Incident stroke | Women: OR: 6.6 (95% CI 1.8 to 24.8) Men: OR: 0.6 (95% CI 0.1 to 2.3) |
Aoyagi, 2001 [40] | Population-based | 524 | 100% | BMD distal and proximal radius, calcaneus single photon absorptiometry by sinlge photon absorptiometry | AC by x-ray | BMD distal radius and AC: OR: 1.1 (95% CI 0.9 ro 1.3) BMD calcaneus and AC: OR: 1.1 (0.9 to 1.3) |
Van der Klift, 2002 [29] | Population-based | 5,268 | 57% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | PAD by ABI | Women: PAD and BMD hip: OR: 1.35 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.79) Men: PAD and BMD hip: OR: 0.89 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.23) |
Tanko, 2003 [39] | Population-based | 963 | 100% | BMD hip and lumbar spine by DXA | AC by x-ray | AC and BMD hip: β-0.10, 9 (P = 0.004) |
Hirose, 2003 [56] | Clinic-based | 7,865 | 9% | OSI calcaneus | baPWV | Women: β-0.11 (P < 0.01) Men: β-0.07 (P < 0.01) |
Pennisi, 2004 [50] | Clinic-based | 36 | 44% | BMD total body, lumbar spine, and hip by DXA and calcaneus by QUS | IMT and presence of plaque in carotid artery | 63% patients with BMD spine T <-1 93% patients with BMD hip T <-1 |
Jorgensen, 2004 [47] | Population-based | 5,296 | 52% | BMD distal radius by single x-ray absorptiometry | IMT and prevalent plaque | BMD and IMT: NS BMD and prevalent plaque: OR: 0.90 (95% CI 0.75 to 1.07) BMD and echogenic plaque: OR: 0.51 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.83) |
Montalcini, 2004 [49] | Clinic-based | 157 | 100% | BMD calcaneus by QUS | IMT | BMD and IMT: NS |
Magnus, 2005 [23] | Population-based | 5,050 | 36% | BMD hip by DXA | Self reported CV events | Women: OR: 1.22 (0.80 to 1.86) Men: OR: 1.39 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.87) |
Bakhireva, 2005 [31] | Population-based | 366 | 51% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | CAC by CT scan | Women: BMD hip and CAC: OR: 0.69 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.93) Men: BMD hip and CAC: OR: 1.03 (0.75 to 1.41) |
Wong, 2005 [30] | Population-based | 3,998 | 50% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | PAD by ABI | Per SD increase in ABI sign associated with hip BMD: 0.5 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.9) |
Yamada, 2005 [53] | Clinic-based | 260 | 59% | BMD lumbar spine by DXA and OSI calcanues | IMT carotid artery and femoral artery | BMD lumbar spine and FA-IMT: ρ-0.117 (P < 0.005) |
Farhat, 2006 [34] | Population-based | 490 | 100% | vBMD spine by CT scan | AC and CAC by CT scan | AC and BMD: OR: 1.68 (95% CI 1.06 to 2.68) CAC and BMD: OR: 1.19 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.74) |
Farhat, 2006 [19] | Population-based | 1,489 | 51% | BMD hip by DXA vBMD lumbar spine by QCT | Prevalent CV disease self reported Prevalent PAD by ABI | Women: Prevalent CV disease and BMD hip: OR: 1.22 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.43) PAD and BMD hip: NS Men: Prevalent CV disease and BMD hip: NS PAD and BMD hip: OR: 1.39 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.84) |
Yamada, 2006 [54] | Population-based | 149 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine by DXA and vBMD calcaneus by QCT | IMT and PWV | FA-IMT and BMD spine: β-0.067 (P < 0.05) PWV and BMD spine: NS |
Sumino, 2006 [60] | Clinic-based | 315 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine by DXA | baPWV | Association baPWV and BMD: β-0.265 (P = 0.002) |
Sinnot, 2006 [43] | Clinic-based | 480 | 65% | BMD lumbar spine by QCT | Calcium score by CT-scan | No correlation CAD and BMD in women and men |
Shaffer, 2007 [51] | Population-based | 870 | 61% | BMD lumbar spine, hip and distal radius by DXA | IMT | Women >60 years: IMT and BMD spine: β-73.0 (P < 0.001) IMT and BMD hip: β-62.4 (P < 0.001) Men >60 years: IMT and BMD radius: β-27.0 (P < 0.001) |
Sumino, 2007 [61] | Clinic-based | 85 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine by DXA | Brachial arterial endothelial function (FMD) | Correlation FMD and BMD: r .034 (P < 0.01) Association FMD and BMD: β 0.40 (P < 0.01) |
Hyder, 2007 [36] | Clinic-based | 365 | 64% | BMD lumbar spine by CT-scan | Atherosclerotic calcium in carotid, coronary and iliac arteries by CT-scan | Women: Calcium score aorta and BMD: OR: 3.14 (95% CI 1.55 to 6.38) Calcium score iliac arteries and BMD: OR: 2.20 (95% CI 1.13 to 4.29) Men: Calcium score carotid and BMD: OR: 2.85 (95% CI 1.02 to 7.96) Calcium score aorta and BMD: OR: 5.90 (95% CI 1.78 to 19.6) |
Shen, 2007 [42] | Population-based | 682 | 56% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | CAC by CT scan | CAC and BMD spine: -0.105 ± 0.132 (NS) CAC and BMD hip: 0.022 ± 0.142 (NS) |
Sioka, 2007 [24] | Clinic-based | 21 | 0% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | CAD by angiography | BMD in severe CAD vs no CAD: 77.8% vs 37.5%, P =? |
Sumino, 2008 [52] | Clinic-based | 175 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine by DXA | IMT | BMD and IMT β-0.313 (P = 0.001) |
Kim, 2008 [48] | Clinic-based | 194 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA Prevalent vertebral fracture | IMT and prevalent plaque | BMD and IMT: NS BMD and plaque: NS Vertebral fracture and plaque: OR: 2.8 (95% CI 1.17 to 7.12) |
Frost, 2008 [45] | Clinic-based | 54 | 100% | Lumbar spine and hip by DXA | IMT and PWV | BMD spine and IMT: r -.025 (P = 0.26) BMD hip and IMT: r-0.17 (NS) BMD and PWV: NS |
Mangiafico, 2008 [57] | Clinic-based | 182 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine and hip DXA | PWA (AIx and PWV) | BMD hip and AIx: β-5.46 (P < 0.0001) BMD spine and Aix: β-3.29 (P < 0.0001) |
Tekin, 2008 [25] | Clinic-based | 227 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine by DXA | Prevalence CAD | CAD and low BMD: OR: 0.68 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.28) |
Broussard, 2008 [18] | Population-based | 3,881 | 51% | BMD total femur by DXA | Framingham CHD risk score by Framingham CHD prediction model | Women: moderate CHD risk and low BMD: OR: 1.45 (95% CI 1.03 to 2.06) high CHD risk and low BMD: OR: 1.73 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.66) Men: NS |
Chow, 2008 [41] | Population-based | 693 | 54% | vBMD lumbar spine and hip by QCT and vBMD distal radius by HRpQCT | AC by CT-scan | Women: NS Men: NS |
Hyder, 2009 [37] | NA | 1,909 | 50% | vBMD lumbar spine by CT scan | CAC and AAC score | Women: vBMD and CAC (P-trend <0.002) vBMD AND AAC (P-trend <0.004) Men: vBMD and CAC (P-trend <0.034) vBMD and AAC (P-trend <0.001) |
Hmamouchi, 2009 [46] | Clinic-based | 72 | 100% | BMD lulmbar spine and hip by DXA | IMT in carotid artery and femoral artery | CA-IMT and BMD hip: r-0.330 (P < 0.05) FA-IMT and BMD hip: NS IMT and BMD lumbar spine: NS |
Mikumo, 2009 [58] | Clinic-based | 143 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine by DXA | PWV | BMD and PWV: r-99.78 (NS) |
Marcowitz, 2005 [20] | Clinic-based | 209 | 88% | Lumbar spine, hip and distal radius by DXA | CAD | Osteoporosis: OR: 5.58 (95% CI 2.59 to 12.0) for CAD |
Ness, 2006 [38] | Clinic-based | 1,000 | 100% | Diagnosis osteoporosis or osteopenia by electronic medical records | AVD | Prevalence AVD osteoporotis vs osteopenia: 60% vs 35% (P < 0.001) Prevalence AVD osteoporis vs normal bone mass: 60% vs 22% (P < 0.001) |
Gupta, 2006 [78] | Clinic-based | 101 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine and total hip by DXA | Prevalent CV disease | Prevalent CV disease in low BMD vs normal BMD: 61% vs 38% (P < 0.025) |
Mangifico, 2006 [28] | Clinic-based | 345 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine and femoral neck by DXA | PAD by ABI | PAD and BMD lumbar spine: OR: 1.01 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.05) PAD and BMD hip: OR: 0.20 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.70) |
Erbilen, 2007 [33] | Clinic-based | 74 | 0% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | CAD | Association BMD and CAD: OR: 5.4 (95% CI 1.66 to 17.49) |
Sennerby, 2007 [21] | Clinic-based | 1,327 | 100% | Incident hip fracture by X-ray and hospital record | Prevalent CV disease by questionnaire | OR: 2.38 (95% CI 1.92 to 2.94) |
Varma, 2008 [22] | Clinic-based | 198 | 74% | Lumbar spine and hip by DXA | Obstructive CAD | Prevalence CAD osteoporosis vs osteopenia: 76% vs 68% (P < 0.01) Prevalence CAD osteoporosis vs normal bone mass: 76% vs 47% (P < 0.005) |
Seo, 2009 [59] | Clinic-based | 253 | 100% | BMD lumbar spine and hip by DXA | baPWV | Sign association BMD hip and baPWV: Β-0.123 (P < 0.05) |
Pouwels, 2009 [16] | Clinic-based | 6,763 | 73% | Incident hip fracture | Incident stroke by ICD 9 code | Risk hip fracture after stroke Women: OR: 2.12 (95% CI 1.73 to 2.59) Men: OR: 1.63 (95% CI 1.17 to 2.28) |
Results
Studies included
Study results
The relationship between CV disease and osteoporosis
Cardiovascular disease and fracture risk
Cardiovascular disease and bone loss
The relationship between osteoporosis and CV disease
Low bone mineral density and cardiovascular mortality
Low bone mineral density and incident cardiovascular disease
Low bone mineral density and subclinical atherosclerosis
Links between CV disease and osteoporosis
Common pathogenesis
Common risk factors
Genetic studies
Discussion
Association | No association | |
---|---|---|
CV disease and OP | N = 6 | N = 0 |
Bone mass and CV events | N = 3 | N = 2 |