Introduction
Type 1 diabetes arises following the selective destruction of pancreatic beta cells by immune cells that infiltrate the islets of Langerhans during disease development. In humans, these infiltrates contain various different immune cell subtypes but are dominated by autoreactive CD8
+ T cells [
1‐
3], considered to be the principal mediators of beta cell demise [
4]. Loss of beta cells occurs via a combination of direct cell-mediated toxicity and the release of soluble factors (such as proinflammatory cytokines, granzymes and perforin) which promote apoptosis [
5‐
9]. However, the situation is complex since balanced against these pro-apoptotic mechanisms favouring beta cell loss are factors which act to sustain viability, including anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-13 and IL-4. In common with their proinflammatory counterparts, these may be secreted from specific immune cell subsets [
10‐
14] and might also originate from the islet cells. Irrespective of their precise source, the final outcome of any inflammatory episode for beta cell viability will be determined by the competing effects of these various antagonistic influences operating within the islet milieu.
The actions of proinflammatory cytokines have been well-studied in beta cells [
9,
12,
15‐
18] but, in contrast, the counter-balancing effects of anti-inflammatory molecules have received much less attention. Nevertheless, it is known that exogenous administration of IL-13 or IL-4 reduces the incidence and delays the onset of diabetes in the NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes [
10,
19] and that IL-4 and IL-13 each exert direct pro-survival effects in human pancreatic islet cells [
20‐
22]. Thus, it is likely that the availability of such molecules within islets may influence the survival of beta cells in the face of ongoing autoimmunity.
IL-4 and IL-13 share approximately 30% sequence homology [
23] and both interact with cell surface receptors containing the ‘IL-4RA’ subunit. In the case of IL-4, this subunit is complexed with the common γ-chain to form the functional receptor, whereas in the IL-13 receptor, IL-4RA interacts with IL-13Rα1 [
24]. All of these components are expressed in human islets and on clonal beta cell lines [
25,
26]. Upon binding of their cognate cytokines, each receptor promotes the auto-phosphorylation of associated Janus kinases (JAKs), leading to a cascade of events culminating in the recruitment and phosphorylation of the transcription factor, signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6). In response, STAT6 monomers dimerise and translocate to the nucleus where they bind to consensus sequences in genomic DNA to promote the transcription of target genes [
27]. Previous studies have confirmed that IL-13 treatment induces a robust and early phosphorylation of STAT6 in the beta cell, in a JAK-dependent manner, demonstrating that this pathway is operational in these cells [
20].
Despite this evidence, the mechanisms involved in promoting beta cell viability in response to STAT6 activation are unclear and it is not known whether this pathway is altered during the autoimmune attack associated with type 1 diabetes. Therefore, to address these issues, we have disrupted STAT6 signalling specifically in clonal beta cells and studied its effects on the actions of IL-4 and IL-13.
Overexpression of SIRPα
SIRPα was overexpressed in INS-1E cells using a pCMV6 vector containing the SIRPΑ coding sequence (Origene, Rockville, MD, USA). Transfection of this construct or an empty vector was performed using Lipofectamine LTX reagent (Invitrogen) 24 h prior to each experiment. Transfection was confirmed by western blotting and/or qRT-PCR.
Discussion
We show that activation of STAT6 plays an important role in maintaining the viability of pancreatic beta cells by promoting the transcription of a variety of anti-apoptotic target genes. Moreover, we reveal that the expression of STAT6 is significantly diminished in the beta cells of individuals with type 1 diabetes and propose that this is likely to enhance their susceptibility to the actions of proinflammatory cytokines during disease progression. We further show that depletion of STAT6 occurs in vitro when islet cells are exposed to proinflammatory cytokines or the saturated fatty acid palmitate (Fig.
7), suggesting that its loss may be consequent to the development of beta cell stress. Hence, our studies place STAT6 as a central component of the regulatory network controlling beta cell viability.
These conclusions arise from an analysis of the signalling pathways activated by two anti-inflammatory cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, which culminate in STAT6 activation in beta cells. We confirm that both cytokines can protect beta cells against the cytotoxic effects of serum deprivation (used as a surrogate for growth factor withdrawal) and the presence of either proinflammatory cytokines [
20‐
22,
25] or palmitate (Fig.
2), thereby suggesting that they are likely to be important in the context of the inflammatory milieu associated with diabetes. Although their precise origins during islet inflammation are uncertain, IL-13 and/or IL-4 may be released by specific subsets of immune cells recruited to islets during the process of insulitis. Additionally, the islet cells themselves are a potential source since IL-13 gene expression has been detected in human islets [
36]. Irrespective of the endogenous sources, however, the cytoprotective effects achieved upon exogenous addition of IL-13 or IL-4 to beta cells were prevented by knockdown of STAT6, consistent with the view that a functional STAT6 pathway is required to mediate protection.
This conclusion differs from that reached recently by Rutti et al [
21], who argued that the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3K)–Akt pathway may be of specific importance in mediating the cytoprotective effects of IL-13 in primary human beta cells. In considering these differences, we accept that it is entirely possible that multiple pathways are involved in the response but also note that the PI-3K inhibitor, wortmannin, failed to influence the cytoprotective response to IL-13 in rodent beta cells [
20].
When investigating the time course over which IL-13 exerts its effects in beta cells, it was observed that tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT6 occurs as an early event but that full cytoprotection required a much longer period of incubation with IL-13. This is consistent with the accepted model in which phosphorylation of STAT6 is followed by its translocation to the nucleus and the subsequent transcription of specific target genes [
27]. Accordingly, we sought to identify potential candidate genes and noted that, among a range of target molecules, two well-known anti-apoptotic genes,
MCL1 and
BCL2L1, were markedly increased under conditions of STAT6 activation. This was confirmed at the protein level, thereby placing these gene products as being of potential importance in mediating the cytoprotective response to cytokines acting via STAT6. Both proteins are well described as anti-apoptotic molecules in the context of the beta cell [
37‐
40] and the present data demonstrating a loss of STAT6 from beta cells in type 1 diabetes implies that anti-apoptotic responses could be downregulated under these conditions. Consistent with this, we have shown previously that MCL-1 levels are reduced in certain beta cells in the islets of people with type 1 diabetes [
41] and it is worth noting that MCL-1 was also downregulated following the treatment of INS-1E cells with proinflammatory cytokines [
42]. The current results imply that these effects might be contingent on STAT6 depletion.
Despite the alterations in
MCL1 and
BCL2L1, the gene which was most robustly increased in beta cells or human islets treated with IL-13 was
SIRPα. This gene encodes a protein, SIRPα (also known as SHPS-1), which is widely understood to function as a regulator of immune responses [
43] but which has received relatively little attention in beta cells. An earlier report has implicated SIRPα in the control of insulin secretion [
35] but we are not aware of any previous evidence implicating SIRPα in the control of beta cell viability or of any strong evidence for
SIRPα being a target gene for STAT6. Thus, it was important to consider the functional role of SIRPα more fully and, accordingly, interference RNA approaches were employed to deplete the expression of the molecule in beta cells. These studies revealed that knockdown of SIRPα led to a loss of the cytoprotective actions of IL-4 and IL-13 and that depletion of SIRPα also caused a net reduction in beta cell viability under non-stimulating conditions. On this basis, we propose that SIRPα may function as a previously unrecognised regulator of beta cell viability and that increases in SIRPα, mediated by activation of STAT6, represent one important component of the downstream effector pathway by which IL-13 and/or IL-4 promote beta cell cytoprotection. The present work does not reveal the molecular pathways by which SIRPα achieves these effects but we note that beta cells also express abundant levels of its cognate binding partner, CD47 (K. A. Leslie, M. A. Russell and N. G. Morgan [principal investigator]; unpublished observations), implying that a functional signalling complex might be formed in these cells.
Interestingly, despite the loss of viability seen in the absence of a cytotoxic stimulus when SIRPα was knocked down, a similar effect was not observed upon depletion of STAT6. Rather, under these conditions, the basal viability of the cells was unaffected. These results suggest that STAT6 is unlikely to be involved in driving the constitutive expression of SIRPα in beta cells but imply that it is required to mediate the increase in expression seen upon exposure of cells to IL-13 or IL-4. Given that this then enhances the propensity of the cells to resist the effects of cytotoxic insults, these results suggest that decreases in STAT6 and SIRPα could contribute to beta cell demise during the progression of type 1 diabetes in susceptible individuals.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.