Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2019

02.08.2019 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

The Impact of Dedicated Cancer Centers on Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Liver and Pancreatic Cancer Surgery

verfasst von: Rittal Mehta, MPH, BDS, Aslam Ejaz, MD, J. Madison Hyer, MS, Diamantis I. Tsilimigras, MD, Susan White, PhD, Katiuscha Merath, MD, Kota Sahara, MD, Fabio Bagante, MD, Anghela Z. Paredes, MD, Jordan M. Cloyd, MD, Mary Dillhoff, MD, Allan Tsung, MD, Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD, FACS, FRACS (Hon.)

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 12/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers (DCCs) is comprised of 11 institutions that are exempt from the prospective payment system utilized by Medicare for hospital reimbursement.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing liver and pancreatic surgery for cancer at DCCs versus non-DCCs.

Methods

Patients who underwent a liver or pancreatic operation for a malignant indication between 2013 and 2015 were identified using the Medicare Inpatient Standard Analytic Files. Regression analyses and the Kaplan–Meier method were used to assess short- and long-term outcomes of patients at DCCs versus non-DCCs.

Results

Among 13,256 patients, 7.0% of patients were treated at a DCC. Median patient age and complexity of surgical procedures were comparable among DCCs and non-DCCs (all p > 0.05). Overall complications (16.5% vs. 23.6%), 90-day readmission (26.2% vs. 30.2%), and 90-day mortality (3.0% vs. 8.7%) were lower at DCCs compared with non-DCCs (all p < 0.001). In addition, long-term hazards of death among patients undergoing hepatectomy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54–0.75] and pancreatectomy (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.56–0.78) were lower among patients treated at DCCs (both p <  0.05). While Medicare payments for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery (DCC: $22,200 vs. non-DCC: $22,100; p = 0.772) were comparable among DCC and non-DCC hospitals, Medicare payments for liver resection at DCCs were 13.9% lower than non-DCCs (DCC: $16,700 vs. non-DCC: $19,400; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing hepatopancreatic surgery at DCCs had better short- and long-term outcomes for the same/lower level of Medicare expenditure as non-DCC hospitals. DCCs provide higher-value surgical care for patients undergoing liver and pancreatic cancer operations.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Toyota S, Ohta H, Anazawa S. Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum. 1995;38(7):705–711.CrossRef Toyota S, Ohta H, Anazawa S. Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum. 1995;38(7):705–711.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Knol JA, Upchurch GR Jr. Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch. Surg. 2003;138(2):185–191.CrossRef Dimick JB, Cowan JA Jr, Knol JA, Upchurch GR Jr. Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch. Surg. 2003;138(2):185–191.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mukherjee S, Kocher HM, Hutchins RR, Bhattacharya S, Abraham AT. Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single UK HPB centre experience. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;35(7):734–738.CrossRef Mukherjee S, Kocher HM, Hutchins RR, Bhattacharya S, Abraham AT. Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single UK HPB centre experience. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;35(7):734–738.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gani F, Johnston FM, Nelson-Williams H, et al. Hospital volume and the costs associated with surgery for pancreatic cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017;21(9):1411–1419.CrossRef Gani F, Johnston FM, Nelson-Williams H, et al. Hospital volume and the costs associated with surgery for pancreatic cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017;21(9):1411–1419.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Macedo FIB, Jayanthi P, Mowzoon M, Yakoub D, Dudeja V, Merchant N. The impact of surgeon volume on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017;21(10):1723–1731.CrossRef Macedo FIB, Jayanthi P, Mowzoon M, Yakoub D, Dudeja V, Merchant N. The impact of surgeon volume on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2017;21(10):1723–1731.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Shida D, et al. Potential impact of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for low rectal cancer on prognoses and local control: a comparison of 2 high-volume centers in Japan that employ different policies concerning LLND. Surgery. 2017;162(2):303–314.CrossRef Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Shida D, et al. Potential impact of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for low rectal cancer on prognoses and local control: a comparison of 2 high-volume centers in Japan that employ different policies concerning LLND. Surgery. 2017;162(2):303–314.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med. Care. 1994;32(7):700–715.CrossRef Iezzoni LI, Daley J, Heeren T, et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data. Med. Care. 1994;32(7):700–715.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med. Care. 2000;38(8):785–795.CrossRef Lawthers AG, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Peterson LE, Palmer RH, Iezzoni LI. Identification of in-hospital complications from claims data. Is it valid? Med. Care. 2000;38(8):785–795.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Weingart SN, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, et al. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med. Care. 2000;38(8):796–806.CrossRef Weingart SN, Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, et al. Use of administrative data to find substandard care: validation of the complications screening program. Med. Care. 2000;38(8):796–806.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2015;313(5):496–504.CrossRef Osborne NH, Nicholas LH, Ryan AM, Thumma JR, Dimick JB. Association of hospital participation in a quality reporting program with surgical outcomes and expenditures for Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2015;313(5):496–504.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1075–1079 (discussion 1081–1090).CrossRef Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1993;46(10):1075–1079 (discussion 1081–1090).CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pradarelli JC, Healy MA, Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Variation in medicare expenditures for treating perioperative complications: the cost of rescue. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):e163340.CrossRef Pradarelli JC, Healy MA, Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Variation in medicare expenditures for treating perioperative complications: the cost of rescue. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):e163340.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Merath K, Chen Q, Bagante F, et al. Variation in the cost-of-rescue among medicare patients with complications following hepatopancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(3):310–318.CrossRef Merath K, Chen Q, Bagante F, et al. Variation in the cost-of-rescue among medicare patients with complications following hepatopancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(3):310–318.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JT. Compartment syndromes: concepts and perspectives for the anesthesiologist. Anesth. Analg. 1992;75(2):275–283.CrossRef Martin JT. Compartment syndromes: concepts and perspectives for the anesthesiologist. Anesth. Analg. 1992;75(2):275–283.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hussey PS, Huckfeldt P, Hirshman S, et al. Hospital and regional variation in Medicare payment for inpatient episodes of care. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015;175(6):1056–1057.CrossRef Hussey PS, Huckfeldt P, Hirshman S, et al. Hospital and regional variation in Medicare payment for inpatient episodes of care. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015;175(6):1056–1057.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Halliwill JR, Hewitt SA, Joyner MJ, Warner MA. Effect of various lithotomy positions on lower-extremity blood pressure. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(6):1373–1376.CrossRef Halliwill JR, Hewitt SA, Joyner MJ, Warner MA. Effect of various lithotomy positions on lower-extremity blood pressure. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(6):1373–1376.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Oliver WC Jr, Abenstein JP, Nuttall GA. Ventilator alarm failure due to modification of the scavenging system. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(5):1351–1352.CrossRef Oliver WC Jr, Abenstein JP, Nuttall GA. Ventilator alarm failure due to modification of the scavenging system. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(5):1351–1352.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Hockings A, Ooi SM, Mwipatayi BP, Sieunarine K. Endovascular graft limb occlusion after an anterior resection for rectal cancer: report of a case. Surg. Today. 2007;37(7):600–603.CrossRef Hockings A, Ooi SM, Mwipatayi BP, Sieunarine K. Endovascular graft limb occlusion after an anterior resection for rectal cancer: report of a case. Surg. Today. 2007;37(7):600–603.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamilton CA, Robinson WR. Femoral artery occlusion following pelvic cancer surgery. Gynecol. Oncol. 1996;63(1):151–153.CrossRef Hamilton CA, Robinson WR. Femoral artery occlusion following pelvic cancer surgery. Gynecol. Oncol. 1996;63(1):151–153.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chase J, Harford F, Pinzur MS, Zussman M. Intraoperative lower extremity compartment pressures in lithotomy-positioned patients. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2000;43(5):678–680.CrossRef Chase J, Harford F, Pinzur MS, Zussman M. Intraoperative lower extremity compartment pressures in lithotomy-positioned patients. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2000;43(5):678–680.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Ghaferi AA. Impact of hospital characteristics on failure to rescue following major surgery. Ann. Surg. 2016;263(4):692–697.CrossRef Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Ghaferi AA. Impact of hospital characteristics on failure to rescue following major surgery. Ann. Surg. 2016;263(4):692–697.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann. Surg. 2009;250(6):1029–1034.CrossRef Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann. Surg. 2009;250(6):1029–1034.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Buettner S, Spolverato G, Amini N, Kim Y, Kilic A, Pawlik TM. The impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes of oncologic liver surgery. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;221(4 Suppl 2):e107.CrossRef Buettner S, Spolverato G, Amini N, Kim Y, Kilic A, Pawlik TM. The impact of hospital volume and surgeon volume on perioperative outcomes of oncologic liver surgery. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2015;221(4 Suppl 2):e107.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta HB, Parmar AD, Adhikari D, et al. Relative impact of surgeon and hospital volume on operative mortality and complications following pancreatic resection in Medicare patients. J. Surg. Res. 2016;204(2):326–334.CrossRef Mehta HB, Parmar AD, Adhikari D, et al. Relative impact of surgeon and hospital volume on operative mortality and complications following pancreatic resection in Medicare patients. J. Surg. Res. 2016;204(2):326–334.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Geest LG, van Rijssen LB, Molenaar IQ, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(4):317–324.CrossRef van der Geest LG, van Rijssen LB, Molenaar IQ, et al. Volume-outcome relationships in pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(4):317–324.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, et al. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surgery. 2014;156(3):538–547.CrossRef Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, et al. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Surgery. 2014;156(3):538–547.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat McClelland S 3rd, Goldstein JA. Minimally invasive versus open spine surgery: what does the best evidence tell us? J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 2017;8(2):194–198.CrossRef McClelland S 3rd, Goldstein JA. Minimally invasive versus open spine surgery: what does the best evidence tell us? J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 2017;8(2):194–198.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Vora D, Kinnard M, Falk D, et al. A comparison of narcotic usage and length of post-operative hospital stay in open versus minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws. J. Spine Surg. 2018;4(3):516–521.CrossRef Vora D, Kinnard M, Falk D, et al. A comparison of narcotic usage and length of post-operative hospital stay in open versus minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws. J. Spine Surg. 2018;4(3):516–521.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsilimigras DI, Moris D, Vagios S, Merath K, Pawlik TM. Safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic liver resections: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(7):1517–1530.CrossRef Tsilimigras DI, Moris D, Vagios S, Merath K, Pawlik TM. Safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic liver resections: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(7):1517–1530.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch. Surg. 2003;138(11):1198–1206 (discussion 1206).CrossRef Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, et al. One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Arch. Surg. 2003;138(11):1198–1206 (discussion 1206).CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Paredes AZ, Hyer JM, Beal EW, et al. Impact of skilled nursing facility quality on postoperative outcomes after pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2019;166(1):1–7.CrossRef Paredes AZ, Hyer JM, Beal EW, et al. Impact of skilled nursing facility quality on postoperative outcomes after pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2019;166(1):1–7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Impact of Dedicated Cancer Centers on Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Liver and Pancreatic Cancer Surgery
verfasst von
Rittal Mehta, MPH, BDS
Aslam Ejaz, MD
J. Madison Hyer, MS
Diamantis I. Tsilimigras, MD
Susan White, PhD
Katiuscha Merath, MD
Kota Sahara, MD
Fabio Bagante, MD
Anghela Z. Paredes, MD
Jordan M. Cloyd, MD
Mary Dillhoff, MD
Allan Tsung, MD
Timothy M. Pawlik, MD, MPH, PhD, FACS, FRACS (Hon.)
Publikationsdatum
02.08.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 12/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07677-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.