Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2019

06.11.2018 | Genetics

The effect of repeated biopsy on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) treatment outcome

verfasst von: Shira Priner, Gheona Altarescu, Oshrat Schonberger, Hananel Holzer, Esther Rubinstein, Nava Dekel, Aharon Peretz, Talia Eldar-Geva

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To study the outcome of repeated biopsy for pre-implantation genetic testing in case of failed genetic diagnosis in the first biopsy.

Methods

The study group included 81 cycles where embryos underwent re-biopsy because there were no transferable embryos after the first biopsy: in 55 cycles, the first procedure was polar body biopsy (PBs) and the second cleavage-stage (BB); in 26 cycles, the first was BB and the second trophectoderm (BLAST) biopsy. The control group included 77 cycles where embryos underwent successful genetic diagnosis following the first biopsy, matched by maternal age, egg number, genetic inheritance type, and embryonic stage at the first biopsy. We measured genetic diagnosis rate, clinical pregnancy rates (PRs), live-birth rates (LBRs), gestational age, and birth weight.

Results

For repeated biopsy, genetic diagnosis was received in 67/81 cycles (82.7%); at a higher rate in PB + BB than in BB + BLAST (49/55, 89.1% and 18/26, 69.2% respectively, p = 0.055). Transferable embryos were found in 47 and 68 cycles in the study and the control groups. PRs/ET were 20/47 (42.6%) and 36/68 (52.9%) (p = 0.27), 16/36 (44.4%) following PB + BB, and 4/11 (36.4%) following BB + BLAST (p = 0.74). LBRs/ET were 13/47 (27.7%) in study group, and 28/68 (41.2%) in the controls (p = 0.14), 10/36 (27.8%) following PB + BB group, and 3/11 (27.3%) following BB + BLAST (p > 0.99). Gestational age and birth weight were similar in all groups.

Conclusions

Re-biopsy of embryos when no genetic diagnosis could be reached following the first biopsy, achieved high rates of genetic diagnosis, pregnancies, and live births.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sermon K, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1633–41.CrossRefPubMed Sermon K, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Lancet. 2004;363:1633–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Harper JC, Sengupta SB. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011. Hum Genet. 2012;131:175–86.CrossRefPubMed Harper JC, Sengupta SB. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art 2011. Hum Genet. 2012;131:175–86.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Traeger-Synodinos J. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;39:74–88.CrossRefPubMed Traeger-Synodinos J. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;39:74–88.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, Wilson RD, Brock JA, Campagnolo C, et al. Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:451–63.CrossRefPubMed Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, Wilson RD, Brock JA, Campagnolo C, et al. Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015;37:451–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat De Rycke M, Belva F, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta SB, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1763–89.CrossRefPubMed De Rycke M, Belva F, Goossens V, Moutou C, SenGupta SB, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium data collection XIII: cycles from January to December 2010 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2011. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1763–89.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:494–510. ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:494–510.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Greco E, Biricik A, Cotarelo RP, Iammarone E, Rubino P, Tesarik J, et al. Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst. Springerplus. 2015;4:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greco E, Biricik A, Cotarelo RP, Iammarone E, Rubino P, Tesarik J, et al. Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst. Springerplus. 2015;4:22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang S, Tan K, Gong F, Gu Y, Tan Y, Lu C, et al. Blastocysts can be rebiopsied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1641–5.CrossRefPubMed Zhang S, Tan K, Gong F, Gu Y, Tan Y, Lu C, et al. Blastocysts can be rebiopsied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1641–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wininger JD, Taylor TH, Orris JJ, Glassner M, Anderson SH. Pregnancy after rebiopsy and vitrification of blastocysts following allele dropout after day 3 biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1122.e1–2.CrossRef Wininger JD, Taylor TH, Orris JJ, Glassner M, Anderson SH. Pregnancy after rebiopsy and vitrification of blastocysts following allele dropout after day 3 biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1122.e1–2.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley CK, Livingstone M, Traversa MV, McArthur SJ. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:999–1006.CrossRefPubMed Bradley CK, Livingstone M, Traversa MV, McArthur SJ. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017;108:999–1006.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wurfel W, Suttner R, Shakeshaft D, Mayer V, Schoen U, Sendelbach K, et al. Pregnancy and birth after a two-step PGD: polar body diagnosis for hemophilia A and array CGH on Trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013;73:812–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wurfel W, Suttner R, Shakeshaft D, Mayer V, Schoen U, Sendelbach K, et al. Pregnancy and birth after a two-step PGD: polar body diagnosis for hemophilia A and array CGH on Trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013;73:812–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Toschi M, Esposito F, Fasolino MC. The combination of polar body and embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1163–9.CrossRefPubMed Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Toschi M, Esposito F, Fasolino MC. The combination of polar body and embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1163–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in assisted reproduction. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2005;5:499–505.CrossRefPubMed Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in assisted reproduction. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2005;5:499–505.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Capalbo A, Romanelli V, Cimadomo D, Girardi L, Stoppa M, Dovere L, et al. Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1279–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Capalbo A, Romanelli V, Cimadomo D, Girardi L, Stoppa M, Dovere L, et al. Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33:1279–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornhill AR, McGrath JA, Eady RA, Braude PR, Handyside AH. A comparison of different lysis buffers to assess allele dropout from single cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:490–7.CrossRefPubMed Thornhill AR, McGrath JA, Eady RA, Braude PR, Handyside AH. A comparison of different lysis buffers to assess allele dropout from single cells for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:490–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Renbaum P, Brooks B, Kaplan Y, Eldar-Geva T, Margalioth EJ, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Advantages of multiple markers and polar body analysis in preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Alagille disease. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:317–21.CrossRefPubMed Renbaum P, Brooks B, Kaplan Y, Eldar-Geva T, Margalioth EJ, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Advantages of multiple markers and polar body analysis in preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Alagille disease. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:317–21.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornhill AR, deDie-Smulders CE, Geraedts JP, Harper JC, Harton GL, Lavery SA, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:35–48.CrossRefPubMed Thornhill AR, deDie-Smulders CE, Geraedts JP, Harper JC, Harton GL, Lavery SA, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:35–48.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Harton GL, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, Moutou C, SenGupta S, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:33–40.CrossRefPubMed Harton GL, De Rycke M, Fiorentino F, Moutou C, SenGupta S, Traeger-Synodinos J, et al. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for amplification-based PGD. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:33–40.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Eldar-Geva T, Srebnik N, Altarescu G, Varshaver I, Brooks B, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1016–21.CrossRefPubMed Eldar-Geva T, Srebnik N, Altarescu G, Varshaver I, Brooks B, Levy-Lahad E, et al. Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102:1016–21.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Desmyttere S, De Rycke M, Staessen C, Liebaers I, De Schrijver F, Verpoest W, et al. Neonatal follow-up of 995 consecutively born children after embryo biopsy for PGD. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:288–93.CrossRefPubMed Desmyttere S, De Rycke M, Staessen C, Liebaers I, De Schrijver F, Verpoest W, et al. Neonatal follow-up of 995 consecutively born children after embryo biopsy for PGD. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:288–93.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The effect of repeated biopsy on pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases (PGT-M) treatment outcome
verfasst von
Shira Priner
Gheona Altarescu
Oshrat Schonberger
Hananel Holzer
Esther Rubinstein
Nava Dekel
Aharon Peretz
Talia Eldar-Geva
Publikationsdatum
06.11.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1359-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Gestationsdiabetes: In der zweiten Schwangerschaft folgenreicher als in der ersten

13.05.2024 Gestationsdiabetes Nachrichten

Das Risiko, nach einem Gestationsdiabetes einen Typ-2-Diabetes zu entwickeln, hängt nicht nur von der Zahl, sondern auch von der Reihenfolge der betroffenen Schwangerschaften ab.

Embryotransfer erhöht womöglich Leukämierisiko der Kinder

13.05.2024 Assistierte Reproduktion Nachrichten

Reproduktionsmedizinische Techniken haben theoretisch das Potenzial, den epigenetischen Code zu verändern und somit das Krebsrisiko der Kinder zu erhöhen. Zwischen Embryotransfer und Leukämie scheint sich ein solcher Zusammenhang bestätigt zu haben.

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.