Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2017

Open Access 12.03.2016 | Ankle

Surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review

verfasst von: T. P. A. Baltes, R. Zwiers, J. I. Wiegerinck, C. N. van Dijk

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 6/2017

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the available literature on surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy and to provide an overview of the different surgical techniques.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature available in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database of controlled trials was performed. The primary outcome measure in terms of patient satisfaction and the secondary outcome measures that consisted of complication rate, pain score, functional outcome score and success rate were evaluated. The Downs & Black checklist and the Coleman methodology scale were used to assess the methodological quality of included articles.

Results

Of 1090 reviewed articles, 23 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported on the results of 1285 procedures in 1177 patients. The surgical techniques were divided into five categories. Eleven studies evaluated open surgical debridement, seven studies described minimally invasive procedures, three studies evaluated endoscopic procedures, one study evaluated open gastrocnemius lengthening, and one study reported on open autologous tendon transfer. Results regarding patient satisfaction (69–100 %) and complication rate (0–85.7 %) varied widely.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the large variation in surgical techniques available for treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy. None of the included studies compared surgical intervention with nonsurgical or placebo intervention. Minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures yield lower complication rates with similar patient satisfaction in comparison with open procedures. Minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures might therefore prove to be the future of surgical treatment of Achilles midportion tendinopathy.

Level of evidence

IV.

Introduction

Midportion Achilles tendinopathy is a painful condition of the Achilles tendon located 2–7 cm proximal to the insertion on the calcaneus. Symptoms include pain, swelling and impaired performance. It is an over-use injury, often seen in athletes. The incidence varies from 0.2 % in the general population up to 9 % in recreational runners [12, 17].
Initially, treatment of midportion tendinopathy is nonsurgical. Various noninvasive treatment options have been described, including eccentric exercise, the use of orthoses and rest. Additionally, invasive nonsurgical techniques like extracorporeal shockwave therapy and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection are commonly used [39]. In approximately 25 % of the patients nonsurgical treatment fails to alleviate symptoms and surgical treatment is indicated [14].
Historically, surgical treatment was performed using an open procedure [13, 26, 32]. With new insights into the aetiology of tendinopathy, new surgical procedures were developed, resulting in a large variety of surgical techniques [19, 34]. Because of the high complication rates in open procedures, less invasive techniques gained popularity [16, 24, 29, 37].
Due to the variety of surgical techniques and the confusing terminology used to describe pathologies of the Achilles tendon, no study to date has provided a clear overview of the literature regarding the best surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the available literature on surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy and to provide an overview of the different surgical techniques in terms of patient satisfaction and complication rate.

Materials and methods

Search strategy

A systematic review of the literature was performed. In collaboration with a clinical librarian, the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database for controlled trials were searched (Fig. 1).

Inclusion criteria

Studies reporting on the results of surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy in humans were included. In this study, the definition of midportion Achilles tendinopathy as described by van Dijk et al. [8] is used. Midportion Achilles tendinopathy is defined as symptoms of pain, swelling and impaired performance in combination with a histopathological diagnosis that includes, but is not limited to, the diagnosis of tendinosis 2–7 cm from the calcaneal insertion. Studies were eligible if they assessed the outcome measures of patient satisfaction or complication rate. Reviews and studies reporting on less than ten patients were excluded. Only studies written in English, French or German were considered eligible. Studies lacking clear distinction between midportion and insertional Achilles tendinopathy were excluded. Two authors (TB & RZ) performed title and abstract screening independently. Subsequently, these two authors individually performed full text selection. Disagreement during study selection was settled by discussion.

Data extraction

Data on patient characteristics, surgical technique and outcome were extracted. Patient satisfaction was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures consisted of complication rate, functional outcome scores, pain scores and success rate. Complications were divided in minor and major (Table 1). Successful treatment was defined as an excellent or good outcome, or when patients were satisfied with the result.
Table 1
Classification of complications
Complications
Major
Minor
AT rupture
Discomfort
Any reoperation
Superficial infections
Deep venous thrombosis
Minor wound problems
Reflex dystrophy
Scar tenderness/hypertrophy
Persisting neuralgia
Mild form of paraesthesia
Deep infections/major wound problems
Prolonged hospitalisation

Methodological quality

Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Downs & Black checklist and the Coleman methodology scale [7, 9]. The Downs & Black checklist was designed to evaluate the methodological quality of randomised and nonrandomised studies. It consists of a 27-item checklist with a highest possible score of 33 points. The Coleman methodology scale was designed to evaluate the methodological quality of studies on Achilles tendinopathies. The checklist consists of two parts and has a maximum possible score of 100 points. Two authors (TB & JW) assessed the included studies independently on methodological quality. Correlations between success rate and both the Coleman scale and Downs & Black checklist were calculated.

Data presentation and statistical analysis

Due to the heterogeneity of the data, results were not pooled. Outcome data were presented per study. Ranges of outcome were reported per type of surgical procedure. To calculate the correlations of nonparametric data, the Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient was used. Correlation with a p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

After removal of duplicates, the search yielded 1090 articles. Based on title and abstract screening, 1026 articles were excluded (Fig. 1). The remaining 64 articles were eligible for full text evaluation. Forty-two articles were excluded after full text selection. Finally, after screening references of included articles and the related literature, one article was added [6]. A total of 23 studies were included in this study (Table 2; Appendix 1 in Table 5) [14, 6, 10, 11, 13, 15, 18, 2024, 2631, 33, 36].
Table 2
Overview of included studies
Study
N patients (N tendons)
Surgical technique
Coleman
D&B
Open debridement
 Benazzo et al. [4]
A. 20 (20)
A. Open surgery: multiple longitudinal tenotomies and excision degenerations
54
22
B. 32 (32)
B. Open surgery: excision degeneration + soleus fibres transfer
 Johnston et al. [11]
A. 10 (10)
A. Open surgery: excision inflamed paratenon and decompression AT
29
7
B. 7 (7)
B. Open surgery: excision inflamed paratenon, decompression AT + debridement degenerations
 Kvist and Kvist [13]
182 (201)
Open surgery: removal adhesions between paratenon, crural fascia and skin + excision thickened paratenon
27
14
 Lohrer and Nauck [15]
A. 11 (15)
A. Open surgery: release AT + transachillear scarification
60
23
B. 23 (24)
B. Open surgery: release AT + excision intratendinous lesions + transachillear scarification
 Maffulli et al. [18]
10 (10)
Open surgery: excision paratenon, multiple longitudinal tenotomies and excision of degenerations
39
10
 Maffulli et al. [21]
86 (86)
Open surgery: excision paratenon, multiple longitudinal tenotomies + excision degenerations
69
14
 Nelen et al. [26]
A. (93)
A. Open surgery: release AT (not ventrally) + excision inflamed paratenon
42
16
B. (26)
B. Open surgery: debridement tendinosis
C. (24)
C. Open surgery: debridement tendinosis (reinforcement with turned-down tendon flap)
 Ohberg et al. [27]
24 (24)
Open surgery: excision hypertrophic paratenon and debridement of degenerations through a longitudinal incision
52
15
 Paavola et al. [29]
A. 171 (171)
A. Open surgery: excision adhesions between crural fascia and paratenon
24
9
B. 50 (50)
B. Open surgery: debridement intratendinous lesions
 Paavola et al. [28]
A. 16 (16)
A. Open surgery: excision adhesions between crural fascia and paratenon
56
14
B. 26 (26)
B. Open surgery: excision adhesions between crural fascia and paratenon + debridement intratendinous lesions
 Sarimo and Orava [31]
24 (24)
Open surgery: fascial adhesiolysis and radiofrequency microtenotomy
36
20
Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies
 Alfredson et al. [2]
10 (10)
Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT
48
17
 Alfredson [1]a
A. 15 (18)
A. Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT
41
17
B. 16 (19)
B. Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT by use of a needle
 Alfredson [1]a
72 (88)
Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT
30
14
 Alfredson et al. [3]
13 (13)
Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT
46
17
 Calder et al. [6]
32 (34)
Minimally invasive: Release AT and excision plantaris tendon
59
21
 Maffulli et al. [20]
39 (39)
Minimally invasive: multiple percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies
59
20
 Naidu et al. [24]
26 (29)
Minimally invasive: circumferential AT release with a tracheal hook + peritendinous infusion of corticosteroids
40
17
 Testa et al. [36]
63 (63)
Minimally invasive: multiple US-guided percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies
65
20
Endoscopic procedures
 Maquirriain [22]
24 (27)
Endoscopic: debridement paratenon + two longitudinal tenotomies
52
13
 Pearce et al. [30]
11 (11)
Endoscopic: debridement paratenon + release of plantaris tendon
60
13
 Steenstra and van Dijk [33]
16 (16)
Endoscopic: debridement paratenon + release of plantaris tendon
26
11
Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening
 Duthon et al. [10]
13 (15)
Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening
65
15
Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer
 Martin et al. [23]
44 (44)
Open surgery: excision AT + FHL transfer
54
21
Outlined are the number of included patients; reported surgical technique; and methodological quality
AT Achilles tendon, US ultrasound, CD colour doppler
aSame study comparing release of ventral AT with knife versus needle

Population characteristics

The studies reported on a total of 1177 patients with 1285 affected tendons. 62.7 % of the patients was male. Seven studies did not report on gender distribution [11, 13, 26, 29, 30, 33, 36]. The weighted mean age was 40.2 years. The remaining seven studies did not adequately report on age [1, 10, 21, 26, 29, 33, 36].

Surgical techniques

In this review, the techniques were roughly grouped into five types of procedures. Eleven studies reported open techniques as treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy [4, 11, 13, 15, 18, 21, 2629, 31]. Seven studies evaluated minimally invasive procedures [13, 6, 20, 24, 36]. Three studies reported on endoscopic techniques [22, 30, 33], one study evaluated gastrocnemius lengthening by an open procedure [10], and one reported on a technique for open resection of the distal Achilles tendon, followed by interposition of FHL graft [23]. Techniques were classified as minimally invasive based on descriptions in the studies. In six of the included studies reporting minimally invasive techniques, incisions were smaller than 2 cm (Appendix 2 in Table 6).

Open surgery

Eleven studies described the outcome of an open surgical approach [4, 11, 13, 15, 18, 21, 2629, 31]. There is a large variation in techniques; however, each technique consisted of the release of the tendon (adhesiolysis, release or excision of the paratenon), debridement of degenerative tissue, longitudinal tenotomies or a combination of these (Table 2; Appendix 2 in Table 6). Four studies compared the results of release of the tendon with or without tenotomies, with a group of patients that additionally underwent debridement of degenerative tissue [11, 15, 28, 29]. One compared the results between a group of patients that underwent debridement without suturing or augmentation with a group in which the tendon was augmented using fibres of the soleus muscle [4]. In another study, three groups were distinguished: no debridement of the tendon was performed in group A. Group B and C consisted of patients with tendinosis and extensive tendinosis. Both groups were treated by excision of degenerations, followed by side-to-side suture for patients in group B or reconstruction with a turndown flap in group C [26].
None of the studies reported on patient satisfaction (Table 3). Complication rates were adequately reported in eight studies and ranged from 0 up to 85.7 % (Table 3) [4, 11, 13, 18, 21, 27, 29, 31]. Success rates varied from 73.1 up to 100 % (Table 4) [13, 15, 2628, 31].
Table 3
Patient satisfaction and complication rate
Study
Postoperative satisfaction
Complications
Satisfied
Unsatisfied
Major
Minor
Total
Reoperations
Open debridement
 Benazzo et al. [4]
  
A. 1/20 (5 %)
A. 2/20 (10 %)
A. 3/20 (15 %)
A. 1/20 (5 %)
  
B. 1/32 (3.1 %)
B. 3/32 (9.4 %)
B. 4/32 (12.5 %)
B. 1/32 (3.1 %)
 Johnston et al. [11]
  
0/17 (0 %)
0/17 (0 %)
0/17 (0 %)
 
 Kvist and Kvist [13]
  
20/201 (10.0 %)
2/201 (1.0 %)
22/201 (10.9 %)
20/201 (10.0 %)
 Lohrer and Nauck [15]
     
 Maffulli et al. [18]
  
6/14 (42.9 %)
6/14 (42.9 %)
12/14 (85.7 %)
6/14 (42.9 %)
 Maffulli et al. [21]
  
8/86 (9.3 %)
23/86 (26.7 %)
31/86 (36.0 %)
8/86 (9.3 %)
 Nelen et al. [26]
  
A+B+C. 12/143 (8.4 %)
A+B+C. 2/143 (1.4 %)
A+B+C. 14/143 (9.8 %)
A. 4/93 (4.3 %)
  
B. 1/26 (3.8 %)
  
C. 0/24 (0 %)
 Ohberg et al. [27]
  
0/24 (0 %)
2/24 (8.3 %)
2/24 (8.3 %)
0/24 (0 %)
 Paavola et al. [29]
  
A. 9/171 (5.3 %)
A.18/171 (10.5 %)
A. 27/171 (15.8 %)
A. 9/171 (5.3 %)
  
B. 0/50 (0 %)
B. 1/50 (2 %)
B. 1/50 (2 %)
B. 0/50 (0 %)
 Paavola et al. [28]
  
A+B. 2/42 (4.8 %)
A+B. 6/42 (14.3 %)
A+B. 8/42 (19.1 %)
A+B. 2/42 (4.8 %)
 Sarimo and Orava [31]
  
1/24 (4.2 %)
1/24 (4.2 %)
2/24 (8.3 %)
 
 Totals
  
60/824 (7.3 %)
66/824 (8.0 %)
126/824 (15.3 %)
 
Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies
 Alfredson et al. [2]
10/10 (100 %)
 
1/10 (10 %)
0/10 (0 %)
1/10 (10 %)
 
 Alfredson [1]a
A. 15/18 (83.3 %)b
A. 3/18 (16.7 %)b
A+B. 3/37 (8.1 %)
A+B. 0/37 (0 %)
A+B. 3/37 (8.1 %)
 
B. 15/19 (78.9 %)b
B. 4/19 (21.1 %)b
 
 Alfredson [1]a
81/88 (92.0 %)b
7/88 (8.0 %)b
    
 Alfredson et al. [3]
11/13 (84.6 %)
2/13 (15.4 %)
    
 Calder et al. [6]
22/32 (69 %)c
10/32 (31 %)c
0/34 (0 %)
1/34 (2.9 %)
1/34 (2.9 %)
 
 Maffulli et al. [20]
     
 Naidu et al. [24]
24/26 (92 %)c
2/26 (7.7 %)c
1/29 (3.4 %)
2/29 (6.9 %)
3/29 (10.3 %)
1/29 (3.4 %)
 Testa et al. [36]
  
9/75 (12 %)
14/75 (18.6 %)
23/75 (30.6 %)
9/75 (12 %)
 Totals
  
14/185 (7.6 %)
17/185(9.2 %)
31/185 (16.8 %)
 
Endoscopic procedures
 Maquirriain [22]
  
2/27 (7.4 %)
0/27 (0 %)
2/27 (7.4 %)
 
 Pearce et al. [30]
8/11 (73 %)
3/11 (27 %)
0/11 (0 %)
0/11 (0 %)
0/11 (0 %)
0/11 (0 %)
 Steenstra and van Dijk [33]
  
0/20 (0 %)
0/20 (0 %)
0/20 (0 %)
 
 Totals
  
2/58 (3.4 %)
0/58 (0 %)
2/58 (3.4 %)
 
Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening
 Duthon et al. [10]
12/13 (92.3 %)c
1/13 (7.7 %)c
0/15 (0 %)
0/15 (0 %)
0/15 (0 %)
 
Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer
 Martin et al. [23]
37/44 (86 %)
6/44 (13.8 %)
1/44 (2.3 %)
4/44 (9.1 %)
5/44 (11.4 %)
 
aSame study comparing release of ventral AT with knife versus needle
bStudy includes patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on individual tendons
cStudy included patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on patient level
Table 4
Success rate
Study
Success rate
Successful
Unsuccessful
Open debridement
 Benazzo et al. [4]
  
 Johnston et al. [11]
  
 Kvist and Kvist [13]b
194/201 (96.5 %)
7/201 (3.5 %)
 Lohrer and Nauck [15]b
15/15 (100 %)
 
23/24 (95.8 %)
1 (4.2 %)
 Maffulli et al. [18]
  
 Maffulli et al. [21]
  
 Nelen et al. [26]b
A. 82/93 (88.2 %)
A. 11/93 (11.8 %)
B. 19/26 (73.1 %)
B. 7/26 (26.9 %)
C. 21/24 (87.5 %)
C. 3/24 (12.5 %)
 Ohberg et al. [27]
22/24 (91.7 %)
2/24 (8.3 %)
 Paavola et al. [29]
  
 Paavola et al. [28]
A. 16/16 (100 %)
 
B. 19/26 (73.1 %)
B. 7/26 (26.9 %)
 Sarimo and Orava [31]
24/24 (100 %)
 
Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies
 Alfredson et al. [2]
10/10 (100 %)
 
 Alfredson [1]a,b
A. 15/18 (83.3 %)
A. 3/18 (16.7 %)
B. 15/19 (78.9 %)
B. 4/19 (21.1 %)
 Alfredson [1]a,b
81/88 (92.0 %)
7/88 (8.0 %)
 Alfredson et al. [3]
11/13 (84.6 %)
2/13 (15.4 %)
 Calder et al. [6]c
22/32 (69 %)
10/32 (31 %)
 Maffulli et al. [20]
30/39 (76.9 %)
9/39 (23.1 %)
 Naidu et al. [24]c
24/26 (92 %)
2/26 (7.7 %)
 Testa et al. [36]
47/63 (74.6 %)
16/63 (25.4 %)
Endoscopic procedures
 Maquirriain [22]c
24/24 (100 %)
 
 Pearce et al. [30]
8/11 (73 %)
3/11 (27 %)
 Steenstra and van Dijk [33]
  
Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening
 Duthon et al. [10]c
12/13 (92.3 %)
1/13 (7.7 %)
Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer
 Martin et al. [23]
37/44 (86 %)
6/44 (13.8 %)
aSame study comparing release of ventral AT with knife versus needle
bStudy includes patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on individual tendons
cStudy included patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on patient level

Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies

Minimally invasive procedures were described in seven included studies [13, 6, 20, 24, 36]. Five articles described a technique to perform a release of the Achilles tendon [13, 6, 24] with additional excision of the plantaris tendon in one study [6]. The other two minimally invasive techniques described aimed to perform percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies with additional release of adhesions by infiltration performed in one study (Table 2, Appendix 2 in Table 6) [20, 36].
Patient satisfaction was reported in five studies and ranged from 69 up to 100 % (Table 3). [13, 6, 24]. Complications rates were adequately reported in four studies, ranging from 2.9 up to 30.6 % (Table 3) [2, 6, 24, 36]. Success rates varied from 69 up to 100 % (Table 4) [13, 6, 20, 24, 36].

Endoscopic procedures

Three studies reported on the outcome of endoscopic procedures [22, 30, 33]. In all procedures, debridement of the paratenon was performed, with additional release of the plantaris tendon in two studies [30, 33] and additional longitudinal tenotomies in one study [22] (Table 2, Appendix 2 in Table 6).
Only one study reported on patient satisfaction; in this study 73 % of patients was satisfied (Table 3) [30]. Complications rates varied from 0 to 7.4 % (Table 3) [22, 30, 33]. Success rates varied from 73 up to 100 % (Table 4) [22, 30].

Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening

One study evaluated gastrocnemius lengthening through an open procedure (Table 2, Appendix 2 in Table 6) [10]. Using this technique, a satisfaction rate of 92.3 % was achieved in combination with 0 % complications (Table 3). A success rate of 92.3 % was achieved (Table 4).

Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer

One study reported on autologous tendon transfer [23]. The technique consisted of resection of the distal Achilles tendon, followed by interposition of the flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon (Table 2, Appendix 2 in Table 6).
The study reported that patient satisfaction was achieved in 86 % of the patients (Table 3). Complications occurred in 11.4 % of the patients (Table 3). A success rate of 86 % was achieved (Table 4).

Methodological quality

The assessment of the methodological quality using the Downs & Black checklist and the Coleman methodological scale resulted in a median score of 12.0 (IQR 10.0–13.25) and 57.5 (IQR 40.0–64.25), respectively (Table 2).
There was no significant correlation between success rate and both Coleman score and Downs & Black score. However, a significant positive correlation was found between year of publication and Coleman score (rho: 0.53, p < 0.01), and year of publication and Downs & Black score (rho 0.66, p < 0.01).

Discussion

The most important finding of the present study is the large variation in surgical techniques available for the treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy. Additionally, it demonstrates that minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures have lower complication rates with comparable patient satisfaction in comparison with open procedures. Due to low methodological quality of included studies in combination with large heterogeneity in population, used techniques and reported outcome measures, we refrained from data pooling.
Hitherto, one review evaluating surgical treatment of Achilles tendinopathy was performed [35]. In this study from 2001 a mean success rate of 77.4 % was reported [35]. Additionally, a negative correlation between success rate and methodological quality in studies on the topic of surgical treatment of tendinopathy was established [35]. In contrast to that review, we found no correlation between effectiveness and methodological quality. However, we found a positive correlation between year of publication and Coleman score, in line with a previous review on insertional tendinopathy [38]. This implicates that in current research on Achilles tendinopathy the methodological quality is improving.
Studies on open surgery reported inconsistent results regarding patient satisfaction and the complication rates varied widely. Particularly high complication rates were observed in studies evaluating the outcome of multiple tenotomies via an open procedure [4, 18, 21].
In general, good results regarding patient satisfaction and complication rates were reported in studies on minimally invasive surgery. Most of these studies reported on minimally invasive release of the Achilles tendon or minimally invasive longitudinal tenotomies of the Achilles tendon. One study evaluated the results of excision of the plantaris tendon [6]. In this study promising results were reported. However, more studies are needed to support these findings.
Minimally invasive procedures are assumed to have lower complication rates. Most studies evaluating minimally invasive techniques reported low complication rates (Table 3). However, a particularly high complication rate was observed in the study evaluating multiple percutaneous tenotomies [36].
Excellent results regarding functional outcome and postoperative pain were reported in three small series on endoscopic surgery. There were significant differences in the evaluated endoscopic procedures. Maquirriain et al. [22] reported the results of multiple endoscopic longitudinal tenotomies where in the other studies endoscopic release of the Achilles tendon in combination with release of the plantaris tendon was evaluated [30, 33]. Compared to the study by Pearce et al. a higher complication rate was observed in this study.
One study evaluating the results of gastrocnemius lengthening was included in this review [10]. Although promising results are reported, the study evaluated a mere 13 patients at final follow-up. A recent study reported less promising results regarding self-reported sport function in patients treated for Achilles tendinopathy with gastrocnemius lengthening [25].
One study on FHL transfer was included [23]. Good results were reported; however, a high complication rate was observed. The included retrospective case series reported on 44 patients with a mean age of 58.2 years. However, patients affected by midportion tendinopathy tend to be younger, and a wish for return to high-level sport is often present.
The most important limitation of this review is the limited level of evidence of included articles resulting in a high risk of bias. In addition, the lack of or incomplete reportage of our primary and secondary outcome measures made for an arduous comparison. In addition, the included studies used a large variety of heterogeneous outcome measures to measure functional outcome and pain. Therefore, caution should be taken when interpreting the results presented in this review. Another limitation is the confusing terminology used to describe the various pathological conditions of the Achilles tendon [8].
Despite the low level of evidence of the included study, this systematic review is of clinical significance [5]. This study is the first systematic review to compare surgical techniques for their effectiveness on patient satisfaction and complication rate. The study provides a comprehensive overview and clearly demonstrates the variation per surgical technique in outcome of patient satisfaction and complication rates.
We strongly encourage future studies to be conducted using validated instruments to assess pain and functional outcome. As often advocated, larger populations, prospective studies and long-term follow-up studies are needed to be conclusive on the best surgical treatment option of midportion Achilles tendinopathy.
In addition, no comparative study of surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment or placebo intervention has been conducted. Therefore, no additional benefit of surgery over nonsurgical treatment, placebo intervention or wait-and-see policy has been established. Future research should therefore strive to compare surgical treatment with nonsurgical or placebo intervention.
Furthermore, as the exact pathophysiology of midportion tendinopathy is still poorly understood, current surgical techniques address a range of hypothetical abnormalities with varying results (Appendix 1 in Table 5). Future research should aim to determine whether the extent of the pathology influences the required surgical approach.

Conclusion

The study provides a comprehensive overview of the current literature and clearly demonstrates the variation in outcome of patient satisfaction and complication rates. None of the included studies compared surgical treatment with nonsurgical treatment or placebo intervention. However, minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures result in lower complication rates compared to open surgical procedures. Minimally invasive and endoscopic procedures might therefore prove to be the future of surgical treatment of Achilles midportion tendinopathy.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Anhänge

Appendix 1

See Table 5.
Table 5
Included studies
Study
Level of evidence
N patients (N tendons)
Gender (% F)
Mean age (years)
Duration of symptoms (months)
Mean F-U (months)
Diagnosis made by
Diagnosis
Surgical technique
Open debridement
 Benazzo et al. [4]
Level II
A. 20 (20)
A. 15 %
A. 41.6 ± 11.2
A. 9.14
A 6;.55.2 ± 14.4
A. History + Clinical + MRI
A. Midportion Achilles tendinopathy (= intratendinous lesions)
A. Open surgery: multiple longitudinal tenotomies and excision degenerations
B. 32 (32)
B. 12.5 %
B. 43.2 ± 12.8
B. 8.91
B. 6; 47.2 ± 11.7
B. History + Clinical + MRI
B. Midportion Achilles tendinopathy (= intratendinous lesions)
B. Open surgery: excision degeneration + soleus fibres transfer
 Johnston et al. [11]
Level IV
A. 10 (10)
     
A. Tenosynovitis
A. Open surgery: excision inflamed paratenon and decompression AT
B. 7 (7)
 
B. 48 (33–58)
   
B. Chronic Achilles tendonitis + tenosynovitisa
B. Open surgery: excision inflamed paratenon, decompression AT + debridement degenerations
 Kvist and Kvist [13]
Level IV
182 (201)
 
27.5 (12–53)
7.5 (2–120)
  
Calcaneal paratenonitis
Open surgery: removal adhesions between paratenon, crural fascia and skin + excision thickened paratenon
 Lohrer and Nauck [15]
Level II
A. 11 (15)
A. 36.4 %
A. 48.4 (± 7.3; 39.0–58.0)
 
A. 3; 6; 12
A. Clinical + US-PD + MRIa
A. Isolated midportion Achilles tendinopathy
A. Open surgery: release AT + transachilllear scarification
B. 23 (24)
B. 17.4 %
B. 50.5 (± 9.9; 23–66)
 
B. 3; 6; 12
B. Clinical + US-PD + MRIa
B. Midportion Achilles tendinopathy + central core lesions
B. Open surgery: release AT + excision intratendinous lesions + transachillear scarification
 Maffulli et al. [18]
Level IV
10 (10)
20 %
34.8 (21–52)
87 (27–178)
35 (27–52)
Clinical + MRIa + USa + CTa
Achilles tendinopathy with central core degeneration, 2–6 cm area
Open surgery: excision paratenon, multiple longitudinal tenotomies and excision of degenerations
 Maffulli et al. [21]
Level III
86 (86)
47.7 %
 
25.3 (12–52)
39.6 (30–60)
Clinical + US + Histological
Tendinopathy of the main body, 2–6 cm area
Open surgery: excision paratenon, multiple longitudinal tenotomies + excision degenerations
 Nelen et al. [26]
Level IV
A. (93)
     
A. Peritendinitis
A. Open surgery: release AT (not ventrally) + excision inflamed paratenon
B. (26)
     
B. Tendinosis
B. Open surgery: debridement tendinosis
C. (24)
     
C. Extensive tendinosis
C. Open surgery: debridement tendinosis (reinforcement with turned-down tendon flap)
 Ohberg et al. [27]
Level IV
24 (24)
29.2 %
43 (26–54)
>6
60 (31–82)
History + Clinical + US
Tendinosis, 2–6 cm level
Open surgery: excision hypertrophic paratenon and debridement of degenerations through a longitudinal incision.
 Paavola et al. [29]
Level IV
A. 171 (171)
  
A. >3
A. 0.5; 1; 2.5; 12 (N = 28)
A. History + Clinical + USa
A. Peritendinitis
A. Open surgery: excision adhesions between crural fascia and paratenon
B. 50 (50)
  
B. >3
B. 0.5; 1; 2.5; 12 (N = 28)
B. History + Clinical + USa
B. Tendinosis
B. Open surgery: debridement intratendinous lesions
 Paavola et al. [28]
Level IV
A. 16 (16)
A. 25 %
A. 37 (±12)
 
A. 7
A. History + Clinical + MRIa + USa
A. Tendinopathy: peritendinous adhesions
A. Open surgery: excision adhesions between crural fascia and paratenon
B. 26 (26)
B. 34.6 %
B. 46 (±14)
 
B. 7
B. History + Clinical + MRIa + USa
B. Tendinopathy: peritendinous adhesions + localised intratendinous lesion
B. Open surgery: excision adhesions between crural fascia and paratenon + debridement intratendinous lesions
 Sarimo and Orava [31]
Level IV
24 (24)
50 %
54 (39–72)
14 (6–28)
30 (18–45)
History + Clinical + US
Chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy
Open surgery: fascial adhesiolysis and radiofrequency microtenotomy
Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies
 Alfredson et al. [2]
Level I
10 (10)
40 %
45.2
23(6–60)
3; 6
Clinical + US–CD
Chronic painful midportion Achilles tendinosis
Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT
 Alfredson [1]b
Level I
A. 15 (18)
A. 33.3 %
A. 46 (31–67)
A. 74 (7–240)
 
A. Clinical + US–CD
A. Midportion Achilles tendinosis
A. Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT.
B. 16 (19)
B. 37.5 %
B. 47 (31–76)
B. 82 (5–240)
 
B. Clinical + US–CD
B. Midportion Achilles tendinosis
B. Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT by use of a needle.
 Alfredson [1]b
Level IV
72 (88)
36.1 %
 
>3
 
Clinical + US–CD
Midportion Achilles tendinosis
Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT.
 Alfredson et al. [3]
Level IV
13 (13)
46.2 %
53 (34–70)
>6
6
Clinical + US–CD
Midportion Achilles tendinopathy
Minimally invasive: US–CD-guided release ventral AT.
 Calder et al. [6]
Level IV
32 (34)
31.3 %
27.2 (19–42)
 
22.1 (12–48)
Clinical + MRI
Noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy (= paratendinitis + tendinosisa)
Minimally invasive: release AT and excision plantaris tendon
 Maffulli et al. [20]
Level IV
39 (39)
23.1 %
45 (34–63)
13 (6–55)
204 (180–264)
Clinical + US
Midportion Achilles tendinopathy + paratendinopathya
Minimally invasive: multiple percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies
 Naidu et al. [24]
Level IV
26 (29)
68.8 %
53 (38–66)
 
13 (6–31)
Clinical + radiograph + MRIa + USa
Noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy
Minimally invasive: circumferential AT release with a tracheal hook + peritendinous infusion of corticosteroids
 Testa et al. [36]
Level IV
63 (63)
   
51 (±8.2)
History + Clinical + MRIa + US
Chronic Achilles tendinopathy + paratendinopathya
Minimally invasive: multiple US-guided percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies
Endoscopic procedures
 Maquirriain [22]
Level IV
24 (27)
50 %
45.5 (±8.9)
>6
92.4 (60–168)
History + Clinical + MRI
Chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy
Endoscopic debridement paratenon + two longitudinal tenotomies
 Pearce et al. [30]
Level IV
11 (11)
 
36.5 (24–55)
13 (3–36)
30 (24–39)
Clinical + MRIa + USa
Noninsertional tendinopathy (= paratendinopathy + intratendinous disease)
Endoscopic debridement paratenon + release of plantaris tendon
 Steenstra and van Dijk [33]
Level IV
16 (16)
  
>24
72 (24–84)
 
Noninsertional tendinopathy + paratendinopathy.
Endoscopic debridement paratenon + release of plantaris tendon
Open surgery: gastrocnemius recession
 Duthon et al. [10]
Level IV
13 (15)
23.1 %
  
12; 24
History + Clinical + MRIa
Noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy (= peritendonitis + tendinosis)
Open surgery: gastrocnemius recession
Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer
 Martin et al. [23]
Level IV
44 (44)
59 %
58.2 (±10.1)
 
40.8 (±22.8)
Clinical + Radiograph + MRI
Chronic degenerative Achilles tendinosis, 2–6 cm area
Open surgery: excision AT + FHL transfer
Outlined are level of evidence; patient demographics; duration of follow-up (F-U); reported surgical technique and methodological quality
AT Achilles tendon, US ultrasound, CD color doppler
aOnly in percentage of patients
bSame study comparing release of ventral AT with knife versus needle

Appendix 2

See Table 6.
Table 6
Surgical techniques
 
N of procedures
N of surgeons
Position
Approach
Description
Open debridement
 Benazzo et al. [4]
A. 20
A. 1
A. Prone
A. Lateral longitudinal incision
A. Two–three longitudinal tenotomies and excision of degenerated areas (not sutured)
B. 32
B. 2
B. Prone
B. Lateral longitudinal incision
B. Excision of the degenerations through a longitudinal tenotomy after which a muscle bundle of the soleus muscle was bluntly dissected and distally left attached. The proximal end of the muscle bundle was anchored into the longitudinal incision with absorbable sutures
 Johnston et al. [11]
A. 10
  
A. Medial longitudinal incision
A. Resection of thickened peritenon after which a one cm portion was resected and the AT was decompressed
B. 7
  
B. Medial longitudinal incision
B. Resection of thickened peritenon after which a one cm portion was resected. If the AT was thickened or swollen, a longitudinal incision was made and degenerations were debrided
 Kvist and Kvist [13]
201
 
Prone
Lateral incision (7 cm)
Fascial incision, after which adhesions between the paratenon and crural fascia and the crural fascia and the skin were removed. Thickened paratenon was excised (not sutured)
 Lohrer and Nauck [15]
A. 15
A. 1
 
A. Transverse incision (4 cm) + s.o.s. expanded longitudinally medial or lateral, creating a Z- or L-shape
A. The AT was released, after which transachillear scarification, parallel to the fibres, was performed with a surgical scalpel
B. 24
B. 1
 
B. Transverse incision (4 cm) + s.o.s. expanded longitudinally medial or lateral, creating a Z- or L-shape
B. The AT was released, after which a longitudinal incision was made to excise degenerated lesions. The AT was reconstructed with sutures. With a surgical scalpel transachillear scarification was performed, parallel to the fibres
 Maffulli et al. [18]
10
1
Prone
Medial longitudinal incision
The paratenon was excised and suspicious areas were explored by three–five longitudinal tenotomies and degenerations were excised (not sutured)
 Maffulli et al. [21]
86
 
Prone
Medial or lateral curvilinear longitudinal incision (10-12 cm)
The paratenon was excised and suspicious areas were explored by three–five longitudinal tenotomies and degenerations were excised (not sutured)
 Nelen et al. [26]
A. 93
  
A. Medial longitudinal incision
A. Incision of crural fascia and paratenon, after which the medial, lateral and dorsal aspect of the AT were released (no circular dissection, ventral side AT left untouched). Hypertrophic paratenon was excised
B. 26
  
B. Medial longitudinal incision
B. Debridement tendinosis (sutured side to side)
 
C. 24
  
C. Medial longitudinal incision
C. Extensive debridement tendinosis, after which the AT was reinforced with a rectangular flap of lateral or medial tendon aponeurosis, turned down on itself and sutured in the defect with resorbable sutures
 Ohberg et al. [27]
24
  
Lateral longitudinal incision
Hypertrophic paratenon was excised, and a longitudinal incision was made to debride degenerations (sutured side to side)
 Paavola et al. [29]
A. 171
A. 1
A. Prone
A. Lateral longitudinal incision
A. Fascial incision, after which adhesions between the paratenon and the crural fascia were excised
B. 50
B. 1
B. Prone
B. Lateral longitudinal incision
B. Fascial incision, after which adhesions between paratenon and crural fascia were removed and a longitudinal incision was made to excise intratendinous lesions (sutured side to side)
 Paavola et al. [28]
A. 16
A. 2
A. Prone
A. Lateral longitudinal incision
A. Fascial incision, after which adhesions between paratenon and crural fascia were removed
B. 26
B. 2
B. Prone
B. Lateral longitudinal incision
B. Fascial incision, after which adhesions between paratenon and crural fascia were removed and a longitudinal incision was made to excise intratendinous lesions (sutured side to side)
 Sarimo and Orava [31]
24
  
Medial or Lateral longitudinal incision (3–5 cm)
Fascial incision, after which adhesions between paratenon and crural fascia were removed and multiple radiofrequency microtenotomies were performed
Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies
 Alfredson et al. [2]
10
  
Lateral longitudinal incision
US–CD-guided dissection of the AT from the ventral soft tissue by use of a knife followed by haemostasis with diathermia
 Alfredson [1]a
A. 18
 
A. Prone
A. Lateral longitudinal incision (1–2 cm)
A. US–CD-guided dissection of the AT from the ventral soft tissue by use of a knife followed by haemostasis with diathermia
B. 19
 
B. Prone
B. Medial or lateral needle insertion
B. US–CD-guided release of the AT from the ventral soft tissue by use of a needle
 Alfredson [1]a
88
 
Prone
Lateral longitudinal incision (1–2 cm)
US–CD-guided dissection of the AT from the ventral soft tissue by use of a knife, followed by haemostasis with diathermia
 Alfredson et al. [3]
13
  
Medial longitudinal incision (1–2 cm)
US–CD-guided dissection of the AT from the ventral soft tissue by use of a knife followed by haemostasis with diathermia
 Calder et al. [6]
34
  
Medial incision (2–3 cm)
Release of the AT, after which the plantaris tendon was released from the AT and transected distally. The proximal end of the plantaris tendon is sectioned at the musculo-tendinous junction and delivered through a stab incision
 Maffulli et al. [20]
39
1
Prone
Five stab incisions: 2 medial; 1 central; 2 lateral
Multiple US-guided percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies were created through five stab incisions
 Naidu et al. [24]
29
 
Prone
Midline longitudinal incision (1–2 cm)
A blunt tracheal hook was passed up and down the AT to perform adhesiolysis. After closure of the paratenon, corticosteroids were infused peritendinously
 Testa et al. [36]
63
 
Prone
Stab incision central over degeneration
Adhesiolysis by 0.5 % carbocaine infiltration. Next, six US-guided percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies through one incision, three up- and three downwards, varying 45° were performed
Endoscopic procedures
 Maquirriain [22]
27
1
Prone
Two midline portals
Endoscopic debridement of paratenon and release of the crural fascia were performed. Thereafter, two longitudinal tenotomies were performed
 Pearce et al. [30]
11
 
Prone
Proximal portal medial + distal portal lateral
Endoscopic debridement of paratenon and release of the plantaris tendon were performed
 Steenstra and van Dijk [33]
16
 
Prone
Proximal portal medial + distal portal lateral
Endoscopic debridement of paratenon and release of the plantaris tendon were performed
Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening
 Duthon et al. [10]
15
1
Supine
Medial incision (5 cm)
The gastrocnemius muscle was separated from the soleus muscle by blunt dissection after which the gastrocnemius muscle was cut transversally (not sutured)
Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer
 Martin et al. [23]
44
 
Supine
Medial longitudinal incision (10 cm)
The distal four–six cm of the AT was excised after which the FHL was harvested and interpositioned (secured proximally with a Pulvertaft weave, distally a tunnel is drilled in the calcaneus and the FHL is secured with an interference screw or reflected onto self and sutured)
Outlined are number of procedures; number of involved surgeons; positioning; approach and used surgical technique
AT Achilles tendon, US ultrasound, CD color doppler
aSame study comparing release of ventral AT with knife versus needle

Appendix 3

See Table 7.
Table 7
Functional outcome and pain score
 
Functional outcome measures
Pain scores
Result at follow-up
Study
Preoperative
At follow-up
Preoperative
At follow-up
Successful
Unsuccessful
Open debridement
 Benazzo et al. [4]
A. AOFAS: 72.0 ± 11.6
A. AOFAS (6 months): 93.7 ± 5.0a
(55.2 months): 89.8 ± 3.8
    
A. VISA-A: 53.4 ± 14.7
A. VISA-A (6 months): 93.3 ± 5.3a
(55.2 months): 88.7 ± 5.4
    
A. TEGNER: 6 ± 1.2
A. TEGNER (55.2 months): 6 ± 0.9
    
B. AOFAS: 69.0 ± 10.2
B. AOFAS (6 months): 98.5 ± 3.4a
(47.2 months): 95.1 ± 5.1
    
B. VISA-A: 51.9 ± 15.4
B. VISA-A (6 months): 96.5 ± 5.4a
(47.2 months): 94.4 ± 5.8
    
B. TEGNER: 6 ± 1.4
B. TEGNER (47.2 months): 6 ± 1.1
    
 Johnston et al. [11]
      
 Kvist and Kvist [13]d
    
194/201 (96.5 %)
7/201 (3.5 %)
 Lohrer and Nauck [15]d
A. VISA-A: 44.2 ± 5.5 (16–66)
A. VISA-A (3 months): 51.4 ± 20.4 (12–86)
(6 months): 76.2 ± 18.5 (48–99)a
(12 months): 86.3 ± 8.8 (73–97)a
  
A. 15/15 (100 %)
 
B. VISA-A: 37.0 ± 17.6 (10–79)
B. VISA-A (3 months): 57.0 ± 23.2 (12–97)
(6 months): 81.0 ± 15.8 (50–99)a
(12 months) 90.3 ± 10.6 (62–100)a
  
B. 23/24 (95.8 %)
B. 1/24 (4.2 %)
 Maffulli et al. [18]
      
 Maffulli et al. [21]
      
 Nelen et al. [26]d
    
A. 82/93 (88.2 %)
A. 11/93 (11.8 %)
B. 19/26 (73.1 %)
B. 7/26 (26.9 %)
C. 21/24 (87.5 %)
C. 3/24 (12.5 %)
 Ohberg et al. [27]
    
22/24 (91.7 %)
2/24 (8.3 %)
 Paavola et al. [29]
      
 Paavola et al. [28]
    
A. 16/16 (100 %)
 
B. 19/26 (73.1 %)
B. 7/26 (26.9 %)
 Sarimo and Orava [31]
  
NPSAO 5.0 (3–7)
NPSAO: 0.7 (0–4)a
24/24 (100 %)
 
   
VAS rest: 0 mm
  
   
VAS daily living: 1.4 mm (0–20 mm)
  
   
VAS athletic activity: 6.0 mm (0–40 mm)
  
Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies
 Alfredson et al. [2]
  
VAS (3 months): 75 mm
VAS (3 months): 21 mma
10/10 (100 %)
 
 Alfredson [1]b,d
  
A. VAS AT-loading: 69 mm (40–92 mm)
A. VAS AT-loading: 6 mm (0–38 mm)a
A. 15/18 (83.3 %)
A. 3/18 (16.7 %)
  
B. VAS AT-loading: 75 mm (40–99 mm)
B. VAS AT-loading: 2 mm (0–15 mm)a
B. 15/19 (78.9 %)
B. 4/19 (21.1 %)
 Alfredson [1]b,d
    
81/88 (92.0 %)
7/88 (8.0 %)
 Alfredson et al. [3]
  
VAS AT-loading: 76 mm (55–98 mm)
VAS AT-loading: 7 mm (0–23 mm)
11/13 (84.6 %)
2/13 (15.4 %)
 Calder et al. [6]e
FAOS: 333 (321–345)
FAOS: 449 (431–468)
VAS: 58 mm (95 % CI 5.4–6.3)
VAS: 8 mm (95 % CI 0.3–1.3)a
22/32 (69 %)
10/32 (31 %)
 Maffulli et al. [20]
 
VISA-A: 78.5 (51–94)
  
30/39 (76.9 %)
9/39 (23.1 %)
 Naidu et al. [24]e
Puddu scale: 4.9/6
Puddu scale: 1.7/6
VAS: 87 mm
VAS: 24 mma
24/26 (92 %)
2/26 (7.7 %)
 Testa et al. [36]
    
47/63 (74.6 %)
16/63 (25.4 %)
Endoscopic procedures
 Maquirriain [22]e
VISA-A (N = 15): 37.06 ± 4.99
VISA-A (N = 15): 97.55 ± 12.11a
 
VAS 2.2 mm ± 11.5 mm
24/24 (100 %)
 
ATSS-score: 32.66 ± 13.15
ATSS-score: 97.25 ± 12.31a
    
 
PGART: 0.25 ± 0.71
    
 Pearce et al. [30]
AOFAS: 68 (51–82)
AOFAS: 92 (74–100)a
AOS-pain: 28 %
AOS-pain: 8 %a
8/11 (73 %)
3/11 (27 %)
AOS-disability: 38 %
AOS-disability: 10 %a
    
SF-36: 76
SF-36: 87
    
 Steenstra and van Dijk [33]
      
Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening
 Duthon et al. [10]e
AOFAS: 71 (67–73)c
AOFAS (12 months N = 17d): 100 (90–100)a,c
  
12/13 (92.3 %)
1/13 (7.7 %)
FFI: 39 (25–45)c
FFI (12 months N = 17d): 12 (10–18)a,c; (24 months N = 17d): 12 (10–19)a,c
    
SF-12 physical: 36 (33–44)c
SF-12 physical (12 months N = 17b): 51 (42–56)a,c; (24 months N = 17d): 51 (46–56)a,c
    
Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer
 Martin et al. [23]
 
AOFAS (N = 19): 91.6 ± 7.7
 
VAS: 15 mm (±20 mm)
37/44 (86 %)
6/44 (13.8 %)
aStatistically significant (p < 0.05)
bSame study divided into two separate studies
cMedian instead of mean
dStudy includes patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on individual tendons
eStudy included patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on patient level

Appendix 4

See Table 8.
Table 8
Success rate
Study
Result at F-U
Success rate
Satisfied
Unsatisfied
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Successful
Unsuccessful
Open debridement
 Benazzo et al. [4]
        
 Johnston et al. [11]
        
 Kvist and Kvist [13]b
  
169/201 (84.1 %)
25/201 (12.4 %)
 
7/201 (3.5 %)
194/201 (96.5 %)
7/201 (3.5 %)
 Lohrer and Nauck [15]b
 
A. 15/15 (100 %)
 
A. 15/15 (100 %)
 
 
B. 23/24 (95.8 %)
B. 1/24 (4.2 %)
B. 23/24 (95.8 %)
B. 1/24 (4.2 %)
 Maffulli et al. [18]
        
 Maffulli et al. [21]
        
 Nelen et al. [26]b
  
A. 54/93 (58.1 %)
A. 28/93 (30.1 %)
A. 8/93 (8.6 %)
A. 3/93 (3.2 %)
A. 82/93 (88.2 %)
A. 11/93 (11.8 %)
  
B. 15/26 (57 %)
B. 4/26 (15.4 %)
B. 4/26 (15.4 %)
B. 3/26 (11.5 %)
B. 19/26 (73.1 %)
B. 7/26 (26.9 %)
  
C. 12/24 (50 %)
C. 9/24 (37.5 %)
C. 2/24 (8.3 %)
C. 1/24 (4.2 %)
C. 21/24 (87.5 %)
C. 3/24 (12.5 %)
 Ohberg et al. [27]
  
12/24 (50 %)
10/24 (41.7 %)
 
2/24 (8.3 %)
22/24 (91.7 %)
2/24 (8.3 %)
 Paavola et al. [29]
        
 Paavola et al. [28]
  
A. 5/16 (31.3 %)
A. 11/16 (68.8 %)
  
A. 16/16 (100 %)
 
  
B.7/26 (26.9 %)
B.12/26 (46.2 %)
B. 1/26 (3.8 %)
B. 6/26 (23.1 %)
B. 19/26 (73.1 %)
B. 7/26 (26.9 %)
 Sarimo and Orava [31]
  
14/24 (58.3 %)
10/24 (41.7 %)
  
24/24 (100 %)
 
Minimally invasive tendon stripping/tenotomies
 Alfredson et al. [2]
10/10 (100 %)
     
10/10 (100 %)
 
 Alfredson [1]a,b
A. 15/18 (83.3 %)
A. 3/18 (16.7 %)
    
A. 15/18 (83.3 %)
A. 3/18 (16.7 %)
B. 15/19 (78.9 %)
B. 4/19 (21.1 %)
    
B. 15/19 (78.9 %)
B. 4/19 (21.1 %)
 Alfredson [1]a,b
81/88 (92.0 %)
7/88 (8.0 %)
    
81/88 (92.0 %)
7/88 (8.0 %)
 Alfredson et al. [3]
11/13 (84.6 %)
2/13 (15.4 %)
    
11/13 (84.6 %)
2/13 (15.4 %)
 Calder et al. [6]c
22/32 (69 %)
10/32 (31 %)
    
22/32 (69 %)
10/32 (31 %)
 Maffulli et al. [20]
 
30/39 (76.9 %)
9/39 (23.1 %)
 
30/39 (76.9 %)
9/39 (23.1 %)
 Naidu et al. [24]c
24/26 (92 %)
2/26 (7.7 %)
    
24/26 (92 %)
2/26 (7.7 %)
 Testa et al. [36]
  
35/63 (55.6 %)
12/63 (19.0 %)
8/63 (12.7 %)
8/63 (12.7 %)
47/63 (74.6 %)
16/63 (25.4 %)
Endoscopic procedures
 Maquirriain [22]c
  
20/24 (85.1 %)
4/24 (14.9 %)
  
24/24 (100 %)
 
 Pearce et al. [30]
8/11 (73 %)
3/11 (27 %)
    
8/11 (73 %)
3/11 (27 %)
 Steenstra and van Dijk [33]
        
Open surgery: gastrocnemius lengthening
 Duthon et al. [10]c
12/13 (92.3 %)
1/13 (7.7 %)
    
12/13 (92.3 %)
1/13 (7.7 %)
Open surgery: autologous tendon transfer
 Martin et al. [23]
37/44 (86 %)
6/44 (13.8 %)
    
37/44 (86 %)
6/44 (13.8 %)
Outlined are patient satisfaction; postoperative result; and success rate
aSame study comparing release of ventral AT with knife versus needle
bStudy includes patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on individual tendons
cStudy included patients who received bilateral surgical treatment; outcome reported on patient level
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfredson H (2011) Ultrasound and Doppler-guided mini-surgery to treat midportion Achilles tendinosis: results of a large material and a randomised study comparing two scraping techniques. Br J Sports Med 45:407–410CrossRefPubMed Alfredson H (2011) Ultrasound and Doppler-guided mini-surgery to treat midportion Achilles tendinosis: results of a large material and a randomised study comparing two scraping techniques. Br J Sports Med 45:407–410CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfredson H, Ohberg L, Zeisig E, Lorentzon R (2007) Treatment of midportion Achilles tendinosis: similar clinical results with US and CD-guided surgery outside the tendon and sclerosing polidocanol injections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1504–1509CrossRefPubMed Alfredson H, Ohberg L, Zeisig E, Lorentzon R (2007) Treatment of midportion Achilles tendinosis: similar clinical results with US and CD-guided surgery outside the tendon and sclerosing polidocanol injections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1504–1509CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfredson H, Spang C, Forsgren S (2012) Unilateral surgical treatment for patients with midportion Achilles tendinopathy may result in bilateral recovery. Br J Sports Med 48:1421–1424CrossRefPubMed Alfredson H, Spang C, Forsgren S (2012) Unilateral surgical treatment for patients with midportion Achilles tendinopathy may result in bilateral recovery. Br J Sports Med 48:1421–1424CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Benazzo F, Zanon G, Klersy C, Marullo M (2014) Open surgical treatment for chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: faster recovery with the soleus fibres transfer technique. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3232-x Benazzo F, Zanon G, Klersy C, Marullo M (2014) Open surgical treatment for chronic midportion Achilles tendinopathy: faster recovery with the soleus fibres transfer technique. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-014-3232-x
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhandari M, Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB (2004) Doubling the impact: publication of systematic review articles in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1012–1016CrossRefPubMed Bhandari M, Montori VM, Devereaux PJ, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB (2004) Doubling the impact: publication of systematic review articles in orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1012–1016CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Calder JDF, Freeman R, Pollock N (2014) Plantaris excision in the treatment of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy in elite athletes. Br J Sports Med 49:1532–1534CrossRefPubMed Calder JDF, Freeman R, Pollock N (2014) Plantaris excision in the treatment of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy in elite athletes. Br J Sports Med 49:1532–1534CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11CrossRefPubMed Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat van Dijk CN, van Sterkenburg MN, Wiegerinck JI, Karlsson J, Maffulli N (2011) Terminology for Achilles tendon related disorders. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 19:835–841CrossRef van Dijk CN, van Sterkenburg MN, Wiegerinck JI, Karlsson J, Maffulli N (2011) Terminology for Achilles tendon related disorders. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 19:835–841CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Downs SH, Black N (1998) The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:377–384CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Duthon VB, Lübbeke A, Duc SR, Stern R, Assal M (2011) Noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy treated with gastrocnemius lengthening. Foot Ankle Int 32:375–379CrossRefPubMed Duthon VB, Lübbeke A, Duc SR, Stern R, Assal M (2011) Noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy treated with gastrocnemius lengthening. Foot Ankle Int 32:375–379CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston E, Scranton P, Pfeffer GB (1997) Chronic disorders of the Achilles tendon: results of conservative and surgical treatments. Foot Ankle Int 18:570–574CrossRefPubMed Johnston E, Scranton P, Pfeffer GB (1997) Chronic disorders of the Achilles tendon: results of conservative and surgical treatments. Foot Ankle Int 18:570–574CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat de Jonge S, van den Berg C, de Vos RJ, van der Heide HJL, Weir A, Verhaar JAN, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Tol JL (2011) Incidence of midportion Achilles tendinopathy in the general population. Br J Sports Med 45:1026–1028CrossRefPubMed de Jonge S, van den Berg C, de Vos RJ, van der Heide HJL, Weir A, Verhaar JAN, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Tol JL (2011) Incidence of midportion Achilles tendinopathy in the general population. Br J Sports Med 45:1026–1028CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kvist H, Kvist M (1980) The operative treatment of chronic calcaneal paratenonitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62:353–357PubMed Kvist H, Kvist M (1980) The operative treatment of chronic calcaneal paratenonitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62:353–357PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohrer H, Nauck T (2014) Results of operative treatment for recalcitrant retrocalcaneal bursitis and midportion Achilles tendinopathy in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1073–1081CrossRefPubMed Lohrer H, Nauck T (2014) Results of operative treatment for recalcitrant retrocalcaneal bursitis and midportion Achilles tendinopathy in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1073–1081CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo UG, Ramamurthy C, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2008) Minimally invasive stripping for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. Disabil Rehabil 30:1709–1713CrossRefPubMed Longo UG, Ramamurthy C, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2008) Minimally invasive stripping for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. Disabil Rehabil 30:1709–1713CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Maffulli N, Binfield PM, Moore D, King JB (1999) Surgical decompression of chronic central core lesions of the Achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med 27:747–752PubMed Maffulli N, Binfield PM, Moore D, King JB (1999) Surgical decompression of chronic central core lesions of the Achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med 27:747–752PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Maffulli N, Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro V (2010) Current treatment options for tendinopathy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 11:2177–2186CrossRefPubMed Maffulli N, Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro V (2010) Current treatment options for tendinopathy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 11:2177–2186CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maffulli N, Oliva F, Testa V, Capasso G, Del Buono A (2013) Multiple percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies for chronic Achilles tendinopathy in runners: a long-term study. Am J Sports Med 41:2151–2157CrossRefPubMed Maffulli N, Oliva F, Testa V, Capasso G, Del Buono A (2013) Multiple percutaneous longitudinal tenotomies for chronic Achilles tendinopathy in runners: a long-term study. Am J Sports Med 41:2151–2157CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Maffulli N, Testa V, Capasso G, Oliva F, Panni AS, Longo UG, King JB (2008) Surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy produces worse results in women. Disabil Rehabil 30:1714–1720CrossRefPubMed Maffulli N, Testa V, Capasso G, Oliva F, Panni AS, Longo UG, King JB (2008) Surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy produces worse results in women. Disabil Rehabil 30:1714–1720CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Maquirriain J (2013) Surgical treatment of chronic achilles tendinopathy: long-term results of the endoscopic technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 52:451–455CrossRefPubMed Maquirriain J (2013) Surgical treatment of chronic achilles tendinopathy: long-term results of the endoscopic technique. J Foot Ankle Surg 52:451–455CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RL, Manning CM, Carcia CR, Conti SF (2005) An outcome study of chronic Achilles tendinosis after excision of the Achilles tendon and flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer. Foot Ankle Int 26:691–697CrossRefPubMed Martin RL, Manning CM, Carcia CR, Conti SF (2005) An outcome study of chronic Achilles tendinosis after excision of the Achilles tendon and flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer. Foot Ankle Int 26:691–697CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Naidu V, Abbassian A, Nielsen D, Uppalapati R, Shetty A (2009) Minimally invasive paratenon release for non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 30:680–685CrossRefPubMed Naidu V, Abbassian A, Nielsen D, Uppalapati R, Shetty A (2009) Minimally invasive paratenon release for non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 30:680–685CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nawoczenski DA, Barske H, Tome J, Dawson LK, Zlotnicki JP, Digiovanni BF (2015) Tendinopathy: strength and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:99–105CrossRefPubMed Nawoczenski DA, Barske H, Tome J, Dawson LK, Zlotnicki JP, Digiovanni BF (2015) Tendinopathy: strength and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:99–105CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelen G, Martens M, Burssens A (1989) Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendinitis. Am J Sports Med 17:754–759CrossRefPubMed Nelen G, Martens M, Burssens A (1989) Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendinitis. Am J Sports Med 17:754–759CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H (2001) Good clinical results but persisting side-to-side differences in calf muscle strength after surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis: a 5-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:207–212CrossRefPubMed Ohberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H (2001) Good clinical results but persisting side-to-side differences in calf muscle strength after surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendinosis: a 5-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:207–212CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Paavola M, Kannus P, Orava S, Pasanen M, Järvinen M (2002) Surgical treatment for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a prospective seven month follow up study. Br J Sports Med 36:178–182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paavola M, Kannus P, Orava S, Pasanen M, Järvinen M (2002) Surgical treatment for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: a prospective seven month follow up study. Br J Sports Med 36:178–182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Paavola M, Orava S, Leppilahti J, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2000) Chronic Achilles tendon overuse injury: complications after surgical treatment. An analysis of 432 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 28:77–82CrossRefPubMed Paavola M, Orava S, Leppilahti J, Kannus P, Järvinen M (2000) Chronic Achilles tendon overuse injury: complications after surgical treatment. An analysis of 432 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 28:77–82CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pearce CJ, Carmichael J, Calder JD (2012) Achilles tendinoscopy and plantaris tendon release and division in the treatment of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Surg 18:124–127CrossRefPubMed Pearce CJ, Carmichael J, Calder JD (2012) Achilles tendinoscopy and plantaris tendon release and division in the treatment of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Surg 18:124–127CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarimo J, Orava S (2011) Fascial incision and adhesiolysis combined with radiofrequency microtenotomy in treatment of chronic midportion achilles tendinopathy. Scand J Surg 100:125–128CrossRefPubMed Sarimo J, Orava S (2011) Fascial incision and adhesiolysis combined with radiofrequency microtenotomy in treatment of chronic midportion achilles tendinopathy. Scand J Surg 100:125–128CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Schepsis AA, Leach RE (1987) Surgical management of Achilles tendinitis. Am J Sports Med 15:308–315CrossRefPubMed Schepsis AA, Leach RE (1987) Surgical management of Achilles tendinitis. Am J Sports Med 15:308–315CrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat van Sterkenburg MN, van Dijk CN (2011) Mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: why painful? An evidence-based philosophy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1367–1375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Sterkenburg MN, van Dijk CN (2011) Mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: why painful? An evidence-based philosophy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1367–1375CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Tallon C, Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N (2001) Outcome of surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. A critical review. Am J Sports Med 29:315–320PubMed Tallon C, Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N (2001) Outcome of surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy. A critical review. Am J Sports Med 29:315–320PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Testa V, Capasso G, Benazzo F, Maffulli N (2002) Management of Achilles tendinopathy by ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:573–580PubMed Testa V, Capasso G, Benazzo F, Maffulli N (2002) Management of Achilles tendinopathy by ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:573–580PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Thermann H, Benetos IS, Panelli C, Gavriilidis I, Feil S (2009) Endoscopic treatment of chronic mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: novel technique with short-term results. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1264–1269CrossRef Thermann H, Benetos IS, Panelli C, Gavriilidis I, Feil S (2009) Endoscopic treatment of chronic mid-portion Achilles tendinopathy: novel technique with short-term results. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1264–1269CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiegerinck JI, Kerkhoffs GM, van Sterkenburg MN, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN (2013) Treatment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1345–1355CrossRef Wiegerinck JI, Kerkhoffs GM, van Sterkenburg MN, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN (2013) Treatment for insertional Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 21:1345–1355CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Zwiers R, Wiegerinck JI, van Dijk CN (2014) Treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy: an evidence-based overview. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3407-5 Zwiers R, Wiegerinck JI, van Dijk CN (2014) Treatment of midportion Achilles tendinopathy: an evidence-based overview. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-014-3407-5
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical treatment for midportion Achilles tendinopathy: a systematic review
verfasst von
T. P. A. Baltes
R. Zwiers
J. I. Wiegerinck
C. N. van Dijk
Publikationsdatum
12.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4062-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.