nach oben

Erschienen in:

07.07.2023 | ORIGINAL PAPER

The Experience Sampling Method: A New Way of Assessing Variability of the Emotional Dimensions of Religiosity and Spirituality in a Dutch Psychiatric Population

verfasst von: Bart van den Brink, Matthias Jongkind, Willemijn Wijzenbroek, Mira Duif, Arjan W. Braam, Philippe Delespaul, Hanneke Schaap-Jonker

Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health | Ausgabe 5/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Religiosity and spirituality (R/S) are often regarded as being relatively stable over time. The present exploratory experience sampling method (ESM) study aims to assess the variability of three R/S parameters concerning affective representations of God and spiritual experiences in a psychiatric population. Depressed in- and outpatients self-identifying as being spiritual or religious participated, from two Dutch mental health care institutions. The twenty-eight participants rated momentary affective R/S-variables up to 10 times per day over a 6-day period when prompted by a mobile application. All three examined R/S parameters varied significantly within the day. ESM examination of R/S showed good compliance and little reactivity. This indicates that ESM offers a feasible, usable, and valid way to explore R/S in a psychiatric population.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Bolger, N., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Kenny, D. A. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.

Brelsford, G. M., Underwood, L. G., & Wright, B. R. E. (2019). Love in the midst of stressors: Exploring the role of daily spiritual experiences. In R. W. Hood & S. Cheruvallil-Contractor (Eds.), Research in the social scientific study of religion (Vol. 30, pp. 25–43). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/br9789004416987_003CrossRef

Brouwer, D., Meijer, R. R., & Zevalkink, J. (2013). On the factor structure of the beck depression inventory–II: G is the key. Psychological Assessment, 25(1), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029228CrossRefPubMed

Crowe, E., Daly, M., Delaney, L., Carroll, S., & Malone, K. M. (2019). The intra-day dynamics of affect, self-esteem, tiredness, and suicidality in major depression. Psychiatry Research, 279, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.02.032CrossRefPubMed

Finke, R. (Ed.). (2017). Faithful measures: New methods in the measurement of religion. New York University Press.

Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Skouteris, H., Richardson, B., Blore, J., Holmes, M., & Mills, J. (2013). Does the burden of the experience sampling method undermine data quality in state body image research? Body Image, 10(4), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.06.003CrossRefPubMed

Hall, T. W., & Fujikawa, A. M. (2013). God image and the sacred. In K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol 1): Context, theory, and research (pp. 277–292). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14045-015CrossRef

Hoeve, K., Brink, B. van den, Jongkind, M., Schaap-Jonker, H., & Braam, A. W. (2020). De Experience Sampling Method bij het in kaart brengen van de variabiliteit van religie bij religieuze psychiatrische patiënten. Psyche en Geloof, 31(4), 210–217.

Houben, M., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Kuppens, P. (2015). The relation between short-term emotion dynamics and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 901–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038822CrossRefPubMed

Kleiman, E. M., Bentley, K. H., Glenn, C. R., Liu, R. T., & Rizvi, S. L. (2022). Building on the past 50 years, not starting over: A balanced interpretation of meta-analyses, reviews, and commentaries on treatments for suicide and self-injury. General Hospital Psychiatry, 74, 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.11.002CrossRefPubMed

Koenig, H. G., & Al Zaben, F. (2021). Psychometric validation and translation of religious and spiritual measures. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(5), 3467–3483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01373-9CrossRefPubMed

Koenig, H. G., & Büssing, A. (2010). The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions, 1(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010078CrossRef

Koenig, H. G., King, D. E., & Carson, V. B. (2012). Handbook of religion and health (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kucinskas, J., Wright, B. R. E., & Riepl, S. (2018). The interplay between meaning and sacred awareness in everyday life: Evidence from a daily smartphone study. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 28(2), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2017.1419050CrossRef

Moreira-Almeida, A., Sharma, A., van Rensburg, B. J., Verhagen, P. J., & Cook, C. C. H. (2016). WPA Position Statement on spirituality and religion in psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(1), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20304CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

NESDA. (n.d.). Table measurement instruments The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Retrieved December 23, 2021, from https://www.nesda.nl/nesda/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Table_instruments_NESDA.pdf

Pargament, K. I. (Ed.). (2013). APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality. American Psychological Association.

Pawluk, E. J., Koerner, N., Kuo, J. R., & Antony, M. M. (2021). An experience sampling investigation of emotion and worry in people with generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 84, 102478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102478CrossRefPubMed

Renaud, S. M., & Zacchia, C. (2012). Toward a definition of affective instability. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 20(6), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229.2012.747798CrossRefPubMed

RStudio Team. (2019). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc. http://www.rstudio.com

Russell, M. A., & Gajos, J. M. (2020). Annual research review: Ecological momentary assessment studies in child psychology and psychiatry. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13204CrossRefPubMed

Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The Big Four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412267CrossRef

Schaap-Jonker, H., Eurelings-Bontekoe, E. H. M., Zock, H., & Jonker, E. (2008). Development and validation of the Dutch questionnaire god image: Effects of mental health and religious culture. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 11(5), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674670701581967CrossRef

Underwood, L. G. (2006). Ordinary spiritual experience: Qualitative research, interpretive guidelines, and population distribution for the daily spiritual experience scale. Archive for the Psychology of Religion/Archiv Für Religionspychologie, 28(1), 181–218. https://doi.org/10.1163/008467206777832562CrossRef

van Ballegooijen, W., Ruwaard, J., Karyotaki, E., Ebert, D. D., Smit, J. H., & Riper, H. (2016). Reactivity to smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment of depressive symptoms (MoodMonitor): Protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 359. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1065-5CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Verhagen, P. J. (2019). Psychiatry and religion: Controversies and consensus: A matter of attitude. Shaker Verlag. https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/29807498/Verhagen_Psychiatry_17_04_2019.pdf

Verhagen, S. J. W., Hasmi, L., Drukker, M., van Os, J., & Delespaul, P. A. E. G. (2016). Use of the experience sampling method in the context of clinical trials. Evidence Based Mental Health, 19(3), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmental-2016-102418CrossRefPubMed

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Springer.CrossRef

Wilt, J. A., Exline, J. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2021). Daily measures of religious/spiritual struggles: Relations to depression, anxiety, satisfaction with life, and meaning. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000399CrossRef

Titel: The Experience Sampling Method: A New Way of Assessing Variability of the Emotional Dimensions of Religiosity and Spirituality in a Dutch Psychiatric Population
verfasst von: Bart van den Brink
Matthias Jongkind
Willemijn Wijzenbroek
Mira Duif
Arjan W. Braam
Philippe Delespaul
Hanneke Schaap-Jonker
Publikationsdatum: 07.07.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of Religion and Health / Ausgabe 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01857-w

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

The Experience Sampling Method: A New Way of Assessing Variability of the Emotional Dimensions of Religiosity and Spirituality in a Dutch Psychiatric Population

Abstract

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2023

Exploring Factors Influencing Cervical Cancer Prevention Behaviors: Unveiling Perspectives of Conservative Muslim American Women in Virginia

Correction: Schizophrenia or possession

Polish Validation of a 14-Item Version of the Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale (RSS-14): Factorial Structure, Psychometric Properties, and Clinical Correlates

Training Researchers in the Field of Religion, Spirituality, and Health: Experiences from a Workshop in the United States and Recommendations for Future Workshop Curricula

Investigation of the Relationship Between Spiritual Coping Styles and Hope Levels in Mothers with Disabled Children in Turkey

Religious and Spiritual Coping Elements in Dealing with Chronic Diseases: A Qualitative Exploration of the Perspectives of Older Iranian Zoroastrians