Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2017

12.11.2015 | Shoulder

The influence of suprapectoral arthroscopic biceps tenodesis for isolated biceps lesions on elbow flexion force and clinical outcomes

verfasst von: Martin Hufeland, Carina Kolem, Christoph Ziskoven, Jörn Kircher, Rüdiger Krauspe, Thilo Patzer

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 10/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate elbow flexion force, cosmetic and clinical outcome of all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis for isolated biceps lesions.

Methods

Tenodesis was performed using a 6.25-mm absorbable interference screw for intraosseous fixation. Seventeen out of 24 patients (70.8 %, median age 49.0 ± 10.1 years; 10 = male) could be included for 24 months follow-up. Elbow flexion strength in 10° and 90° elbow flexion, the upward-directed force of the upper arm in the O’Brien position, objective evaluation of a Popeye-sign deformity and validated clinical scores (CMS, SST, ASES) were assessed preoperatively, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively.

Results

Elbow flexion strength in 90° improved significantly from 12 months onwards (P = 0.001) without significant difference to the contralateral arm from 3 months postoperatively (n.s.). At 24 months, an average increase of 46.4 % (median 37.7 %) from preoperative could be seen. The dominant arm was affected in 70.6 %. All scores showed a significant improvement 3 months postoperatively: SST (P = 0.003), ASES (P = 0.006) and total CMS (P < 0.001). Three patients (17.6 %) developed a distalization of the maximum biceps circumference of more than 20 % compared to preoperative.

Conclusions

All-arthroscopic proximal suprapectoral intraosseous single-limb biceps tenodesis for the treatment of isolated biceps lesions provides good-to-excellent clinical results with significant improvement of elbow flexion strength and clinical scores and no significant difference to the unaffected contralateral arm.

Level of evidence

IV.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Arora AS, Singh A, Koonce RC (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 29:638–644CrossRefPubMed Arora AS, Singh A, Koonce RC (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 29:638–644CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Baleani M, Francesconi D, Zani L, Giannini S, Snyder SJ (2015) Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new “soft anchor” tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation. Clin Biomech 30:188–194CrossRef Baleani M, Francesconi D, Zani L, Giannini S, Snyder SJ (2015) Suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: a biomechanical comparison of a new “soft anchor” tenodesis technique versus interference screw biceps tendon fixation. Clin Biomech 30:188–194CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Coste JS, Walch G (2002) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 18:1002–1012CrossRefPubMed Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Coste JS, Walch G (2002) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 18:1002–1012CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Boileau P, Ahrens PM, Hatzidakis AM (2004) Entrapment of the long head of the biceps tendon: the hourglass biceps—a cause of pain and locking of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:249–257CrossRefPubMed Boileau P, Ahrens PM, Hatzidakis AM (2004) Entrapment of the long head of the biceps tendon: the hourglass biceps—a cause of pain and locking of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:249–257CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Boileau P, Parratte S, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Shia D, Bicknell R (2009) Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion. Am J Sports Med 37:929–936CrossRefPubMed Boileau P, Parratte S, Chuinard C, Roussanne Y, Shia D, Bicknell R (2009) Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion. Am J Sports Med 37:929–936CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brady PC, Narbona P, Adams CR, Huberty D, Parten P, Hartzler RU, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS (2015) Arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis at the articular margin: evaluation of outcomes, complications, and revision rate. Arthroscopy 31:470–476CrossRefPubMed Brady PC, Narbona P, Adams CR, Huberty D, Parten P, Hartzler RU, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS (2015) Arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis at the articular margin: evaluation of outcomes, complications, and revision rate. Arthroscopy 31:470–476CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Søjbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P (2008) A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:355–361CrossRefPubMed Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, Søjbjerg JO, Gohlke F, Boileau P (2008) A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:355–361CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Golish SR, Caldwell PE, Miller MD, Singanamala N, Ranawat AS, Treme G, Pearson SE, Costic R, Sekiya JK (2008) Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 24:1103–1108CrossRefPubMed Golish SR, Caldwell PE, Miller MD, Singanamala N, Ranawat AS, Treme G, Pearson SE, Costic R, Sekiya JK (2008) Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 24:1103–1108CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gombera MM, Kahlenberg CA, Nair R, Saltzman MD, Terry MA (2015) All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med 43:1077–1083CrossRefPubMed Gombera MM, Kahlenberg CA, Nair R, Saltzman MD, Terry MA (2015) All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med 43:1077–1083CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurnani N, van Deurzen DF, Janmaat VT, van den Bekerom MP (2015) Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3640-6 PubMed Gurnani N, van Deurzen DF, Janmaat VT, van den Bekerom MP (2015) Tenotomy or tenodesis for pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-015-3640-6 PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermeyer P, Krieter C, Tang KL, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P (2008) A new arthroscopic classification of articular-sided supraspinatus footprint lesions: a prospective comparison with Snyder’s and Ellman’s classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:909–913CrossRefPubMed Habermeyer P, Krieter C, Tang KL, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P (2008) A new arthroscopic classification of articular-sided supraspinatus footprint lesions: a prospective comparison with Snyder’s and Ellman’s classification. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 17:909–913CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Leggin BG, Neuman RM, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Thompson EC (1996) Intrarater and interrater reliability of three isometric dynamometers in assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5:18–24CrossRefPubMed Leggin BG, Neuman RM, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Thompson EC (1996) Intrarater and interrater reliability of three isometric dynamometers in assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 5:18–24CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lippitt SB, Harryman DT, Matsen FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ (1993) A practical tool for evaluating function: the simple shoulder test. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability, vol 1993. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, pp 501–518 Lippitt SB, Harryman DT, Matsen FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ (1993) A practical tool for evaluating function: the simple shoulder test. The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability, vol 1993. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, pp 501–518
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lorbach O, Trennheuser C, Kohn D, Anagnostakos K (2014) The biomechanical performance of a new forked knotless biceps tenodesis compared to a knotless and suture anchor tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3365-y Lorbach O, Trennheuser C, Kohn D, Anagnostakos K (2014) The biomechanical performance of a new forked knotless biceps tenodesis compared to a knotless and suture anchor tenodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-014-3365-y
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B (1995) Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 23:93–98CrossRefPubMed Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B (1995) Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 23:93–98CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma H, Van Heest A, Glisson C, Patel S (2009) Musculocutaneous nerve entrapment: an unusual complication after biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med 37:2467–2469CrossRefPubMed Ma H, Van Heest A, Glisson C, Patel S (2009) Musculocutaneous nerve entrapment: an unusual complication after biceps tenodesis. Am J Sports Med 37:2467–2469CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mariani EM, Cofield RH, Askew LJ, Li GP, Chao EY (1988) Rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:233–239 Mariani EM, Cofield RH, Askew LJ, Li GP, Chao EY (1988) Rupture of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 228:233–239
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mazzocca AD, Cote MP, Arciero CL, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2008) Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med 36:1922–1929CrossRefPubMed Mazzocca AD, Cote MP, Arciero CL, Romeo AA, Arciero RA (2008) Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw. Am J Sports Med 36:1922–1929CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarty LP, Buss DD, Datta MW, Freehill MQ, Giveans MR (2013) Complications observed following labral or rotator cuff repair with use of poly-L-lactic acid implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:507–511CrossRefPubMed McCarty LP, Buss DD, Datta MW, Freehill MQ, Giveans MR (2013) Complications observed following labral or rotator cuff repair with use of poly-L-lactic acid implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:507–511CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat McCormick F, Nwachukwu BU, Solomon D, Dewing C, Golijanin P, Gross DJ, Provencher MT (2014) The efficacy of biceps tenodesis in the treatment of failed superior labral anterior posterior repairs. Am J Sports Med 42:820–825CrossRefPubMed McCormick F, Nwachukwu BU, Solomon D, Dewing C, Golijanin P, Gross DJ, Provencher MT (2014) The efficacy of biceps tenodesis in the treatment of failed superior labral anterior posterior repairs. Am J Sports Med 42:820–825CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ (2002) American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:587–594CrossRefPubMed Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ (2002) American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11:587–594CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Millett PJ, Rios D, Martetschläger F, Horan MP (2014) Complications following subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Obere Extremität 9:276–279CrossRef Millett PJ, Rios D, Martetschläger F, Horan MP (2014) Complications following subpectoral biceps tenodesis with interference screw fixation. Obere Extremität 9:276–279CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2015) Analysis of “hidden lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med 43:63–68CrossRefPubMed Moon SC, Cho NS, Rhee YG (2015) Analysis of “hidden lesions” of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site. Am J Sports Med 43:63–68CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nordin M, Frankel VH (2001) Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Nordin M, Frankel VH (2001) Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Patzer T, Rundic JM, Bobrowitsch E, Olender GD, Hurschler C, Schofer MD (2011) Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 27:1036–1047CrossRefPubMed Patzer T, Rundic JM, Bobrowitsch E, Olender GD, Hurschler C, Schofer MD (2011) Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 27:1036–1047CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Patzer T, Kircher J, Krauspe R (2012) All-arthroscopic suprapectoral long head of biceps tendon tenodesis with interference screw-like tendon fixation after modified lasso-loop stitch tendon securing. Arthrosc Tech 1:e53–e56CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patzer T, Kircher J, Krauspe R (2012) All-arthroscopic suprapectoral long head of biceps tendon tenodesis with interference screw-like tendon fixation after modified lasso-loop stitch tendon securing. Arthrosc Tech 1:e53–e56CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Patzer T, Santo G, Olender GD, Wellmann M, Hurschler C, Schofer MD (2012) Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:116–125CrossRefPubMed Patzer T, Santo G, Olender GD, Wellmann M, Hurschler C, Schofer MD (2012) Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:116–125CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Romeo AA, Mazzocca AD, Tauro JC (2004) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 20:206–213CrossRefPubMed Romeo AA, Mazzocca AD, Tauro JC (2004) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 20:206–213CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Salata MJ, Bailey JR, Bell R, Frank RM, McGill KC, Lin EC, Kercher JS, Wang VM, Provencher MT, Mazzocca AD, Verma NN, Romeo AA (2014) Effect of interference screw depth on fixation strength in biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 30:11–15CrossRefPubMed Salata MJ, Bailey JR, Bell R, Frank RM, McGill KC, Lin EC, Kercher JS, Wang VM, Provencher MT, Mazzocca AD, Verma NN, Romeo AA (2014) Effect of interference screw depth on fixation strength in biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 30:11–15CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Samilson RL, Prieto V (1983) Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:456–460CrossRefPubMed Samilson RL, Prieto V (1983) Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:456–460CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheibel M, Schröder RJ, Chen J, Bartsch M (2011) Arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis versus bony fixation anchor tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Am J Sports Med 39:1046–1052CrossRefPubMed Scheibel M, Schröder RJ, Chen J, Bartsch M (2011) Arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis versus bony fixation anchor tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Am J Sports Med 39:1046–1052CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Sethi PM, Vadasdi K, Greene RT, Vitale MA, Duong M, Miller SR (2015) Safety of open suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic assessment of risk for neurologic injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:138–142CrossRefPubMed Sethi PM, Vadasdi K, Greene RT, Vitale MA, Duong M, Miller SR (2015) Safety of open suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic assessment of risk for neurologic injury. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 24:138–142CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Shank JR, Singleton SB, Braun S, Kissenberth MJ, Ramappa A, Ellis H, Decker MJ, Hawkins RJ, Torry MR (2011) A comparison of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength in patients with long head of the biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. Arthroscopy 27:9–16CrossRefPubMed Shank JR, Singleton SB, Braun S, Kissenberth MJ, Ramappa A, Ellis H, Decker MJ, Hawkins RJ, Torry MR (2011) A comparison of forearm supination and elbow flexion strength in patients with long head of the biceps tenotomy or tenodesis. Arthroscopy 27:9–16CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Slenker NR, Lawson K, Ciccotti MG, Dodson CC, Cohen SB (2012) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 28:576–582CrossRefPubMed Slenker NR, Lawson K, Ciccotti MG, Dodson CC, Cohen SB (2012) Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 28:576–582CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, Ferkel RD, Friedman MJ (1990) SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 6:274–279CrossRefPubMed Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, Ferkel RD, Friedman MJ (1990) SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 6:274–279CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Sturzenegger M, Béguin D, Grünig B, Jakob RP (1986) Muscular strength after rupture of the long head of the biceps. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:18–23CrossRefPubMed Sturzenegger M, Béguin D, Grünig B, Jakob RP (1986) Muscular strength after rupture of the long head of the biceps. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:18–23CrossRefPubMed
38.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner BC, Evans CL, Holzgrefe RE, Tuman JM, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD, Brockmeier SF (2014) Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of minimum 2-year clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 42:2583–2590CrossRefPubMed Werner BC, Evans CL, Holzgrefe RE, Tuman JM, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD, Brockmeier SF (2014) Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of minimum 2-year clinical outcomes. Am J Sports Med 42:2583–2590CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner BC, Pehlivan HC, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD, Brockmeier SF (2014) Increased incidence of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic compared with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 30:1075–1084CrossRefPubMed Werner BC, Pehlivan HC, Hart JM, Carson EW, Diduch DR, Miller MD, Brockmeier SF (2014) Increased incidence of postoperative stiffness after arthroscopic compared with open biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 30:1075–1084CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner BC, Lyons ML, Evans CL, Griffin JW, Hart JM, Miller MD, Brockmeier SF (2015) Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques. Arthroscopy 31:620–627CrossRefPubMed Werner BC, Lyons ML, Evans CL, Griffin JW, Hart JM, Miller MD, Brockmeier SF (2015) Arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: a comparison of restoration of length-tension and mechanical strength between techniques. Arthroscopy 31:620–627CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Q, Zhou J, Ge H, Cheng B (2015) Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head biceps lesions in shoulders with reparable rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:464–469CrossRefPubMed Zhang Q, Zhou J, Ge H, Cheng B (2015) Tenotomy or tenodesis for long head biceps lesions in shoulders with reparable rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomised trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:464–469CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Ziskoven C, Kolem C, Stefanovska K, Kircher J, Krauspe R, Patzer T (2014) Die suprapektorale arthroskopische Tenodese der langen Bizepssehne. Obere Extremität 9:24–31CrossRef Ziskoven C, Kolem C, Stefanovska K, Kircher J, Krauspe R, Patzer T (2014) Die suprapektorale arthroskopische Tenodese der langen Bizepssehne. Obere Extremität 9:24–31CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The influence of suprapectoral arthroscopic biceps tenodesis for isolated biceps lesions on elbow flexion force and clinical outcomes
verfasst von
Martin Hufeland
Carina Kolem
Christoph Ziskoven
Jörn Kircher
Rüdiger Krauspe
Thilo Patzer
Publikationsdatum
12.11.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3846-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2017

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 10/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.