Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2015

01.07.2015 | Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The efficacy of adhesiolysis on chronic abdominal pain: a systematic review

verfasst von: Jonas Gerner-Rasmussen, Jakob Burcharth, Ismail Gögenur

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Abdominal adhesions are a frequent reason for chronic abdominal pain. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the evidence of performing laparoscopic adhesiolysis as a treatment for patients with chronic abdominal pain.

Methods

Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for trials performing lysis of adhesions on patients suffering from chronic abdominal pain. Clinical studies on patients being treated for chronic abdominal pain with surgical adhesiolysis were included. The main outcome of the study was the postoperative assessment of symptoms. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for bias assessment of non-randomized studies while the Jadad score was used for the randomized controlled trials.

Results

A total of 25 studies were identified evaluating the efficacy of adhesiolysis in 1281 patients suffering from chronic abdominal pain. A total of 22 trials were identified as case-series and included no control group. Three studies were identified as randomized controlled trials (RCT). A benefit of the intervention varied from 16 to 88 % in the non-randomized studies, with the majority reporting pain relief in more than 50 % of their patients. However, analysis indicated a high risk of bias in most of the studies. The RCTs also showed variance, with one study showing benefit, one study showing benefit only in a subgroup in which the patients had dense and vascularized adhesions, and one study showed no difference between the intervention and control group.

Conclusion

The identified studies showed promising but preliminary results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis as a treatment of chronic abdominal pain. The evidence for laparoscopic adhesiolysis is not sufficient to make definitive conclusions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lavonius M et al (1999) Laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9(1):42–44PubMedCrossRef Lavonius M et al (1999) Laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc 9(1):42–44PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Paajanen H, Julkunen K, Waris H (2005) Laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain: a prospective nonrandomized long-term follow-up study. J Clin Gastroenterol 39(2):110–114PubMed Paajanen H, Julkunen K, Waris H (2005) Laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain: a prospective nonrandomized long-term follow-up study. J Clin Gastroenterol 39(2):110–114PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Onders RP, Mittendorf EA, Nussbaum MS (2003) Utility of laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain. Surgery 134(4):549–554PubMedCrossRef Onders RP, Mittendorf EA, Nussbaum MS (2003) Utility of laparoscopy in chronic abdominal pain. Surgery 134(4):549–554PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kresch AJ et al (1984) Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 64(5):672–674PubMed Kresch AJ et al (1984) Laparoscopy in 100 women with chronic pelvic pain. Obstet Gynecol 64(5):672–674PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Rapkin AJ (1986) Adhesions and pelvic pain: a retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol 68(1):13–5PubMed Rapkin AJ (1986) Adhesions and pelvic pain: a retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol 68(1):13–5PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Richard PG et al. (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Online) 347(7929) Richard PG et al. (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Online) 347(7929)
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel HH (1990) Sequelae of appendectomy, with special reference to intra-abdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Investig 29(4):241–245CrossRef Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Mecke H, Riedel HH (1990) Sequelae of appendectomy, with special reference to intra-abdominal adhesions, chronic abdominal pain, and infertility. Gynecol Obstet Investig 29(4):241–245CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikard RW (1992) There is no current indication for laparoscopic adhesiolysis to treat abdominal pain. South Med J 85(10):939–40PubMedCrossRef Ikard RW (1992) There is no current indication for laparoscopic adhesiolysis to treat abdominal pain. South Med J 85(10):939–40PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Diamond MP et al (1987) Adhesion reformation and de novo adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 47(5):864–6PubMed Diamond MP et al (1987) Adhesion reformation and de novo adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 47(5):864–6PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: evaluation at early second-look procedures (1991) Operative Laparoscopy Study Group. Fertil Steril 55(4): p. 700–4 Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: evaluation at early second-look procedures (1991) Operative Laparoscopy Study Group. Fertil Steril 55(4): p. 700–4
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen MD, TG, Reynolds HT et al. (1998) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178: p. 499–503 Chen MD, TG, Reynolds HT et al. (1998) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178: p. 499–503
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Krähenbühl L et al (1998) Experimental study of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 85(6):826–830PubMedCrossRef Krähenbühl L et al (1998) Experimental study of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 85(6):826–830PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339 Moher D et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Greenhalgh T, Peacock R (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331(7524):1064–1065PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh T, Peacock R (2005) Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 331(7524):1064–1065PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jadad AR et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17(1):1–12PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters AA et al (1992) A randomized clinical trial on the benefit of adhesiolysis in patients with intraperitoneal adhesions and chronic pelvic pain. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99(1):59–62PubMedCrossRef Peters AA et al (1992) A randomized clinical trial on the benefit of adhesiolysis in patients with intraperitoneal adhesions and chronic pelvic pain. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 99(1):59–62PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Swank DJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet 361(9365):1247–1251PubMedCrossRef Swank DJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial. Lancet 361(9365):1247–1251PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Keltz MD, Gera PS, Olive DL (2006) Prospective randomized trial of right-sided paracolic adhesiolysis for chronic pelvic pain. JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg / Soc Laparoendosc Surg 10(4):443–446 Keltz MD, Gera PS, Olive DL (2006) Prospective randomized trial of right-sided paracolic adhesiolysis for chronic pelvic pain. JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg / Soc Laparoendosc Surg 10(4):443–446
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan CLK, Wood C (1985) Pelvic adhesiolysis—the assessment of symptom relief by 100 patients. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 25(4):295–298PubMedCrossRef Chan CLK, Wood C (1985) Pelvic adhesiolysis—the assessment of symptom relief by 100 patients. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 25(4):295–298PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Daniell JF (1989) Laparoscopic enterolysis for chronic abdominal pain. J Gynecol Surg 5(1):61–66CrossRef Daniell JF (1989) Laparoscopic enterolysis for chronic abdominal pain. J Gynecol Surg 5(1):61–66CrossRef
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Khaitan L et al (2003) Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of Seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 17(2):247–253CrossRef Khaitan L et al (2003) Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of Seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain. Surg Endosc Interv Tech 17(2):247–253CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Saravelos HG, Li TC, Cooke ID (1995) An analysis of the outcome of microsurgical and laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic pelvic pain. Hum Reprod 10(11):2895–2901PubMed Saravelos HG, Li TC, Cooke ID (1995) An analysis of the outcome of microsurgical and laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic pelvic pain. Hum Reprod 10(11):2895–2901PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Steege JF, Stout AL (1991) Resolution of chronic pelvic pain after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165(2):278–283PubMedCrossRef Steege JF, Stout AL (1991) Resolution of chronic pelvic pain after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 165(2):278–283PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Fayez JA, Clark RR (1994) Operative laparoscopy for the treatment of localized chronic pelvic-abdominal pain caused by postoperative adhesions. J Gynecol Surg 10(2):79–83PubMedCrossRef Fayez JA, Clark RR (1994) Operative laparoscopy for the treatment of localized chronic pelvic-abdominal pain caused by postoperative adhesions. J Gynecol Surg 10(2):79–83PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nezhat FR et al (2000) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis and relief of chronic pelvic pain. JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg / Soc Laparoendosc Surg 4(4):281–285 Nezhat FR et al (2000) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis and relief of chronic pelvic pain. JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg / Soc Laparoendosc Surg 4(4):281–285
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Francois Y et al (1994) Postoperative adhesive peritoneal disease. Laparoscopic treatment. Surg Endosc 8(7):781–783PubMedCrossRef Francois Y et al (1994) Postoperative adhesive peritoneal disease. Laparoscopic treatment. Surg Endosc 8(7):781–783PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller MD et al (1995) An evaluation of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Endosc 9(7):802–804PubMedCrossRef Mueller MD et al (1995) An evaluation of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Endosc 9(7):802–804PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Bremers AJA et al (2000) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain: an objective assessment. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech - Part A 10(4):199–202CrossRef Bremers AJA et al (2000) Laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain: an objective assessment. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech - Part A 10(4):199–202CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Malik E et al (2000) Subjective evaluation of the therapeutic value of laparoscopic adhesiolysis: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 14(1):79–81PubMedCrossRef Malik E et al (2000) Subjective evaluation of the therapeutic value of laparoscopic adhesiolysis: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 14(1):79–81PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Schietroma M et al (2001) The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in chronic abdominal pain. Minerva Chir 56(5):461–465PubMed Schietroma M et al (2001) The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in chronic abdominal pain. Minerva Chir 56(5):461–465PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Swank DJ et al (2003) A prospective analysis of predictive factors on the results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 13(2):88–94CrossRef Swank DJ et al (2003) A prospective analysis of predictive factors on the results of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 13(2):88–94CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat McClain GD et al (2011) Diagnostic laparoscopy and adhesiolysis: does it help with complex abdominal and pelvic pain syndrome (CAPPS) in general surgery? J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 15(1):1–5CrossRef McClain GD et al (2011) Diagnostic laparoscopy and adhesiolysis: does it help with complex abdominal and pelvic pain syndrome (CAPPS) in general surgery? J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 15(1):1–5CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller K, Mayer E, Moritz E (1996) The role of laparoscopy in chronic and recurrent abdominal pain. Am J Surg 172(4):353–6, discussion 356–7 PubMedCrossRef Miller K, Mayer E, Moritz E (1996) The role of laparoscopy in chronic and recurrent abdominal pain. Am J Surg 172(4):353–6, discussion 356–7 PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Shayani V, Siegert C, Favia P (2002) The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the treatment of patients with chronic abdominal pain or recurrent bowel obstruction. JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg / Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6(2):111–114 Shayani V, Siegert C, Favia P (2002) The role of laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the treatment of patients with chronic abdominal pain or recurrent bowel obstruction. JSLS : J Soc Laparoendosc Surg / Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6(2):111–114
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunker MS et al (2004) Long-term outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):36–41PubMedCrossRef Dunker MS et al (2004) Long-term outcomes and quality of life after laparoscopic adhesiolysis for chronic abdominal pain. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(1):36–41PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Pitt T et al (2008) Diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4(3):394–398PubMedCrossRef Pitt T et al (2008) Diagnostic laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4(3):394–398PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Kligman I et al (1993) Immunohistochemical demonstration of nerve fibers in pelvic adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 82(4 Pt 1):566–8PubMed Kligman I et al (1993) Immunohistochemical demonstration of nerve fibers in pelvic adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 82(4 Pt 1):566–8PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Klingensmith ME, Soybel DI, Brooks DC (1996) Laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain. Surg Endosc 10(11):1085–1087PubMedCrossRef Klingensmith ME, Soybel DI, Brooks DC (1996) Laparoscopy for chronic abdominal pain. Surg Endosc 10(11):1085–1087PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Roman H et al. (2009) Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(2): p. 136.e1-4 Roman H et al. (2009) Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 200(2): p. 136.e1-4
Metadaten
Titel
The efficacy of adhesiolysis on chronic abdominal pain: a systematic review
verfasst von
Jonas Gerner-Rasmussen
Jakob Burcharth
Ismail Gögenur
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2015
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-015-1316-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2015

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.