The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3935-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Though the incidence of Testicular cancer among young is rising, little attention is given to promoting testicular self-examination which is recommended for its early prevention in developing countries. This study aimed to assess testicular self-examination and associated factors among Bahir Dar University students using integrated behavioral model.
Cross sectional study was conducted among Bahir Dar University students in September, 2016. Systematic sampling technique was used to select 884 participants. Data was collected using self-administer questionnaire, entered into EPI Data 3.1 and exported to SPSS 21 for analysis. Path analysis was done using STATA 14.2 to check causal effect of integrated behavioral model constructs on testicular self-examination. Internal reliability of the items was checked using Cronbach’s alpha. Multivariable linear and Logistic regression were used to predict the role of independent variable on Intention and TSE respectively. Findings with p-value <0.05 at 95% confidence interval were considered as statistically significant in the final model.
Only 11.8% of the students practiced testicular self-examination in the previous year. Experiential and Instrumental attitude, Perceived control and Self-efficacy were significantly predicted behavioral intention with β coefficient 0.33, 0.12, −0.08 and 0.36. Students’ academic unit [OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15–0.63], educational status of student’s father AOR = 2.25; CI: 1.15–4.44] and [AOR = 3.00; CI: 1.36–6.64], Intention [OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1–1.31], Know-how of TSE [OR = 3.35, 95% CI:1.94–5.80] and knowledge [AOR = 3.93; CI: 2.30–6.72] were the significant predictors of testicular self-examination. The finding of path analysis also demonstrated as Experiential and Instrumental attitude, Perceived control and Self-efficacy have significant effect on intention with path coefficient of 0.33, 0.12, −0.07 and 0.36. Intention, Knowledge and Know-how have effect on testicular self-examination with path coefficient of 0.2, 0.36 and 0.22 respectively.
Magnitude of testicular self-examination is low among university students and it is a product of the type of the college, family educational status, intention, Know-how and knowledge. So, behavior change communication strategy that focus on these behavioral factors should be designed and implemented to improve students’ regular practice of testicular self-examination.
Additional file 1: Survey instrument used to assess testicular self examination among Bahir Dar University students. (DOCX 34 kb)12885_2017_3935_MOESM1_ESM.docx
US Preventative Services Task Force. Screening for Testicular Cancer [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www. ahrq.gov/clinic/3rduspstf/testicular/testiculrs.htm.
American Society Of Clinical Oncology. Testicular Cancer [Internet]. 2014. Available from: https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/testicular-cancer.
Dearnaley DP, Huddart RA, Horwich A. Regular review- managing testicular cancer. Br Med J. 2001;322(7302):1583–8. CrossRef
Trabert B, Chen J, Devesa SS, Bray F, McGlynn K. International patterns and trends in testicular cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype, 1973–2007. Andorology. 2015;3:4–12. CrossRef
Harrison P. Testicular Cancer ups risky prostate cancer Later on. In Orlando, Florida: Medscape; 2015. Available from: http.//WWW. Medscape.com/viewarticle/840285
NCI. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Testis cancer [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Oct 23]. Available from: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/testis.html
WHO. World Cancer Report 2014 [Internet]. WHO; 2014. Report No.: 3. Available from: www.iarc.fr/en/publications/books/wcr/wcr-order.php
Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Knowledge, attitude and practice of testicular self-examination among male university students from Bangladesh, Madagascar, Singapore, South Africa and Turkey. Asian Pac J Cancer Pre. 2015;16(14):4741–3. CrossRef
McClenaham C, Shevlin M, Adamsom G, Bennett C, O’Neill B. Testicular self-examination: a test of the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour. Health Educ Res. 2007;22(2):272–84. CrossRef
Ugurlu Z, Akkuzu G, Karahan A, Beder A, Dogan N, Okdem S, et al. Testicular cancer awareness and testicular self-examination among university students. Asian Pacific. J Cancer. 2011;12:695–8.
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:171–211. CrossRef
Glanz K, Rimer BK. Health, Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Practice. 4th ed. 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103–1741: Jossey-Bass; 2008. 590 p.
McCaul K, Sandgren A, O’Neill H. The value of the theory of planned behaviour, perceived control and selfefficacy expectations for predicting health-protective behaviours. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1993;14:231–52. CrossRef
Barling NR, Lehman M. Young men's awareness, attitudes and practice of testicular self-examination: a health action process approach. Psychol Health Med. 1999;4(3):255–63.
Braun RE. Using the integrated behavioral model to predict binge drinking among college students [dissertation]: The University of Toledo; 2012.
Garcia K, Mann T. From “I wish” to “I will”: social cognitive predictors of behavioural intentions. J Health Psychol. 2003;8:347–60. PubMed
Norman HS. The theory of planned behaviour and breast self-examination: distinguishing between perceived control and self-efficacy. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004;34:694–708. CrossRef
Armitage C, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40(4):471–99.
- Testicular self examination among Bahir Dar University students: application of integrated behavioral model
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II