nach oben

Current Urology Reports

Erschienen in:

28.02.2024

The Use of Uroflowmetry as a Diagnostic Test

verfasst von: Sanjay Sinha

Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports | Ausgabe 5/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Uroflowmetry is widely used for initial non-invasive evaluation of lower urinary tract disorders. Current clinical use is mostly restricted to a scrutiny of the maximum flow rate and uroflow pattern recorded by a conventional flowmeter in a health care facility. There are several advancements in our understanding and in available technologies that promise to transform clinical utilization of this simple test.

Recent Findings

Several aspects of the uroflow test in addition to maximum flow rate and uroflow pattern show potential diagnostic utility. This includes flow acceleration, uroflow indices, uroflow-electromyography including lag time, stop uroflow test, and uroflow-based nomograms. There are initial attempts to use artificial intelligence in analysis. There is also new data with regard to factors influencing variability of uroflow testing that might influence the diagnostic value in as yet uncertain ways including diurnal variability, postural variability, locational variability, and operator variability. There are new technologies for uroflow testing in a home environment allowing for easy repetition. However, there are several challenges owing to a paucity of clinical data and standardization. There are also critical lacunae in terminology that need to be addressed.

Summary

There are exciting new advancements in the field of uroflowmetry. However, there is need to standardize and validate the newer uroflow tracing analyses and technologies.

de Wachter S, Abranches-Monteiro L, Gammie A, Hashim H, Nitti V, Rosier P, Sinha S, Tarcan T, Toozs-Hobson P, Wen JG. Urodynamic testing. In: Cardozo L, Rovner E, Wagg A, Wein A, Abrams P, editors. Incontinence. 7th ed. Bristol, UK: ICUD ICS; 2023. p. 487–550.

Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Das AK, et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline Part I-Initial work-up and medical management. J Urol. 2021;206(4):806–17.PubMedCrossRef

Harding CK, Lapitan MC, Arlandis S, Bo K, Costantini E, Groen J, Nambiar AK, Omar MI, Phe V. Non-neurogenic female LUTS. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2023 [cited 2023 Jan 5]. Available from https://uroweb.org/guideline/non-neurogenic-female-luts.

Cornu JN, Gacci M, Hashim H, Herrmann TRW, Malde S, Netsch C, Rieken M, Sakalis V, Tutolo M. Non-neurogenic male LUTS. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 12]. Available from https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/.

Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261–74.PubMedCrossRef

•• Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Lane JA, Lewis AL, Abrams P, Blair PS, et al. Prostate surgery for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: Do we need urodynamics to find the right candidates? Exploratory findings from the UPSTREAM trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1331–9. Secondary analysis of a large randomized trial comparing the outcome of prostate surgery in men offered routine care versus urodynamics-based evaluation. This analysis showed that regardless of evaluation pathway, uroflow was an important predictor of outcome.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ. Non-invasive testing and its role in diagnosis and management of children with voiding dysfunction. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2018;13(2):56–65.CrossRef

• Ben Muvhar R, Wagmaister J, Mekayten M. Navigating the diagnostic maze: unraveling the non-invasive evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction in men—A comprehensive systematic review. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2023;18(4):318–32. Systematic review of all non-invasive evaluation for assessing bladder outlet obstruction in men including uroflowmetry with comments on flow rate, flow pattern and volume correction.CrossRef

Ito H, Sakamaki K, Young GJ, Blair PS, Hashim H, Lane JA, et al. Predicting prostate surgery outcomes from standard clinical assessments of lower urinary tract symptoms to derive prognostic symptom and flowmetry criteria. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;S2405–4569(23):00154–62.

10.

Escobar C, Brucker B. Urodynamics for the “failed” midurethral sling. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2020;15(4):245–58.CrossRef

11.

Sinha S, Agarwal MM, Vasudeva P, Khattar N, Madduri VKS, Yande S, et al. The urological Society of India Guidelines for the evaluation and management of nonneurogenic urinary incontinence in adults (executive summary). Indian J Urol. 2019;35(3):185–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

12.

•• Tarcan T, Acar O, Agarwal MM, Rubilotta E, De Nunzio C, Rosier P. ICS educational module: The practice of uroflowmetry in adults. Continence. 2024;9:101065. An educational module from the International Continence Society on uroflowmetry with comments on technique, quality check, interpretation, and reporting based on a systematic review and expert consensus.CrossRef

13.

Bauer SB, Nijman RJM, Drzewiecki BA, Sillen U, Hoebeke P, International Children’s Continence Society Standardization Subcommittee. International Children’s Continence Society standardization report on urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(7):640–7.PubMedCrossRef

14.

ICS Glossary [Internet]. ICS. [cited 2022 Sep 26]. Available from https://www.ics.org/glossary.

15.

Wada N, Watanabe M, Ishikawa M, Takeuchi K, Miyauchi K, Abe N, et al. Uroflowmetry pattern in detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021;13(3):361–5.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Netto JMB, Hittelman A, Lambert S, Murphy K, Collette-Gardere T, Franco I. Interpretation of uroflow curves: A global survey measuring inter and intra rater reliability. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):826–32.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Martonosi ÁR, Pázmány P, Kiss S, Földi M, Zsákai A, Szabó L. Urine flow acceleration in healthy children: A retrospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(2):463–71.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Karasu AFG, Aydın S, Kalkan S, Ersoz C. Association of intrinsic sphincter deficiency with urine flow acceleration measurement. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021;13(1):154–9.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Futyma K, Nowakowski Ł, Bogusiewicz M, Ziętek A, Wieczorek AP, Rechberger T. Use of uroflow parameters in diagnosing an overactive bladder-back to the drawing board. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(1):198–202.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Franco I, Franco J, Lee YS, Choi EK, Han SW. Can a quantitative means be used to predict flow patterns: Agreement between visual inspection vs flow index derived flow patterns. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):218.e1–8.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Ha JS, Lee YS, Han SW, Kim SW. The relationship among flow index, uroflowmetry curve shape, and EMG lag time in children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(5):1387–93.PubMedCrossRef

22.

• Van Batavia JP, Pohl HG, Farhat WA, Chiang G, BaniHani A, Collett-Gardere T, et al. Is it time to reconsider how we document pediatric uroflow studies?: A study from the SPU Voiding Dysfunction task force. J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(5):546–54. Study from the Society of Pediatric Urology Voiding Dysfunction task force showing the limitations of using flow pattern.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Sinha S. Dysfunctional voiding: a review of the terminology, presentation, evaluation and management in children and adults. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(4):437–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

24.

Sharifi-Rad L, Ladi-Seyedian S-S, Amirzargar H, Kajbafzadeh A-M. Pelvic floor electromyography and urine flow patterns in children with vesicoureteral reflux and lower urinary tract symptoms. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44(6):1207–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

25.

Rosier PFWM, Gammie A, Valdevenito JP, Speich J, Smith P, Sinha S, et al. ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 2: Analysis of PFS, reporting, and diagnosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25187.CrossRefPubMed

26.

El-Hakim A, Al-Hathal N, Al-Qaoud T, Gagné G, Larocque S, Denis R, et al. Novel uroflow stop test at time of catheter removal is a strong predictor of early urinary continence recovery following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(1):60–4.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Alenizi AM, Bienz M, Rajih E, Alesawi A, Al-Hathal N, Benayoun S, et al. Uroflow stop test and potency recovery: A surrogate for pelvic floor integrity post robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? Urology. 2015;86(4):766–71.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Boni A, Gervasoni F, Lomauro A, Del Zingaro M, Maiolino G, Galletti C, et al. Urologic latency time during uroflow stop test with electromyography: An incontinence detector in rehabilitation after robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;59(1):94–102.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Shinohara M, Torimoto K, Matsushita C, Gotoh D, Yoshida H, Saka T, et al. A new nomogram of urinary flow rate and volume based on multiple measurements per healthy adult Japanese men using a portable uroflowmeter (P-Flowdiary^®). BMC Urol. 2022;22(1):130.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Szmydki D, Burzynski B, Soltysiak-Gibala Z, Przymuszala P, Trzewik M, Chudek J, et al. Prediction of detrusor underactivity based on non-invasive functional tests and clinical data in patients with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(21):10992–8.PubMed

31.

Matsukawa Y, Kameya Y, Takahashi T, Shimazu A, Ishida S, Yamada M, et al. Characteristics of uroflowmetry patterns in men with detrusor underactivity revealed by artificial intelligence. Int J Urol. 2023;30(10):907–12.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Spyropoulos E, Galanakis I, Deligiannis D, Spyropoulou A, Kotsiris D, Panagopoulos A, et al. Flow resistive forces index (QRF): Development and clinical applicability assessment of a novel measure of bladder outlet resistance, aiming to enhance the diagnostic performance of uroflowmetry. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020;12(3):190–7.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Yoshiyama A, Tsujimura A, Hiramatsu I, Morino J, Anno Y, Kurosawa M, et al. Circadian rhythm of voided volume, maximum flow rate, and voiding time evaluated by toilet uroflowmetry in hospitalized women with nocturia. Urology. 2023;179:50–7.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Hiramatsu I, Tsujimura A, Miyoshi M, Ogasa T, Miyoshi Y, Ishikawa K, et al. Maximum flow rate is lowest in the early morning in hospitalized men with nocturia evaluated over 24 hours by toilet uroflowmetry. Urology. 2022;166:196–201.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Kato S, Watanabe H, Yamasue K. Freeflow: The novel portable uroflowmeter can help to realize practical urinary conditions at home. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022;14(3):208–13.PubMedCrossRef

36.

•• Lee HJ, Aslim EJ, Balamurali BT, Ng LYS, Kuo TLC, Lin CMY, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning system for sound-based prediction of urinary flow. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(1):209–15. Study of audio analysis of the uroflow pattern with use of machine deep learning to develop a smartphone-based test that can identify abnormal and normal flow based on audioflow analysis.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Pandolfo SD, Crauso F, Aveta A, Cilio S, Barone B, Napolitano L, et al. A novel low-cost uroflowmetry for patient telemonitoring. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3287.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

38.

Gallo GA, Cabral Dias Filho A, Cruz PR, Moraes CF. Development and construction of an open-platform, open-source low-cost portable uroflowmeter: The OpenFlow device. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(1):153–60.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Rosier PFWM, Valdevenito JP, Smith P, Sinha S, Speich J, Gammie A. ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting, Part 1: Background theory and practice. Continence. 2023;100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cont.2023.100710.

40.

Bladt L, Kashtiara A, Platteau W, De Wachter S, De Win G. First-year experience of managing urology patients with home uroflowmetry: Descriptive retrospective analysis. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:e51019.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

41.

Long Depaquit T, Michel F, Gaillet S, Savoie P-H, Karsenty G. Home uroflowmetry technics and clinical relevance: A narrative review. Prog Urol. 2022;32(17):1531–42.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Namiri NK, Cheema B, Lui H, Enriquez A, Rios N, Srirangapatanam S, et al. Characterizing voiding experiences of men choosing seated and standing positions. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(8):2509–19.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Alrabadi A, Al Demour S, Mansi H, AlHamss S, Al OL. Evaluation of voiding position on uroflowmetry parameters and post void residual urine in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and healthy men. Am J Mens Health. 2020;14(4):1557988320938969.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

44.

Dönmez Mİ, Özkent MS, Hamarat MB, Kocalar M. Through the zipper or pants down: Does it change uroflowmetry parameters in healthy males? Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022;14(5):341–5.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Dogan S. Comparison of self-conducted and assistant-supervised uroflowmetry methods. Cureus. 2022;14(2):e22030.PubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Jin J, Chung Y, Kim W, Heo Y, Jeon J, Hoh J, et al. Classification of bladder emptying patterns by LSTM neural network trained using acoustic signatures. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(16):5328.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Schultz RE. Smartphone app for in-home uroflowmetry. Urol Pract. 2022;9(6):524–30.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Qi Y, Kong H, Kim Y. Estimation of urine flow velocity using millimeter-wave FMCW radar. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(23):9402.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

49.

Han JH, Lee JH, Jun J, Park MU, Lee JS, Park S, et al. Validity and reliability of a home-based, guardian-conducted video voiding test for voiding evaluation after hypospadias surgery. Investig Clin Urol. 2020;61(4):425–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Rogel R, Lorenzo L, Avargues A, Lujan S, Broseta E, Arlandis S. ANalogical UroFlowmetry (ANUF): Correspondence between this new visual pictogram and uroflowmetry in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: A new approach for the study of male micturition dynamics. Urology. 2020;146:236–41.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: The Use of Uroflowmetry as a Diagnostic Test
verfasst von: Sanjay Sinha
Publikationsdatum: 28.02.2024
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Urology Reports / Ausgabe 5/2024
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-024-01200-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Stufenschema weist Prostatakarzinom zuverlässig nach

22.04.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Erst PSA-Test, dann Kallikrein-Score, schließlich MRT und Biopsie – ein vierstufiges Screening-Schema kann die Zahl der unnötigen Prostatabiopsien erheblich reduzieren: Die Hälfte der Männer, die in einer finnischen Studie eine Biopsie benötigten, hatte einen hochgradigen Tumor.

Harnwegsinfektprophylaxe: Es geht auch ohne Antibiotika

20.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Beim chronischen Harnwegsinfekt bei Frauen wird bisher meist eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe eingesetzt. Angesichts der zunehmenden Antibiotikaresistenz erweist sich das Antiseptikum Methenamin-Hippurat als vielversprechende Alternative, so die Auswertung einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen