Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Heart Failure Reviews 1/2024

Open Access 28.08.2023

The prognostic impact of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Vasileios Anastasiou, Andreas S. Papazoglou, Dimitrios V. Moysidis, Stylianos Daios, Konstantinos Barmpagiannos, Thomas Gossios, Georgios K. Efthimiadis, Theodoros Karamitsos, Antonios Ziakas, Vasileios Kamperidis

Erschienen in: Heart Failure Reviews | Ausgabe 1/2024

Abstract

The echocardiographic tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio is a non-invasive surrogate of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial (RV-PA) coupling which corresponds well with the respective invasively derived index. Recently, a wealth of observational data has arisen, outlining its prognostic value in heart failure (HF) patients. To systematically appraise and quantitatively synthesize the evidence of the prognostic value of TAPSE/PASP ratio in left-sided HF regardless of etiology or left ventricular ejection fraction. A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting the association of TAPSE/PASP ratio with outcomes in patients with HF and, when appropriate, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios [(a)HRs] for all-cause death and the composite outcome of all-cause death or HF hospitalization. Eighteen studies were deemed eligible encompassing 8,699 HF patients. The applied cut-off value for RV-PA uncoupling varied substantially from 0.27 to 0.58 mm/mmHg, and in most studies values lower than the applied cutoff conveyed dismal prognosis. Eleven studies reported appropriate data for meta-analysis. TAPSE/PASP reduction by 1 mm/mmHg was independently associated with all-cause death (pooled aHR=1.32 [1.06-1.65]; p=0.01; I2=56%) and the composite outcome (pooled aHR=3.48 [1.67-7.25]; p<0.001; I2=0%). When a TAPSE/PASP cutoff value of 0.36 mm/mmHg was applied it yielded independent association with all-cause death (pooled aHR=2.84 [2.22-3.64]; p<0.001; I2=82%). RV-PA coupling assessed by echocardiographic TAPSE/PASP ratio appears to be an independent outcome predictor for HF patients.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10741-023-10341-2.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
CIs
confidence intervals
CRT
cardiac resynchronization therapy
HF
heart failure
HR
hazard ratio
LV
left ventricle
MR
mitral regurgitation
PASP
pulmonary artery systolic pressure
RV
right ventricular-pulmonary artery
TAPSE
tricuspid annular systolic plane excursion

Introduction

Despite the ongoing advances in disease-modifying therapies for patients with heart failure (HF), they continue to suffer a substantial risk for recurrent HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death [1]. Beyond medical management, promising interventional therapies have entered the clinical arena in an effort to modify the natural history of HF. However, the risk stratification of HF patients and the selection of appropriate interventional treatments in a well-timed manner remain challenging, raising the quest for widely available risk stratification tools. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction has been recognized as an indicator of poor prognostic course, providing information over and above left ventricular (LV) dysfunction [2]. Additionally, the prognostic role of pulmonary hypertension, a common hemodynamic complication of long-standing elevation of LV filling pressure in HF, has been reported [3, 4].
RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling has emerged as a novel, comprehensive index that allows evaluating RV function in relation to the underlying RV afterload [5]. This index can be readily assessed non-invasively by the ratio of two standard echocardiographic measurements: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) over pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP). Recently, a large body of evidence has arisen outlining the prognostic role of echocardiographically assessed RV-PA coupling in chronic [6] and acute [7] HF patients, as well as recipients of interventional HF treatments including cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) [8] and transcatheter repair of functional mitral regurgitation (MR) or tricuspid regurgitation [9, 10].
This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to aggregate, systematically appraise and quantitatively synthesize the existing literature in regard to the long-term prognostic value of RV-PA coupling, assessed non-invasively by the echocardiographic TAPSE/PASP ratio, in patients with left-sided HF regardless of etiology or left ventricular ejection fraction.

Methods

Search strategy

The study was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO registry (PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023417767, https://​www.​crd.​york.​ac.​uk/​prospero/​display_​record.​php?​ID=​CRD42023417767). A systematic electronic literature search was conducted up to April 10, 2023 using the MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (Supplemental Table 1) [11]. The Medical Subject Headings and keywords used as search terms were (‘’right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling’’ OR ‘’right ventricular-vascular coupling’’ OR ‘’tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion to pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio’’ OR‘’TAPSE to PASP ratio’’) AND (‘’heart failure’’ OR ‘’functional mitral regurgitation’’ OR ‘’functional tricuspid regurgitation’’ OR ‘’prognosis’’ OR ‘’outcomes’’). Relevant reviews and the reference lists of the included studies were hand-searched to identify any non-detected relevant studies.
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of included studies (18 studies)
Author
Year
Design
Included in meta-analysis
HF population
No. of patients
LVEF cut-off for inclusion, %
LVEF, % (mean)
Age, years, (mean)
Male, %
TAPSE/PASP, mm/mmHg (mean)
Vendor
Reproducibility for TAPSE/PASP
Guazzi et al. [5]
2013
Prospective
Yes
HFrEF and HFpEF
293
-
36.0 ± 11.1
62.9 ± 8.9
79.2
0.50 ± 0.15
Phillips
Interobserver: coefficient of variation 3.5% (TAPSE), 4.7% (PASP); intraobserver: coefficient of variation 3% (TAPSE), 4% (PASP)
Guazzi et al. [28]
2015
Prospective
No
HFrEF and HFpEF
458
-
33.6 ± 10.6
62.5 ± 9.5
84.3
0.51 ± 0.17
Phillips
Interobserver: coefficient of variation 3.5% (TAPSE), 4.7% and 4.3 (PASP)
Iacoviello et al. [6]
2017
Retrospective
Yes
Stable HF, LVEF <45%
315
<45
NA
64.0 ±14.0
77.0
0.61 ± 0.23
GE
NA
Guazzi et al. [23]
2017
Prospective
No
HFpEF
387
≥50
59.5 ± 6.8
65.1 ± 11.5
40.4
NA
Phillips, GE
NA
Ghio et al. [14]
2017
Retrospective
Yes
Ischaemic, hypertensive, idiopathic HFrEF and HFpEF
1663
-
NA
65.0 ± 13.0
75.0
NA
NA
NA
Bosch et al. [20]
2017
Prospective
Yes
HFrEF and HFpEF
438
All
45.0 ± 8.0
66.5 ± 11
50.7
0.55 ± 0.27
NA
NA
Gorter et al. [18]
2018
Prospective
Yes
HF with LVEF ≥45% and suspected pulmonary hypertension
102
≥45
57.0 ± 5.0
73.4 ± 8.5
30.9
0.44 ± 0.20
GE
NA
Santas et al. [24]
2019
Prospective
No
Acute HFpEF
760
≥50
NA
75.6 ± 9.7
31.7
0.43 ± 0.17
Phillips
NA
Falletta et al. [15]
2019
Prospective
Yes
Clinically stable HFrEF
431
≤40
27.3 ± 5.7
59.0 ± 12.0
83.0
NA
GE
NA
Santas et al. [16]
2020
Prospective
Yes
Acute HFpEF
884
≥50
61.7 ±7.5
76.1 ± 9.7
35.6
0.44 ± 0.17
Phillips
NA
Braganca et al. [19]
2020
Retrospective
Yes
HFrEF undergoing CRT
70
<35
26.4 ± 7.1
69.0 ± 9.0
68.6
0.48 ± 0.24
Phillips
NA
Rosa et al. [26]
2020
Retrospective
No
HFrEF and HFmrEF
400
≤50
32.9 ± 8.5
77.5 ± 4.8
73.3
0.44 ± 0.33
Mountain View, Phillips
NA
Palazzuoli et al. [7]
2020
Prospective
No
Acute HFrEF and HFpEF
381
-
45.0 ± 11.0
81.5 ± 9.0
42.0
0.43 ± 0.31
NA
95% reproducibility
Schmeisser et al. [27]
2021
Prospective
No
HFrEF with indication for CRT
330
≤35
31.6 ± 3.4
66.4 ± 4.6
NA
0.39 ± 0.16
Phillips
NA
Karam et al. [9]
2021
Retrospective
No
Secondary MR undergoing TMVR
817
-
35.8 ± 13.1
73.8 ±10.1
66.3
0.46 ± 0.20
NA
Interobserver: interclass correlation coefficient >0.85
Deaconu et al. [22]
2021
Prospective
Yes
HFrEF undergoing CRT
54
<35
28.4 ± 1.3
64.0 ± 13.8
58.0
0.70 ± 0.20
NA
NA
Ishiwata et al. [21]
2021
Retrospective
Yes
Dilated cardiomyopathy, HFrEF
109
<40
22.0 ± 7.4
44.1 ± 14.0
69.8
0.47 ± 0.22
NA
NA
Stassen et al. [8]
2022
Retrospective
Yes
HFrEF undergoing CRT
807
≤35
27.8 ± 8.3
65.5 ± 10.5
76.0
0.46 ± 0.34
GE
NA
CRT cardiac resynchronization therapy, GE general electrics, HF heart failure, HFmrEF heart failure mildly reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF heart failure preserved ejection fraction, HFrEF heart failure reduced ejection fraction, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, MR mitral regurgitation, NA not available, TAPSE/PASP tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure, TMVR transcatheter mitral valve repair, TR tricuspid regurgitation, TTVR transcatheter tricuspid valve repair

Study selection – eligibility criteria

The retrieved studies were independently assessed for eligibility by two investigators (V.A., K.B.), according to prespecified eligibility criteria. The eligibility criteria included all studies investigating the long-term prognostic significance of TAPSE/PASP ratio in left-sided HF patients with or without concomitant functional valvular heart disease, irrespective of LV ejection fraction or symptomatic status. Studies including organic or mixed valvulopathies were excluded. Also, studies including patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation of non left-sided etiology were deemed ineligible. TAPSE/PASP ratio was assessed both as categorical and continuous variable. Studies not reporting hazard ratios (HRs) or studies with suspected high risk of bias were not deemed eligible for the meta-analysis. Case reports, review papers, editorials, and letters were excluded.

Data extraction

Data were independently extracted and reviewed by two investigators (V.A., K.B.). Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer (S.D.). Pre-specified forms were used to extract epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the eligible studies. More specifically, the following data were extracted: study design, study population, demographic and echocardiographic data, follow-up period, outcomes of interest, association with outcomes and adjustment for confounding factors, whenever available.

Risk of bias assessment

The methodological quality of the individual studies was assessed independently by two investigators (D.V.M. and S.D.) using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool [12]. For each eligible study, the risk of bias was assessed as “low”, “moderate” or “high” in the following domains: study participation, study attrition, prognostic factor measurement, outcome measurement, study confounding, statistical analysis and reporting. Publication bias was not evaluated through the funnel plot method due to the limited number of eligible studies [13].

Outcomes of interest

The primary study outcome was all-cause death, defined as death from any cause. The secondary study outcome was the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization.

Data synthesis and statistical analysis

All unadjusted and adjusted HRs and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals of all-cause death and of the composite outcome were extracted for the TAPSE/PASP ratio, as a continuous variable, to reflect the risk difference per 1mm/mmHg of reduction. Moreover, the unadjusted and adjusted HRs and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals of all-cause death were extracted for the TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.36 mm/mmHg, as a binary variable. The value of 0.36 mm/mmHg was selected, as this cutoff was most commonly used in the eligible studies included in the meta-analysis [5, 1416].
Pooled (a)HRs and 95% confidence intervals were computed using random-effect models (DerSimonian and Laird method) for both the primary and secondary outcome of interest, adjusted or unadjusted for clinical differences between the populations. A random effects model was selected a priori given the expected heterogeneity in study design across the eligible studies. Separate analyses using only unadjusted or adjusted data were conducted. Forest plots were constructed to show the overall effect of each parameter. The observed heterogeneity in each analysis was described using the I [2] statistic, which was quantified as low (<25%), moderate (25% to 75%), or high (>75%) [17].
All statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan), Version 5.4, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020. A two-tailed p-value of less than 0.05 was deemed as the statistical significance threshold for our study.

Results

Search outcomes

The process of study selection is summarized in Fig. 1. From the initial 601 studies identified based on the search strategy, 18 relevant eligible full-text article were included in this systematic review. Of these, 11 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis [5, 6, 8, 1416, 1822]. Four out of 7 studies were not included in the quantitative synthesis as they reported discordant outcomes and cutoff values [7, 2325], whereas 3 out of 7 studies were deemed of prohibitive risk of bias (Supplemental Table S2) [2628]. Overall, the risk of bias was considered to be low or moderate for the 11 studies included in meta-analysis (Supplemental Table S3).

Qualitative analysis

Study characteristics

The baseline characteristics of the 18 studies included in the systematic review are summarized in Table 1. Overall, the studies included diverse HF cohorts based on the LV ejection fraction; 6 studies included HF patients with reduced ejection fraction [8, 15, 19, 21, 22, 27], 3 studies constituted of HF patients with preserved ejection fraction [3, 16, 24], and 9 studies encompassed HF subjects with mixed ejection fraction [57, 9, 14, 18, 20, 26, 28]. One out of the 9 studies with mixed ejection fraction investigated subjects with HF and functional mitral regurgitation (MR) receiving transcatheter repair [9]. Mean age of the study populations varied significantly from 44.1±14.0 to 81.5±9.0 years, while the number of enrolled patients ranged from 54 to 1663. The mean value of TAPSE/PASP ratio among studies varied from 0.34±0.50 to 0.70±0.20 mm/mmHg (Table 1).

Prognostic value of TAPSE/PASP

Out of the 18 studies addressing the prognostic role of TAPSE/PASP in HF, 11 studies examined all-cause or cardiovascular mortality as the primary outcome [5, 6, 8, 9, 1416, 18, 19, 26, 27], 1 study examined HF readmissions [24], and the rest included combined primary outcomes (Table 2) [7, 2023, 28]. The follow up period varied from 5 months to 4.8 years. A substantial heterogeneity was observed in the applied cutoff values of TAPSE/PASP, which ranged from 0.27 to 0.58 mm/mmHg. With the exception of one study [19] all investigators consistently disclosed worst long-term event free survival for subjects with reduced values of TAPSE/PASP.
Table 2
Prognostic value of TAPSE/PASP ratio in heart failure (18 studies)
Author
Year
Included in meta-analysis
HF population
Primary outcome
TAPSE/PASP cutoff value (mm/mmHg)
Follow up
Predictive value of TAPSE/PASP
Guazzi et al. [5]
2013
Yes
HFrEF andHFpEF
Cardiovascular mortality
0.36
20 months (median)
TAPSE/PASP <0.36 was associated with worse event free survival
Guazzi et al. [28]
2015
No
HFrEF and HFpEF
Composite of cardiovascular mortality, left ventricular assist device implant, or heart transplant
0.40
4 years max
TAPSE/PASP <0.40 was associated with worse event free survival, Hazard ratio: 5.6 (3.5-8.9; p<0.001)
Iacoviello et al. [6]
2017
Yes
Stable HF, LVEF <45%
All-cause mortality
NA
36 months (range; 10-62)
After adjustment, TAPSE/PASP remained significantly associated with events in echocardiographic (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.52–0.93; p: 0.016) but not in the clinical multivariate model (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.71–1.25; p: 0.68)
Guazzi et al. [23]
2017
No
HFpEF
All-cause death and any cardiovascular hospitalization
0.35
13.4 months (range; 5.2-23.7)
Adverse outcomes were more common in the lower tertile (TAPSE/PASP <0.35) compared to the others
Ghio et al. [14]
2017
Yes
HFrEF and HFpEF
All-cause mortality
0.36
5 months (median)
Patients with TAPSE/PASP <0.36 and LVEF <40% demonstrated the worst long term event free survival
Bosch et al. [20]
2017
Yes
HFrEF and HFpEF
All-cause mortality and HF hospitalization
0.48
715 days (median)
Significant increase in the composite endpoint among patients with TAPSE/PASP <0.48 (log-rank p< 0.001)
Gorter et al. [18]
2018
Yes
HF with LVEF ≥45% and suspected pulmonary hypertension
All cause mortality
0.36
816 days (range; 547–1047)
TAPSE/PASP <0.36 was associated with worse event free survival (log-rank p=0.006)
Santas et al. [24]
2019
No
Acute HFpEF
Hospitalization for any cause
0.36
2 years (range; 0.74-3.6)
TAPSE/PASP <0.36 was associated with a higher risk of HF-related recurrent admissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.51, 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.24; p=0.040)
Falletta et al. [15]
2019
Yes
Clinically stable HFrEF
All-cause mortality
0.36
32 months (range; 20-53)
TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.36 had a threefold decrease in risk of death compared to the TAPSE/PASP ratio ≥0.36 group
Santas et al. [16]
2020
Yes
Acute HFpEF
All-cause mortality
0.36
1 year
The cohort with TAPSE/PASP <0.36 and significant tricuspid regurgitation had the highest cardiovascular mortality rates
Braganca et al. [19]
2020
Yes
HFrEF undergoing CRT
All-cause mortality
0.43
4 years (maximum)
No significant differences in survival were observed between groups with different RV-PA coupling (TAPSE/PASP <0.43 vs 0.43: four-year survival of 80% vs 76%, p=0.72)
Rosa et al. [26]
2020
No
HFmrEF and HFrEF
All-cause mortality
0.34
25.5months (range; 8-46)
Survival free from all-cause mortality in patients with TAPSE/PASP <0.34 was worse as compared to that of patients with TAPSE/PASP ≥0.34 (log-rank p<0.001)
Palazzuoli et al. [7]
2020
No
Acute HFrEF and HFpEF
All-cause death and rehospitalization due to cardiovascular causes
0.43
6 months
TAPSE/PASP ratio<0.43 was related to increased risk of the outcome in univariable (HR: 2.31; CI 1.54–3.46; p<0.001) but not in the multivariable analysis
Schmeisser et al. [27]
2021
No
HFrEF with indication for CRT
All-cause mortality
0.38
4.8 years (median)
Patients with TAPSE/PASP <0.38 had significantly worse overall survival
Karam et al. [9]
2021
No
Functional MR undergoing TMVR with MitraClip
All-cause mortality
0.27
476 days (range; 225-727)
Survival rates at 1 and 2 years were lower among patients with impaired RV-PA coupling; 70.2 vs. 84.0%, respectively; p<0.001; and 53.4% vs. 73.1%, respectively; p<0.001)
Deaconu et al. [22]
2021
Yes
HFrEF undergoing CRT
All-cause mortality and HF rehospitalization
0.58
31 months (range; 18.1-43.9)
TAPSE/PASP<0.58 was associated with a higher risk of death or HF hospitalizations (HR 5.37; 95% CI 1.6-18; p<0.001)
Ishiwata et al. [21]
2021
Yes
Dilated cardiomyopathy, HFrEF
LV assist device implantation and all-cause death
-
12 months
After adjusting for age, BMI, NYHA class, systolic blood pressure and heart rate, TAPSE/PASP was independently associated (HR: 0.19; CI 0.03-0.82; p=0.02) with the outcome
Stassen et al. [8]
2022
Yes
HFrEFundergoint CRT
All-cause mortality
0.45
97 months (range; 54-143)
Survival rates at 5 years follow-up were significantly lower for patients with a TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.45 compared to those with a TAPSE/PASP ratio ≥0.45 (58 vs 82%, p<0.001)
BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, CRT cardiac resynchronization therapy, HF heart failure, HFmrEF heart failure mildly reduced ejection fraction, HFpEF heart failure preserved ejection fraction, HFrEF heart failure reduced ejection fraction, HR hazard ratio, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, NA not available, NYHA new york heart association, TAPSE/PASP tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure, TMVR transcatheter mitral valve repair, TR tricuspid regurgitation, TTVR transcatheter tricuspid valve repair

Quantitative analysis

Association of TAPSE/PASP ratio with all-cause death

A total of 5 studies provided appropriate data to quantitatively synthesize the association of TAPSE/PASP ratio, as a continuous variable, with all-cause death [5, 6, 8, 18, 19]. The pooled unadjusted HR was 2.27 (1.86-2.27; p<0.001;I2=35%) per 1 mm/mmHg reduction of TAPSE/PASP, as depicted in Fig. 2Α. When adjusted for pre-specified clinically-relevant parameters, it was shown that for each unit of reduction in TAPSE/PASP the risk for all-cause death was increased by 32% (pooled aHR=1.32 [1.06-1.65]; p=0.01; I2=56%) (Fig. 2Β).
Similar results were obtained when TAPSE/PASP ratio was assessed as a categorical variable, using the cutoff value of 0.36 mm/mmHg, retrieved from 4 studies which provided appropriate data [5, 1416]. In the unadjusted analysis, TAPSE/PASP <0.36 mm/mmHg was associated with a more than 2-fold increased risk (pooled unadjusted HR: 2.63 [2.00-3.47]; p<0.001; I2=55%) of all-cause death compared to TAPSE/PASP ≥0.36 mm/mmHg (Fig. 3Α). After adjustment for clinically relevant cofounders, this strong association of TAPSE/PASP <0.36 mm/mmHg with increased all-cause death was retained (pooled aHR=2.84 [2.22-3.64]; p<0.001; I2=82%) (Fig. 3Β).

Association of TAPSE/PASP ratio with the composite outcome

Regarding the composite outcome of all-cause death or HF hospitalization, a total of 3 studies provided obtainable data for meta-analysis [2022]. The pooled unadjusted HR was 6.64 (3.11-14.15; p<0.001; I2=20%) per 1 mm/mmHg reduction in TAPSE/PASP, as illustrated in Fig. 4Α. After adjustment for cofounders, the results remained similar indicating that for each unit of reduction in TAPSE/PASP ratio the risk of the composite outcome was 3.48-fold higher (pooled aHR=3.48 [1.67-7.25]; p<0.001; I2=0%) (Fig. 4Β).

Discussion

The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis, encompassing a total 8,699 HF patients from a wide range of HF phenotypes, which examined the long-term prognostic value of non-invasive RV-PA coupling assessed with echocardiographic TAPE/PASP ratio. The quantitative synthesis confirmed the independent association of reduced TAPSE/PASP ratio, indicating worse RV-PA coupling, with increased all-cause death and worse composite outcome in HF cohorts. Additionally, the TAPSE/PASP ratio <0.36 mm/mmHg was independently associated with all-cause death in HF patients.

Pathophysiology of RV-PA coupling

Left sided heart disease is by far the leading cause of pulmonary hypertension accounting for 65-80% of all cases [29]. Chronic elevation of the left-sided filling pressure due to systolic or diastolic dysfunction in HF is passively backwards transmitted. Elevated left atrial pressure is upstream transmitted to the pulmonary vasculature causing pulmonary vascular remodeling [30]. Pulmonary hypertension is ultimately transferred to the thin-walled flow-generator RV which is not designed to cope with brisk increases of pressure [31]. During the initial stages of pulmonary hypertension RV adapts by increasing its contractility to match the afterload excess and maintain pulmonary circulation [3]. However, as the disease progresses the compensatory phase ends leading to RV failure and disruption of the normal RV-PA coupling.

Utility of TAPSE/PASP ratio

RV-PA uncoupling connotes an advanced stage of disease progression in left-sided heart disease, when trials to alter the course of disease with advanced therapies may be futile. In this regard, identifying such high-risk patients with ease in clinical practice is pivotal for risk stratification, but also to omit valueless procedures. Echocardiographic TAPSE/PASP ratio has emerged as an alternative predictor of invasive pressure-volume loop-derived end-systolic/arterial elastance, which is the gold standard measure of RV-PA coupling [32]. This index is the most extensively established surrogate of RV-PA coupling in HF [8, 23, 24], with fewer studies investigating alternative indices such as longitudinal strain of RV free wall/PASP [6, 33].

RV-PA coupling for diverse HF cohorts

There is ample evidence that TAPSE/PASP ratio provides prognostic information beyond that provided from TAPSE or PASP separately in HF. Worse TAPSE/PASP values were associated with adverse long-term outcomes in all the 18 studies included in this systematic review, but 1 [19]. This strong association was demonstrated in various HF cohorts including outpatients with HF [15],patients in the acute phase of decompensation [24], subjects with HF with preserved [16] or reduced [27] ejection fraction, as well as recipients of CRT [8] or transcatheter valve procedures [9].
A substantial heterogeneity was observed in the definition of RV-PA uncoupling, with suggested TAPSE/PASP cutoff values varying from 0.27 to 0.58 mm/mmHg. Six studies [5, 1416, 18, 24] implemented the cutoff of 0.36 mm/mmHg, initially proposed by Guazzi et al. [5] as derived by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis from a mixed cohort of 293 HF patients. This cutoff value was strongly linked with all-cause death in the current meta-analysis (Fig. 3).
In one of the largest series of patients with acute HF and preserved ejection fraction, Santas et al. disclosed that TAPSE/PASP <0.36 mm/mmHg could independently predict unplanned rehospitalization for HF [24]. The risk was increased in a stepwise manner, with lower quintiles of TAPSE/PASP [24]. When the same cutoff value was applied for clinically stable HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, it demonstrated a threefold increase in the risk of death. On the contrary, Braganca et al. failed to elicit prognostic information for HF patients with reduced ejection fraction undergoing CRT, but their study was small and underpowered; a total of 70 patients were included with only 15 events [19]. Overall, TAPSE/PASP appears to be an efficient risk stratification tool for diverse HF phenotypes, including acute and chronic HF regardless of ejection fraction, as described by most studies and confirmed by the current quantitative analysis (Figs. 2, 3 and 4).

RV-PA coupling as triage tool for interventional HF therapies

Contemporary evidence demonstrates than TAPSE/PASP can potentially identify non-responders to interventional HF therapies. Stassen et al. illustrated that among 807 CRT recipients TAPSE/PASP <0.45 mm/mmHg provided incremental prognostic information on top of impaired TAPSE [8]. In addition, lack of improvement in TAPSE/PASP ratio after CRT was associated with worst survival [8]. Those findings exemplify that when RV-PA uncoupling is established, the disease stage is so advanced that CRT implantation might come with little clinical benefit for the patient. A similar message was delivered by Karam et al., who elegantly demonstrated that patients with functional MR and pre-operative RV-PA uncoupling, defined as TAPSE/PASP <0.27 mmHg, derived significantly less survival benefit from transcatheter mitral valve repair compared to their counterparts [9].
Non-invasive TAPSE/PASP appears applicable for variable HF cohorts, however, in patients with greater than severe tricuspid regurgitation, it might overestimate the true coupling of the RV-PA circuit, as echocardiographic PASP is underestimated and correlates poorly with the respective invasive PASP. In a cohort of 126 patients with greater than severe tricuspid regurgitation undergoing transcatheter repair, only the TAPSE/PASP using the invasive PASP could provide prognostic information, whereas the echocardiographic TAPSE/PASP could not [10].
Overall, after excluding the patients with massive or torrential tricuspid regurgitation where echocardiographic PASP may not reflect the true pulmonary pressure, non-invasive TAPSE/PASP ratio can identify advanced HF phenotypes, where any potential benefit derived from intervention is attenuated.

Future perspectives

The current systematic review and meta-analysis highlighted that the available observational data are more than enough to infer that RV-PA uncoupling, estimated from the reduced echocardiographic TAPSE/PASP ratio, connotes a poor prognostic course for HF patients receiving medical and interventional management. In order to favorably implement this index in clinical practice it is of paramount importance to consolidate a specific cutoff value; however different optimal cutoff values may be appropriate in different HF phenotypes (acute vs chronic, preserved vs reduced LV ejection fraction), and further research is warranted towards this direction. Ultimately, RV-PA uncoupling could serve as part of the standard HF risk assessment to select appropriate candidates that will benefit from advanced HF treatments including CRT or transcatheter valve repair of functional MR or tricuspid regurgitation. Thus, more studies have to be conducted in this direction of advanced interventional treatment of HF.

Limitations

Although the current study follows a strict study selection protocol with a robust methodology some limitations should be acknowledged. First and foremost, the limitations of the present review are inherent to the observational nature of the included studies. The variations in the inclusion and exclusion criteria, endpoints reported, and cutoff values of TAPSE/PASP used contribute to the heterogeneity among studies. Subsequently, quantitative synthesis was limited to 11 out of the 20 studies included in the qualitative analysis.
With respect to the meta-analysis, a meta-regression analysis was unobtainable, and it was unfeasible to derive a universal cutoff value of TAPSE/PASP due to high discrepancy and limited reports of diagnostic accuracy data. Although the variables used for multivariate adjustment across the included in the meta-analysis studies coincide to some extent, they are not identical; hence pooled (a)HRs should be interpreted with caution.

Conclusion

In summary, TAPSE/PASP ratio is a universally applicable non-invasive surrogate of RV-PA coupling that could be evaluated as part of the routine echocardiographic assessment of HF patients, to risk stratify them throughout the diverse HF phenotypes, since its reduction has been demonstrated to be independently associated with adverse outcomes. Future research should explore optimal cutoff values of the TAPSE/PASP ratio to define RV-PA uncoupling and ultimately integrate this index in HF risk stratification schemes for advanced interventional HF treatments.

Declarations

Ethical approval

The study was prospectively registered on the PROSPERO registry (PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023417767, https://​www.​crd.​york.​ac.​uk/​prospero/​display_​record.​php?​ID=​CRD42023417767).

Conflict of interests

None relevant to this work.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Anhänge

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tavazzi L, Senni M, Metra M, Gorini M, Cacciatore G, Chinaglia A, Di Lenarda A, Mortara A, Oliva F, Maggioni AP (2013) Multicenter prospective observational study on acute and chronic heart failure: one-year follow-up results of IN-HF (Italian Network on Heart failure) outcome registry. Circ Heart Fail 6:473–481CrossRefPubMed Tavazzi L, Senni M, Metra M, Gorini M, Cacciatore G, Chinaglia A, Di Lenarda A, Mortara A, Oliva F, Maggioni AP (2013) Multicenter prospective observational study on acute and chronic heart failure: one-year follow-up results of IN-HF (Italian Network on Heart failure) outcome registry. Circ Heart Fail 6:473–481CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JH, Park JJ, Park JB, Cho GY (2018) Prognostic value of Biventricular strain in risk stratifying in patients with Acute Heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc 7:e009331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park JH, Park JJ, Park JB, Cho GY (2018) Prognostic value of Biventricular strain in risk stratifying in patients with Acute Heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc 7:e009331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Guazzi M, Naeije R (2017) Pulmonary hypertension in Heart failure: pathophysiology, pathobiology, and emerging clinical perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:1718–1734CrossRefPubMed Guazzi M, Naeije R (2017) Pulmonary hypertension in Heart failure: pathophysiology, pathobiology, and emerging clinical perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 69:1718–1734CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghio S, Gavazzi A, Campana C, Inserra C, Klersy C, Sebastiani R, Arbustini E, Recusani F, Tavazzi L (2001) Independent and additive prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:183–188CrossRefPubMed Ghio S, Gavazzi A, Campana C, Inserra C, Klersy C, Sebastiani R, Arbustini E, Recusani F, Tavazzi L (2001) Independent and additive prognostic value of right ventricular systolic function and pulmonary artery pressure in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:183–188CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guazzi M, Bandera F, Pelissero G, Castelvecchio S, Menicanti L, Ghio S, Temporelli PL, Arena R (2013) Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure relationship in heart failure: an index of right ventricular contractile function and prognosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 305:H1373–H1381CrossRefPubMed Guazzi M, Bandera F, Pelissero G, Castelvecchio S, Menicanti L, Ghio S, Temporelli PL, Arena R (2013) Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure relationship in heart failure: an index of right ventricular contractile function and prognosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 305:H1373–H1381CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Iacoviello M, Monitillo F, Citarelli G, Leone M, Grande D, Antoncecchi V, Rizzo C, Terlizzese P, Romito R, Caldarola P, Ciccone MM (2017) Right ventriculo-arterial coupling assessed by two-dimensional strain: a new parameter of right ventricular function independently associated with prognosis in chronic heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol 241:318–321CrossRefPubMed Iacoviello M, Monitillo F, Citarelli G, Leone M, Grande D, Antoncecchi V, Rizzo C, Terlizzese P, Romito R, Caldarola P, Ciccone MM (2017) Right ventriculo-arterial coupling assessed by two-dimensional strain: a new parameter of right ventricular function independently associated with prognosis in chronic heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol 241:318–321CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Palazzuoli A, Ruocco G, Evangelista I, De Vivo O, Nuti R, Ghio S (2020) Prognostic significance of an early echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular dimension and function in Acute Heart failure. J Card Fail 26:813–820CrossRefPubMed Palazzuoli A, Ruocco G, Evangelista I, De Vivo O, Nuti R, Ghio S (2020) Prognostic significance of an early echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular dimension and function in Acute Heart failure. J Card Fail 26:813–820CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stassen J, Galloo X, Hirasawa K, Chimed S, Marsan NA, Delgado V, van der Bijl P, Bax JJ (2022) Right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in cardiac resynchronization therapy: evolution and prognosis. ESC heart failure 9:1597–1607CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stassen J, Galloo X, Hirasawa K, Chimed S, Marsan NA, Delgado V, van der Bijl P, Bax JJ (2022) Right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling in cardiac resynchronization therapy: evolution and prognosis. ESC heart failure 9:1597–1607CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Karam N, Stolz L, Orban M, Deseive S, Praz F, Kalbacher D, Westermann D, Braun D, Näbauer M, Neuss M, Butter C, Kassar M, Petrescu A, Pfister R, Iliadis C, Unterhuber M, Park SD, Thiele H, Baldus S, von Bardeleben S, Blankenberg R, Massberg S, Windecker S, Lurz S P and, Hausleiter J (2021) Impact of right ventricular dysfunction on Outcomes after Transcatheter Edge-to-edge repair for secondary mitral regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 14:768–778CrossRefPubMed Karam N, Stolz L, Orban M, Deseive S, Praz F, Kalbacher D, Westermann D, Braun D, Näbauer M, Neuss M, Butter C, Kassar M, Petrescu A, Pfister R, Iliadis C, Unterhuber M, Park SD, Thiele H, Baldus S, von Bardeleben S, Blankenberg R, Massberg S, Windecker S, Lurz S P and, Hausleiter J (2021) Impact of right ventricular dysfunction on Outcomes after Transcatheter Edge-to-edge repair for secondary mitral regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 14:768–778CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerçek M, Körber MI, Narang A, Friedrichs KP, Puthumana JJ, Rudolph TK, Thomas JD, Pfister R, Davidson CJ (2022) Rudolph V. echocardiographic pulmonary artery systolic pressure is Not Reliable for RV-PA coupling in transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 15:2578–2580CrossRefPubMed Gerçek M, Körber MI, Narang A, Friedrichs KP, Puthumana JJ, Rudolph TK, Thomas JD, Pfister R, Davidson CJ (2022) Rudolph V. echocardiographic pulmonary artery systolic pressure is Not Reliable for RV-PA coupling in transcatheter tricuspid valve annuloplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 15:2578–2580CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA (2021) Whiting P and Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 372:n71PubMed Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA (2021) Whiting P and Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 372:n71PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Grooten WJA, Tseli E, Äng BO, Boersma K, Stålnacke BM, Gerdle B, Enthoven P (2019) Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement. Diagn prognostic Res 3:5CrossRef Grooten WJA, Tseli E, Äng BO, Boersma K, Stålnacke BM, Gerdle B, Enthoven P (2019) Elaborating on the assessment of the risk of bias in prognostic studies in pain rehabilitation using QUIPS-aspects of interrater agreement. Diagn prognostic Res 3:5CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghio S, Guazzi M, Scardovi AB, Klersy C, Clemenza F, Carluccio E, Temporelli PL, Rossi A, Faggiano P, Traversi E, Vriz O, Dini FL (2017) Different correlates but similar prognostic implications for right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 19:873–879CrossRefPubMed Ghio S, Guazzi M, Scardovi AB, Klersy C, Clemenza F, Carluccio E, Temporelli PL, Rossi A, Faggiano P, Traversi E, Vriz O, Dini FL (2017) Different correlates but similar prognostic implications for right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 19:873–879CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Falletta C, Clemenza F, Klersy C, Agnese V, Bellavia D, Di Gesaro G, Minà C, Romano G, Temporelli PL, Dini FL, Rossi A, Raineri C, Turco A, Traversi E, Ghio S (2019) Additive value of biomarkers and Echocardiography to stratify the risk of death in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiol Res Pract 2019:1824816CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Falletta C, Clemenza F, Klersy C, Agnese V, Bellavia D, Di Gesaro G, Minà C, Romano G, Temporelli PL, Dini FL, Rossi A, Raineri C, Turco A, Traversi E, Ghio S (2019) Additive value of biomarkers and Echocardiography to stratify the risk of death in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiol Res Pract 2019:1824816CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Santas E, De la Espriella R, Chorro FJ, Palau P, Miñana G, Heredia R, Amiguet M, Merenciano H, Sanchis J, Lupón J (2020) Bayés-Genís A and Núñez J. Right Ventricular Dysfunction Staging System for Mortality Risk Stratification in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Clin Med 9 Santas E, De la Espriella R, Chorro FJ, Palau P, Miñana G, Heredia R, Amiguet M, Merenciano H, Sanchis J, Lupón J (2020) Bayés-Genís A and Núñez J. Right Ventricular Dysfunction Staging System for Mortality Risk Stratification in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Clin Med 9
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 327:557–560CrossRefPubMed Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 327:557–560CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorter TM, van Veldhuisen DJ, Voors AA, Hummel YM, Lam CSP, Berger RMF, van Melle JP, Hoendermis ES (2018) Right ventricular-vascular coupling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pre- vs. post-capillary pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:425–432CrossRefPubMed Gorter TM, van Veldhuisen DJ, Voors AA, Hummel YM, Lam CSP, Berger RMF, van Melle JP, Hoendermis ES (2018) Right ventricular-vascular coupling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pre- vs. post-capillary pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:425–432CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bragança B, Trêpa M, Santos R, Silveira I, Fontes-Oliveira M, Sousa MJ, Reis H, Torres S, Santos M (2020) Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventriculo-arterial coupling: clinical Correlates and Prognostic Impact in Heart failure patients undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:109–120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bragança B, Trêpa M, Santos R, Silveira I, Fontes-Oliveira M, Sousa MJ, Reis H, Torres S, Santos M (2020) Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventriculo-arterial coupling: clinical Correlates and Prognostic Impact in Heart failure patients undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:109–120CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosch L, Lam CSP, Gong L, Chan SP, Sim D, Yeo D, Jaufeerally F, Leong KTG, Ong HY, Ng TP, Richards AM, Arslan F, Ling LH (2017) Right ventricular dysfunction in left-sided heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 19:1664–1671CrossRefPubMed Bosch L, Lam CSP, Gong L, Chan SP, Sim D, Yeo D, Jaufeerally F, Leong KTG, Ong HY, Ng TP, Richards AM, Arslan F, Ling LH (2017) Right ventricular dysfunction in left-sided heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 19:1664–1671CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishiwata J, Daimon M, Nakanishi K, Sugimoto T, Kawata T, Shinozaki T, Nakao T, Hirokawa M, Sawada N, Yoshida Y, Amiya E, Hatano M, Morita H (2021) Yatomi Y and Komuro I. Combined evaluation of right ventricular function using echocardiography in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. ESC heart failure 8:3947–3956CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ishiwata J, Daimon M, Nakanishi K, Sugimoto T, Kawata T, Shinozaki T, Nakao T, Hirokawa M, Sawada N, Yoshida Y, Amiya E, Hatano M, Morita H (2021) Yatomi Y and Komuro I. Combined evaluation of right ventricular function using echocardiography in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. ESC heart failure 8:3947–3956CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Deaconu S, Deaconu A, Scarlatescu A, Petre I, Onciul S, Vijiac A, Onut R, Zamfir D, Marascu G, Iorgulescu C, Radu DA, Bogdan S, Vatasescu R, Dorobantu M (2021) Right ventricular-arterial coupling - a new perspective for right ventricle evaluation in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Echocardiography 38:1157–1164CrossRefPubMed Deaconu S, Deaconu A, Scarlatescu A, Petre I, Onciul S, Vijiac A, Onut R, Zamfir D, Marascu G, Iorgulescu C, Radu DA, Bogdan S, Vatasescu R, Dorobantu M (2021) Right ventricular-arterial coupling - a new perspective for right ventricle evaluation in heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Echocardiography 38:1157–1164CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Guazzi M, Dixon D, Labate V, Beussink-Nelson L, Bandera F, Cuttica MJ, Shah SJ (2017) RV contractile function and its coupling to pulmonary circulation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: stratification of clinical phenotypes and outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:1211–1221CrossRefPubMed Guazzi M, Dixon D, Labate V, Beussink-Nelson L, Bandera F, Cuttica MJ, Shah SJ (2017) RV contractile function and its coupling to pulmonary circulation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: stratification of clinical phenotypes and outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 10:1211–1221CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Santas E, Palau P, Guazzi M, de la Espriella R, Miñana G, Sanchis J, Bayes-Genís A, Lupón J (2019) Chorro FJ and Núñez J. usefulness of right ventricular to pulmonary circulation coupling as an Indicator of risk for recurrent admissions in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 124:567–572CrossRefPubMed Santas E, Palau P, Guazzi M, de la Espriella R, Miñana G, Sanchis J, Bayes-Genís A, Lupón J (2019) Chorro FJ and Núñez J. usefulness of right ventricular to pulmonary circulation coupling as an Indicator of risk for recurrent admissions in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 124:567–572CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Karam N, Mehr M, Taramasso M, Besler C, Ruf T, Connelly KA, Weber M, Yzeiraj E, Schiavi D, Mangieri A, Vaskelyte L, Alessandrini H, Deuschl F, Brugger N, Ahmad H, Ho E, Biasco L, Orban M, Deseive S, Braun D, Gavazzoni M, Rommel KP, Pozzoli A, Frerker C, Näbauer M, Massberg S, Pedrazzini G, Tang GHL, Windecker S, Schäfer U, Kuck KH, Sievert H, Denti P, Latib A, Schofer J, Nickenig G, Fam N, von Bardeleben S, Lurz P, Maisano F, Hausleiter J (2020) Value of echocardiographic right ventricular and pulmonary pressure Assessment in Predicting Transcatheter Tricuspid Repair Outcome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13:1251–1261CrossRefPubMed Karam N, Mehr M, Taramasso M, Besler C, Ruf T, Connelly KA, Weber M, Yzeiraj E, Schiavi D, Mangieri A, Vaskelyte L, Alessandrini H, Deuschl F, Brugger N, Ahmad H, Ho E, Biasco L, Orban M, Deseive S, Braun D, Gavazzoni M, Rommel KP, Pozzoli A, Frerker C, Näbauer M, Massberg S, Pedrazzini G, Tang GHL, Windecker S, Schäfer U, Kuck KH, Sievert H, Denti P, Latib A, Schofer J, Nickenig G, Fam N, von Bardeleben S, Lurz P, Maisano F, Hausleiter J (2020) Value of echocardiographic right ventricular and pulmonary pressure Assessment in Predicting Transcatheter Tricuspid Repair Outcome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 13:1251–1261CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosa GM, D’Agostino A, Giovinazzo S, La Malfa G, Fontanive P, Miccoli M, Dini FL (2020) Echocardiography of right ventricular-arterial coupling predicts survival of elderly patients with heart failure and reduced to mid-range ejection fraction. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 90 Rosa GM, D’Agostino A, Giovinazzo S, La Malfa G, Fontanive P, Miccoli M, Dini FL (2020) Echocardiography of right ventricular-arterial coupling predicts survival of elderly patients with heart failure and reduced to mid-range ejection fraction. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 90
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmeisser A, Rauwolf T, Groscheck T, Kropf S, Luani B, Tanev I, Hansen M, Meißler S, Steendijk P, Braun-Dullaeus RC (2021) Pressure-volume loop validation of TAPSE/PASP for right ventricular arterial coupling in heart failure with pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 22:168–176CrossRefPubMed Schmeisser A, Rauwolf T, Groscheck T, Kropf S, Luani B, Tanev I, Hansen M, Meißler S, Steendijk P, Braun-Dullaeus RC (2021) Pressure-volume loop validation of TAPSE/PASP for right ventricular arterial coupling in heart failure with pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 22:168–176CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Guazzi M, Naeije R, Arena R, Corrà U, Ghio S, Forfia P, Rossi A, Cahalin LP, Bandera F, Temporelli P (2015) Echocardiography of Right Ventriculoarterial Coupling Combined with Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Predict Outcome in Heart failure. Chest 148:226–234CrossRefPubMed Guazzi M, Naeije R, Arena R, Corrà U, Ghio S, Forfia P, Rossi A, Cahalin LP, Bandera F, Temporelli P (2015) Echocardiography of Right Ventriculoarterial Coupling Combined with Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Predict Outcome in Heart failure. Chest 148:226–234CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkranz S, Gibbs JS, Wachter R, De Marco T, Vonk-Noordegraaf (2016) A and Vachiéry JL. Left ventricular heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 37:942–954CrossRefPubMed Rosenkranz S, Gibbs JS, Wachter R, De Marco T, Vonk-Noordegraaf (2016) A and Vachiéry JL. Left ventricular heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Eur Heart J 37:942–954CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Vachiéry JL, Adir Y, Barberà JA, Champion H, Coghlan JG, Cottin V, De Marco T, Galiè N, Ghio S, Gibbs JS, Martinez F, Semigran M, Simonneau G (2013) Wells A and Seeger W. Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:D100–D108CrossRefPubMed Vachiéry JL, Adir Y, Barberà JA, Champion H, Coghlan JG, Cottin V, De Marco T, Galiè N, Ghio S, Gibbs JS, Martinez F, Semigran M, Simonneau G (2013) Wells A and Seeger W. Pulmonary hypertension due to left heart diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:D100–D108CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Haddad F, Chin KM, Forfia PR, Kawut SM, Lumens J, Naeije R, Newman J, Oudiz RJ, Provencher S, Torbicki A, Voelkel NF, Hassoun PM (2013) Right heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:D22–33CrossRefPubMed Vonk-Noordegraaf A, Haddad F, Chin KM, Forfia PR, Kawut SM, Lumens J, Naeije R, Newman J, Oudiz RJ, Provencher S, Torbicki A, Voelkel NF, Hassoun PM (2013) Right heart adaptation to pulmonary arterial hypertension: physiology and pathobiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 62:D22–33CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Tello K, Wan J, Dalmer A, Vanderpool R, Ghofrani HA, Naeije R, Roller F, Mohajerani E, Seeger W, Herberg U, Sommer N, Gall H, Richter MJ (2019) Validation of the tricuspid annular plane systolic Excursion/Systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio for the Assessment of right ventricular-arterial coupling in severe pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 12:e009047CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tello K, Wan J, Dalmer A, Vanderpool R, Ghofrani HA, Naeije R, Roller F, Mohajerani E, Seeger W, Herberg U, Sommer N, Gall H, Richter MJ (2019) Validation of the tricuspid annular plane systolic Excursion/Systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio for the Assessment of right ventricular-arterial coupling in severe pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 12:e009047CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Brener MI, Grayburn P, Lindenfeld J, Burkhoff D, Liu M, Zhou Z, Alu MC, Medvedofsky DA, Asch FM, Weissman NJ, Bax J, Abraham W, Mack MJ, Stone GW, Hahn RT (2021) Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in patients with HF secondary MR: analysis from the COAPT Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14:2231–2242CrossRefPubMed Brener MI, Grayburn P, Lindenfeld J, Burkhoff D, Liu M, Zhou Z, Alu MC, Medvedofsky DA, Asch FM, Weissman NJ, Bax J, Abraham W, Mack MJ, Stone GW, Hahn RT (2021) Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in patients with HF secondary MR: analysis from the COAPT Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 14:2231–2242CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The prognostic impact of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Vasileios Anastasiou
Andreas S. Papazoglou
Dimitrios V. Moysidis
Stylianos Daios
Konstantinos Barmpagiannos
Thomas Gossios
Georgios K. Efthimiadis
Theodoros Karamitsos
Antonios Ziakas
Vasileios Kamperidis
Publikationsdatum
28.08.2023
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Heart Failure Reviews / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1382-4147
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7322
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-023-10341-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

Heart Failure Reviews 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

10.05.2024 Hypercholesterinämie Nachrichten

Patienten mit Arteriosklerose-bedingten kardiovaskulären Erkrankungen, die trotz Statineinnahme zu hohe Triglyzeridspiegel haben, profitieren von einer Behandlung mit Icosapent-Ethyl, und zwar unabhängig vom individuellen Risikoprofil.

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

In den USA ist erstmals eine bioresorbierbare Gefäßstütze – auch Scaffold genannt – zur Rekanalisation infrapoplitealer Arterien bei schwerer PAVK zugelassen worden. Das markiert einen Wendepunkt in der Geschichte dieser speziellen Gefäßstützen.

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.