Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2019

Open Access 07.05.2019 | Original Scientific Report

The Feasibility and Advantages of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Lobectomy

verfasst von: Xueying Yang, Linlin Wang, Chenxi Zhang, Danyang Zhao, Yao Lu, Zelong Wang

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2019

Abstract

Background

Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has emerged as a promising and exciting approach for minimally invasive thoracic surgeries. However, nearly all reported uniportal VATS lobectomies are performed via an intercostal route, and chest wall trauma remains an issue. Here, we report the use of a novel uniportal VATS technique involving a subxiphoid route for pulmonary lobectomies.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed perioperative data for patients who underwent subxiphoid uniportal and traditional three-port VATS lobectomies from January 2016 to January 2017 at our hospital.

Results

During the study period, 37 patients successively underwent subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomies, including three synchronous bilateral pulmonectomies; 68 patients underwent traditional three-port VATS. There were no surgical or 30-day postoperative mortalities, and no significant between-group differences were found in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of explored nodal stations, blood loss, drainage time, postoperative complications, or length of hospital stay. Operative time was longer in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group than in the traditional three-port VATS group (P < 0.001). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores after surgery were significantly lower in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy is a safe and feasible surgical procedure associated with reduced surgical trauma and postoperative pain as well as improved cosmetic results compared with traditional VATS. Moreover, this procedure is better suited for patients receiving synchronous bilateral pulmonectomy. Further long-term follow-up analyses involving more patients are ongoing.

Trial registry number

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03051438.
Hinweise

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Rapid technological progress has decreased the invasiveness of thoracic surgeries, as well as the duration of postoperative rehabilitation [1]. Since 2010, uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become a new area of exploration and evolution for minimally invasive thoracic surgery [2]. Because of excellent results, uniportal VATS lobectomy is becoming increasingly accepted [3, 4]. We started using this surgical procedure in 2015 [5]. However, nearly all reported uniportal VATS lobectomies were performed via an intercostal route, and intercostal incisions can result in postoperative intercostal neuralgia and chronic thoracotomy pain [6]. Here, we report the use of a novel uniportal VATS technique involving a subxiphoid route for pulmonary lobectomy prevents these outcomes and better preserves pulmonary function. This study aims to assess the feasibility and applicability of the subxiphoid uniportal VATS approach for pulmonary lobectomy and to compare perioperative outcomes of subxiphoid uniportal and traditional three-port VATS lobectomies.

Materials and methods

Data acquisition and follow-up

We retrospectively analyzed the results of patients who underwent subxiphoid uniportal or traditional three-port VATS lobectomy between January 2016 and January 2017 at our hospital. None of these patients had received neoadjuvant therapies prior to surgery. Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and patient consent were obtained. The retrospective study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03051438). Pre-, peri-, and postoperative outcome variables and patient details were collected via patient inquiry and clinical assessment.

Surgical technique

General aspects

Both subxiphoid uniportal and traditional three-port VATS lobectomies were performed under general anesthesia. A double-lumen endotracheal tube and single-lung ventilation were utilized. Required surgical equipment included Echelon Flex endoscopic articulating linear cutters (Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Somerville, NJ, USA), long curved endoscopic surgical instruments with double articulations and curved suction (Yundi, Wuxi, China), and a 10-mm 30° thoracoscope (Storz Medical AG, Tägerwilen, Switzerland).

Traditional three-port VATS technique

Traditional VATS lobectomies were completed using the three-port technique, which involves three incisions and an operative field that is visualized onscreen via a video thoracoscope [7].

Subxiphoid uniportal VATS technique

Patients were placed in a supine position, and the operating table was adjusted as needed to elevate the appropriate side of the body for surgery (Fig. 1). Both the surgeon and the assistant stood contralaterally to the surgical lung so that the same visual field was obtained, enhancing surgical coordination. A single incision approximately 4.0 cm in length was made below the xiphoid process. The incision was transverse and for bilateral lung surgeries and tilted in the direction of the operative costal arch for unilateral lung surgeries (Fig. 1a–d). The skin, subcutaneous tissue, and rectus abdominis insertion at the costal arch were cut. During single-lung ventilation, the tunnel close to the deep surface of the costal arch was bluntly dissected with a finger, and the pleural cavity was entered above the diaphragm (Fig. 1e). A plastic wound protector (Demai, Guangzhou, China) was placed in the incision to provide optimal exposure. The procedures required bimanual instrumentation with paired surgical instruments that crossed at incision sites (Fig. 1f).
Our surgical procedures followed classic principles of pulmonary resections, and similar to mediastinal lymphadenectomies for lung cancer, we were often required to dissect individual veins, arteries, and lobar bronchi. Of key concern was adequate exposure of the lung, which was mandatory for every step. For a subxiphoid uniportal VATS approach, an endostapler was the most convenient tool for ligating bronchi, incomplete fissures, and blood vessels due to the operative angle. Small vascular branches were difficult to divide using an endostapler. Thus, vascular clips were used in these cases. Resected tissue specimens were collected in a protective bag, and mediastinal lymphadenectomy was performed for all lung cancer patients. At the end of the operations, a U-shaped suture surrounding the chest tube was placed to close the drainage spout after extubation (Fig. 1d), and the wound was infiltrated with ropivacaine (Naropin, AstraZeneca AB, Sweden).

Upper lobectomy

Right and left upper lobectomies were performed by first dividing the artery and then the vein. The corresponding pulmonary fissure was ultimately stapled when the bronchus was transected (Fig. 2). Procedures for subxiphoid uniportal VATS of the left lung sometimes caused compression of the heart that leads to premature ventricular contraction; to overcome this problem, long curved endoscopic surgical instruments with double articulations and curved suction were used, and we attempted to minimize pressure on the heart. All patients tolerated the entire procedure well, with no instances of severe intraoperative arrhythmia.

Middle lobectomy

Right middle lobectomies were performed in the following sequence: division of the anterior portion of the major fissure, the vein, the bronchus, the artery, and the remaining fissure. Only when the fissure was complete was the artery divided before the bronchus (Fig. 3a–c).

Lower lobectomy

For right and left lower lobectomies, the procedure was easier when the division of the fissure was complete. When the fissure was incomplete and no arteries were visible in the fissure, lobectomy was performed from bottom-to-top, with the fissure stapled last (Fig. 3d–f).

Pulmonary ground-glass opacities and small nodules

Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) and small nodules can be difficult to palpate through a subxiphoid incision. Therefore, preoperative CT-guided puncture positioning was used to pinpoint the positions of pulmonary lesions (Fig. 1f).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as percentages, and continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Variables were compared using Student’s t test, Chi-squared test, or Fisher’s exact test. Data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0. P values < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

Between January 2016 and January 2017, 37 patients were successfully treated via subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy, including three synchronous bilateral pulmonectomies for the following purpose: (1) radical right upper lobectomy for carcinoma with left upper lobe wedge resection; (2) radical right lower lobectomy for carcinoma with left upper lobe wedge resection; (3) radical left upper lobectomy for carcinoma with right lower lobe wedge resection. A total of 68 patients underwent traditional three-port VATS. There were no surgical or 30-day postoperative mortalities. All patient characteristics and lobectomy combinations are presented in Table 1. Postoperative pathologic diagnoses included both primary lung cancers and benign conditions (Table 2). Primary lung cancers were classified by pathologic stages (stage I, II, III, or higher; Table 3).
Table 1
Baseline patient characteristics
Characteristic
Subxiphoid uniportal VATS (n = 37)
Three-port VATS (n = 68)
P value
Age (Mean ± SD)
54.12 ± 6.43
63.32 ± 7.54
<0.01
Sex (%)
0.174
 Male
15 (40.54%)
37 (54.41%)
 
 Female
22 (59.50%)
31 (45.59%)
Pulmonary function (Mean ± SD)
 FVC (% predicted)
91.26 ± 11.54
87.13 ± 12.79
0.105
 FEV1 (% predicted)
88.83 ± 13.27
82.35 ± 14.42
0.026
 MVV (% predicted)
66.26 ± 15.36
71.63 ± 17.16
0.115
Arterial blood gas analysis (Mean ± SD)
 PAO2 (mmHg)
82.59 ± 10.21
79.75 ± 14.20
0.285
 PACO2 (mmHg)
40.87 ± 4.38
42.61 ± 6.12
0.130
 SAO2 (%)
95.76 ± 2.28
94.28 ± 3.71
0.029
Lobectomy (%)
 Right upper
12 (32.43%)
15 (22.06%)
0.245
 Right middle
4 (10.81%)
6 (8.82%)
1.000
 Right lower
9 (24.32%)
16 (23.53%)
0.927
 Left upper
6 (16.22%)
13 (19.12%)
0.712
 Left lower
3 (8.11%)
17 (25.00%)
0.035
 Left pneumonectomy
0 (0%)
1 (1.47%)
1.000
 Synchronous bilateral pulmonectomya
3 (8.11%)
0 (%)
0.077
aSynchronous bilateral pulmonectomies included the following surgical procedures: (1) radical right upper lobe cancer surgery and left upper lobe wedge resection; (2) radical right lower lobe cancer surgery and left upper lobe wedge resection; and (3) radical left upper lobe cancer surgery and right lower lobe wedge resection
Table 2
Pathology results
Pathological types
Subxiphoid uniportal VATS (%) (n = 37)
Three-port VATS (%) (n = 68)
P value
Primary lung cancer
30 (81.08%)
53 (77.94%)
0.706
 Adenocarcinoma
21 (56.76%)
29 (42.65%)
0.167
 Squamous cell carcinoma
9 (24.32%)
19 (27.94%)
0.689
 Adenosquamous
0 (0%)
2 (2.94%)
0.539
 Large cell carcinoma
0 (0%)
2 (2.94%)
0.539
 Carcinosarcoma
0 (0%)
1 (1.47%)
1.000
Benign disease
7 (18.92%)
15 (22.06%)
0.706
 Inflammatory granuloma
3 (8.11%)
5 (7.35%)
1.000
 Pulmonary cyst
2 (5.41%)
2 (2.94%)
0.923
 Tuberculosis
1 (2.70%)
2 (2.94%)
1.000
 Pulmonary hamartoma
1 (2.70%)
1 (1.47%)
1.000
 Bronchiectasis
0 (0%)
4 (5.88%)
0.332
 Lung sequestration
0 (0%)
1 (1.47%)
1.000
There were no significant differences in these results between the groups (all P > 0.05)
Table 3
Distribution of primary lung cancers by pathologic stage
Stage
Subxiphoid uniportal VATS (%) (n = 30)
Three-port VATS (%) (n = 53)
P value
Stage I
15 (50.00%)
22 (41.51%)
0.455
 IA
8 (26.67%)
9 (16.98%)
0.294
 IB
7 (23.33%)
13 (24.53%)
0.903
Stage II
12 (40.00%)
24 (45.28%)
0.241
 IIA
7 (23.33%)
13 (24.53%)
0.903
 IIB
5 (16.67%)
11 (20.75%)
0.650
Stage III or greater
3 (10.00%)
7 (13.21%)
0.936
 IIIA
3 (10.00%)
5 (9.43%)
1.000
 IIIB
0 (0%)
1 (1.89%)
1.000
 IVa
0 (0%)
1 (1.89%)
1.000
aIsolated brain metastasis following metastasectomy prior to being evaluated for lobectomy

Surgical outcomes

In both the subxiphoid uniportal and three-port VATS groups, one procedure required conversion to conventional open thoracotomy because of dense adhesions and bleeding. The conversion rates were 2.70% and 1.47%, respectively. Both converted procedures were completed safely, and no inpatient deaths occurred. There were no significant between-group differences in blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of explored nodal stations, drainage time, or length of hospital stay. Operative time was longer in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group compared with the traditional three-port VATS group (P < 0.01; Table 4). Three patients (8.11%) in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group and six patients (8.82%) in the traditional three-port VATS group experienced postoperative complications (P > 0.05; Table 5).
Table 4
Surgical results (Mean ± SD)
Characteristic
Subxiphoid uniportal VATS (n = 37)
Three-port VATS (n = 68)
P value
Operative time (min)
262.15 ± 40.68
151.84 ± 47.12
<0.001
Blood loss (mL)
110.61 ± 23.37
105.34 ± 25.64
0.302
Drainage time (days)
4.72 ± 1.41
5.13 ± 3.27
0.470
Length of hospital stay (days)
9.23 ± 2.94
9.87 ± 3.86
0.382
Number of lymph nodes retrieved (lung cancer patients only)
11.29 ± 3.51
12.68 ± 3.79
0.068
Number of nodal stations explored (lung cancer patients only)
7.22 ± 1.17
7.08 ± 1.83
0.675
Operative time was longer for the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group than for the traditional three-port VATS group (P < 0.001)
Table 5
Postoperative complications
Complication
Subxiphoid uniportal VATS (%) (n = 37)
Three-port VATS (%) (n = 68)
P value
Pneumonia
1 (2.70%)
2 (2.94%)
1.000
Cardiac arrhythmias
1 (2.70%)
1 (1.47%)
1.000
Prolonged air leak
1 (2.70%)
2 (2.94%)
1.000
Hemothorax
0 (0%)
1 (1.47%)
1.000
Totals
3 (8.11%)
6 (8.82%)
1.000
The overall rate of postoperative complications has no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the subxiphoid uniportal VATS and three-port VATS group

Visual analog scale pain scores

The intensity of postoperative pain was scored using a 10-cm vertical visual analog scale (VAS) [8]. The mean VAS scores at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery were 3.27 ± 1.46, 3.14 ± 1.52, 2.35 ± 1.29, 1.97 ± 0.54, and 0.79 ± 0.35, respectively, for the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group; the scores were 7.69 ± 1.32, 6.26 ± 1.28, 4.65 ± 1.63, 2.31 ± 0.75, and 1.11 ± 0.54, respectively, for the three-port VATS group. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group than in the three-port VATS group, confirming an expected advantage of subxiphoid uniportal VATS.

Discussion

The field of thoracic surgery is continually evolving [9]. Since the first uniportal VATS lobectomy was performed by Gonzalez Rivas in 2011, there have been considerable improvements in techniques and reliability [4, 10]. The advantages of uniportal VATS over traditional three-port VATS include less postoperative pain, speedier recovery, and superior cosmetic results [11, 12]. Although postoperative pain and chest wall paresthesias can be reduced with uniportal VATS due to its minimally invasive nature, they often still occur when an incision through the intercostal space is utilized. Technological advances and innovative devices have led to the development of a novel uniportal VATS involving a subxiphoid approach [10]. Initially, this procedure was applied to pneumothorax operations, metastasectomies, and mediastinal tumor resections [1113]. However, as demonstrated here, the use of novel uniportal VATS approaches for lobectomies has proved quite successful.
In this study, we compared the outcomes of pulmonary lobectomy via subxiphoid uniportal VATS with traditional three-port VATS. We found no significant between-group differences in the number of retrieved lymph nodes, number of explored nodal stations, blood loss, drainage time, postoperative complications, or length of hospital stay. Compared with other reports [14], the average number of resected lymph nodes was lower in our study. This can be explained by our routine performance of en-bloc resection of lymph nodes during mediastinal lymphadenectomy. During our procedures, we dissected and investigated over six stations of lymph nodes during mediastinal lymphadenectomy, including at least three mediastinal lymph node stations. Specifically, in our center, we conventionally dissect stations #2, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12 during right pneumonectomies, and stations #5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, and 12 lymph nodes during left pneumonectomies. Dissection of #7 lymph nodes is often relatively difficult. During our procedures, we pulled the lobes forward along the mediastinum below the bronchus and resected lymph nodes en-bloc. We feel this is an effective approach; as previously noted, the two groups did not differ in the number of retrieved lymph nodes or the number of explored nodal stations.
Besides the number of resected lymph nodes, other surgical outcomes in our center, including blood loss, drainage time, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay, were mostly in accordance with other published results [1517]. The positioning of patients and general surgical techniques followed Dr. Chia-Chuan Liu’s subxiphoid incision approach [16]. His techniques helped us to adapt to the new approach, and complete the operation proficiently. However, we used some extended laparoscopic instruments to better access to certain surgical regions. Our retrospective study had a limited sample size, and the next step is to expand surgical cases via subxiphoid VATS. These experiences will be summarized in future publications.
In early surgeries at our hospital, we utilized three ports by conventional thoracoscopic access. With increased technical proficiency, we were eventually able to complete the operation using one port through the thoracic cage. Now the majority of thoracic surgeries are performed with single-port VATS at our center. More importantly, we have found that the intensity of postoperative pain following the single-port approach is indeed lower than after the three-port approach. We have compared the results of procedures performed through the thoracic cage using either three ports or one port in a previous study [5]; despite the number of ports, patients continued to experience intercostal neuralgia. Thus, we began to explore uniportal subxiphoid VATS and to investigate advantages of the uniportal approach over the three-port conventional VATS. Because this technique and approach were new to us and synchronous bilateral pulmonectomies were performed in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS group, operative times for this group were somewhat prolonged. Substantially less time will likely be required for subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomies with increased experience and enhanced instrumentation. Finally, we found that VAS pain scores were significantly lower after surgery in the subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy group than in the other group. We attributed this difference to decreased incidence of intercostal nerve injury and access trauma.
We have noted several advantages of the uniportal subxiphoid approach in this study. First, there was no limitation of shoulder movement after subxiphoid uniportal VATS, because thoracic integrity was maintained. Second, this approach involves a low risk of pulmonary complications. All the advantages above have overt benefits for enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) [18]. Third, for patients with bilateral pulmonary lesions, subxiphoid uniportal VATS allows synchronous bilateral pulmonectomies. Furthermore, compared with other approaches, subxiphoid uniportal VATS has superior aesthetic outcomes, with no visible chest scars.
Subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy may have certain limitations under certain technical conditions. First, it is difficult to use this approach to perform complex thoracic procedures, such as surgeries in patients who have received prior thoracic irradiation and induction therapy, sleeve lobectomies, and vascular reconstructions. Second, bleeding control for vascular injuries may be significantly harder to achieve when using this approach. Third, the heart may be compressed, or arrhythmias may be encountered when passing instruments into the left chest. However, we are convinced that these weaknesses will be overcome with the continuous development of videoendoscopic instruments and endosurgical techniques.
In our study, we retrospectively analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of uniportal subxiphoid VATS in pulmonectomies compared to traditional VATS. Our recent experience demonstrates that subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy is a safe and feasible surgical procedure with excellent postoperative results, particularly for patients with bilateral pulmonary lesions. However, subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy is a relatively complex procedure, and appropriate expertise and instruments are critical to its success. Moreover, further analyses of subxiphoid uniportal VATS lobectomy should be conducted with more patients to better evaluate the potential and promise of this approach.

Acknowledgments

We thank Katrina Krogh, MD, from essayreview.co.kr for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna WC, de Valence M, Atenafu EG et al (2013) Is video-assisted lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer oncologically equivalent to open lobectomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43:1121–1125CrossRefPubMed Hanna WC, de Valence M, Atenafu EG et al (2013) Is video-assisted lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer oncologically equivalent to open lobectomy? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 43:1121–1125CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R et al (2011) Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 13:539–541CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Rivas D, de la Torre M, Fernandez R et al (2011) Single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 13:539–541CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Reinersman JM, Passera E, Rocco G (2016) Overview of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS): past and present. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 5:112–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Reinersman JM, Passera E, Rocco G (2016) Overview of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS): past and present. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 5:112–117CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez-Rivas D, Paradela M, Fernandez R et al (2013) Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: two years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 95:426–432CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Rivas D, Paradela M, Fernandez R et al (2013) Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: two years of experience. Ann Thorac Surg 95:426–432CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang L, Liu D, Lu J et al (2017) The feasibility and advantage of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary lobectomy. BMC Cancer 17:75CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang L, Liu D, Lu J et al (2017) The feasibility and advantage of uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in pulmonary lobectomy. BMC Cancer 17:75CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Yim AP (1995) Minimizing chest wall trauma in video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109:1255–1256CrossRefPubMed Yim AP (1995) Minimizing chest wall trauma in video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109:1255–1256CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang X, Wang S, Qu J (2009) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compares favorably with thoracotomy for the treatment of lung cancer: a five-year outcome comparison. World J Surg 33:1857–1861CrossRefPubMed Yang X, Wang S, Qu J (2009) Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compares favorably with thoracotomy for the treatment of lung cancer: a five-year outcome comparison. World J Surg 33:1857–1861CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB et al (1998) The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 86:102–106PubMed DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB et al (1998) The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 86:102–106PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Reck M, Heigener DF, Mok T et al (2013) Management of non-small-cell lung cancer: recent developments. Lancet 382:709–719CrossRefPubMed Reck M, Heigener DF, Mok T et al (2013) Management of non-small-cell lung cancer: recent developments. Lancet 382:709–719CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Suda T, Ashikari S, Tochii S et al (2014) Single-incision subxiphoid approach for bilateral metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 97:718–719CrossRefPubMed Suda T, Ashikari S, Tochii S et al (2014) Single-incision subxiphoid approach for bilateral metastasectomy. Ann Thorac Surg 97:718–719CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu CY, Lin CS, Liu CC (2015) Subxiphoid single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 10:125–128PubMedPubMedCentral Liu CY, Lin CS, Liu CC (2015) Subxiphoid single-incision thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 10:125–128PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu L, Lin L, Liu M et al (2015) Subxiphoid uniportal thoracoscopic extended thymectomy. J Thorac Dis 7:1658–1660PubMedPubMedCentral Wu L, Lin L, Liu M et al (2015) Subxiphoid uniportal thoracoscopic extended thymectomy. J Thorac Dis 7:1658–1660PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu PK, Lin WC, Chang YC et al (2015) Multiinstitutional analysis of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 99:1739–1744CrossRefPubMed Hsu PK, Lin WC, Chang YC et al (2015) Multiinstitutional analysis of single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection for primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 99:1739–1744CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Aresu G, Weaver H, Wu L et al (2016) Uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic bilateral segmentectomy for synchronous bilateral lung adenocarcinomas. J Vis Surg 2:170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aresu G, Weaver H, Wu L et al (2016) Uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic bilateral segmentectomy for synchronous bilateral lung adenocarcinomas. J Vis Surg 2:170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
The Feasibility and Advantages of Subxiphoid Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery in Pulmonary Lobectomy
verfasst von
Xueying Yang
Linlin Wang
Chenxi Zhang
Danyang Zhao
Yao Lu
Zelong Wang
Publikationsdatum
07.05.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04948-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

World Journal of Surgery 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.