Contextual background: collaborative learning in youth-friendly health services in Moldova
The national scaling up process for YFHS in Moldova implemented training of healthcare providers to deliver high quality services to young people. In 2011–2012 a comprehensive system of in-service training was developed in accordance with the WHO Adolescent Job Aid [
13] and Orientation Program on Adolescent Health for Health-care Providers [
14], as well as the EuTEACH training program [
15] and the national quality standards for youth-friendly health services. This training was implemented in all districts of Moldova between 2012 and 2016, varying from three days of basic training in youth-friendly healthcare for family doctors and nurses, to 10 days of extended training for specialist doctors from YFHS. A three-day learning program on adolescent health promotion was also developed for community and school workers (e.g. school nurses, psychologists, social workers and teachers).
The scaling up process also incorporated collaborative learning processes, pre-empting the WHO Global Standards for Quality Healthcare for Adolescents, which recommend the implementation of a supportive, non-punitive system for supervising adolescent healthcare providers with an emphasis on problem-solving approaches [
16]. The first collaborative learning meetings were conducted at the end of 2012 by four YFHS, with 30 (of 35) YFHS applying the approach by the end of 2016. Each CLS aims to improve the knowledge, understanding and motivation of health professionals working in adolescent healthcare and health promotion to ensure delivery of high quality health services.
Collaborative learning sessions are conducted according to national YFHS regulations, which stipulate that each YFHS should conduct two CLS per month. Each CLS brings together 10–15 local health providers (general practitioners, specialists and nurses) and/or school and community workers from the local YFHS, other health services, and schools for around three hours and focuses on a subject related to one of the seven priority adolescent health problems described in the YFHS standards (see Tables
1 and
2). The subject of each session is generally selected in consultation with participants with consideration of the local epidemiological situation (for example, increased incidence of violence in a particular area could prompt a session on this issue). The sessions are moderated by two specialists from the YFHS (often also YFHS managers), who facilitate discussions, offer teaching and document the session. National-level collaborative learning sessions are also conducted quarterly, where YFHS from different districts report on their results and share experiences and challenges.
Table 1
The seven priority adolescent health problems addressed by YFHS in Moldova
1. Sexually transmitted infections and HIV |
2. Early pregnancy |
3. Pubertal disorders |
4. Nutritional problems and eating disorders |
5. Psychological wellbeing, including mental health problems, depression and suicide |
6. Substance abuse and misuse |
7. Health problems related to violence and human trafficking |
Table 2
Schedule of a typical collaborative learning session
Introduction (30–40 min) Welcome and introductions, discussion of changes in practice after basic training in adolescent health care/promotion or previous collaborative learning session |
Sharing of experience (60 mins) Discussion of existing and best practices on the specific topic of the session |
Teaching (30 mins) Teaching on a selected issue, moderated by a YFHC specialist (based on WHO Adolescent Job Aid, current evidence, or other relevant resources) |
Planning (30–40 min) Discussion to identify solutions and actions to improve practice to address the discussed health issue or problem; updating and sharing of the district’s referral framework for adolescent health. |
Characteristics and feasibility of the collaborative learning approach
Our results showed that the collaborative learning approach was implemented in 30 of 35 districts in Moldova, with a total of 31 YFHS participating. A total of 464 collaborative learning sessions were held in 2016. YFHS conducted learning sessions from one to three times per month, giving an average of almost 15 (14.96) sessions per service per year, or 1.25 sessions per month at each service. The duration of each session was two to three hours.
A total of 6942 health providers and community workers participated in the sessions (with an average of just under 15 participants per session). Both health professionals and community workers such as teachers and school counsellors well represented. Over half (50.9%) of sessions were conducted only with healthcare providers, with the remaining sessions fairly evenly split between groups of community and school workers and other stakeholders (26.7%), and mixed groups (22.4%). Nearly 80% of provider participants became involved in CLS after completing the basic training in adolescent healthcare or promotion. It was noted that the vast majority of participants were female (83.3%, n = 5780), reflecting the high proportion of women working in the health, teaching, and community work professions.
The majority (70%,
n = 325) of CLS took place in town-based YFHCs. The sessions nonetheless reached a significant number of rural participants (74.3% of participants), which offered the opportunity for community and school workers to improve their understanding of the YFHC model. The other 30% of sessions were conducted in rural areas that do not have ready access to town-based YFHCs, with the aim of facilitating the participation of local communities (see Table
3).
Table 3
Location, number, and participant profile of collaborative learning sessions, all YFHCs, 2016
Chisinau | 4 | 148 | 140 | 8 | 0 |
Anenii Noi | 20 | 322 | 228 | 94 | 93.2% |
Balti | 24 | 253 | 30 | 223 | 59.3% |
Briceni | 8 | 94 | 62 | 32 | 74.5% |
Cahul | 22 | 244 | 173 | 71 | 73.4% |
Calarași | 7 | 66 | 45 | 21 | 24.2% |
Cantemir | 6 | 73 | 45 | 28 | 68.5% |
Ceadîr-Lunga | 9 | 230 | 80 | 150 | 87% |
Cimișlia | 20 | 333 | 169 | 164 | 77.8% |
Comrat | 8 | 123 | 30 | 93 | 81.3% |
Criuleni | 21 | 189 | 142 | 47 | 68.8% |
Dondușeni | 13 | 134 | 85 | 49 | 67.1% |
Drochia | 24 | 371 | 251 | 120 | 80.9% |
Edinet | 24 | 502 | 301 | 201 | 84.9% |
Falesti | 21 | 230 | 202 | 28 | 73.9% |
Floresti | 24 | 606 | 240 | 366 | 70.3% |
Glodeni | 11 | 119 | 95 | 24 | 71.4% |
Leova | 24 | 505 | 204 | 301 | 73.3% |
Nisporeni | 17 | 166 | 124 | 42 | 80.1% |
Ocnita | 16 | 167 | 121 | 46 | 59.3% |
Orhei | 19 | 186 | 72 | 114 | 67.2% |
Riscani | 16 | 172 | 147 | 25 | 72.7% |
Singerei | 23 | 368 | 215 | 153 | 76.1% |
Soldanesti | 1 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 100% |
Soroca | 10 | 90 | 43 | 47 | 66.7% |
Stefan Voda | 15 | 225 | 42 | 183 | 78.7% |
Straseni | 17 | 179 | 120 | 59 | 56.4% |
Taraclia | 2 | 31 | 13 | 18 | 100% |
Telenesti | 8 | 140 | 88 | 52 | 60% |
Ungheni | 22 | 465 | 289 | 176 | 66.7% |
Vulcanesti | 8 | 181 | 32 | 149 | 61.9% |
Total | 464 | 6942 | 3828 (55.1%) | 3114 (44.9%) | 74.3% |
The most common topics for sessions in 2016 were adolescent health and YFHS (159 of 464 sessions), sexual and reproductive health (103 sessions), and violence (76 sessions). Table
4 presents a breakdown of CLS themes according to participant type. For community workers, the bio-psycho-social development of adolescents was the most common topic, whereas health providers focussed on more sensitive topics such as prevention of STIs, unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion.
Table 4
CLS themes and participants, 2016
Adolescent health and YFHS |
Bio-psycho-social development of adolescents | 53 | 19 | 24 | 10 |
Puberty development and disorders; psycho-sexual development | 27 | 15 | 7 | 5 |
Orientation to YFHS and improving inter-sectorial cooperation | 23 | 14 | 3 | 6 |
Health promotion | 26 | 10 | 7 | 9 |
Importance of adolescent health for society | 16 | 9 | 5 | 2 |
The adolescent-parent relationship and conflicts | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
The family’s role in promoting adolescent health | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Volunteer roles within YFHCs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Education and career considerations for adolescents | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Sexual and reproductive health |
Prevention of STIs/HIV, unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion | 86 | 54 | 15 | 17 |
Sexuality education of adolescents | 17 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
Violence |
Family violence and violent behaviour among adolescents | 50 | 31 | 8 | 11 |
Bullying in schools | 19 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
Prevention of human trafficking of young people | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
Mental health |
Adolescents’ emotional wellbeing and psychological development | 11 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
Depression and suicide prevention among adolescents | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Risk behaviours among adolescents; prevention of substance abuse | 28 | 10 | 13 | 5 |
Prevention of mental health problems among adolescents | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 |
General health |
Nutritional disorders in adolescence, including obesity and undernutrition | 18 | 10 | 3 | 5 |
Acne and other skin problems in adolescents | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Cervical cancer prevention | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Trauma and injuries in adolescents | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Breast development and pathologies | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Tuberculosis prevention in young people | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Counselling and communication with adolescents |
HEADS assessment and using the WHO Job Aid | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Individual counselling of adolescents | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Effective communication and healthy inter-personal relationships | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Prevention of professional burn-out syndrome | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Marginalised and vulnerable groups |
Adolescents at risk; concepts of vulnerability | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
Integration of adolescents with special needs at school | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Each CLS identified ways to improve adolescent health practice. The most common intended activities were:
-
Strengthening of referral frameworks;
-
Creation of new partnerships (e.g. with local non-governmental organisations, social services, police); and
-
Planning of new activities with partners (e.g. information sessions for parents and/or adolescents, advocacy meetings with local authorities, or other health promotion activities).
Acceptability and perceived benefits of collaborative learning
The two questionnaires provided information on the purpose and benefits of collaborative learning, as perceived by participants and facilitators. Participants had three main interpretations of the purpose of collaborative learning:
1)
To increase knowledge on a specific adolescent health subject;
2)
To share good practices and successful adolescent health care models; and
3)
To engage in group problem-solving.
Perceived benefits from participation in the sessions also fell into three main categories, which mirrored the perceived purpose of the sessions:
1)
Increased adolescent health knowledge and skills;
2)
Improved teamwork and cooperation; and
3)
Empowerment to provide high quality, youth-friendly care.
The first benefit relates to obtaining new knowledge and skills related to adolescent health and development, for example by learning how to make better use of guidelines and obtain more information and education materials for their work. Specialists stated, “I became aware of available services for adolescents” (teacher, Calarasi district) and, “I learned to apply the local referral framework” (school nurse, Soroca district).
The second area centred on improving communication with colleagues and developing cooperation with other specialists and sectors. One specialist reported, “I satisfied my need to communicate with colleagues” (family doctor, Edinet district).
The third area of perceived benefit related to empowerment to “make a difference” to young people. Participants felt enabled to provide more youth-friendly care to young people, especially in sensitive areas: “After participating in CLS … I feel more confident to discuss issues related to sexuality with adolescents” (biology teacher, Cimislia district). One nurse commented, “I better understood the particularities of adolescence, and how to deal with adolescents in my practice and in my family” (family nurse, Criuleni district). A family doctor concluded, “Respectful attitudes and confidential care can improve the results of our work with adolescents a great deal” (family doctor, Edinet district).
CLS moderators had a more refined understanding of this form of collaborative learning, describing each CLS as a meeting of professionals with a common goal, i.e. learning how to practice more effectively and efficiently through the exchange of experience, and identifying challenges and solutions to them. Moderators confirmed the benefits of CLS articulated by participants, especially with regard to benefits for teamwork and cooperation. Specifically, moderators mentioned that collaborative learning offers participants the possibility to “improve cooperation” (moderator, doctor, Cimislia district) and “referral to different services” (moderator, psychologist, Edinet district), including via “creation of a functional inter-disciplinary team at the local level” (moderator, social worker, Balti district).
Moderators additionally identified benefits for the quality and youth-friendliness of services. For example, moderators reported that CLS helped participants “to have a more youth-friendly attitude and better respect confidentiality” (moderator, doctor, Soroca district), “to have a more understanding and supportive attitude to some sensitive issues such as sexuality or violence” (moderator, doctor, Falesti district), “to develop their interpersonal communication abilities,” (moderator, psychologist, Orhei district), and to improve use of existing guidelines.
YFHS managers also evoked a series of benefits to youth-friendly health services from collaborative learning sessions, including:
-
Improved cooperation within the health sector and across other sectors in the area of adolescent health;
-
Strengthened positioning of YFHS as trusted resource centres for adolescent health and development;
-
Increased number of YFHS beneficiaries; and
-
More efficient health services for adolescents, especially vulnerable groups.
This was supported by CLS reports, in which participants reported informing over 65,700 adolescents (representing almost 15% of adolescents in the country) about YFHS (see Table
5). While this is not directly attributable to involvement in the collaborative learning approach, participants also reported referring almost 11,000 young people to YFHCs, suggesting a high level of confidence in the YFHC model as an important resource for young people.
Table 5
Number of young people informed of or referred to YFHCs by CLS participants, 2016
Total number of CLS participants | 6942 |
Total number of young people informed about YFHCs by CLS participants | 65,783 |
Total number of young people referred to YFHCs by CLS participants | 10,997 |
Challenges in implementing collaborative learning sessions
CLS participants and moderators were generally positive about the collaborative learning approach, but identified some challenges in implementing the sessions, most of which related to the novelty of the approach and the resources (e.g. staff time and travel costs) required to run sessions.
While youth-friendly health services have been in place for some time, the application of collaborative learning is new in Moldova. In particular, learning in multi-disciplinary groups, where participants have different backgrounds and understanding of adolescent health, was a relatively new concept for many moderators and participants. One moderator noted, “Initially we didn’t know how it would work better - to have CLS only for doctors, only for nurses, only for teachers or to combine them” (psychologist, Anenii Noi district). The involvement of stakeholders from outside YFHCs, such as family doctors and school resource persons, was in fact identified as both a key strength and a challenge of the approach, especially in rural areas where health providers are often under significant time pressure in their work. “CLS with participation of family doctors and community resource persons made it possible to establish better cooperation between different actors in the local area … but it was very difficult to find a convenient time for all of them to meet” (moderator, doctor, Falesti district).
These challenges and the newness of the approach meant that significant time, energy and skill was required to start sessions and to establish a learning environment where it was possible for all participants to contribute equally. One moderator said, “CLS needs time for preparation, travel if it is organised outside of the YFHC, and effort to invite participants, especially from other sectors” (doctor, Cimislia district). Further, as noted by one of the authors who led this process (GL), the lack of normative guidance on how to conduct CLS and of functional systems to involve different sectors hindered work.