Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control 5/2021

16.02.2021 | Original Paper

The FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial: patient-reported outcomes in clinical genetic sequencing for colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Sukh Makhnoon, Deborah J. Bowen, Brian H. Shirts, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Eric B. Larson, James D. Ralston, Kathleen A. Leppig, David R. Crosslin, David Veenstra, Gail P. Jarvik

Erschienen in: Cancer Causes & Control | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

As genetics gains favor in clinical oncology, it is important to address patient concerns around confidentiality, privacy, and security of genetic information that might otherwise limit its utilization. We designed a randomized controlled trial to assess the social impact of an online educational tool (FamilyTalk) to increase family communication about colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and screening. Of 208 randomized participants, 149 (71.6%) returned six-month surveys. Overall, there was no difference in CRC screening between the study arms. Privacy and confidentiality concerns about medical and genetic information, reactions to genetic test results, and lifestyle changes did not differ between arms. Participants with pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) and variant of uncertain significance (VUS) results were more likely than those with negative results to report that the results accurately predicted their disease risks (OR 5.37, p = 0.02 and OR 3.13, p = 0.02, respectively). This trial demonstrated no evidence that FamilyTalk impacted patient-reported outcomes. Low power, due to the limited number of participants with P/LP results in the overall sample, as well as the short follow-up period, could have contributed to the null findings.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hampel H (2009) Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 18(4):687–703CrossRef Hampel H (2009) Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 18(4):687–703CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson EB et al (2018) Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: a landscape analysis of reviews. Transl Behav Med 8(1):59–70CrossRef Peterson EB et al (2018) Communication of cancer-related genetic and genomic information: a landscape analysis of reviews. Transl Behav Med 8(1):59–70CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Clayton EW et al (2018) A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States. PLoS ONE 13(10):e0204417CrossRef Clayton EW et al (2018) A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on privacy and genetic information in the United States. PLoS ONE 13(10):e0204417CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Musa J et al (2017) Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0183924CrossRef Musa J et al (2017) Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 12(9):e0183924CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett S et al (2016) Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008144PubMed Bennett S et al (2016) Educational interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008144PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Faury S et al (2017) Patient education interventions for colorectal cancer patients with stoma: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 100(10):1807–1819CrossRef Faury S et al (2017) Patient education interventions for colorectal cancer patients with stoma: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 100(10):1807–1819CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Usher-Smith JA et al (2018) Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 8(1):e017717CrossRef Usher-Smith JA et al (2018) Effect of interventions incorporating personalised cancer risk information on intentions and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 8(1):e017717CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards AG et al (2013) Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001865 Edwards AG et al (2013) Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD001865
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lowery JT et al (2014) A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(4):601–610CrossRef Lowery JT et al (2014) A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(4):601–610CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Esplen MJ et al (2019) Telephone versus in-person colorectal cancer risk and screening intervention for first-degree relatives: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 125(13):2272–2282CrossRef Esplen MJ et al (2019) Telephone versus in-person colorectal cancer risk and screening intervention for first-degree relatives: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer 125(13):2272–2282CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Leventhal H, Cameron L (1987) Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Educ Couns 10(2):117–138CrossRef Leventhal H, Cameron L (1987) Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance. Patient Educ Couns 10(2):117–138CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowen DJ et al (2020) Development of FamilyTalk: an intervention to support communication and educate families about colorectal cancer risk. J Cancer Educ 35(3):470–478CrossRef Bowen DJ et al (2020) Development of FamilyTalk: an intervention to support communication and educate families about colorectal cancer risk. J Cancer Educ 35(3):470–478CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris PA et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRef Harris PA et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Provenzale D et al (2018) NCCN guidelines insights: colorectal cancer screening, version 1. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16(8):939–949CrossRef Provenzale D et al (2018) NCCN guidelines insights: colorectal cancer screening, version 1. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16(8):939–949CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pocock SJ, Stone GW (2016) The primary outcome fails - what next? N Engl J Med 375(9):861–870CrossRef Pocock SJ, Stone GW (2016) The primary outcome fails - what next? N Engl J Med 375(9):861–870CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron KA et al (2011) Patient outreach to promote colorectal cancer screening among patients with an expired order for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171(7):642–646CrossRef Cameron KA et al (2011) Patient outreach to promote colorectal cancer screening among patients with an expired order for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 171(7):642–646CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Naylor K, Ward J, Polite BN (2012) Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 27(8):1033–1046CrossRef Naylor K, Ward J, Polite BN (2012) Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 27(8):1033–1046CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Makhnoon S, Shirts BH, Bowen DJ (2019) Patients’ perspectives of variants of uncertain significance and strategies for uncertainty management. J Genet Couns 28(2):313–325CrossRef Makhnoon S, Shirts BH, Bowen DJ (2019) Patients’ perspectives of variants of uncertain significance and strategies for uncertainty management. J Genet Couns 28(2):313–325CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Niu X et al (2019) Clinical exome sequencing vs. usual care for hereditary colorectal cancer diagnosis: a pilot comparative effectiveness study. Contemp Clin Trials 84:105820CrossRef Niu X et al (2019) Clinical exome sequencing vs. usual care for hereditary colorectal cancer diagnosis: a pilot comparative effectiveness study. Contemp Clin Trials 84:105820CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brewer NT, DeFrank JT, Gilkey MB (2016) Anticipated regret and health behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 35(11):1264–1275CrossRef Brewer NT, DeFrank JT, Gilkey MB (2016) Anticipated regret and health behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 35(11):1264–1275CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogith D et al (2014) Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21(e2):e320–e325CrossRef Rogith D et al (2014) Attitudes regarding privacy of genomic information in personalized cancer therapy. J Am Med Inform Assoc 21(e2):e320–e325CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial: patient-reported outcomes in clinical genetic sequencing for colorectal cancer
verfasst von
Sukh Makhnoon
Deborah J. Bowen
Brian H. Shirts
Stephanie M. Fullerton
Eric B. Larson
James D. Ralston
Kathleen A. Leppig
David R. Crosslin
David Veenstra
Gail P. Jarvik
Publikationsdatum
16.02.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Cancer Causes & Control / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-021-01398-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Cancer Causes & Control 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.