Introduction
P300 Amplitude and Behavior
Delta/Theta Activity
-
Hypothesis 1: P300 amplitude modulation. When comparing two ADHD patient groups receiving either delta/theta tACS or sham stimulation, patients in the stimulation group will show an increase in P300 amplitude pre-to-post stimulation while patients in the sham group will not show the same effect.
-
Hypothesis 2: behavioral effects. Along with the hypothesized increase of P300 amplitude, we hypothesize that tACS will induce a reduction of ADHD-related cognitive performance deficits, i.e. a decrease in mean reaction time and of reaction time variability as well as in omission and commission type error rates.
Materials and Methods
General Study Design and Equipment
Study Sample
Procedure and Task
tACS Configuration and Parameters
Stimulation Timing
Electrode Montage
Data Analysis
Online Analysis
Offline Analysis
Outcome Variables
-
P300 amplitude and latency: P300 amplitude was defined as the maximum value [µV] of the averaged ERP waveform at Pz electrode in 300 to 600 ms time window after stimulus onset per condition and patient. P300 latency was its corresponding time point relative to stimulus onset [ms].
-
Reaction time mean (RT-M) and reaction time variability (RT-V): reaction time (RT) was calculated based on EEG triggers, by subtracting the latencies of button presses and respective target stimulus onset. Means and standard deviations over trials were computed, serving as measures of RT-M and RT-V, respectively. Trials in which RT was longer than 1000 ms or less than 200 ms were judged invalid and were excluded from all analyses.
-
Errors: two types of errors were investigated. All targets that were not followed by any button press were considered omission errors. Omission error trials were naturally excluded from reaction time analysis (mean number of trials: pre: 88.39 ± 7.37, during: 106.72 ± 17.75, post: 101.00 ± 6.49), while remaining in the EEG data analyses including P300 amplitude and latency estimation (mean number of trials: pre: 91.50 ± 0.71, post: 103.94 ± 0.24; see discussion in the Online Resource). A button press in response to a standard stimulus was classified as false alarm or commission error.
Testing Hypothesis 1: P300 Amplitude Modulation
Testing Hypothesis 2: Behavioral Effects
Testing Underlying Assumptions
P300 Amplitude and Behavior
Delta/Theta Activity
Additional Analyses
Parameter Estimation Error
Group Comparability
tACS Side-Effects
P300 Latency
Results
Findings Concerning Hypothesis 1: P300 Amplitude Modulation
Findings Concerning Hypothesis 2: Behavioral Effects
Reaction Time Mean and Variability
Error Rates
Findings Concerning Underlying Assumptions
P300 Amplitude and Behavior
P3amp Pre-to-post | RT-M Pre-to-post | RT-M Pre-to-during | RT-V Pre-to-post | RT-V Pre-to-during | Omissions Pre-to-post | Omissions Pre-to-during | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P3amp | Correlation | 1 | − 0.150 | − 0.253 | − 0.265 | − 0.457 | − 0.581* | − 0.673** |
Pre-to-post | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0 | 0.553 | 0.311 | 0.288 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.002 |
RT-M | Correlation | 1 | 0.876*** | 0.633** | 0.281 | 0.241 | 0.114 | |
Pre-to-post | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0 | 0.000 | 0.0048 | 0.257 | 0.335 | 0.651 | |
RT-M | Correlation | 1 | 0.612** | 0.482* | 0.123 | 0.026 | ||
Pre-to-during | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0 | 0.007 | 0.043 | 0.628 | 0.918 | ||
RT-V | Correlation | 1 | 0.311 | 0.139 | 0.196 | |||
Pre-to-post | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0 | 0.210 | 0.583 | 0.435 | |||
RT-V | Correlation | 1 | 0.2633 | 0.383 | ||||
Pre-to-during | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0 | 0.291 | 0.117 | ||||
Omissions | Correlation | 1 | 0.808*** | |||||
Pre-to-post | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0 | 0.000 | |||||
Omissions | Correlation | 1 | ||||||
Pre-to-during | Sig. (2-tailed) | 0 | ||||||
N | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 |