Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 2/2021

09.11.2020 | Original Contributions

Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis

verfasst von: Thomas Scarritt, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Felipe B. Maegawa, Alfonso E. Ayala, Matthew Mobily, Iman Ghaderi

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract:

Purpose:

Robotic-assisted surgery has become increasingly popular across surgical subspecialties. We aimed to analyze trends in the national utilization and outcomes in bariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods:

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP®) data for 2015-2018 was queried. We included robotic-assisted sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric band (AGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), and revisional cases. The Kruskal–Wallis test or Wilcoxon rank-sum were used for comparing continuous variables and Cochran-Armitage trend analysis for categorical variables when comparing years, or with Fisher’s Exact Test when directly comparing categories.

Results:

Of 760,076 bariatric cases performed between 2015 and 2018, 7.4% with robotic and 90.4% with laparoscopic approach. SG constituted 61.3% of robotic volume. Utilization of robotic surgery increased 1.96-fold; SG represented the most substantial increase of 2.16-fold, followed by a 1.53-fold in RYGB. The 30-day readmission and re-intervention rates decreased from 5.63% to 4.78% (p<0.01), and 2.31% to 1.46% (p<0.01), respectively. The overall leak rate improved from 0.64% to 0.39% (p=0.01). Mortality and re-operations remained statistically unchanged. When compared to laparoscopic approach, the operative time were significantly longer in the robotic group. Regarding postoperative outcomes, when adjusted for patient characteristics, there were no differences between two approaches except a higher leak rate in robotic group in 2015.

Conclusion:

A steady increase in robotic bariatric surgery is apparent. While the operative time remains significantly longer in the robotic group, trends indicate improvement in key quality metrics and patient outcomes as utilization increases.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, et al. Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care. JSLS. 2018;22(4) George EI, Brand TC, LaPorta A, et al. Origins of Robotic Surgery: From Skepticism to Standard of Care. JSLS. 2018;22(4)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Himpens JLG, Cadiere GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998; Himpens JLG, Cadiere GB. Telesurgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1998;
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2550–7.CrossRef Leal Ghezzi T, Campos Corleta O. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery. World J Surg. 2016;40(10):2550–7.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stewart CL, Ituarte PHG, Melstrom KA, et al. Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(8):2591–601.CrossRef Stewart CL, Ituarte PHG, Melstrom KA, et al. Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(8):2591–601.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayakumaran J, Patel SD, Gangrade BK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(2):97–109.CrossRef Jayakumaran J, Patel SD, Gangrade BK, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in reproductive surgery: a contemporary review. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(2):97–109.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamel MK, Villena-Vargas J, Rahouma M, et al. National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic resection of thymic tumours in the United States: a propensity matching comparison with open and video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(4):762–9.CrossRef Kamel MK, Villena-Vargas J, Rahouma M, et al. National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic resection of thymic tumours in the United States: a propensity matching comparison with open and video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(4):762–9.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Nik-Ahd F, Souders CP, Zhao H, et al. Robotic urologic surgery: trends in litigation over the last decade. J Robot Surg. 2019; Nik-Ahd F, Souders CP, Zhao H, et al. Robotic urologic surgery: trends in litigation over the last decade. J Robot Surg. 2019;
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mikhail D, Sarcona J, Mekhail M, et al. Urologic Robotic Surgery. Surgical Clinics. 2020;100(2):361–78.PubMed Mikhail D, Sarcona J, Mekhail M, et al. Urologic Robotic Surgery. Surgical Clinics. 2020;100(2):361–78.PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper MAIA, Lyu H, Makary MA. Underreporting of robotic surgery complications. J Healthc Qual. 2015;37(2):133–8.CrossRef Cooper MAIA, Lyu H, Makary MA. Underreporting of robotic surgery complications. J Healthc Qual. 2015;37(2):133–8.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Li K, Zou J, Tang J, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):3031–44.CrossRef Li K, Zou J, Tang J, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):3031–44.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures. JAMA network open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918911-. Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical Procedures. JAMA network open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918911-.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–4.CrossRef Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–4.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rausa E, Bonavina L, Asti E, et al. Rate of Death and Complications in Laparoscopic and Open Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis on 69,494 Patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1956–63.CrossRef Rausa E, Bonavina L, Asti E, et al. Rate of Death and Complications in Laparoscopic and Open Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression Analysis on 69,494 Patients. Obes Surg. 2016;26(8):1956–63.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarr ME, Brancato SJ, Cunkelman JA, et al. Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(2):234–8.CrossRef Tarr ME, Brancato SJ, Cunkelman JA, et al. Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(2):234–8.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, et al. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):261–6.CrossRef Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, et al. Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. 2014;28(2):261–6.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore LJ, Wilson MR, Waine E, et al. Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy. J Robot Surg. 2015;9:67–73.CrossRef Moore LJ, Wilson MR, Waine E, et al. Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy. J Robot Surg. 2015;9:67–73.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebastian R, Howell MH, Chang KH, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(5):1600–12.CrossRef Sebastian R, Howell MH, Chang KH, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(5):1600–12.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pastrana M, Stoltzfus J, Almandini A, et al. Evolution of outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: first report based on MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020; Pastrana M, Stoltzfus J, Almandini A, et al. Evolution of outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: first report based on MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi WJ, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews. Annals of Surgery. 2020; Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi WJ, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews. Annals of Surgery. 2020;
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Shah SK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. bmj. 2020;370 Olavarria OA, Bernardi K, Shah SK, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial. bmj. 2020;370
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, et al. Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Open Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):243–51.CrossRef Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, et al. Robot-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Phase II Open Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267(2):243–51.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright JD. Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Balancing Evidence and Implementation. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1545–7.CrossRef Wright JD. Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Balancing Evidence and Implementation. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1545–7.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis
verfasst von
Thomas Scarritt
Chiu-Hsieh Hsu
Felipe B. Maegawa
Alfonso E. Ayala
Matthew Mobily
Iman Ghaderi
Publikationsdatum
09.11.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05055-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Obesity Surgery 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.