nach oben

Prevention Science

Erschienen in:

01.02.2012

The Effect of the PROSPER Partnership Model on Cultivating Local Stakeholder Knowledge of Evidence-Based Programs: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study of 28 Communities

verfasst von: D. Max Crowley, Mark T. Greenberg, Mark E. Feinberg, Richard L. Spoth, Cleve R. Redmond

Erschienen in: Prevention Science | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

A substantial challenge in improving public health is how to facilitate the local adoption of evidence-based interventions (EBIs). To do so, an important step is to build local stakeholders’ knowledge and decision-making skills regarding the adoption and implementation of EBIs. One EBI delivery system, called PROSPER (PROmoting School-community-university Partnerships to Enhance Resilience), has effectively mobilized community prevention efforts, implemented prevention programming with quality, and consequently decreased youth substance abuse. While these results are encouraging, another objective is to increase local stakeholder knowledge of best practices for adoption, implementation and evaluation of EBIs. Using a mixed methods approach, we assessed local stakeholder knowledge of these best practices over 5 years, in 28 intervention and control communities. Results indicated that the PROSPER partnership model led to significant increases in expert knowledge regarding the selection, implementation, and evaluation of evidence-based interventions. Findings illustrate the limited programming knowledge possessed by members of local prevention efforts, the difficulty of complete knowledge transfer, and highlight one method for cultivating that knowledge.

Aarons, G., Sommerfeld, D., Hecht, D., Silovsky, J., & Chaffin, M. (2009). The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 270–280.PubMedCrossRef

Adelman, H., & Taylor, L. (2003). On sustainability of project innovations as systemic change. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 1–25.CrossRef

Backer, T., & Rogers, E. (1999). Dissemination best practices workshop briefing paper: State-of-the-art review on dissemination research and dissemination partnership. Encino, CA: NCAP.

Brownson, R., Royer, C., Ewing, R., & McBride, T. (2006). Researchers and policymakers: Travelers in parallel universes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3, 164–72.CrossRef

Butterfoss, F., Goodman, R., & Wandersman, A. (1993). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Education Research, 8, 315–330.PubMedCrossRef

Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crowley, M., Jones, D., Greenberg, M., Feinberg., M., & Spoth, D. (2011). Resource consumption of a dissemination model for prevention programs: The PROSPER partnership model. Journal of Adolescent Health. (in press)

Durlak, J. (1998). Why program implementation is important. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 17, 5–18.CrossRef

Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.PubMedCrossRef

Feinberg, M., Greenberg, M., Osgood, D., Anderson, A., & Babinski, L. (2002). The effects of training community leaders in prevention science. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 245–259.CrossRef

Feinberg, M., Greenberg, M., & Osgood, D. (2004). Readiness, functioning, and effectiveness in community prevention coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 163–176.PubMedCrossRef

Fixsen, D., Naoom, S., Blase, K., Friedman, R., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.

Flay, B., Biglan, A., Boruch, R., Castro, F., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.PubMedCrossRef

Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

Gomez, B., Greenberg, M., & Feinberg, M. (2005). Sustainability of community coalitions: An evaluation of Communities That Care. Prevention Science, 6, 199–202.PubMedCrossRef

Halfors, D., & Godette, D. (2002). Will the “Principles of Effectiveness” improve prevention practice? Health Education Review, 17, 461–470.CrossRef

Hawkins, J., Catalano, R., & Arthur, M. (2002). Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 951–976.PubMedCrossRef

Hawkins, D., Oesterle, S., Brown, E., Arthur, M., Abbott, R., Fagan, A., et al. (2009). Results of a type 2 translational research trial to prevent adolescent drug use and delinquency. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 163, 789–793.CrossRef

Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley, C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 135–149.CrossRef

Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.CrossRef

Landis, R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 3, 159–74.CrossRef

Littell, R., Milliken, G., Stroup, W., Wolfinger, R., & Schabenberger, O. (2006). SAS for mixed models (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Mihalic, S., Irwin, K., Elliott, D. S., Fagan, A., & Hansen, D. (2001). Blueprints for violence prevention. Bulletin. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Mihalic, S., Irwin, K., Fagan, A., Ballard, D., & Elliott, D. (2004). Successful program implementation: Lessons from Blueprints. Electronic report. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs). Retrieved August 11, 2011, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov.

Molgaard, V. (1997). The extension service as key mechanism for research and services delivery for prevention of mental health disorders in rural areas. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 515–544.PubMedCrossRef

O’Connell, M., Boat, T., & Warner, K. (Eds.). (2009). Mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people. Washington, DC: National Academy.

O’Donnell, L., Scattergood, P., Adler, M., San Doval, A., Barker, M., Kelly, J., et al. (2000). The role of technical assistance in the replication of effective HIV interventions. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12, 99–111.PubMed

Perkins, D., Feinberg, M., Greenberg, M., Johnson, L., Chilenski, S., Mincemoyer, C., et al. (2011). Team factors that predict to sustainability indicators for community-based prevention teams. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34, 283–291.PubMedCrossRef

Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. BMJ, 320, 114–116.PubMedCrossRef

Redmond, C., Spoth, R., Shin, C., Schainke, L., Greenberg, M., & Feinberg, M. (2009). Long-term protective factor outcomes of evidence-based interventions implemented by community teams through community-university partnership. Journal of Primary Prevention, 30, 513–530.PubMedCrossRef

Riggs, N., Nakawatase, M., & Pentz, M. (2008). Promoting community coalition functioning: Effects of project STEPP. Prevention Science, 9, 63–72.PubMedCrossRef

Ringwalt, C., Vincus, A., Ennett, S., Hanley, S., Bowling, J., & Rohrbach, L. (2009). The prevalence of evidence-based substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools in 2005. Prevention Science, 10, 33–40.PubMedCrossRef

Roussos, S., & Fawcett, S. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 369–402.PubMedCrossRef

SAS Institute Inc. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

Spoth, R., & Greenberg, M. (2005). Toward a comprehensive strategy for effective practitioner-scientist partnerships and larger-scale community benefits. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 107–126.PubMedCrossRef

Spoth, R., & Greenberg, M. (2011). Impact challenges in community science-with-practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48, 106–119.PubMedCrossRef

Spoth, D., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems. Prevention Science, 5, 31–39.PubMedCrossRef

Spoth, R., Clair, S., Greenberg, M., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (2007a). Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 137–145.CrossRef

Spoth, R., Guyll, M., Lillehoj, C., Redmond, C., & Greenberg, M. (2007b). PROSPER study of evidence-based intervention implementation quality by community-university partnerships. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 981–999.CrossRef

Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Clair, S., & Feinberg, M. (2007c). Substance use outcomes at 18 months past baseline from the PROSPER community-university partnership trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 395–402.CrossRef

Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., & Turrisi, R. (2008). Preventive interventions addressing underage drinking. Pediatrics, 121, 311–336.CrossRef

Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Clair, S., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., & Feinberg, M. (2011). Preventing substance misuse through community health partnerships and evidence-based interventions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 4, 440–447.CrossRef

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration (2011). National Registry of Effective Programs. Retrieved August 11, 2011, from http://nrepp.samhsa.gov/.

Wandersman, A., & Florin, P. (2003). Community interventions and effective prevention. American Psychologist, 58, 441–448.PubMedCrossRef

Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 171–181.CrossRef

Titel: The Effect of the PROSPER Partnership Model on Cultivating Local Stakeholder Knowledge of Evidence-Based Programs: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study of 28 Communities
verfasst von: D. Max Crowley
Mark T. Greenberg
Mark E. Feinberg
Richard L. Spoth
Cleve R. Redmond
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2012
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Prevention Science / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0250-5

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Improving Participation Rates for Women of Color in Health Research: The Role of Group Cohesion

Moderation of the Association between Media Exposure and Youth Smoking Onset: Race/Ethnicity, and Parent Smoking

Evaluating the Impact of a Substance Use Intervention Program on the Peer Status and Influence of Adolescent Peer Leaders

Mediators of Effects of a Selective Family-Focused Violence Prevention Approach for Middle School Students

Component Analysis of a School-Based Substance Use Prevention Program in Spain: Contributions of Problem Solving and Social Skills Training Content

Risk for Maternal Harsh Parenting in High-Risk Families From Birth to Age Three: Does Ethnicity Matter?