Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Urban Health 3/2014

01.06.2014

Towards the Estimation of Effect Measures in Studies Using Respondent-Driven Sampling

verfasst von: Michael A. Rotondi

Erschienen in: Journal of Urban Health | Ausgabe 3/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is an increasingly common sampling technique to recruit hidden populations. Statistical methods for RDS are not straightforward due to the correlation between individual outcomes and subject weighting; thus, analyses are typically limited to estimation of population proportions. This manuscript applies the method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER) to construct confidence intervals for effect measures such as risk difference (difference of proportions) or relative risk in studies using RDS. To illustrate the approach, MOVER is used to construct confidence intervals for differences in the prevalence of demographic characteristics between an RDS study and convenience study of injection drug users. MOVER is then applied to obtain a confidence interval for the relative risk between education levels and HIV seropositivity and current infection with syphilis, respectively. This approach provides a simple method to construct confidence intervals for effect measures in RDS studies. Since it only relies on a proportion and appropriate confidence limits, it can also be applied to previously published manuscripts.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997; 44: 174–199.CrossRef Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997; 44: 174–199.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002; 49: 11–34.CrossRef Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002; 49: 11–34.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramirez-Valles J, Garcia D, Campbell RT, et al. HIV infection, sexual risk behavior, and substance use among latino gay and bisexual men and transgender persons. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1036–1042.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ramirez-Valles J, Garcia D, Campbell RT, et al. HIV infection, sexual risk behavior, and substance use among latino gay and bisexual men and transgender persons. Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1036–1042.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotondi NK, Bauer GR, Scanlon K, et al. Prevalence of and risk and protective factors for depression in female-to-male transgender Ontarians: trans PULSE Project. Can J Commun Mental Health. 2011; 30: 135–155. Rotondi NK, Bauer GR, Scanlon K, et al. Prevalence of and risk and protective factors for depression in female-to-male transgender Ontarians: trans PULSE Project. Can J Commun Mental Health. 2011; 30: 135–155.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Heckathorn DD, Semaan S, Broadhead RS, et al. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of injection drug users aged 18–25. AIDS Behav. 2002; 6: 55–67.CrossRef Heckathorn DD, Semaan S, Broadhead RS, et al. Extensions of respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of injection drug users aged 18–25. AIDS Behav. 2002; 6: 55–67.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Heckathorn DD, Jeffri J. Finding the beat: using respondent-driven sampling to study jazz musicians. Poetics. 2001; 28: 307–329.CrossRef Heckathorn DD, Jeffri J. Finding the beat: using respondent-driven sampling to study jazz musicians. Poetics. 2001; 28: 307–329.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Volz E, Wejnert C, Cameron C, et al. Respondent-driven sampling analysis tool (RDSAT) version 7.1. Ithaca: Cornell University; 2012. Volz E, Wejnert C, Cameron C, et al. Respondent-driven sampling analysis tool (RDSAT) version 7.1. Ithaca: Cornell University; 2012.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Zou GY. On the estimation of additive interaction by use of the four-by-two table and beyond. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168: 212–224.PubMedCrossRef Zou GY. On the estimation of additive interaction by use of the four-by-two table and beyond. Am J Epidemiol. 2008; 168: 212–224.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Donner A, Zou GY. Closed-form confidence intervals for functions of the normal mean and standard deviation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012; 21: 347–359.PubMedCrossRef Donner A, Zou GY. Closed-form confidence intervals for functions of the normal mean and standard deviation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2012; 21: 347–359.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Zou GY, Donner A. Construction of confidence limits about effect measures: a general approach. Stat Med. 2008; 27: 1693–1702.PubMedCrossRef Zou GY, Donner A. Construction of confidence limits about effect measures: a general approach. Stat Med. 2008; 27: 1693–1702.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Newcombe RG. Propagating imprecision: combining confidence intervals from independent sources. Commun Stat A-Theor. 2011; 40: 3154–3180.CrossRef Newcombe RG. Propagating imprecision: combining confidence intervals from independent sources. Commun Stat A-Theor. 2011; 40: 3154–3180.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schenker N, Gentleman JF. On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. Am Stat. 2001; 55: 182–186.CrossRef Schenker N, Gentleman JF. On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. Am Stat. 2001; 55: 182–186.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Salganik MJ. Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. J Urban Health. 2006; 83: 98–112.PubMedCentralCrossRef Salganik MJ. Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling. J Urban Health. 2006; 83: 98–112.PubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kral AH, Malekinejad M, Vaudrey J, et al. Comparing respondent-driven sampling and targeted sampling methods of recruiting injection drug users in San Francisco. J Urban Health. 2010; 87: 839–850.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kral AH, Malekinejad M, Vaudrey J, et al. Comparing respondent-driven sampling and targeted sampling methods of recruiting injection drug users in San Francisco. J Urban Health. 2010; 87: 839–850.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong F, Lin P, Xu H, et al. Possible increase in HIV and syphilis prevalence among men who have sex with men in Guangzhou, China: results from a respondent-driven sampling survey. AIDS Behav. 2011; 15: 1058–1066.PubMedCrossRef Zhong F, Lin P, Xu H, et al. Possible increase in HIV and syphilis prevalence among men who have sex with men in Guangzhou, China: results from a respondent-driven sampling survey. AIDS Behav. 2011; 15: 1058–1066.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wejnert C, Pham H, Krishna N, et al. Estimating design effect and calculating sample size for respondent-driven sampling studies of injection drug users in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2012; 16: 797–806.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Wejnert C, Pham H, Krishna N, et al. Estimating design effect and calculating sample size for respondent-driven sampling studies of injection drug users in the United States. AIDS Behav. 2012; 16: 797–806.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2008. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2008.
Metadaten
Titel
Towards the Estimation of Effect Measures in Studies Using Respondent-Driven Sampling
verfasst von
Michael A. Rotondi
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Urban Health / Ausgabe 3/2014
Print ISSN: 1099-3460
Elektronische ISSN: 1468-2869
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9836-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2014

Journal of Urban Health 3/2014 Zur Ausgabe