Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007

01.06.2007 | Original paper

The cost-utility of magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers aged 30–49

verfasst von: Richard P. A. Norman, D. Gareth Evans, Douglas F. Easton, Kenneth C. Young

Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Recent evidence has investigated the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in younger women with a BRCA1 mutation. However, this evidence has not been contrasted with existing cost-effectiveness standards to determine whether screening is appropriate, given limited societal resources. We constructed a Markov model investigating surveillance tools (mammography, MRI, both in parallel) under a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. The key benefit of MRI is that increased sensitivity leads to early detection, and improved prognosis. For a 30- to 39-year-old cohort, the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of mammography relative to no screening was £5,200. The addition of MRI to this costs £13,486 per QALY. For a 40- to 49-year-old cohort, the corresponding values were £2,913 and £7,781. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported the cost-effectiveness of the parallel approach of mammography and MRI. It is necessary to extend this analysis beyond BRCA1 carriers within this age group, and also to other age groups.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Griebsch, I., Brown, J., Boggis, C. et al.: Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs. X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 95, 801–810 (2006)CrossRef Griebsch, I., Brown, J., Boggis, C. et al.: Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs. X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer 95, 801–810 (2006)CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold, M.R., Siegel, J.E., Russell, L.B., Weinstein, M.C.: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996) Gold, M.R., Siegel, J.E., Russell, L.B., Weinstein, M.C.: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Leach, M.O., Boggis, C.R., Dixon, A.K., et al.: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365, 1769–1778 (2005)CrossRef Leach, M.O., Boggis, C.R., Dixon, A.K., et al.: Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS). Lancet 365, 1769–1778 (2005)CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske, K., Grady, D., Barclay, J., et al.: Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276, 33–38 (1996)CrossRef Kerlikowske, K., Grady, D., Barclay, J., et al.: Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 276, 33–38 (1996)CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McIntosh, A., Shaw, C., Evans, G., et al.: Clinical guidelines and evidence review for the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer. Royal College of General Practitioners/University of Sheffield, London (2004) McIntosh, A., Shaw, C., Evans, G., et al.: Clinical guidelines and evidence review for the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer. Royal College of General Practitioners/University of Sheffield, London (2004)
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman, R., Ritchie, G., Evans, D.G., et al.: Clinical guidelines and evidence review for familial breast cancer: the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care (partial update): routine surveillance using magnetic resonance imaging. Royal College of General Practitioners, London (2006) Norman, R., Ritchie, G., Evans, D.G., et al.: Clinical guidelines and evidence review for familial breast cancer: the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care (partial update): routine surveillance using magnetic resonance imaging. Royal College of General Practitioners, London (2006)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Plevritis, S.K., Kurian, A.W., Sigal, B.M., et al.: Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 295, 2374–84 (2006)CrossRef Plevritis, S.K., Kurian, A.W., Sigal, B.M., et al.: Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 295, 2374–84 (2006)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., et al.: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New Engl. J. Med. 353, 1773–1778 (2005)CrossRef Pisano, E.D., Gatsonis, C., Hendrick, E., et al.: Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. New Engl. J. Med. 353, 1773–1778 (2005)CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou, A.C., Pharoah, P.D., Narod, S.: Breast and ovarian cancer risks to carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC and 185delAG and BRCA2 6174delT mutations: a combined analysis of 22 population based studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 1117–1130 (2003)CrossRef Antoniou, A.C., Pharoah, P.D., Narod, S.: Breast and ovarian cancer risks to carriers of the BRCA1 5382insC and 185delAG and BRCA2 6174delT mutations: a combined analysis of 22 population based studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72, 1117–1130 (2003)CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Coleman, M.P., Babb, P., Quinn, M.J., et al.: Socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales. Cancer 91, 208–216 (2001)CrossRef Coleman, M.P., Babb, P., Quinn, M.J., et al.: Socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales. Cancer 91, 208–216 (2001)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Cortesi, L., Chiuri, V.E., Ruscelli, S., et al.: Prognosis of screen-detected breast cancers: results of a population based study. BMC Cancer 6, 17 (2006) Cortesi, L., Chiuri, V.E., Ruscelli, S., et al.: Prognosis of screen-detected breast cancers: results of a population based study. BMC Cancer 6, 17 (2006)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen, A.R., Garne, J.P., Storm, H.H., et al.: Stage and survival in breast cancer patients in screened and non-screened Danish and Swedish populations. Acta Oncol. 42, 701–709 (2003)CrossRef Jensen, A.R., Garne, J.P., Storm, H.H., et al.: Stage and survival in breast cancer patients in screened and non-screened Danish and Swedish populations. Acta Oncol. 42, 701–709 (2003)CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Yassin, M.M., Peel, A.L.G., Thompson, W.D., et al.: Does screen-detected breast cancer have better survival than symptomatic breast cancer? Asian J. Surg. 26, 101–107 (2003)CrossRef Yassin, M.M., Peel, A.L.G., Thompson, W.D., et al.: Does screen-detected breast cancer have better survival than symptomatic breast cancer? Asian J. Surg. 26, 101–107 (2003)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Berrington de Gonzalez, A., Reeves, G.: Mammographic screening before age 50 in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with mortality benefits. Br. J. Cancer 93, 590–596 (2005)CrossRef Berrington de Gonzalez, A., Reeves, G.: Mammographic screening before age 50 in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with mortality benefits. Br. J. Cancer 93, 590–596 (2005)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Law, J.: Risk and benefit associated with radiation dose in breast screening programmes. Br. J. Radiol. 68, 870–876 (1995)CrossRef Law, J.: Risk and benefit associated with radiation dose in breast screening programmes. Br. J. Radiol. 68, 870–876 (1995)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Preston, D.L., Mattson, A., Holmberg, E., et al.: Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: a pooled analysis of eight cohorts. Radiat. Res. 158, 220–235 (2002)CrossRef Preston, D.L., Mattson, A., Holmberg, E., et al.: Radiation effects on breast cancer risk: a pooled analysis of eight cohorts. Radiat. Res. 158, 220–235 (2002)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (1996) ASQRAD—assessment system for the quantification of radiation detriment (EUR 16644, CEPN-L95/2) European Commission (1996) ASQRAD—assessment system for the quantification of radiation detriment (EUR 16644, CEPN-L95/2)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Young, K.C., Faulkner, K., Wall, B., et al.: Review of radiation risk in breast screening. NHSBSP report no. 54 (2003) Young, K.C., Faulkner, K., Wall, B., et al.: Review of radiation risk in breast screening. NHSBSP report no. 54 (2003)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnston, K., Brown, J., Gerard, K., et al.: Valuing temporary and chronic health states associated with breast screening. Soc. Sci. Med. 47, 213–222 (1998)CrossRef Johnston, K., Brown, J., Gerard, K., et al.: Valuing temporary and chronic health states associated with breast screening. Soc. Sci. Med. 47, 213–222 (1998)CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenwick, E., Byford, S.: A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br. J. Psychiatr. 187, 106–108 (2005)CrossRef Fenwick, E., Byford, S.: A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Br. J. Psychiatr. 187, 106–108 (2005)CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The cost-utility of magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers aged 30–49
verfasst von
Richard P. A. Norman
D. Gareth Evans
Douglas F. Easton
Kenneth C. Young
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-007-0042-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe