Background
The complement system plays a critical role in the process of carcinogenesis. Despite of significant research, controversial viewpoints remain on the exact relationship of complement system with cancer. Classically, the complement system fights against cancer by exerting the effects of immunosurveillance in the immunologic microenvironment of tumors [
1]. Recently it was found that complement may contribute to tumor growth by a wide variety of mechanisms including dysregulation of mitogenic signaling pathways, sustained cellular proliferation, angiogenesis, insensitivity to apoptosis, invasion and migration, and escape from complement cytotoxicity [
2]. This suggested complement, just like a double-edged sword, plays a dual role in carcinogenesis. In particular, component C3 and its receptors have been demonstrated to be a key link between innate and adaptive immunity [
3].
Complement receptor type 1 (CR1, CD35) is a multifunctional polymorphic glycoprotein which binds to C3b fragment of C3 and to C4b with lower affinity [
4,
5]. CR1 belongs to the regulators of complement activation (RCA) family of proteins and is expressed in a wide spectrum of cells and involved in T-cell and B-cell mediated immune regulation [
6,
7]. CR1 also modulates the complement cascade activation by preventing formation of classical and alternative pathway convertases and by acting as a cofactor for factor I mediated inactivation of C3b and C4b [
8,
9]. It has been demonstrated that chronic inflammation can predispose to cancer development and spread [
10], as a fundamental component of innate immunity, the complement cascade consists of potential proinflammatory molecules especially C3 and C5. Moreover, complement activation and abnormal expression in tumor tissues has been demonstrated [
11]. Considering the important role of CR1 in complement activation, innate immunity and chronic inflammation, CR1 has emerged as a molecule of immense interest in gaining insight into the susceptibility to cancer.
CR1 gene is located on the Chromosome 1 at the locus 1q32 [
12]. Various polymorphisms have been studied including the intronic and exonic density polymorphism for their ability to alter the density of erythrocyte CR1 on the cell membranes [
13‐
15]. There are also the molecular weight variants due to insertion-deletion polymorphisms [
16]. Up to now, there have been very few studies on the association of genetic variants of CR1 with susceptibility to autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. It has been proposed that genetic variant at
CR1 gene (rs6656401) might influence the susceptibility to late-onset Alzheimer’s disease [
17]. CR1 expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) may be a new biomarker for prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and a potential therapeutic target [
18]. Recently, it has been indicated that
CR1 A3650G (His1208Arg) polymorphism plays a critical role in conferring genetic susceptibility to gallbladder cancer in north Indian population [
19]. However, the association of genetic variants of
CR1 with risk of lung cancer remains unexplored.
Worldwide, lung cancer is the most common cancer in terms of both incidence and mortality [
20]. NSCLC is the most common subtype of lung cancer and less aggressive and metastic than SCLC. Although cigarette smoking is the predominant risk factor for lung cancer, inherited genetic characteristics are presumed to account in part for this interindividual variation in lung cancer susceptibility. Recently, several genome-wide association studies have demonstrated the common genetic variations associated with susceptibility to lung cancer [
21‐
24]. Given the involvement of the complement system in coordinating innate immunity and inflammatory response [
25], further examination of the potential association between genetic variation of
CR1 genes and lung cancer is warranted.
In the current study, we conducted a case-control study to investigate the association of tag SNPs in CR1 gene with the risk of NSCLC and effect of the interaction of gene-environment on the risk of NSCLC.
Discussion
The chronic airway inflammation and dysfunctional immune system might promote pulmonary carcinogenesis. Implicated in the immune and inflammatory responses, the complement cascade plays a pivotal role in the development of cancer. Thus, it is likely that the genetic variants of CR1 in the complement system confer the susceptibility to lung cancer. In this study, we have for the first time demonstrated that one intronic SNP (rs7525160 G > C) out of 13 tag SNPs of CR1 was associated with the risk of NSCLC in Chinese population. Notably, the rs7525160 CC genotype was associated with an increased risk of developing NSCLC (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.02-2.28; P = 0.028) compared with the GG genotype. MDR analysis also showed that there was no gene-gene interaction among 12 tag SNPs in CR1 gene. Moreover, the risk of NSCLC was associated with the rs7525160 C allele carriers in smokers with OR (95% CI) of 1.72 (1.15-2.59), but not in non-smokers with OR (95% CI) of 1.15 (0.81-1.65), indicating this SNP is a smoking-modifying risk factor for susceptibility to NSCLC. To the best of our knowledge, this study shed new insight into the interplay of genetic variation of CR1 with lung cancer risk. More importantly, it highlights the potential gene-environmental interaction influences the susceptibility to lung cancer.
The complement system has been proposed to get involved in innate immunity with the ability to “complement” antibody-mediated elimination of immune complex and foreign pathogens [
26]. Upon complement activation, the biologically active peptides C5a and C3a elicit a lot of pro-inflammatory effects and could be closely associated with tumorigenesis [
27]. Complement proteins play a dual role in the tumor microenvironment. On one hand, they exert a defensive effect against tumor through complement or antibody-dependent cytotoxicity [
1,
28]. On the other hand, they may escape from immunosurveillance and facilitate carcinogenesis [
2]. Specifically, a number of experimental evidence has suggested an association between complement activation and tumor growth [
29,
30], which provides a strong biologically link between the abnormal expression and activity of complement cascade and carcinogenesis.
Till now, a few studies have been carried out to demonstrate the association of genetic variants in complement proteins with susceptibility to cancer. A significant association of CR2 SNP (rs3813946) with the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma was indicated in Cantonese population [
31], and the genetic variations of complement system genes C5 and C9 plays a potential role in susceptibility to non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [
32]. Recently, it has been shown that complement factor H Y402H polymorphism interact with cigarette smoking to confer the susceptibility to lung cancer [
33]. Furthermore, it has been indicated that
CR1 A3650G (His1208Arg) polymorphism plays a critical role in conferring genetic susceptibility to gallbladder cancer in north Indian population [
19]. However, whether the genetic variants of
CR1 are related to the risk of lung cancer remains unknown. In this case-control study, we found an intronic SNP (rs7525160 G > C) with CC genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of NSCLC. Consistently, our results were in accordance with the study that genetic polymorphisms in innate immunity genes may play a role in the carcinogenesis of lung cancer [
34]. It is likely that some genetic variations in strong link disequilibrium with this intronic SNP (rs7525160 G > C) are functional, which provides a new insight into the hallmarks in susceptibility to lung cancer and further functional experiments are warranted to address the proposal.
Functionally, human CR1 exists on the surface of almost all peripheral blood cells and plays a key role in immune complex clearance and complement inhibition at the cell surface by binding to activated products C3b and C4b [
4,
35]. CR1 also possesses cofactor activity for the serum protease factor I and is thus involved in the generation of further fragments of C3/4b with the activation of complement cascade and the cellular immune response [
4]. In our study, the association of
CR1 polymorphism with lung cancer is biologically plausible in that the intronic polymorphism could affect the density of CR1 molecules on the cell surface, thereby contributing to autoimmune disorders and neoplasm.
Tobacco smoking is an established risk factor for susceptibility to lung cancer. However, not all people who suffer from lung cancer are smokers. Lung cancer in non-smokers can be induced by second hand smoke, air pollutants and diesel exhaust [
36‐
39]. Our present data showed significant difference of pack-year smoked, but not smoking status between NSCLC cases and controls, which suggested the important role of other environmental factors in the development of NSCLC. Tobacco could induce chronic and sustained inflammation in lung microenvironment, contributing to pulmonary carcinogenesis in smokers [
40]. Support also comes from the epidemiologic data regarding inflammation and lung cancer [
41]. CR1, an important molecule implicated in immunity and inflammation, could protect the host from invasion of exogenous chemicals derived from cigarette smoking. Genetic variant of CR1 could alter gene function and result in deregulation of the inflammatory and immune responses, thereby, modulating the susceptibility to lung cancer. More importantly, we observed a potential interaction of this SNP (rs7525160 G > C) with smoking status, suggesting the gene-environmental interaction plays a prominent role in the susceptibility to lung cancer. Our present study has its limitation. Our patients may not be representative of total NSCLC patients at large because they were recruited from only one hospital. In addition, due to the relatively small sample size, further case-control studies are still needed to replicate and extend our findings.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Authors’ contributions
XY drafted the article. XY and JR conducted genotyping of CR1. JL, ZZ and LC collected clinical data and analyzed the data. XZ contributed the research plan and approved the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.