We present a case of a 14 year old Caucasian male who underwent initially successful endovascular repair of a traumatic injury to the descending thoracic aorta. The patient had undiagnosed Factor V Leiden at the time of the endovascular repair. He later presented with thrombosis of the endovascular stent graft, necessitating open removal of the stent graft and replacement of the involved aorta with a Dacron graft.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1749-8090-9-47) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
GK drafted the manuscript and developed the concept. AP participated in its design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Abkürzungen
ISS
Injury severity scale
CT
Computed tomography
GCS
Glasgow coma scale
SBP
Systolic blood pressure
ABI
Ankle brachial index.
Background
Endovascular repair for traumatic injury of the descending thoracic aorta is associated with reduced morbidity compared to open repair. As many of the patients undergoing endovascular repair for traumatic aortic disruption are younger, the long term results of endovascular repair in this patient population are unknown. We present a case of a young male who underwent initially successful endovascular repair of a traumatic injury to the descending thoracic aorta. The patient had undiagnosed Factor V Leiden at the time of his endovascular repair. He later presented with thrombosis of the stent graft, necessitating open removal of the stent graft and aortic replacement.
Case presentation
A 14 year old Caucasian male presented after a motor vehicle collision with bilateral rib fractures, pulmonary contusions, a liver laceration, a splenic laceration, a femur fracture, and traumatic disruption of the proximal descending thoracic aorta (Figure 1), with ISS of 29. The patient was neurologically intact (GCS 15) and hemodynamically stable (pulse 90, SBP 100 mmHg) without need for transfusion. He underwent endovascular repair of the thoracic aortic injury 1 day after admission.
×
Anzeige
Preoperative imaging demonstrated the proximal and distal aortic diameters to be 16 mm and 14 mm, respectively. Endovascular repair was performed using two overlapping iliac limb devices (Medtronic Endurant 20 mm x 80 mm proximally and Medtronic AneuRx 20 mm x 57 mm as the distal extension) in an off-label indication. The procedure was technically uneventful and post-procedure imaging demonstrated exclusion of the traumatic injury (Figures 2 and3). He recovered from the other injuries and was discharged to home after a 10 day hospital stay without complications.
×
×
At scheduled follow-up imaging one year later, the CT scan of the thoracic aorta demonstrated non-occlusive intra-luminal thrombus in the distal portion of the endovascular stent graft (Figure 4). There was no thrombus in the native aorta. As part of an evaluation for a hypercoagulable disorder, the patient was diagnosed with Factor V Leiden and placed on oral anticoagulation with warfarin with intention to monitor the thrombus with CT imaging. Follow-up CT imaging demonstrated stable intragraft thrombus.
×
Two years after initial repair, the patient, now 16 years old, stopped his oral anticoagulation after consultation with primary care doctor in order to play competitive sports. Two months after stopping his anticoagulation, he developed progressive lower extremity claudication, which progressed to ischemic rest pain. Examination demonstrated new upper extremity hypertension (brachial SBP 150 mmHg) without palpable pulses in the lower extremities (ankle pressure 68 mmHg, ABI 0.44). A CT scan of the thoracic aorta demonstrated new occlusive thrombus within the distal portion of the stent graft, without any thrombus in the native aorta (Figure 5).
×
Following a 5 day period of systemic anticoagulation with heparin, the patient did not improve. Therefore, given the presence of severe aortic obstruction due to organized thrombus, we performed open repair via a left thoracotomy. Using distal aortic perfusion, the aorta was cross-clamped between the innominate and left common carotid arteries, and the endograft was removed. The aorta was replaced with a 20 mm Dacron graft from the distal aortic arch, incorporating the origin of the left subclavian artery, to the mid descending aorta. The explanted endovascular stent graft demonstrated solid, organized thrombus in the distal portion with less organized thrombotic material proximally (Figure 6).
×
Anzeige
Following open repair, the patient had a normal postoperative recovery. The difference in the blood pressures between the upper and lower extremities resolved (brachial SBP 140 mmHg, ankle SBP 150 mmHg, ABI 1.1). The postoperative CT scan demonstrated a normal appearance to the Dacron graft without evidence of thrombus (Figure 7). The patient has been maintained on oral anticoagulation therapy since this surgery, with planned long term anticoagulation therapy. At latest follow up (6 months), the patient is doing well.
×
Conclusions
Compared to open repair, endovascular repair has reduced early morbidity for repair of traumatic injury to the descending thoracic aorta. Many of the patients who present with traumatic injury to the descending thoracic aorta are younger patients with normal aortic dimensions. In order to avoid the use of oversized aortic endograft devices, iliac limb endovascular devices with smaller sizes than aortic endovascular grafts are sometimes used in this patient population to achieve a better size match[1, 2]. Given the younger age of this patient population, the development of late prosthesis related complications must always be considered.
In-situ thrombosis of thoracic aortic endovascular stent grafts has been described, and has been postulated to be related to infolding or collapse of the endograft[3, 4]. Asymptomatic non-occlusive mural thrombus has also been reported within endovascular stent grafts following repair of traumatic aortic disruption[5]. In this case, the role of mechanical flow obstruction in the aorta is unclear given the full graft expansion noted on the initial post procedure imaging.
The Factor V Leiden mutation is a single point mutation in the Factor V gene, which results in a reduced ability of activated protein C to degrade activated Factor V[6, 7]. Factor V Leiden is a prothrombotic risk factor, and is associated with an increased incidence of venous thromboembolism, especially when combined with other risk factors for venous thrombosis. The risk of arterial thrombosis is less well defined. Anticoagulation with warfarin is indicated following thrombotic episodes, but the role of prophylactic anticoagulation in the absence of other risk factors is undefined[7].
In this case, the unrecognized hypercoagulable state resulted in the serious complication of occlusive thrombosis of the endovascular stent graft. Consistent, long term therapeutic anticoagulation may help prevent this complication.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legal guardian for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
GK drafted the manuscript and developed the concept. AP participated in its design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.
Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.
Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.
Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.
Update Chirurgie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletterund bleiben Sie gut informiert.
Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.
Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.