nach oben

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Erschienen in:

04.02.2016

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Peer-Led Self-Management Programs for Increasing Physical Activity

verfasst von: Krista L Best, William C Miller, Janice J Eng, Francois Routhier

Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Approximately 85 % of Canadians are not physically active enough to achieve health benefits. Peer-led self-management programs are becoming an increasingly popular strategy for modifying health behaviors, including physical activity. The purpose of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the effect of peer-led self-management interventions on physical activity.

Methods

PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were systematically searched to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of peer-led self-management on physical activity. The studies were described and effect size data were included in meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed according to type of physical activity outcome (i.e., duration, frequency, other).

Results

Twenty-one studies were included in the review and 14 reported statistically significant improvements in physical activity. A meta-analysis of 17 studies showed a statistically significant moderate pooled effect (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.4, p < 0.001) of peer-led self-management programs on physical activity immediately post-intervention. The intervention had a large statistically significant effect based on the four studies that included follow-up measures (SMD = 1.5, p = 0.03). Meta-analysis of nine studies that used similar outcomes (i.e., minutes of physical activity) revealed a statistically significant small effect (SMD = 0.2, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Peer-led self-management programs appear to be effective at increasing weekly duration of physical activity in various populations, but the effect size is small. Training peers to encourage increased physical activity may provide an effective method for reaching various clinical and non-clinical populations. More research is needed using validated and consistent physical activity outcomes.

World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva, Switzerland, 2011. Available online: www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/. [Accessed 14 April 2015].

Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair SN, Katzmarzyk PT. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;13(9838):219–29.CrossRef

Janssen I. Health care costs of physical inactivity in Canadian adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(4):803–6.CrossRefPubMed

Katzmarzyk PT, Janssen I. The economic costs associated with physical inactivity and obesity in Canada: an update. Can J Appl Physiol. 2004;29(1):90–115.CrossRefPubMed

5.•

Warburton DE, Nicol C, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174:801–9.CrossRef

Warburton DE, Charlesworth S, Ivey A, Nettlefold L, Bredin SS. A systematic review of the evidence for Canada’s physical activity guidelines for adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Public Health Agency of Canada, The Strengthened Pan-Canadian Healthy Living Strategy 2010. Available online: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/hp-ps/hl-mvs/ipchls-spimmvs/ld2-eng.php

Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Stat Can. 2011. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-003-x/2011001/article/11396-eng.htm. [Accessed 14 April 2015].

Lorig K, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behavior Med. 2003;26(1):1–7.CrossRef

10.

Barlow J, Wright C, Sheasby J, et al. Self-management for people with chronic conditions: a review. Patient Educ Counsel. 2002;48:177–87.CrossRef

11.

Lorig KR. Stanford self-management programs effectiveness and translation. Institute of Medicine, 2004.

12.

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1997.

13.

Medvene L. Self-help groups, peer helping, and social comparison. In: Shirlynn Spacapan SO, editor. Helping and being helped: naturalistic studies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1992. p. 49–77.

14.

Bratter B, Freeman E. The maturing of peer counseling. Generations. 1990;14:49.

15.

Nuñez DE, Keller C, Ananian CD. A review of the efficacy of the self-management model on health outcomes in community-residing older adults with arthritis. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(3):130–48.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dale JR, Williams SM, Bowyer V. What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review. Diabet Med. 2012;29(11):1361–77.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Jonker AA, Comijs HC, Knipscheer KC, Deeg DJ. Promotion of self-management in vulnerable older people: a narrative literature review of outcomes of the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP). Eur J Ageing. 2009;6(4):303–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Webel AR, Okonsky J, Trompeta J, Holzemer WL. A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviours in adults. Am J Pub Health. 2010;100(2):247–53.CrossRef

19.

Richardson G, Kennedy A, Reeves P, Bower V, Lee E, Middleton C, et al. Cost effectiveness of the expert patients programme (EPP) for patients with chronic conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;62:361–7.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, et al. The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a national lay-led self care support programme for patients with long-term conditions: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2007;61:254–61.CrossRef

21.

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Best KL. Manual wheelchair use: understanding participation and skill development [PhD dissertation]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 2015. Available at https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0166098

23.

Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Maher CG, et al. PEDro. A database of randomized trials and systematic reviews in physical therapy. Man Therapy. 2000;5:223–6.CrossRef

24.

Foley NC, Teasell RW, Bhogal SK, Speechley MR. Stroke rehabilitation evidence-based review: methodology. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:1–7.

25.

Fu R, Gartlehner G, Grant M, Shamliyan T, Sedrakyan A, Wilt TJ, et al. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health care program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(11):1187–97.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.

27.

Glasziou PP, Sanders SL. Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews. Stat Med. 2002;21:1503–11.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J. 2003;327:557.CrossRef

29.

Borenstein B, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009.CrossRef

30.

Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Jones DR, Lau J, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Br Med J. 2011;342:d4002.CrossRef

31.•

Barlow J, Turner A, Edwards R, Gilchrist M. A randomised controlled trial of lay-led self-management for people with multiple sclerosis. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77(1):81–9.CrossRefPubMed

32.•

Buman MP, Giacobbi PR, Dzierzewski JM, Aiken Morgan A, McCrae CS, Roberts BL, et al. Peer volunteers improve long-term maintenance of physical activity with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8 Suppl 2:S257–66.CrossRefPubMed

33.•

Druss BG, Zhao L, von Esenwein SA, Bona JR, Fricks L, Jenkins-Tucker S, et al. The health and recovery peer (HARP) program: a peer-led intervention to improve medical self-management for persons with serious mental illness. Schizophr Res. 2010;118:264–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.•

Fu D, Fu H, McGowan P, Shen YE, Zhu L, Yang H, et al. Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic disease self-management programme in Shanghai, China: randomized controlled trial. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(3):174–82.PubMedPubMedCentral

35.•

Goeppinger J, Armstrong B, Schwartz T, Ensley D, Brady TJ. Self-management education for persons with arthritis: managing comorbidity and eliminating health disparities. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(6):1081–8.CrossRefPubMed

36.•

Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized controlled trial. Med Care. 1999;37:5–14.CrossRefPubMed

37.•

Loriq KR, Ritter PL, Jacquez A. Outcomes of border health Spanish/English chronic disease self-management programs. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(3):401–9.CrossRef

38.•

Lorig KR, Villa FJ, Ritter PL, Piette JD. Spanish diabetes self-management with and without automated telephone reinforcement: two randomized trials. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(3):408–14.CrossRefPubMed

39.•

Lorig KR, Ritter PL, Villa FJ, Armas J. Community-based peer-led diabetes self-management: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35(4):641–51.CrossRefPubMed

40.•

Lorig KR, Ritter PL, González VM. Hispanic chronic disease self-management: a randomized community-based outcome trial. Nurs Res. 2003;52(6):361–9.CrossRefPubMed

41.•

Lorig KR, Gonzalez VM, Ritter P. Community-based Spanish language arthritis education program: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999;37(9):957–63.CrossRefPubMed

42.•

Garrett N, Hageman CM, Sibley SD, Davern M, Berger M, Brunzell C, et al. The effectiveness of an interactive small group diabetes intervention in improving knowledge, feeling of control, and behaviour. Health Promot Pract. 2005;6:320–8.CrossRefPubMed

43.•

Goldberg RW, Dickerson F, Lucksted A, Brown CH, Weber E, Tenhula WN, et al. Living well: an intervention to improve self-management of medical illness for individuals with serious mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64(1):51–7.CrossRefPubMed

44.•

Robinson-Whelen S, Hughes RB, Taylor HB, Colvard M, Mastel-Smith B, Nosek MA. Improving the health and health behaviours of women aging with physical disabilities: a peer-led health promotion program. Womens Health Issues. 2006;16(6):334–45.CrossRefPubMed

45.•

Swerissen H, Belfrage J, Weeks A, Jordan L, Walker CC, Furler J, et al. A randomised control trial of a self-management program for people with a chronic illness from Vietnamese, Chinese, Italian and Greek backgrounds. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64:360–8.CrossRefPubMed

46.•

Williams AM, Bloomfield L, Milthorpe E, Aspinall D, Filocamo K, Wellsmore T, et al. Effectiveness of moving on: an Australian designed generic self-management program for people with a chronic illness. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;11:13–90.

47.•

Barlow JH, Turner AP, Wright CC. A randomized controlled trial of the arthritis self management programme in the UK. Health Edu Res. 2000;15(6):665–80.CrossRef

48.•

Campbell MC, James A, Hudson MA, Carr C, Jackson E, Oates V, et al. Improving multiple behaviours for colorectal cancer prevention among African American church members. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):492–502.CrossRefPubMed

49.•

Rosal MC, Ockene IS, Restrepo A, White MJ, Borg A, Olendzki B, et al. Randomized trial of a literacy-sensitive, culturally tailored diabetes self-management intervention for low-income Latinos: Latinos en control. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(4):838–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.•

van der Wulp I, de Leeuw JR, Gorter KJ, Rutten GE. Effectiveness of peer-led self-management coaching for patients recently diagnosed with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Diabet Med. 2012;29(10):e390–7.CrossRefPubMed

51.•

Vincent D, Pasvogel A, Barrera L. A feasibility study of a culturally tailored diabetes intervention for Mexican Americans. Biol Res Nurs. 2007;9(2):130–41.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:464–75.CrossRefPubMed

53.

Boot WR, Simons DJ, Stothart C, Stutts C. The pervasive problem with placebos in psychology: why active control groups are not sufficient to rule out placebo effects. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013;8(4):445–54.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behaviour in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985;10:141–6.PubMed

55.

Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(2):265–88.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioural research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J App Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.CrossRef

57.

Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behaviour Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5:56.CrossRef

58.

Williams K, Frei A, Vetsch A, Dobbels F, Puhan MA, Rüdell K. Patient-reported physical activity questionnaires: a systematic review of content and format. Health Qual Life Outcome. 2012;10:28.CrossRef

Titel: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Peer-Led Self-Management Programs for Increasing Physical Activity
verfasst von: Krista L Best
William C Miller
Janice J Eng
Francois Routhier
Publikationsdatum: 04.02.2016
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9540-4

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2016

Longitudinal Relationships Between Organizational Justice, Productivity Loss, and Sickness Absence Among Older Employees

The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): German Validation and Development of a Short Form

The Clustering of Lifestyle Behaviours in New Zealand and their Relationship with Optimal Wellbeing

Upswings in Cheerful Mood and Disease Activity in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Differences in Physical and Psychosocial Characteristics Between CFS and Fatigued Non-CFS Patients, a Case-Control Study

Clinical Characteristics and Referral Patterns of Outpatients Visiting a Japanese Psychosomatic Medicine Clinic