Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Surgery 1/2013

Open Access 01.12.2013 | Study protocol

The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in liver functional restoration of patients with obstructive jaundice after endoscopic treatment: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study

verfasst von: Enver Fekaj, Arben Gjata, Mehmet Maxhuni

Erschienen in: BMC Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2013

Abstract

Background

In patients with obstructive jaundice, multi-organ dysfunction may develop.

Methods/Design

This trial is a prospective, open-label, randomized, and controlled study with the objective to evaluate the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in liver functional restoration in patients with obstructive jaundice after endoscopic treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in liver functional restoration of patients with obstructive jaundice after endoscopic treatment. The hypothesis of this trial is that patients with obstructive jaundice, in which will be administered UDCA, in the early phase after endoscopic intervention will have better and faster functional restoration of the liver than patients in the control group.
Patients with obstructive jaundice, randomly, will be divided into two groups: (A) test group in which will be administered ursodeoxycholic acid twenty-four hours after endoscopic procedure and will last fourteen days, and (B) control group.
Serum-testing will include determination of bilirubin, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, gama-glutamil transpeptidase, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and cholesterol levels. These parameters will be determined one day prior endoscopic procedure, and on the third, fifth, seventh, tenth, twelfth and fourteenth days after endoscopic intervention.

Discussion

This trial is a prospective, open-label, randomized, and controlled study to asses the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in liver functional restoration of patients with obstructive jaundice in the early phase after endoscopic treatment.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01688375
Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This study has not received external funding.

Authors’ contributions

EF wrote the manuscript and designed the study. AGJ revised the manuscript and co-authored the writing of the manuscript. MM revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Abkürzungen
TNF
Tumour necrosis factor
UDCA
Ursodeoxycholic acid
ERCP
Endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography
CT
Computerized tomography
MRCP
Magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography
ALT
Alanine transaminase
AST
Aspartate transaminase
GGT
Gama-glutamil transpeptidase
HCV
Hepatitis C virus.

Background

The most common causes of obstructive jaundice are choledocholithiasis, strictures of the biliary tract, cholangiocarcinoma, carcinoma of pancreas, and pancreatitis.
First-line serum testing in a patient with obstructive jaundice should include determination of bilirubin (total and direct fractions), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), gama-glutamil transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase levels [1].
In a prolonged obstruction, multi-organ dysfunction including renal failure, cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary dysfunction, poor hepatic metabolism and hemostasis impairment may develop [2].
It is the conventional concept that the high level of serum bilirubin may cause multisystemic damage in patients with obstructive jaundice. Current pathophysiological studies on obstructive jaundice have shown that the damage to the liver, kidney, and immune system of the patients are closely related to endotoxemia. The key event in the pathophysiology of obstructive jaundice- associated complications is endotoxemia of gut origin because of intestinal barriere failure.
Biliary tract obstruction can cause damage to liver cells and Kupffer cell function. In obstructive jaundice hyper secretion of TNF (tumour necrosis factor) by Kupffer cells may support the production of systemic cytokine and be responsible for significant complications [35].
Patients with obstructive jaundice frequently suffer haemodynamic and body fluid disturbances. Acute renal failure is a relevant complication in obstructive jaundice. The extra cellular water volume depletion and myocardial dysfunction affects haemodynamic and renal disturbance in patients with obstructive jaundice [6].
Experimental and clinical studies have suggested that a period of at least four to six weeks is needed for the restoration of normal major synthetic and clearance functions of the liver, as well as mucosal intestinal barrier functions [7].
Even though there is a general assumption about the increased bleeding tendency in obstructive jaundiced patients, it was demonstrated tendency for hyper coagulation independent of increased prothrombin times. The most probable cause of this effect is the increased activity of fibrin polymers on platelet membrane [8].
It is important to emphasize that the most patients with obstructive jaundice require appropriate endoscopic and surgical procedures for their treatment [1].
There are a many studies, where ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was administrated in patients with cholestatic liver diseases.
UDCA was discovered, by Hammerstein in 1902, as the principal bile acid in the polar bear [9].
It is used for the dissolution of cholesterol-rich gallstones in patients with functioning gallbladders, and in the treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis [10, 11].
Mechanisms underlying the beneficial therapeutic effects of UDCA on cholestatic liver diseases include: 1) protection of injured cholangiocytes against toxic effects of bile acids, 2) stimulation of impaired biliary secretion, 3) protection of hepatocytes against bile acid-induced apoptosis, 4) immunomodulatory properties with reduce immune-related liver damage [1215].
In current literature, there are no a randomized, controlled trials testing the effect of UDCA in liver functional restoration of patients with obstructive jaundice after endoscopic treatment.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis of this trial is that patients with obstructive jaundice, in which will be administered UDCA, in the early phase after endoscopic intervention will have better and faster functional restoration of the liver than patients in the control group.

Aim and purpose of the research

General aim

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of UDCA in liver functional restoration of patients with obstructive jaundice in the early period after endoscopic intervention.

Specific aims

Specific aims are:
– To evaluate the effect of UDCA in relation to the aetiology of obstructive jaundice.
– To assess that in which functional parameters of the liver, treatment with UDCA will have greater impact.

Methods/Design

Study objectives

This trial will be a prospective, open-label, randomized, and controlled study. The objective will be to evaluate the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the functional restoration of the liver in patients with obstructive jaundice in the early post-endoscopic phase.

Study design

After diagnosis, patients with obstructive jaundice will be divided into two groups: (A) the test group in which will be administered UDCA in the early phase after endoscopic treatment, and (B) control group, in which no treatment will be applied with UDCA.
Diagnostic methods will be biochemical findings, ultrasound examination, endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP), CT-scan and magnetic resonance cholangio pancreatography (MRCP).
Serum-testing in patients with obstructive jaundice will include determination of bilirubin (total and direct fractions), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), gama-glutamil transpeptidase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, albumin, and cholesterol levels. These parameters will be determined one day prior endoscopic intervention, and on the third, fifth, seventh, tenth, twelfth and fourteenth days after endoscopic intervention.
Endoscope procedure that will end with the internal derivation of bile shall be named as the internal bile drainage.

Inclusion criteria are

– Patients with obstructive jaundice
– Serum bilirubin level higher than 50 μmol/l
– 19+ years of age
– Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria are

Cholangitis
– Acute pancreatitis
– Pregnant women
– Women during the breastfeeding
– Suspected or proven primary liver diseases
– My family members
– Patients who are unable to understand our study purpose
During our trial, from the study will be excluded patients who show signs of serious side effects and allergic reactions after treatment with UDCA.

UDCA administration

UDCA administration will begin twenty-four hours after endoscopic procedure and will last fourteen days. UDCA dose will be administered at 750 mg/day, divided into three doses.

Power of the study

A clinically relevant improvement of liver functional tests is defined as an improvement of 70% of liver functional tests in test group, and an improvement only 40% in control group. In our study, to have an 80% chance of detecting about a 40% difference (70% vs. 40%) between two groups on improvement of liver functional tests at an alpha level of 0.05, the power calculation indicates that each of the two groups should have at least 48 patients.

Data sources and search strategy

An electronic search was performed on PubMed (from 1 January 1985 to 1 February 2012). A combination of keywords and MeSH terms where: ‘ursodeoxycholic acid’ AND ‘obstructive jaundice’, ‘obstructive jaundice’ AND ‘liver function tests’, ‘obstructive jaundice’ AND ‘acute renal failure’. I have used, also, limits: Type of article (selection was- clinical trial, meta-analyses), Species (selection was- human, animals), Text options (selection was- links to free full text, abstract), Languages (English), Sex (male, female), Age (all adult 19+ years), Field (all fields).

Outcomes

The primary outcome measure in this trial is liver functional restoration. The secondary outcome is assessment liver functional parameters in which, treatment with UDCA, will have greater impact. Follow-up measures will be collected one day prior endoscopic intervention, and on the third, fifth, seventh, tenth, twelfth and fourteenth days after endoscopic intervention.

Randomisation

Patients have to sign an informed consent for the involving in the trial a day before endoscopic procedure. Randomisation will be performed at the time of transfer to the endoscope room by using random number generator at http://​www.​stattrek.​com.

Ethics

This study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol has been approved by Ethics and Professional Committee at University Clinical Centre of Kosovo. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

Data collection and statistical analyses

Data including serum-test results will be collected in a computer secured study platform. These data will be collected continuously, for each patient, starting one day before endoscopic procedure until the last data fourteen days after intervention.
X2-analysis or Fisher exact test will perform to test the differences in proportions of qualitative variables between groups. Mann Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis test will use for testing the difference between quantitative variables when distribution is not normal and Student t-test or ANOVA test when distribution is normal. The level P < 0.05 will consider as the cut-off value for significance.

Discussion

In many studies, it was shown the positive effect of UDCA administration in patient with cholestatic liver desease.
UDCA exerts anti-apoptic effects in experimental in vivo models as well as in vitro in primary human hepatocytes. This anti-apoptic effect may contribute to the alleviation of liver injury during UDCA treatment [16].
After UDCA administration in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, the results show that UDCA is able to reduce serum levels of hepatic enzymes, but this effect is not related to modifications in liver fat content [17].
The study by Willot S, demonstrates the beneficial effect of UDCA on liver function in children after successful surgery for biliary atresia [18].
UDCA in a dose of 13–15 mg\kg\day should be considered in all patients with primary biliary cirrhosis who have abnormal liver enzymes [19].
Long-term high-dose UDCA therapy is associated with improvement in serum liver tests in primary sclerosing cholangitis, but does not improve survival and was associated with higher rates of serious adverse events [20].
UDCA administration can be considered in cases of nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver associated with abnormalities of liver enzymes [21].
It seems that combined therapy with UDCA and polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine could be considered in obstetric cholestasis [22].
It was demonstrated that ciprofloxacin and UDCA have a synergic effect on prevention of bacterial translocation in obstructive jaundiced patients [23].
This trial is a prospective, open-label, randomized, and controlled study with the objective to evaluate the effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in liver functional restoration in patients with obstructive jaundice after endoscopic treatment. The hypothesis of this trial is that patients with obstructive jaundice, in which will be administered UDCA, in the early phase after endoscopic intervention will have better and faster functional restoration of the liver than patients in the control group.

Acknowledgements

We thank Sanie Gashi for her contribution to design the section “Data collection and statistical analyses”.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This study has not received external funding.

Authors’ contributions

EF wrote the manuscript and designed the study. AGJ revised the manuscript and co-authored the writing of the manuscript. MM revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Roche SP, Kobos R: Jaundice in the adult patient. Am Fam Physician. 2004, 69 (2): 299-304.PubMed Roche SP, Kobos R: Jaundice in the adult patient. Am Fam Physician. 2004, 69 (2): 299-304.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rerknimitr R, Kullavanijaya P: Operable malignant jaundice: To stent or not to stent before the operation?. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010, 2 (1): 10-14. 10.4253/wjge.v2.i1.10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rerknimitr R, Kullavanijaya P: Operable malignant jaundice: To stent or not to stent before the operation?. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010, 2 (1): 10-14. 10.4253/wjge.v2.i1.10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yi-Jun Y, Jing-Sen SH, Shu-Min X, De-Ting ZH, Bing-Sheng C: Effects of different drainage procedures on levels of serum endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. HBPD Int. 2003, 2: 426-430. Yi-Jun Y, Jing-Sen SH, Shu-Min X, De-Ting ZH, Bing-Sheng C: Effects of different drainage procedures on levels of serum endotoxin and tumor necrosis factor in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. HBPD Int. 2003, 2: 426-430.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Scott-Conner CE, Grogan JB: The pathophysiology of biliary obstruction and its effect on phagocytic and immune function. J Surg Res. 1994, 57 (2): 316-336. 10.1006/jsre.1994.1151.CrossRefPubMed Scott-Conner CE, Grogan JB: The pathophysiology of biliary obstruction and its effect on phagocytic and immune function. J Surg Res. 1994, 57 (2): 316-336. 10.1006/jsre.1994.1151.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Assimakopoulos SF, Scopa CD, Vaginos CE: Pathophysiology of increased intestinal permeability in obstructive jaundice. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13 (48): 6458-6464. 10.3748/wjg.13.6458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Assimakopoulos SF, Scopa CD, Vaginos CE: Pathophysiology of increased intestinal permeability in obstructive jaundice. World J Gastroenterol. 2007, 13 (48): 6458-6464. 10.3748/wjg.13.6458.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Naranjo A, Cruz A, Lopez P, Chicano M, Martin-Malo A, Sitger-Serra A, Muntane J, Padillo J: Renal function after dopamine and fluid administration in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. A prospective randomized study. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011, 20 (2): 161-167.PubMed Naranjo A, Cruz A, Lopez P, Chicano M, Martin-Malo A, Sitger-Serra A, Muntane J, Padillo J: Renal function after dopamine and fluid administration in patients with malignant obstructive jaundice. A prospective randomized study. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2011, 20 (2): 161-167.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, Van Eijek CHJ, Maro JB, Van der Harst E, Kubben FJ, Gerritsen JJ, Greve JW, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Klinkenbijl JH, Nio CY, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Bossuyt PM, Gouma DJ: Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 129-137. 10.1056/NEJMoa0903230.CrossRefPubMed Van der Gaag NA, Rauws EAJ, Van Eijek CHJ, Maro JB, Van der Harst E, Kubben FJ, Gerritsen JJ, Greve JW, Gerhards MF, de Hingh IH, Klinkenbijl JH, Nio CY, de Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Bossuyt PM, Gouma DJ: Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2010, 362: 129-137. 10.1056/NEJMoa0903230.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cakir T, Cingi A, Yegen C: Coagulation dynamics and platelet functions in obstructive jaundiced patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009, 24 (5): 748-751. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05801.x.CrossRefPubMed Cakir T, Cingi A, Yegen C: Coagulation dynamics and platelet functions in obstructive jaundiced patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009, 24 (5): 748-751. 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05801.x.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fromm H: Gallstone dissolution and the cholesterol-bile acid-lipoprotein axis: Propitious effects of ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology. 1984, 87: 229-233.PubMed Fromm H: Gallstone dissolution and the cholesterol-bile acid-lipoprotein axis: Propitious effects of ursodeoxycholic acid. Gastroenterology. 1984, 87: 229-233.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bachrach WH, Hofmann AF: Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of cholesterol cholelithiasis. Part II Dig Dis Sci. 1982, 27: 833-856. 10.1007/BF01391378.CrossRefPubMed Bachrach WH, Hofmann AF: Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of cholesterol cholelithiasis. Part II Dig Dis Sci. 1982, 27: 833-856. 10.1007/BF01391378.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Parfitt K: MARTINDALE, The complete drug reference, Volume 32. 1999, London: Pharmaceutical Press, p. 1642 Parfitt K: MARTINDALE, The complete drug reference, Volume 32. 1999, London: Pharmaceutical Press, p. 1642
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paumgartner G, Beuers U: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestatic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2004, 8: 67-81. 10.1016/S1089-3261(03)00135-1.CrossRefPubMed Paumgartner G, Beuers U: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestatic liver disease. Clin Liver Dis. 2004, 8: 67-81. 10.1016/S1089-3261(03)00135-1.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowdley KV: Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in hepatobiliary disease. Am J Med. 2000, 108: 481-486. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00318-1.CrossRefPubMed Kowdley KV: Ursodeoxycholic acid therapy in hepatobiliary disease. Am J Med. 2000, 108: 481-486. 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00318-1.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hempfling W, Dilger K, Beuers U: Systematic review: ursodeoxycholic acid—adverse effects and drug interactions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003, 18 (10): 963-972. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01792.x.CrossRefPubMed Hempfling W, Dilger K, Beuers U: Systematic review: ursodeoxycholic acid—adverse effects and drug interactions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003, 18 (10): 963-972. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01792.x.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Copaci I, Micu L, Iliescu L, Voiculesku M: New therapeutical indications of ursodeoxycholic acid. Roman J Gastroenterol. 2005, 14 (3): 259-266. Copaci I, Micu L, Iliescu L, Voiculesku M: New therapeutical indications of ursodeoxycholic acid. Roman J Gastroenterol. 2005, 14 (3): 259-266.
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Santos VN, Lanzoni VP, Szejnfeld J, Shigueoka D, Parise ER: A randomized double-blind study of the short-time treatment of obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with ursodeoxycholic acid. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003, 36 (6): 723-729. 10.1590/S0100-879X2003000600007.CrossRefPubMed Santos VN, Lanzoni VP, Szejnfeld J, Shigueoka D, Parise ER: A randomized double-blind study of the short-time treatment of obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with ursodeoxycholic acid. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2003, 36 (6): 723-729. 10.1590/S0100-879X2003000600007.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Willot S, Uhlen S, Michaud L, Briand G, Bonnevalle M, Sfeir R, Gottrand F: Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver function in children after successful surgery for biliary atresia. Pediatrics. 2008, 122 (6): 1236-1241. 10.1542/peds.2008-0986.CrossRef Willot S, Uhlen S, Michaud L, Briand G, Bonnevalle M, Sfeir R, Gottrand F: Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver function in children after successful surgery for biliary atresia. Pediatrics. 2008, 122 (6): 1236-1241. 10.1542/peds.2008-0986.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbas G, Lindor KD: Pharmacological treatment of biliary cirrhosis with ursodeoxycholic acid. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010, 11 (3): 387-392. 10.1517/14656560903493460.CrossRefPubMed Abbas G, Lindor KD: Pharmacological treatment of biliary cirrhosis with ursodeoxycholic acid. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010, 11 (3): 387-392. 10.1517/14656560903493460.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, Harrison ME, McCashland T, Befeler AS, Harnois D, Jorgensen R, Petz J, Keach J, Mooney J, Sargeant C, Braaten J, Bernard T, King D, Miceli E, Schmoll J, Hoskin T, Thapa P, Enders F: High dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2009, 50 (3): 808-814. 10.1002/hep.23082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lindor KD, Kowdley KV, Luketic VA, Harrison ME, McCashland T, Befeler AS, Harnois D, Jorgensen R, Petz J, Keach J, Mooney J, Sargeant C, Braaten J, Bernard T, King D, Miceli E, Schmoll J, Hoskin T, Thapa P, Enders F: High dose ursodeoxycholic acid for the treatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology. 2009, 50 (3): 808-814. 10.1002/hep.23082.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranucci G, Cirillo F, Corte CD, Vecchione R, Vallone G, Iorio R: Successful use of ursodeoxycholic acid in nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver. Ann Pharmacother. 2011, 45 (4): 20-10.1345/aph.1P742.CrossRef Ranucci G, Cirillo F, Corte CD, Vecchione R, Vallone G, Iorio R: Successful use of ursodeoxycholic acid in nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver. Ann Pharmacother. 2011, 45 (4): 20-10.1345/aph.1P742.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Marciniak B, Kimber-Trojnar Z, Leszezynska-Gorzelak B, Patro-Malysza J, Trojnar M, Oleszezuk J: Treatment of obstetric cholestasis with polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine and ursodeoxycholic acid. Ginekol Pol. 2011, 82 (1): 26-31.PubMed Marciniak B, Kimber-Trojnar Z, Leszezynska-Gorzelak B, Patro-Malysza J, Trojnar M, Oleszezuk J: Treatment of obstetric cholestasis with polyunsaturated phosphatidylcholine and ursodeoxycholic acid. Ginekol Pol. 2011, 82 (1): 26-31.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaya O, Ozdemir F, Atli M, Aslan V, Cagatay M, Anlar M, Alper M: The effects of ciprofloxacine and ursodeoxycholic acid on bacterial translocation in obstructive jaundice. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2009, 20 (3): 186-191.CrossRefPubMed Kaya O, Ozdemir F, Atli M, Aslan V, Cagatay M, Anlar M, Alper M: The effects of ciprofloxacine and ursodeoxycholic acid on bacterial translocation in obstructive jaundice. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2009, 20 (3): 186-191.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The effect of ursodeoxycholic acid in liver functional restoration of patients with obstructive jaundice after endoscopic treatment: a prospective, randomized, and controlled study
verfasst von
Enver Fekaj
Arben Gjata
Mehmet Maxhuni
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2013
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2013
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-38

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

BMC Surgery 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.