nach oben

Current Dermatology Reports

Erschienen in:

15.08.2023 | REVIEW

The Hoax of Clean Beauty and Associated Allergens

verfasst von: Michael Gui, Donglin Zhang, Jennifer M. Tran, Margo J. Reeder

Erschienen in: Current Dermatology Reports | Ausgabe 4/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

‘Clean beauty’ has experienced a notable surge in popularity among consumers. This movement is characterized by the replacement of ‘unsafe’ components with ‘natural’ or clean alternatives in personal care products and cosmetics. This review aims to examine the evidence and expert recommendations surrounding commonly implicated compounds by the clean beauty movement.

Recent Findings

Clean beauty products often contain potential allergens, and despite recent policy changes, there is still no standard definition of clean beauty. Recent studies demonstrated most products marketed as clean contain potential allergens, including fragrances, preservatives, and surfactants.

Summary

Clean beauty advocates often raise concerns about certain cosmetic ingredients, despite no conclusive evidence of harm. Removal of these ingredients by cosmetic manufacturers may inadvertently lead to increased use of other, more allergenic ingredients and play an important role in the prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis, especially to isothiazolinones and alkyl glucosides.

The Evolving Skincare Consumer - The NPD Group. https://www.npd.com/news/infographics/2021/the-evolving-skincare-consumer/. Accessed May 18, 2023.

The Toxic Twelve Chemicals and Contaminants in Cosmetics | Environmental Working Group. https://www.ewg.org/the-toxic-twelve-chemicals-and-contaminants-in-cosmetics. Accessed May 18, 2023.

Clean beauty products: What it means and why brands ban certain ingredients - CNET. https://www.cnet.com/health/personal-care/clean-beauty-products-what-it-means-and-why-brands-ban-certain-ingredients/. Accessed May 18, 2023.

What Is Clean Beauty? And Why It’s so Important | Goop. https://goop.com/beauty/personal-care/clean-beauty-and-why-its-important/. Accessed May 18, 2023.

Campaign for Safe Cosmetics - Making Cosmetics Safer for All. https://www.safecosmetics.org/. Accessed May 18, 2023.

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/laws-enforced-fda/federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-fdc-act. Accessed May 18, 2023.

EWG Skin Deep^® Cosmetics Database. https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/. Accessed May 18, 2023.

Rubin CB, Brod B. Natural Does Not Mean Safe-The Dirt on Clean Beauty Products. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155(12):1344–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMADERMATOL.2019.2724.CrossRefPubMed

Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) - Cosmetics Info. https://www.cosmeticsinfo.org/safety-basics/cosmetic-ingredient-review-cir/. Accessed May 18, 2023.

10.

Robinson VC, Bergfeld WF, Belsito DV, et al. Final report of the amended safety assessment of sodium laureth sulfate and related salts of sulfated ethoxylated alcohols. Int J Toxicol. 2010;29(4 Suppl). https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581810373151

11.

Code of Federal Regulations - Title 21 - Food and Drugs | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/medical-device-databases/code-federal-regulations-title-21-food-and-drugs. Accessed May 21, 2023.

12.

eCFR :: 21 CFR Part 710 -- Voluntary Registration of Cosmetic Product Establishments. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-G/part-710. Accessed May 21, 2023.

13.

eCFR :: 16 CFR Part 502 -- Regulations Under Section 5(C) of the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-16/chapter-I/subchapter-E/part-502?toc=1. Accessed May 21, 2023.

14.

Color Additives History | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives/color-additives-history. Accessed May 21, 2023.

15.

Modernization of Cosmetics Regulation Act of 2022 | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-laws-regulations/modernization-cosmetics-regulation-act-2022. Accessed May 18, 2023.

16.

•• Tran JM, Comstock JR, Reeder MJ. Natural Is Not Always Better: The Prevalence of Allergenic Ingredients in “Clean” Beauty Products. Dermatitis. 2022;33(3):215–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000863. This study identified the most prevalent allergenic ingredients in 1470 clean beauty products from 2 major retailer websites. Notably, most clean products contained potential allergens, with the most prevalent classes being from fragrances, botanicals, surfactants, and preservatives.CrossRefPubMed

17.

•• Young PA, Gui H, Bae GH. Prevalence of Contact Allergens in Natural Skin Care Products From US Commercial Retailers. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(11):1323–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMADERMATOL.2022.3180. This study characterized the prevalence of contact allergens, defined as ingredients present in the CAMP database, among 1651 natural personal care products. They report nearly all studied products contained at least one potential allergen, with fragrance and preservatives as the most common reported sources.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Scheman A, Patel KR, Roszko K, et al. Relative Prevalence of Contact Allergens in North America in 2018. Dermatitis. 2020;31(2):112–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000521.CrossRefPubMed

19.

• Sukakul T, Pruksaeakanan C, Bunyavaree M, Boonchai W. Contact allergens in natural cosmetics-A market survey. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(6):2671–3. https://doi.org/10.1111/JOCD.14411. This markey survey of 5251 cosmetic products labeled as natural or organic in Thailand found most products contained a potential allergen from a list of 197 unspecified patch test allergens.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Xu S, Kwa M, Lohman ME, Evers-Meltzer R, Silverberg JI. Consumer Preferences, Product Characteristics, and Potentially Allergenic Ingredients in Best-selling Moisturizers. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153(11):1099–105. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMADERMATOL.2017.3046.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Sharmeen JB, Mahomoodally FM, Zengin G, Maggi F. Essential Oils as Natural Sources of Fragrance Compounds for Cosmetics and Cosmeceuticals. Molecules. 2021;26(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES26030666

22.

Fragrances in Cosmetics | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredients/fragrances-cosmetics. Accessed May 18, 2023.

23.

• Atwater AR, Ward JM, Liu B, et al. Fragrance- and Botanical-Related Allergy and Associated Concomitant Reactions: A Retrospective Analysis of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data 2007–2016. Dermatitis. 2021;32(1):42–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000661. Large database retrospective analysis of 24,246 patients that evaluated the frequency of concomitant reactions to fragrances and botanical allergens. This study found multiple concomitant concomitant reactions greater than 10%, which suggests cross-reactivity between fragrance and botanical allergens. Notable botanical allergens included Balsam of Peru, propolis, Compositae mix.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ali B, Al-Wabel NA, Shams S, Ahamad A, Khan SA, Anwar F. Essential oils used in aromatherapy: A systemic review. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2015;5(8):601–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtb.2015.05.007.CrossRef

25.

• Geier J, Schubert S, Reich K, et al. Contact sensitization to essential oils: IVDK data of the years 2010–2019. Contact Dermatitis. 2022;87(1):71–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/COD.14126. Large database retrospective characterizing the frequency of sensitization to essential oils in Europe. The most common positive patch test reactions were to ylang ylang oil, lemongrass oil, and jasmine absolute. This study found that while sensitization to essential oils is generally rare, it is an important cause of contact dermatitis especially with occupational exposure in masseurs and cosmeticians.CrossRefPubMed

26.

De Groot AC, Schmidt E. Essential Oils, Part III: Chemical Composition. Dermatitis. 2016;27(4):161–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000193.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Gafner S, Blumenthal M, Foster S, Cardellina JH, Khan IA, Upton R. Botanical Ingredient Forensics: Detection of Attempts to Deceive Commonly Used Analytical Methods for Authenticating Herbal Dietary and Food Ingredients and Supplements. J Nat Prod. 2023;86(2):460–72. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JNATPROD.2C00929.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

28.

•• DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Reeder MJ, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group Patch Test Results: 2019–2020. Dermatitis. 2023;34(2). https://doi.org/10.1089/DERM.2022.29017.JDK. This large database study derived from 13 centers in North America publishes the NACDG patch test data from 2019–2020 and illustrates current trends in contact allergen sensitivity. This study illustrates the changing patterns of positive patch test reactions over recent years, including increased sensitivity to isothiazolinones, alkyl glucosides, propolis, fragrance mix, and hydroperoxides of limonene. Additionally, this study characterizes the most common contact sensitizers for the given period with their clinical relevance.

29.

•• Atwater AR, Petty AJ, Liu B, et al. Contact dermatitis associated with preservatives: Retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1994 through 2016. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(4):965–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAD.2020.07.059. This is the first large database study characterizing trends in sensitivity to preservatives listed as contact allergens on the NACDG standard series. Preservatives are an important source of potential allergens in clean beauty products. This study found that between 1994 and 2016, there was a significant increase in PPTR for methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. The most common sensitizers were methylisothiazolinone and formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers. Parabens, benzyl alcohol, and phenoxyethanol had the lowest PPTR of reported preservatives.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Warshaw EM, Ruggiero JL, DeKoven JG, et al. Patch Testing With Tocopherol and Tocopherol Acetate: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience, 2001 to 2016. Dermatitis. 2021;32(5):308–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000706.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Sasseville D. Alkyl Glucosides: 2017 “Allergen of the Year.” Dermatitis. 2017;28(4):296. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000290.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Weinhammer AP, Scheman A, Reeder MJ. Prevalence of Surfactant in the Contact Allergen Management Program. Dermatitis. 2019;30(6):358–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000511.CrossRefPubMed

33.

• Warshaw EM, Xiong M, Atwater AR, et al. Patch testing with glucosides: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group experience, 2009–2018. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(5):1033–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAD.2022.04.058. This was the first large database study characterizing the prevalence of positive patch test reactions to decyl glucoside and lauryl glucoside, which are often used as anionic surfactants in cosmetics. They report majority of glucoside reactions were currently relevant with the most common exposure being from personal care products. Additionally, there was >43% concomitant reactivity between decyl and lauryl glucoside.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Fransway AF, Fransway PJ, Belsito DV, et al. Parabens Dermatitis. 2019;30(1):3–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000429.CrossRefPubMed

35.

• Liszewski W, Zaidi AJ, Fournier E, Scheman A. Review of aluminum, paraben, and sulfate product disclaimers on personal care products. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;87(5):1081–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAD.2021.06.840. Review of the evidence surrounding aluminums, parabens, and sulfates as used in personal health products. They report no conclusive evidence that these compounds are harmful to human health. They note the avoidance of parabens has coincided with the increased frequency of sensitivity to other preservatives including isothiazolinones.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Fransway AF, Fransway PJ, Belsito DV, Yiannias JA. Paraben Toxicology. Dermatitis. 2019;30(1):32–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000428.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Nowak K, Ratajczak-Wrona W, Górska M, Jabłońska E. Parabens and their effects on the endocrine system. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;474:238–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MCE.2018.03.014.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Matwiejczuk N, Galicka A, Brzóska MM. Review of the safety of application of cosmetic products containing parabens. J Appl Toxicol. 2020;40(1):176–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAT.3917.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Cherian P, Zhu J, Bergfeld WF, et al. Amended Safety Assessment of Parabens as Used in Cosmetics. Int J Toxicol. 2020;39(1_suppl):5S-97S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581820925001

40.

Reeder M, Atwater AR. Parabens: the 2019 nonallergen of the year. Cutis. 2019;103(4):192–193. https://europepmc.org/article/med/31116813. Accessed May 18, 2023.

41.

Boyer IJ, Heldreth B, Bergfeld WF, et al. Amended safety assessment of formaldehyde and methylene glycol as used in cosmetics. Int J Toxicol. 2013;32(6 Suppl):5S-32S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581813511831.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Cogliano V, Grosse Y, Baan R, et al. Advice on formaldehyde and glycol ethers. Lancet Oncol. 2004;5(9):528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01562-1.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Formaldehyde and Cancer Risk - NCI. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/substances/formaldehyde/formaldehyde-fact-sheet. Accessed May 18, 2023.

44.

Hair Smoothing Products That Release Formaldehyde When Heated | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetic-products/hair-smoothing-products-release-formaldehyde-when-heated. Accessed May 20, 2023.

45.

Rethinking our ingredients | Dove. https://www.dove.com/us/en/stories/about-dove/rethinking-our-ingredients.html. Accessed May 18, 2023.

46.

About DMDM Hydantoin in Hair Products | Suave^®. https://www.suave.com/us/en/dmdm-hydantoin-products-information.html. Accessed May 18, 2023.

47.

The ‘No More Tears’ Shampoo, Now With No Formaldehyde - The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/18/business/johnson-johnson-takes-first-step-in-removal-of-questionable-chemicals-from-products.html. Accessed May 18, 2023.

48.

C R-N. I have heard that sodium lauryl sulfate, which is added to many shampoos, may cause cancer. Is this true? Why would a company be allowed to add a harmful substance to such a commonly used product? Harv Womens Health Watch. 1998;6(4):8–8. https://europepmc.org/article/med/9846148. Accessed May 18, 2023.

49.

Geier J, Uter W, Pirker C, Frosch PJ. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;48(2):99–107. https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0536.2003.480209.X.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Phthalates in Cosmetics | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetic-ingredients/phthalates-cosmetics. Accessed May 18, 2023.

51.

Andersen FA, Heldreth B. Dibutyl, Dimethyl, and Diethyl Phthalate and Butyl Benzyl Phthalate. Int J Toxicol. 2017;36(5_suppl2):44S-45S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581817716148

52.

Khasin LG, Della Rosa J, Petersen N, Moeller J, Kriegsfeld LJ, Lishko P V. The Impact of Di-2-Ethylhexyl Phthalate on Sperm Fertility. Front cell Dev Biol. 2020;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCELL.2020.00426

53.

Hao C, Cheng X, Xia H, Ma X. The endocrine disruptor mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate promotes adipocyte differentiation and induces obesity in mice. Biosci Rep. 2012;32(6):619–29. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20120042.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

54.

Weaver JA, Beverly BEJ, Keshava N, et al. Hazards of diethyl phthalate (DEP) exposure: A systematic review of animal toxicology studies. Environ Int. 2020;145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2020.105848

55.

Net S, Sempéré R, Delmont A, Paluselli A, Ouddane B. Occurrence, fate, behavior and ecotoxicological state of phthalates in different environmental matrices. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(7):4019–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES505233B.CrossRefPubMed

56.

• Radke EG, Galizia A, Thayer KA, Cooper GS. Phthalate exposure and metabolic effects: a systematic review of the human epidemiological evidence. Environ Int. 2019;132. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2019.04.040. This systematic review of epidemiologic literature concerning the metabolic effects of phthalate exposure found moderate but inconsistent evidence for DEHP, DBP, DIBP and insulin resistence. For DEP, the only phthalate currently used in cosmetics, there was only slight evidence for adverse metabolic effects from population studies.

57.

Radke EG, Glenn BS, Braun JM, Cooper GS. Phthalate exposure and female reproductive and developmental outcomes: a systematic review of the human epidemiological evidence. Environ Int. 2019;130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2019.02.003

58.

Zhang YJ, Guo JL, Xue J chuan, Bai CL, Guo Y. Phthalate metabolites: Characterization, toxicities, global distribution, and exposure assessment. Environ Pollut. 2021;291. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2021.118106

59.

Shmidt E, Farmer SA, Davis MDP. Patch-testing with plastics and glues series allergens. Dermatitis. 2010;21(5):269–74. https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2010.10024.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Lensen GJ, Jungbauer FHW, Coenraads PJ, Schuttelaar MLA. Contact allergy to di-isodecyl phthalate. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(4):230–1. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0536.2012.02011.X.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Burrows D, Fregert S, Campbell H, Trulsson L. Contact dermatitis from the epoxy resins tetraglycidyl-4,4’-methylene dianiline and o-diglycidyl phthalate in composite material. Contact Dermatitis. 1984;11(2):80–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0536.1984.TB00931.X.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Walker SL, Smith HR, Rycroft RJG, Broome C. Occupational contact dermatitis from headphones containing diethylhexyl phthalate. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;42(3):164–164.PubMed

63.

Heurung AR, Raju SI, Warshaw EM. Benzophenones Dermatitis. 2014;25(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000025.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Sabzevari N, Qiblawi S, Norton SA, Fivenson D. Sunscreens: UV filters to protect us: Part 1: Changing regulations and choices for optimal sun protection. Int J women’s dermatology. 2021;7(1):28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJWD.2020.05.017.CrossRef

65.

• Narla S, Lim HW. Sunscreen: FDA regulation, and environmental and health impact. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2020;19(1):66–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9PP00366E. This review outlined the current FDA regulations for sunscreens, which are regulated as OTC drugs in the US. While there have been concerns surrounding UV filters including as an endocrine disruptor and environmental hazard in in vitro settings, there has been no conclusive evidence that UV filters cause human or environmental harm and levels currently used in sunscrens. Notably, current levels of UV filters in ocean water are thousand-fold lower than levels found to be harmful to coral in vitro.CrossRefPubMed

66.

An update on sunscreen requirements: The deemed final order and the proposed order | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/news-events-human-drugs/update-sunscreen-requirements-deemed-final-order-and-proposed-order. Accessed May 20, 2023.

67.

Schneider SL, Lim HW. Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(1):266–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAAD.2018.06.033.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Suh S, Pham C, Smith J, Mesinkovska NA. The banned sunscreen ingredients and their impact on human health: a systematic review. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59(9):1033–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJD.14824.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Janjua NR, Kongshoj B, Petersen JH, Wulf HC. Sunscreens and thyroid function in humans after short-term whole-body topical application: a single-blinded study. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156(5):1080–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-2133.2007.07803.X.CrossRefPubMed

70.

Kim S, Kim S, Won S, Choi K. Considering common sources of exposure in association studies - Urinary benzophenone-3 and DEHP metabolites are associated with altered thyroid hormone balance in the NHANES 2007–2008. Environ Int. 2017;107:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVINT.2017.06.013.CrossRefPubMed

71.

• Wilbur Johnson Jr., MS; Jinqiu Zhu Ph.D; Wilma F. Bergfeld, M.D. FACP. DVB, M.D.; Curtis D. Klaassen, Ph.D.; Daniel C. Liebler, Ph.D.; James G. Marks, Jr., M.D.; Lisa A. Peterson, Ph.D.; Ronald C. Shank, Ph.D.; Thomas J. Slaga, Ph.D.; and Paul W. Snyder, D.V.M. P. Amended Safety Assessment of Benzophenones as Used in Cosmetics. 2021. This is the most recent CIR safety assessment of benzophenones, which conculded Benzophenone-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -8, -9, -10, -11, and -12 are safe as currently used in cosmetics. This safety assessment considers chemistry, toxicokinetics, and potential toxicity of the compounds.

72.

SB2571. https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/sessions/session2018/bills/SB2571_.htm. Accessed May 18, 2023.

73.

Mitchelmore CL, Burns EE, Conway A, Heyes A, Davies IA. A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021;40(4):967–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/ETC.4948.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

74.

• Warshaw EM, Xiong M, Belsito D V., et al. Patch Testing With Benzophenone-3 and -4: The North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience, 2013–2020. Dermatitis. 2023;34(2). https://doi.org/10.1089/DERM.2022.29013.EWA. This large database study characterized positive patch test reaction frequencies to BZP -3 and -4. They report most reactions were clinically relevant, and the prevalence of BZP positivity from 2013–2020 was 2.1%. The most common sources of exposure were sunscreens and other personal care products.

75.

Warshaw EM, Wang MZ, Maibach HI, et al. Patch test reactions associated with sunscreen products and the importance of testing to an expanded series: retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2010. Dermatitis. 2013;24(4):176–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0B013E3182983845.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Subiabre-Ferrer D, Esteve-Martínez A, Blasco-Encinas R, Sierra-Talamantes C, Pérez-Ferriols A, Zaragoza-Ninet V. European photopatch test baseline series: A 3-year experience. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(1):5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/COD.13118.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Kim Y, Patel DC, Greig D, Cheng H. Photopatch Testing in New Zealand: A 12-Year Retrospective Review. Dermatitis. 2021;32(1):53–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/DER.0000000000000683.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Color Additives History | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additives/color-additives-history. Accessed May 22, 2023.

79.

FDA Begins Posting Adverse Event Report Data for Foods and Cosmetics | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/food/cfsan-constituent-updates/fda-begins-posting-adverse-event-report-data-foods-and-cosmetics. Accessed May 21, 2023.

80.

Draft Guidance for Industry: Cosmetic Good Manufacturing Practices | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/draft-guidance-industry-cosmetic-good-manufacturing-practices. Accessed May 21, 2023.

81.

Summary of Cosmetics Labeling Requirements | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/cosmetics-labeling-regulations/summary-cosmetics-labeling-requirements. Accessed May 22, 2023.

82.

CFSAN Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS) | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/food/compliance-enforcement-food/cfsan-adverse-event-reporting-system-caers?source=govdelivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery. Accessed May 21, 2023.

Titel: The Hoax of Clean Beauty and Associated Allergens
verfasst von: Michael Gui
Donglin Zhang
Jennifer M. Tran
Margo J. Reeder
Publikationsdatum: 15.08.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Dermatology Reports / Ausgabe 4/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 2162-4933
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13671-023-00399-4

Leitlinien kompakt für die Dermatologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Dermatologie

Riesenzellarteriitis: 15% der Patienten sind von okkulter Form betroffen

16.05.2024 Riesenzellarteriitis Nachrichten

In einer retrospektiven Untersuchung haben Forschende aus Belgien und den Niederlanden die okkulte Form der Riesenzellarteriitis genauer unter die Lupe genommen. In puncto Therapie und Rezidivraten stellten sie keinen sehr großen Unterschied zu Erkrankten mit kranialen Symptomen fest.

Betalaktam-Allergie: praxisnahes Vorgehen beim Delabeling

16.05.2024 Pädiatrische Allergologie Nachrichten

Die große Mehrheit der vermeintlichen Penicillinallergien sind keine. Da das „Etikett“ Betalaktam-Allergie oft schon in der Kindheit erworben wird, kann ein frühzeitiges Delabeling lebenslange Vorteile bringen. Ein Team von Pädiaterinnen und Pädiatern aus Kanada stellt vor, wie sie dabei vorgehen.

Isotretinoin: Risiko für schwere Laboranomalien „marginal erhöht“

08.05.2024 Akne Nachrichten

Die Aknetherapie mit Isotretinoin kann einen Anstieg von Leberenzymen und Blutfetten verursachen. Das Risiko für schwere Störungen ist laut einer Forschungsgruppe der Universität Lübeck aber nur marginal erhöht und auf einen engen Zeitraum konzentriert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Dermatologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2023

Incidence and Characteristics of Melanoma in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated With Fingolimod: A Systematic Review

The Future of Patch Testing: Reimbursement Models, Workforce Shortages, and Negotiating in the House of Medicine

Mpox: Diagnosis and Management for the Inpatient Dermatologist

Toward a Molecular Diagnosis: Looking Under the Skin at Allergic Contact Dermatitis

Minimal Eliciting Allergic Contact Dermatitis Concentrations in Normal versus Damaged Skin: Clinical and Toxicologic Relevance