Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2015

01.08.2015 | Original Research

The Long and Short of Genetic Counseling Summary Letters: A Case–control Study

verfasst von: J. Roggenbuck, R. Temme, D. Pond, J. Baker, K. Jarvis, M. Liu, S. Dugan, N. J. Mendelsohn

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 4/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Genetic counseling summary letters are intended to reinforce information received during genetic counseling, but little information is available on patient/family responses to these letters. We conducted a case–control study to assess the effectiveness of two different letter formats. Parents of children receiving a new diagnosis were enrolled. The control group (n = 85) received a genetic counseling summary letter in a narrative format, 4–5 pages in length. After the control enrollment period, genetic counselors were trained by a professional medical writer to develop a concise letter format. The case group (n = 64) received a concise letter, approximately 1.5 pages in length, utilizing simple sentences, lay terms, and lists/bullet points. Parents completed a survey 4 weeks after the visit to rate the letter’s format, usefulness, and their emotional reaction. Results show that parents in the case group rated the letter more highly (p = 0.023), particularly in the emotional response dimension (rating changes in anxiety, depression, fear, ability to cope, and confidence in response to the letter). Parents in the case group also rated the genetic counseling session more highly (p = 0.039). In the control group, parents without a college degree were more likely to rate the letter as too long and the level of medical detail as too high. In the case group, no significant differences were seen between parents with or without a college degree. These data suggest that a short genetic counseling summary letter is rated higher by parents, and is particularly associated with a more positive emotional reaction. A short letter format highlighting the basic facts related to the genetic condition may be more useful to parents of diverse educational backgrounds, and may support a positive emotional adaptation at the time of a new diagnosis. Genetic counselors may benefit from specific instruction in medical and educational writing.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Aspinwall, L. G., Taber, J. M., Kolman, W., Leaf, S. L., & Leachman, S. A. (2014). Peceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(3), 421–37.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Aspinwall, L. G., Taber, J. M., Kolman, W., Leaf, S. L., & Leachman, S. A. (2014). Peceived risk following melanoma genetic testing: a 2-year prospective study distinguishing subjective estimates from recall. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(3), 421–37.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRefPubMed Baker, D. L., Eash, T., Schuette, J. L., & Uhlmann, W. R. (2002). Guidelines for writing letters to patients. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 11(5), 399–418.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Cassini, C., Thauvin-Robinet, C., Binquet, C., Coron, F., Masurel-Paulet, A., Boniton-Kopp, C., Mercier, S., Joly, L., Huet, F., & Faivre, L. (2011). Written information to patients in clinical genetics: what’s the impact? European Journal of Medical Genetics, 54, 277–280.CrossRefPubMed Cassini, C., Thauvin-Robinet, C., Binquet, C., Coron, F., Masurel-Paulet, A., Boniton-Kopp, C., Mercier, S., Joly, L., Huet, F., & Faivre, L. (2011). Written information to patients in clinical genetics: what’s the impact? European Journal of Medical Genetics, 54, 277–280.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and processes in genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.CrossRefPubMed Clarke, A., Parsons, E., & Williams, A. (1996). Outcomes and processes in genetic counseling. Clinical Genetics, 50, 462–469.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35, 27–34.CrossRefPubMed Hallowell, N., & Murton, F. (1998). The value of written summaries of genetic consultations. Patient Education and Counseling, 35, 27–34.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Halowell, N., & Richards, M. (1997). Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 31–43.CrossRef Halowell, N., & Richards, M. (1997). Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 31–43.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Jacobs, C., Dancyger, C., Smith, J. A., Michie, S. (2014). Accuracy of recall of information about a cancer predisposing BRCA1/2 gene mutation amongst patients and relatives. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.84. Jacobs, C., Dancyger, C., Smith, J. A., Michie, S. (2014). Accuracy of recall of information about a cancer predisposing BRCA1/2 gene mutation amongst patients and relatives. European Journal of Human Genetics. doi:10.​1038/​ejhg.​2014.​84.
Zurück zum Zitat Kausmeyer, D., Lengrich, E., Kluhsman, B., Morrone, D., Harper, G., & Baker, M. (2006). A survey of Patients’ experiences with the cancer genetic counseling process: recommendations for cancer genetics programs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 409–431.CrossRefPubMed Kausmeyer, D., Lengrich, E., Kluhsman, B., Morrone, D., Harper, G., & Baker, M. (2006). A survey of Patients’ experiences with the cancer genetic counseling process: recommendations for cancer genetics programs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15, 409–431.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kelly, P. (1977). Dealing with dilemma: a manual for genetic counselors. New York: Springer.CrossRef Kelly, P. (1977). Dealing with dilemma: a manual for genetic counselors. New York: Springer.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler, S. (1990). Current issues in genetic counseling. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 5–18. Kessler, S. (1990). Current issues in genetic counseling. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11, 5–18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., Haan, E., Suthers, G., Gattas, M., & Tucker, K. (2004). Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 321–7. 26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lobb, E. A., Butow, P. N., Barratt, A., Meiser, B., Gaff, C., Young, M. A., Haan, E., Suthers, G., Gattas, M., & Tucker, K. (2004). Communication and information-giving in high-risk breast cancer consultations: influence on patient outcomes. British Journal of Cancer, 90(2), 321–7. 26.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat McAllister, M., Payne, K., Nicholls, S., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2007). Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 71–83.CrossRefPubMed McAllister, M., Payne, K., Nicholls, S., MacLeod, R., Donnai, D., & Davies, L. (2007). Improving service evaluation in clinical genetics: identifying effects of genetic diseases on individuals and families. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(1), 71–83.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451.CrossRefPubMed Meiser, B., Irle, J., Lobb, E., & Barlow-Stewart, K. (2008). Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17, 434–451.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennet, R., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.CrossRefPubMed Resta, R., Biesecker, B., Bennet, R., Blum, S., Estabrooks Hahn, S., Strecker, M., et al. (2006). A new definition of genetic counseling: national society of genetic Counselors’ task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 15(2), 77–83.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shiloh, S. (1996). Decision-making in the context of risk. In T. Marteau & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shiloh, S. (1996). Decision-making in the context of risk. In T. Marteau & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Jansen, A. M., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., Tiben, A., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2011). Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA1/2-test results. Clinical Genetics, 79, 207–218.CrossRefPubMed Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Jansen, A. M., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., Tiben, A., & Stiggelbout, A. M. (2011). Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA1/2-test results. Clinical Genetics, 79, 207–218.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Watson, M., Duvivier, M., Wade Walsh, M., Ashley, S., Davidson, J., Papaikonomou, M., Murday, V., Sacks, N., & Eles, R. (1998). Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? Journal of Medical Genetics, 35, 731–738.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Watson, M., Duvivier, M., Wade Walsh, M., Ashley, S., Davidson, J., Papaikonomou, M., Murday, V., Sacks, N., & Eles, R. (1998). Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk? Journal of Medical Genetics, 35, 731–738.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Long and Short of Genetic Counseling Summary Letters: A Case–control Study
verfasst von
J. Roggenbuck
R. Temme
D. Pond
J. Baker
K. Jarvis
M. Liu
S. Dugan
N. J. Mendelsohn
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9792-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2015

Journal of Genetic Counseling 4/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Ambulantisierung: Erste Erfahrungen mit dem Hybrid-DRG

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Hybrid-DRG-Verordnung soll dazu führen, dass mehr chirurgische Eingriffe ambulant durchgeführt werden, wie es in anderen Ländern schon länger üblich ist. Die gleiche Vergütung im ambulanten und stationären Sektor hatten Niedergelassene schon lange gefordert. Aber die Umsetzung bereitet ihnen doch Kopfzerbrechen.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Harninkontinenz: Netz-Op. erfordert über lange Zeit intensive Nachsorge

30.04.2024 Harninkontinenz Nachrichten

Frauen mit Belastungsinkontinenz oder Organprolaps sind nach einer Netz-Operation keineswegs beschwerdefrei. Vielmehr scheint die Krankheitslast weiterhin hoch zu sein, sogar höher als von harninkontinenten Frauen, die sich nicht haben operieren lassen.

Welche Übungen helfen gegen Diastase recti abdominis?

30.04.2024 Schwangerenvorsorge Nachrichten

Die Autorinnen und Autoren einer aktuellen Studie aus Griechenland sind sich einig, dass Bewegungstherapie, einschließlich Übungen zur Stärkung der Bauchmuskulatur und zur Stabilisierung des Rumpfes, eine Diastase recti abdominis postpartum wirksam reduzieren kann. Doch vieles ist noch nicht eindeutig belegt.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.