Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 7/2010

01.07.2010 | Editorial

Subjective versus objective measurement of surgical outcomes of treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: it is not just black and white

verfasst von: Berna Haliloglu, Diaa E. E. Rizk

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 7/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The best interest of the patient is the only interest to be considered.
William J. Mayo
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Padmanabhan P, Nitti VW (2006) Female stress urinary incontinence: how the patient and physician perspective correlate in assessment of outcomes? Curr Opin Urol 16:212–218CrossRefPubMed Padmanabhan P, Nitti VW (2006) Female stress urinary incontinence: how the patient and physician perspective correlate in assessment of outcomes? Curr Opin Urol 16:212–218CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Castillo PA, Espaillat-Rijo LM, Davila GW (2010) Outcome measures and definition of cure female stress urinary incontinence surgery: a survey of recent publications. Int Urogynecol J 21:343–348CrossRef Castillo PA, Espaillat-Rijo LM, Davila GW (2010) Outcome measures and definition of cure female stress urinary incontinence surgery: a survey of recent publications. Int Urogynecol J 21:343–348CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L, Gonzalez J (2009) Is there a discrepancy between patient and physician quality of life assessment? Neurourol Urodyn 28:179–182CrossRefPubMed Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L, Gonzalez J (2009) Is there a discrepancy between patient and physician quality of life assessment? Neurourol Urodyn 28:179–182CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, Achtari C, Goldberg R, Mascarenhas T et al (2008) Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J 19:5–33CrossRef Ghoniem G, Stanford E, Kenton K, Achtari C, Goldberg R, Mascarenhas T et al (2008) Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J 19:5–33CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brubaker L, Shull B (2005) EGGS for patient-centered outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 16:171–173CrossRef Brubaker L, Shull B (2005) EGGS for patient-centered outcomes. Int Urogynecol J 16:171–173CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:98–101CrossRefPubMed Yalcin I, Bump RC (2003) Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:98–101CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Subjective versus objective measurement of surgical outcomes of treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: it is not just black and white
verfasst von
Berna Haliloglu
Diaa E. E. Rizk
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 7/2010
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1158-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2010

International Urogynecology Journal 7/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.