Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Health Care Analysis 2/2015

01.06.2015 | Original Article

To Transfer or Not to Transfer: The Case of Comprehensive Chromosome Screening of the In Vitro Embryo

verfasst von: Kristien Hens

Erschienen in: Health Care Analysis | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The screening of in vitro embryos resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment for chromosomal abnormalities (aneuploidies) has as a primary aim to help patients achieve a successful pregnancy. Most IVF centers will not transfer aneuploid embryos, as they have an enhanced risk of leading to implantation failure and miscarriage. However, some aneuploidies, such as trisomy-21, can lead to viable pregnancies and to children with a variable health prognosis, and some prospective parents may request transfer of such embryos. I present two cases where the testing for and detection of trisomy-21 can lead to conflicts between IVF professionals and patients and argue that in most such cases respect for choices of patients should prevail.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat de Wert, G. (1999). Ethics of assisted reproduction. In B. C. J. M. Fauser (Ed.), Molecular biology in reproductive medicine (pp. 433–448). New York: Parthenon. de Wert, G. (1999). Ethics of assisted reproduction. In B. C. J. M. Fauser (Ed.), Molecular biology in reproductive medicine (pp. 433–448). New York: Parthenon.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Draper, H., & Chadwick, R. (1999). Beware! Preimplantation genetic diagnosis may solve some old problems but it also raises new ones. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25, 114–120.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Draper, H., & Chadwick, R. (1999). Beware! Preimplantation genetic diagnosis may solve some old problems but it also raises new ones. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25, 114–120.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gavaghan, C. (2007). Defending the genetic supermarket: Law and ethics of selecting the next generation. London: Routledge-Cavendish. Gavaghan, C. (2007). Defending the genetic supermarket: Law and ethics of selecting the next generation. London: Routledge-Cavendish.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hens, K., Dondorp, W., Handyside, A. H., Harper, J., Newson, A. J., Pennings, G., et al. (2013). Dynamics and ethics of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing: A review of the challenges. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 366–375. Hens, K., Dondorp, W., Handyside, A. H., Harper, J., Newson, A. J., Pennings, G., et al. (2013). Dynamics and ethics of comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing: A review of the challenges. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 366–375.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hens, K., Dondorp, W. J., Geraedts, J. P., & de Wert, G. M. (2013). Comprehensive embryo testing. Experts’ opinions regarding future directions: An expert panel study on comprehensive embryo testing. Human Reproduction, 28, 1418–1425.CrossRefPubMed Hens, K., Dondorp, W. J., Geraedts, J. P., & de Wert, G. M. (2013). Comprehensive embryo testing. Experts’ opinions regarding future directions: An expert panel study on comprehensive embryo testing. Human Reproduction, 28, 1418–1425.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Morris, J. K., Wald, N. J., & Watt, H. C. (1999). Fetal loss in Down syndrome pregnancies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 19, 142–145.CrossRefPubMed Morris, J. K., Wald, N. J., & Watt, H. C. (1999). Fetal loss in Down syndrome pregnancies. Prenatal Diagnosis, 19, 142–145.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings, G., & de Wert, G. (2003). Evolving ethics in medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction Update, 9, 397–404.CrossRefPubMed Pennings, G., & de Wert, G. (2003). Evolving ethics in medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction Update, 9, 397–404.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Pennings, G., de Wert, G., Shenfield, F., Cohen, J., Tarlatzis, B., & Devroey, P. (2007). ESHRE task force on ethics and law 13: The welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction, 22, 2585–2588.CrossRefPubMed Pennings, G., de Wert, G., Shenfield, F., Cohen, J., Tarlatzis, B., & Devroey, P. (2007). ESHRE task force on ethics and law 13: The welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction, 22, 2585–2588.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pieters, J. J., Kooper, A. J., van Kessel, A. G., Braat, D. D., & Smits, A. P. (2011). Incidental prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies: Health, behavior, and fertility. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011, 807106.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Pieters, J. J., Kooper, A. J., van Kessel, A. G., Braat, D. D., & Smits, A. P. (2011). Incidental prenatal diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidies: Health, behavior, and fertility. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011, 807106.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Robertson, J. A. (1996). Children of choice. Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Robertson, J. A. (1996). Children of choice. Freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Roizen, N. J., & Patterson, D. (2003). Down’s syndrome. The Lancet, 361, 1281–1289.CrossRef Roizen, N. J., & Patterson, D. (2003). Down’s syndrome. The Lancet, 361, 1281–1289.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15, 413–426.CrossRefPubMed Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15, 413–426.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Savulescu, J., & Kahane, G. (2009). The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics, 23, 274–290.CrossRefPubMed Savulescu, J., & Kahane, G. (2009). The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics, 23, 274–290.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Skotko, B. G., & Levine, S. P. (2006). What the other children are thinking: Brothers and sisters of persons with Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C, 180–186.CrossRefPubMed Skotko, B. G., & Levine, S. P. (2006). What the other children are thinking: Brothers and sisters of persons with Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics, 142C, 180–186.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Skotko, B. G., Levine, S. P., & Goldstein, R. (2011). Having a son or daughter with Down syndrome: Perspectives from mothers and fathers. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155A, 2335–2347.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Skotko, B. G., Levine, S. P., & Goldstein, R. (2011). Having a son or daughter with Down syndrome: Perspectives from mothers and fathers. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155A, 2335–2347.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Skotko, B. G., Levine, S. P., & Goldstein, R. (2011). Self-perceptions from people with Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155A, 2360–2369.CrossRefPubMed Skotko, B. G., Levine, S. P., & Goldstein, R. (2011). Self-perceptions from people with Down syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 155A, 2360–2369.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sybert, V. P., & McCauley, E. (2004). Turner’s syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 1227–1238.CrossRefPubMed Sybert, V. P., & McCauley, E. (2004). Turner’s syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 351, 1227–1238.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
To Transfer or Not to Transfer: The Case of Comprehensive Chromosome Screening of the In Vitro Embryo
verfasst von
Kristien Hens
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Health Care Analysis / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1065-3058
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3394
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-013-0259-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Health Care Analysis 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe